Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Masculinity in the 1800s
Masculinity in the 1800s
Masculinity in american society 20th c
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Masculinity in the 1800s
While America was just in its infancy during the late eighteenth century and into the nineteenth century, expanding and competing for its own national identity, there were ideals of manhood competing for dominance amidst the chaos. A couple of notions of masculinity were brought to the New World straight from Europe; the idea that men were to work hard for success and value family, while others maintained wealth and landownership as the characteristics of a man. However, the eminence of industrialization soon made these notions obsolete. Without these longstanding notions, American men were left in a crisis without an identity. It is within this framework that specific paintings serve as material expressions and vehicles for gendering beliefs and constructs.
One of the oldest traditions of masculinity was the notion of the craftsman/artisan who embraced his civic duties that were often passed down from one generation to the next. The painting The Village Blacksmith (1875) by Thomas Hovenden portrays the dedication and grittiness of the heroic artisan in a realistic portrait form. With his sweaty and gritty appearance, sleeves rolled up and hand on his hip, the bearded man depicts the attitude of a proud craftsman, immersed in his work. As he stands over the fire with tools in hand, the smoke fills the air, viewers can sense the assiduity as he toils away in his dark, cramped shop. For the artisan, masculinity was independence and self-reliance, making him a respected citizen. Most important to the artisan was the community and family. Rarely did artisans hire strangers. Instead, they hired sons of neighbors and friends, teaching them the secrets of the guild while most importantly initiating them into manhood. These characterist...
... middle of paper ...
...actions, since it takes dexterity and skill of hands to make proper incisions. In addition, the highlight on Dr. Gross' forehead could emphasize it takes knowledge to perform the surgery. It gives shape to the importance of the unification of mind and body as he performs a risky surgery for the audience. Meanwhile, in the background a woman (perhaps the mother of the patient) recoils in horror and awe of the operation. The inclusion of the female emphasizes this as being the place of men, establishing a notion of commanding masculinity.
This set off the movement of idealization and using the body as a performance of masculinity. Another painting by Eakins, Frank Hamilton Cushing (1895), emblematized that the West is a place for reinvention. Frank Hamilton Cushing was one of the first American anthropologist to observe and chronicle the lives of Native Americans.
Another example of how art represented in the Native North America exhibit is a painting by David Paul Bradley, a Chippewa artist, titled Greasy Grass Premonition #2. It depicts a scene from the Battle of Little Bighorn, but the tombstone explains that Native Americans know it as the Battle of Greasy Grass Creek. By providing that information for the audience, the MFA is allowing them a glimpse into the minds of Native Americans and their culture instead of presenting it as another example of Western bias.
In Gail Bederman’s Manliness and Civilization, she aims to describe the concepts of manliness and masculinity at the turn of the century. Bederman explains that the concept of what it means to be a man is ever changing as a result of the ideology of the time as well as the material actions of the men. During the Progressive Era, many forces were at work that put pressure on the supremacy of white, middle class men. Some of these forces included the growing move toward empowered women, the unionization of the working class, and the move from self-employment to big, corporate business. She delves into the way that both racism and sexism were used to build up the concept of masculinity and the turn of the century discourse on civilization.
In Gail Bederman’s, Manliness & Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States 1880-1917, Bederman asserts, manhood, race, and gender are three cultural issues that are inseparable and have shaped our American and human history (4-5). Bederman supports her theory using the journalistic works of those effected, political giants using these social constructions for personal gain, and through pop culture during the period being analyzed.
“The Other Wes Moore” By Wes Moore, reveals how two men can develop differently in the same social environment, and yet and have different intrapersonal views. The two men grew up in the same impoverished city, yet both have different experiences and views of what it means to be a man. The other Wes Moore, living his whole life in a poverty-stricken society, believes that being a man means to be powerful and unforgiving. The author, Wes Moore, living in two different worlds, views himself as a man when he becomes an exceptional leader and responsible for others lives. These concepts both tie into the constructs of masculinity in the United States where men are supposed to be protectors of society. The two Wes’ notions of manhood derive from
It has defined “manhood” in terms of it’s own interest and “femininity” likewise” (Beale, 146). Because gender roles in American society are so skewed it is viewed with negative connotation if the women is “dominant” in a relationship. Men should, in the eyes of society, be more powerful than the woman. Moynihan connects the lack of dominance in the black male with economic and educational downfall.
For over centuries, society had established the societal standard of the women. This societal standard pictured the ideal American woman running the household and taking care of the children while her husband provided for the family. However, between 1770 and 1860, this societal standard began to tear at the seams. Throughout this time period, women began to search for a new ideal of American womanhood by questioning and breaking the barriers society had placed upon them.
