Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein depicts how ideals can be received once they are fulfilled. As a cautionary example of negative reception of an ideal, Shelley uses Victor Frankenstein’s achievement of animating a lifeless corpse of mixed body parts. The actions and reactions of Frankenstein and the Creature highlight how making a dream a reality does not always yield a desired effect. Frankenstein’s images of unendurable ice emphasize Shelley’s admonishment of the danger of realizing an ideal.
Frankenstein is portrayed as an individual who cherishes the conceptual aspect of an ideal but cannot cope with it after it has been realized, and his change of attitude towards ice reflects this dilemma. Frankenstein initially views the ice as an element that he can admire, saying that He does not believe ice to be an unendurable realm, but rather as an area that he can comfortably exist in. These sentiments correlate to the ecstasy that Frankenstein experiences during the creation of his Creature. The ice, just like his ideal, the Creature, is something that can be manipulated. Frankenstein’s comment of the ice looking like a plaything parallels his regard of the Creature’s body before it is animated. Similarly, both the ice and the concept of animating the Creature provide Frankenstein with extreme satisfaction. Shelley develops this parallel as a necessary step to setting up Frankenstein’s rejection of his realized ideal, which is where Shelley’s theme is revealed.
Once Frankenstein’s positive consideration of ice is established, the swift change in his regard of ice reveals how ideals can turn out to be worse than they are as theories. Frankenstein states that he must Shelley’s diction in this statement concerning surviv...
... middle of paper ...
...d his men endure the ice portrays how Walton’s restraint in fulfilling his goal allows him to endure the ice that Frankenstein can never survive. Shelley makes the point that by abstaining from realizing his ideal, Walton and consequently his men are saved.
After examining Frankenstein’s inability to endure ice and metaphorically his own ideal, the reader recognizes Shelley’s purpose for repeating images of ice in Frankenstein. Every concept is subject to being distorted and utterly rejected, no matter how grand it is. Shelley is telling the reader it is necessary to be weary of any personal endeavor, for it never affects only one person. Sometimes, in achieving an ideal a person does not speculate any consequences and puts others in jeopardy. Shelley is clear to depict that that danger is far greater than subjecting only their self to cope with their ideal.
In these aspirations, whereas the Romantic poets value the permanence of nature in contrast to that of manmade creations, Frankenstein connects his Romantic sentiments with icy climates which shift and fade. The drastic change in tone from his speech to Walton’s crew to his final speech to Walton is an echo of the ice that melts a few days after his speech to Walton’s crew. Frankenstein’s sublime experience on the icy heights of Mont Blanc (Shelley 66) and his praise of the Arctic’s sublimity (Shelley 155) are also notable in that they both take place in the typically warmer months of August (Shelley 64) and September (Shelley 154). While such alienation from reality is typical of the Romantic poet, Frankenstein’s two experiences in these icy landscapes lead to his greatest failures: the Creature’s request for a wife (Shelley 101), which when Frankenstein refuses (Shelley 120), results in the “destruction” of his friends, family, and himself (Shelley 157). Frankenstein’s praise of the isolating sublime is characteristic of the Romantic poet, but the mutability of his icy landscapes leads to his demise rather than to the prosperous legacies the Romantic poets hoped
Victor Frankenstein, protagonist of the novel Frankenstein, allegorizes his quest from being an over dedicated scientist to a desolate man, stranded in the Arctic ice, with the obligation to stress the importance of leading a balance and moderate lifestyle—“I cannot describe to you the agony that these reflections inflicted upon me: I tried to dispel them, but sorrow only increased with knowledge. Oh, that I had forever remained in my native wood, nor known nor felt beyond the sensations of hunger, thirst, and heat!” (Shelley 102). On condition that this might help him redeem his sins, Frankenstein takes it upon himself to avenge the death of his beloved ones. Similarly, the Creature, mostly driven by feelings of rejection and abandonment, is also engulfed in sorrow and thus plans to relieve some of it by “returning the favor”.
