Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social construction of masculinity
Societys view of masculinity
Men and women stereotypes in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social construction of masculinity
Masculinity in America: The legacy of the self-made man
According to Kimmel, the earliest embodiments of American manhood were landowners, independent artisans, shopkeepers, and farmers. During the first decade of the nineteenth century, the industrial revolution started to influence the way, American men thought of themselves. Manhood was now defined as through the man’s economic success. This was the origin of the “Self-Made Man” ideology and the new concept of manhood that was more exciting, and potentially more rewarding for men themselves. The image of the Self-Made Man has far reaching effects on the notion of masculinity in America. Thus, the emergence of the Self-Made Man put men under pressure. As Kimmel states,
American men’s political, social and economic identity was no longer fixed. If social order, permanence could no longer be taken for granted and a man could rise as high as he aspired, then his sense of himself as a man was in constant need of demonstration. Everything became a test- his relationship to work, to women, to nature, and to other men. (43)
According to Kimmel, men’s reactions to the new situations were self-control, exclusion or escape- themes that continue to characterize American masculinity still
…show more content…
today. As Kimmel notes, “Separate spheres allowed insecure middle-class men to feel like men, both in the homosocial workplace, and when they returned to their homes” (52). The separation of the ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ sphere was also a consequence of the men’s need for control.
The workplace became masculinized, and the home feminized. By the separation of the masculine and feminine spheres that had been promoted, men and women now lived in separate worlds. By the turn of the twentieth century, men realized that their exclusion from the domestic sphere was, in fact, harmful to them: It left men “unable to experience the love, nurture and repose that the home supposedly represented” (Kimmel 158). Men were also worried at the “feminization” that potentially threatened their sons: men feared that women, who had the main responsibility for the upbringing of the children, would make the sons into
‘sissies’. By the 1960’s, the feeling of powerlessness, and alienation has significantly increased among American men, mainly because of the stress, and frustration they experienced in the working life. Along with the rise of feminism, men’s liberation movement emerged in the 1970’s, critiquing the image of success-driven, and self-made man as the source of men’s happiness. Even though the ideals of masculinity in Indian and American society are different in many respects, one may also find some tendencies that are reminiscent of each other. The division between the public (masculine) and the private (feminine) sphere has been characteristic of both India and America. Although it, certainly, has been drastic in India. Control also seems to have been a central theme in the pursuit of “real” masculinity. And finally, the rise of feminist movements have led to masculine backlashes among both Indian and American men.
In Gail Bederman’s Manliness and Civilization, she aims to describe the concepts of manliness and masculinity at the turn of the century. Bederman explains that the concept of what it means to be a man is ever changing as a result of the ideology of the time as well as the material actions of the men. During the Progressive Era, many forces were at work that put pressure on the supremacy of white, middle class men. Some of these forces included the growing move toward empowered women, the unionization of the working class, and the move from self-employment to big, corporate business. She delves into the way that both racism and sexism were used to build up the concept of masculinity and the turn of the century discourse on civilization.
In Kimmel’s essay “’Bros Before Hos’: The Guy Code” he argues that the influence of society on masculinity is equal to or greater than biological influences on masculinity. In the essay, Kimmel uses various surveys and interviews to validate his argument. He points to peers, coaches, and family members as the people most likely to influence the development of a man’s masculinity. When a man has his manliness questioned, he immediately makes the decision never to say or do whatever caused him to be called a wimp, or unmanly. Kimmel’s argument is somewhat effective because the readers get firsthand accounts from the interviewees but the author does not provide any statistics to support his argument.
Bederman’s, Manliness and Civilization, discussed the battle between manhood, race, and gender as inseparable social constructs. Bederman successfully argued these links through the history of the United States. A social hierarchy between the constructs proved violent and to stain the American appearance; breeding and natural selection was encouraged for the white Americans to create a more perfect race; popular culture took a gander at creating the perfect masculine
The concept of masculinity is considered as the qualities and characteristics of a man, typical what is appropriate to a man. In this article, A Community Psychology of Men and Masculinity: Historical and Conceptual Review, The author Eric S. Mankowski and Kenneth I. Maton, analyze four main themes: "Men as gendered beings, the privilege and damage of being a masculine man, men as a privileged group, and men’s power and subjective powerlessness. The second and fourth themes are described as
“The Other Wes Moore” By Wes Moore, reveals how two men can develop differently in the same social environment, and yet and have different intrapersonal views. The two men grew up in the same impoverished city, yet both have different experiences and views of what it means to be a man. The other Wes Moore, living his whole life in a poverty-stricken society, believes that being a man means to be powerful and unforgiving. The author, Wes Moore, living in two different worlds, views himself as a man when he becomes an exceptional leader and responsible for others lives. These concepts both tie into the constructs of masculinity in the United States where men are supposed to be protectors of society. The two Wes’ notions of manhood derive from
It has defined “manhood” in terms of it’s own interest and “femininity” likewise” (Beale, 146). Because gender roles in American society are so skewed it is viewed with negative connotation if the women is “dominant” in a relationship. Men should, in the eyes of society, be more powerful than the woman. Moynihan connects the lack of dominance in the black male with economic and educational downfall.