Over time, the image of men has changed. This is due mostly to the relaxation of rigid stereotypical roles of the two genders. In different pieces of literature, however, men have been presented as the traditional dominate figure, the provider and rule maker or non-traditional figure that is almost useless and unimportant unless needed for sexual intercourse. This dramatic difference can either perpetuate the already existing stereotype or challenge it. Regardless of the differences, both seem to put men into a negative connotation.
Manhood had not always existed; it was created through culture. Depending on the era, masculinity claimed a different meaning. But in all of its wandering definitions, it consistently contains opposition to a set of “others,” meaning racial and sexual minorities. (pp.45) One of the first definitions was the Marketplace Man, where capitalism revolved around his success in power, wealth, and status. A man devoted himself to his work and family came second. Although this is one of the first standing definitions, it still finds its spot in today’s definition, where masculinity consists of having a high paying job, an attractive young wife, and
Different documents in the Gilded Age prominently illustrated gender inequality in their portrayal of men and women within society. Many photographs in the time period by Jacob Riis and Lewis Hine did not shed light on a woman’s hardships, but rather undermined their domestic work. Society failed to give women credit for their work at home due to the common misconception that a woman’s work was easier than that of a man’s. Margaret Byington’s article Homestead: The Households of a Mill Town contrastingly gave an accurate portrayal of the distress women faced in their everyday life. The representation of women in the Gilded Age varies significantly between that in the photographs, and their domestic, weak personification, and in Byington’s article, which gives women a more accurate depiction through their domestic duties.
The first half of the 19th century of the United States of America had a characteristic of masculinity described above.
Juniper Ellis’ “Gendering Melville” argues that not enough attention has been paid to masculinity in relation to other major features in nineteenth century America, including femininity, race, and class....
In the views of Micheal Kimmel “hegemonic masculinity” is a socially constructed process where men are pressured by social norms of masculine ideals to perform behaviors of a “true man” and its influence on young male’s growth. It is the ideology that being a man with power and expressing control over women is a dominant factor of being a biological male. The structure of masculinity was developed within the 18th to 19th century, as men who owned property and provided for his family with strength related work environments was the perfect example of being a generic “American man.” Kimmel introduces Marketplace Manhood and its relation to American men. He states, “Marketplace Masculinity describes the normative definition of American masculinity.
There is a long history of gender roles in society. The expectations of gender roles continually shift; however, there is not a time when women and men share the same equalities simultaneously. The idea of how men and women should act is instilled in us at a young age. I think it starts really young with girls and boys being told what they can be and when they see what they are expected to be, they abandon parts of them which society deems as undesirable. We don’t acknowledge how much pressure we put on men and women to conform to the ideas of gender roles but it is apparent in our media and in the history of our art. One of the most influential things about figurative art is that it has the ability to capture society’s concepts of how men and women are expected to be during that time period. One thing for certain about gender equality is that it has historically and predominantly been a women’s movement. This sculpture, entitled Portrait Bust of a Woman with a Scroll, stood out to me in particular. It is is made of pentelic marble and dates back to the early 5th century. The sculpture shows a woman with a restless face, clothed in a mantle and head piece while holding a scroll. This sculpture reflects the women’s intelligence and capabilities being overshadowed by her gender and
The other objects in the room gave me a sense that this is what a wealthier individual’s life was like back then. From the wine glasses, to the Breaking Home Ties painting, to the Gross Clinic which was at a University, to the ornate pieces of furniture. The Gross Clinic’s subject, Dr. Samuel Gross, who was a university professor of trauma surgery at Jefferson medical college during the 1870s, is leading a medical procedure with a team of five doctors that is taking place on the left thigh of a patient (Yeo). During this operation Dr. Gross has a lecture hall full of undergraduates in the gallery witnessing a new technique to treat a bone disease, that Dr. Gross developed himself (Philadelphia Museum of Art). Dr. Gross was a medical doctor prominent in the understanding and exploration in the surgical techniques of his day (Yeo). This procedure is revolutionary because he is removing a sequestrum (the disease was osteomyelitis) as opposed to an amputation of the leg, which was the customary operating treatment at the time (Yeo, Hendricks 57). Dr. Gross takes center stage in the painting with a long black jacket and a scalpel in his hand with blood on his
These cultural strictures come in a number of forms. First, the artist attacks intellectual conformity, choosing art over all other means of self-expression even though it is not widespread in his or her society. Though it is not explicitly stated - and is perhaps even subconscious - the artist chooses art over either academe or high society. The artist questions society's customs, making this choice explicit in their daily actions. The artist rejects ostentatious displays of wealth and the cultural emphasis on money, replacing it with a frugal simplicity more conducive to authentic experience. Finally, the artist calls into question the cultural construct most important to any understanding of human interaction - the binary conception of gender.