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, she addresses the challenges that arise in both the creation and life of a dead creature that has been brought back to life in hideous forms. The
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein explores the downfall of certain human characteristics, set to the backdrop of creation, destruction, and preservation. The subtitle denoted by Shelly herself supports this idea, by relating the fact that the title can be viewed as either Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. One scholar, Marilyn Butler, also maintains this by noting, "It can be a late version of the Faust Myth"(302). Shelly uses the story of the main character, Victor Frankenstein, to produce the concept of a dooming human characteristic of which Frankenstein states, "I have . . . been blasted in these hopes"(Shelley, 152). The reader finds, as a result of his thirst for knowledge and infatuation with science, Victor creates a living being by whom he has "suffered great and unparalleled misfortunes"(Shelley, 17). Eventually, Victor realizes this self-destructive trait, but he is not able to save himself stating, "I have lost everything, and cannot begin life anew"(Shelley, 16). Although everything in his life that is dear has been lost, Victor is able to convince one in his same position--Robert Walton--to not "lead [his crew] unwillingly to danger"(Shelley, 151). While addressing the concept of characteristic and self-discovery, it is possible to realize that the monster also possesses the characteristics held by both Victor and Walton; except in his learning, the monster is driven to continue to cause destruction. Most important about the thirst for knowledge is that, as a form of human characteristic or downfall, it leads to large, critical pieces of self-discovery. In obtaining these critical pieces, Frankenstein finds satisfaction in j...
We are shown that this ‘monster’ is a ‘creature’ and more of a human than we think. It is in the complex structure of the novel that Mary Shelley creates sympathy. We shift from Robert Walton to Victor Frankenstein to the monster and finally back to Walton. With each shift of perspective, the reader gains new information about both the facts of the story and the reliability of the narrator. Each perspective adds pieces of information that only they knows: Walton explains the circumstances of Victor’s last days, Victor explains his creation of the monster, the monster explains his turn to evil.
in Frankenstein: Contexts, nineteenth century responses, criticism. By Mary Shelley. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. Norton Critical Edition.
The idea of duality permeates the literary world. Certain contradictory commonplace themes exist throughout great works, creation versus destruction, light versus dark, love versus lust, to name a few, and this trend continues in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. The pivotal pair in this text however, is monotony versus individuality. The opposing entities of this pairing greatly contrast against each other in Frankenstein, but individuality proves more dominant of the two in this book.
Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, has captured people’s attention since it was first written. People often wonder how much of Mary Shelley’s life is documented in her novel. From the theme of parental abandonment, to the theme of life and death in the novel, literary scholars have been able to find similarities between Frankenstein and Shelley’s life. The Journal of Religion and Health, the Journal of Analytical Psychology, and the Modern Psychoanalysis discuss the different connections between Shelley’s life and Frankenstein. Badalamenti, the author of “ Why did Mary Shelley Write Frankenstein?” in the Journal of Religion and Health, primarily discusses the connection between Victor
The fact that Frankenstein’s creation turns on him and murders innocent people is never overlooked; it has been the subject of virtually every popularization of the novel. What is not often acknowledged is the fact that Frankenstein himself embodies some of the worst traits of humankind. He is self-centered, with little real love for those who care about him; he is prejudiced, inflexible and cannot forgive, even in death. While some of these traits could be forgivable, to own and flaunt them all should be enough to remind a careful reader that there are two "monsters" in Frankenstein.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment.
The idea for the novel of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein came to her one night when she was staying in the company of what has been called ‘her male coterie’, including Lord Byron and her husband, Percy Shelley. Mary Shelley’s whole life seems to have been heavily influenced by men. She idolised her father, William Godwyn, and appears to have spent a good part of her life trying very hard to impress both him and her husband. There seems to have been a distinct lack of female influence, her mother, Mary Wollstonecraft, having died weeks after her birth, being replaced by a neglectful step-mother. These aspects of her life are perhaps evident in her novel. The characters and plot of Frankenstein were perhaps influenced by Shelley’s conflicting feelings about the predominately masculine circle which surrounded her, and perhaps the many masculine traits that we see in novel were based upon those of the male figures in Shelley’s own life. In this essay I will attempt to show some of these traits.
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, is a book in which men pursue their goals against hopeless odds. Robert Walton’s decision to turn the ship around at the end of the novel is questioned by many. This essay will discuss the interpreted views on Robert Walton’s decision to retreat by Victor Frankenstein, Mary Shelley and myself. Although, some may disagree ultimately Robert Walton made the right choice to turn his ship around at the end of the novel and is therefore not a failure.
Peter Brooks' essay "What Is a Monster" tackles many complex ideas within Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and the main concept that is the title of the essay itself. What is the definition of a monster, or to be monstrous? Is a monster the classic representation we know, green skin, neck bolts, grunting and groaning? A cartoon wishing to deliver sugary cereal? or someone we dislike so greatly their qualities invade our language and affect our interpretation of their image and physical being? Brooks' essay approaches this question by using Shelley's narrative structure to examine how language, not nature, is mainly accountable for creating the idea of the monstrous body.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.