Manhood had not always existed; it was created through culture. Depending on the era, masculinity claimed a different meaning. But in all of its wandering definitions, it consistently contains opposition to a set of “others,” meaning racial and sexual minorities. (pp.45) One of the first definitions was the Marketplace Man, where capitalism revolved around his success in power, wealth, and status. A man devoted himself to his work and family came second. Although this is one of the first standing definitions, it still finds its spot in today’s definition, where masculinity consists of having a high paying job, an attractive young wife, and
These men never attain the masculinity or authenticity they chased endlessly. They don’t find peace or even meaning. They don’t seem to ever form truly intimate bonds with other human beings. Their relationship to material wealth consumes them in one way or another, and this is the final conclusion on what American consumer culture does to the individual man.
The Time spanning the Romanic and Modernist eras was witness to the evolving mythos of American manhood.
I think every man between 20 and 40 needs to read Elizabeth Gilbert's "The Last American Man". Without going into details (like I said, you should read the book), this is a biography/profile of Eustace Conway - a man who is, among other things, capable of and prefers to (or would prefer to) live the kind of frontier lifestyle we have read about: hunting and gathering his food, living in a house he built using his own hands, making his own clothes from the skins of animals he captured, etc. I suspect that for many people the story, at least initially, will arouse the sort of Romantic feelings that tend to come with fantasies of a "simple life" of rugged self-sufficiency. However, even for those who are quite certain that they prefer their modern urban lifestyle (air conditioning, direct deposit, grocery stores, ebay, cable TV, &c.), I think this book raises fundamental questions about what it means to be a man at the dawn of the twenty-first century.
Masculinity is described as possession of attributes considered typical of a man. Hegemonic masculinity is a form of masculine character with cultural idealism and emphasis that connects masculinity to competitiveness, toughness, and women subordination. Masculinity hegemonic is the enforcement of male dominion over a society. Masculine ideology dates back to the time of agrarian and the industrial revolution in Europe when survival compelled men to leave their homesteads to work in industries to earn a living for their families while women remained at home to take care of family affairs (Good and Sherrod 210). Women did not work in industries then because industrial labor was considered too physical beyond their capacity. This led to definition of roles which placated the position of men in a society while condemning women as mere subordinates who cannot do without men. The critics of gender stereotypes in America describe the following five hegemonic features of masculinity: frontiersman ship, heterosexuality, occupational achievement, familial patriarchy, and physical force and control (Trujillo 4). The advent of the 20th century led to sweeping changes in American masculinity.
While historians and scholars use a variety of lenses to analyze American history, the examination of the role that gender has played in society provides a view of history broader than the typical patriarchal tunnel vision taught in most history classes today. Men’s roles in society have been molded and crafted by the changes occurring throughout these societies, but women’s roles both in the home and in the workforce have arguably undergone many more radical transformations since the inception of the United States. Specifically, the transformation of womanhood in the first half of the nineteenth century, beginning with the market revolution, permanently changed how women are viewed in society, by both men and other women, and how women relate
In the views of Micheal Kimmel “hegemonic masculinity” is a socially constructed process where men are pressured by social norms of masculine ideals to perform behaviors of a “true man” and its influence on young male’s growth. It is the ideology that being a man with power and expressing control over women is a dominant factor of being a biological male. The structure of masculinity was developed within the 18th to 19th century, as men who owned property and provided for his family with strength related work environments was the perfect example of being a generic “American man.” Kimmel introduces Marketplace Manhood and its relation to American men. He states, “Marketplace Masculinity describes the normative definition of American masculinity.
I agree with Kimmel’s thesis that the ways the rules of manhood have been constructed that only a few believe that they are truly the most masculine. Disempowers the majority of American men through discrimination. The reason I agree with his thesis is because it’s true the way that we as men are taught from how a man dresses, talks, and walks is ingrained into us at very early ages. That those that don’t follow the status quo are seen as un-manly. Personal story my father like most grew up being taught the usual men don’t show emotion and men dress a certain way almost militaristic only wearing colors like navy’s, blacks, and greys. An if you were to wear another type of color it had to be a very dark form of that color. So if you were going to wear a green or purple they would have to be dark couldn’t be
John A. Tosh is a British historian and Professor of History at Roehampton University. In his article, ‘What Should Historians do with Masculinity? Reflections on Nineteenth-century Britain’, Tosh analyzes masculinity in the nineteenth-century. He is able to depict the thought that masculinity has always been around but not discussed as a debate and it has just always been looked at as “that is the way it is supposed to be”. What is meant by this is that a man should portray traits that are the opposite of being feminine similar to being “strong” or a “provider”. These attributes stem from the thoughts such as saying that a man is not supposed to cry when they are hurt but to not show emotion at all and act tough, and the showing of emotion could then make the man to be thought of as homosexual or even less of a man. The socialization of manliness in our general public starts in his