Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of manchurian crisis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of manchurian crisis
Source Paper
1) In both Source A and B, both history books both agree that China did not attack the Manchurian railway and that the Japanese was at fault. For example, Source A says “The Japanese had successfully caused confusion about what had really happened at the Mukden Incident.” And Source B says “League action was postponed until the submission of the Lytton Commission report, which was given to the Assembly in September 1932. The long document acknowledged Chinese failures in the administration of Manchuria but denied that they justified the Japanese occupation.” However, the impact of the invasion of the league is extremely different in both sources. For example, Source A says “However, because these events took place in East Asia
…show more content…
and not in Europe, they were not too damaging to the League’s authority.” Whereas, Source B says “Observers considered the Manchurian crisis to be the League’s first great defeat.
The failure of the League to act in either the economic or military sphere was worrying. The Covenant powers, especially Great Britain and France, proved weak and hesitant when put to the test. The consequences to the League were lost commitment and confidence even before it had to face the greater challenges that would soon be provided by Germany and Italy.” In conclusion, we can see that both sources A and B acknowledge the fact that Japan had acted aggressively and without enough or any justification. However, we can see both sources disagree with the impact the Manchurian incident had on the league’s integrity. For one, we can see that in Source A indicates that because the incident was not in Europe, it did not affect the league’s integrity as China was in a state of turmoil and was not being governed properly and that the invasion was of no consequence to the League’s integrity. However, Source B states that this was the start of the downfall of the league and its ideals and that because the league did not intervene in the Manchurian incident, it was unable to deal with the other much harder crises such as the invasion of Abyssinia and Hitler’s re-armament with objectivity and integrity as they were far too focused on their very own …show more content…
self interests. 2) Chiang Kai-Shek would have been shocked how the league would have reacted to the Manchurian Invasion as shown in source D. This can be seen when source C says “The League of Nations was established to prevent war and bring collective action into play to stop aggression. We have immediately asked the League to obtain as a first step the immediate withdrawal of the invaders. The Council of the League is dealing with the matter at Geneva.” As seen Chiang Kai-Shek showed that he believed that the league will be able to resolve the matter calling it an establishment “to prevent war and bring collective action into play to stop aggression”. However, in reality, as source D shows Japan had trampled all over the league and even using it as a “floor mat” (as shown in source D), and its ideals while the members and bureaucrats kowtowed to the Japanese oppression of democratic ideals. Furthermore, what makes the action more disgraceful is that the league had still tried to appear noble by morally condemning the Japanese using the Lytton report as shown in Source D. This can be seen when a league member is placing “face saving” makeup on the trampled league. In conclusion, it was likely Chiang Kai-Shek would have been dismayed and extremely angry by the way the League was willing to abandon him and permit the Japanese to take over the whole of Manchuria because the League was unwilling to anger Japan in fear they would attack their overseas colonies. 3) Source E isn’t very surprising at all.
For one, a senior government minister would want to keep British self-interests at heart as they would want their party to win in further elections especially after the British sentiment was extremely war weary. Furthermore, If the British had pushed for sanctions against Japan, Japan would have acted even more aggressively and might have started to act British colonies which would have made the British have to defend against the Japanese Invasions. Firstly, this would have made the general population of Britain very angry as they were extremely war weary. Secondly, as source E states “If you enforce an economic boycott, you will have war declared by Japan and she will seize Singapore and Hong Kong.” If the British had lost these overseas colonies, its influence in the regions would significantly decrease. Furthermore, having Singapore under the control of the British was extremely important as it was vital to implementing one of its biggest naval defense policies as it housed a large number of Warships and was seen as a prime location for defense against aggressive Japanese expansion, as if Singapore was taken, Japan could easily build a railway through Thailand all the way to India which was extremely important to Britain’s economy. Furthermore, Source E states that the letter was written in 1931 as shown here “A senior government minister writing to another member of the British government in 1931.” This was during the Manchurian
crisis and the British would have been on high alert after the Japanese had seized Chinese territory unlawfully. Furthermore, it is not surprising that the British wouldn’t want to lose Hong Kong to the Japanese as it was a key trading port and the British was extracting a lot of the resources from Hong Kong and sustaining its economy. Furthermore, they would not want to place sanctions on Japan as they knew that America had been using isolationist polices to survive all these years. This can be seen again when Source E states “You will get nothing out of the USA but words, big words, but only words.” Lastly, Britain had a bad relationship with USSR as they hated communism and since the USSR was not a league member at the time, they were also unwilling to act against Japanese aggression. In conclusion, Source E isn’t surprising as this British minister would be more interested in protecting British interests against Japanese Invasion as the sanctions would make them even more desperate for resources. Lastly, the British would also not want their naval defense plans spoilt by a hostile, already expansive Ja
Around the early 1920’s, Stalin took power and became leader of Russia. As a result Russians either became fond of Stalin’s policies or absolutely despised them. Stalin’s five-year plans lured many into focusing on the thriving economy rather than the fact that the five year plan hurt the military. The experience of many lives lost, forced labor camps, little supply of food, influenced the Russians negative opinion about Stalin. Having different classes in society, many Russians had different points of views. For the Peasants, times were rough mainly because of the famine, so they were not in favor of Stalin and his policies; where as the upper classes had a more optimistic view of everything that was occurring. Stalin’s policies affected the Russian people and the Soviet Union positively and also had a negative affect causing famine for the Russian people.
For some people a sad story, yet for others a message to the people that see the movie. The Manchurian Candidate (1962) is a movie made after the time of the Cold War (1945-1952) . Indeed, there are reasons to believe that this movie is anti-communist by the fact that it presents traits of some Cold War features such as espionage and maybe proof of McCarthyism.
A war does not necessarily require physical weapons to fight. From 1947 to 1991, military tension and ideological conflicts held place. Cold War is defined as a state of political hostility existing between countries, characterized by threats, violent propaganda, subversive activities, and other measures short of open warfare, in particular. The causes of the Cold War between United States and the Soviet Union were the mutual distrust that had taken place in World War II, intense rivalry between the two super powers, and conflicting ideologies. The two superpowers differed in views of political and economic principles and were eager to spread their ideologies to other countries. The United States were in favor of democracy and capitalism while the Soviet Union sought for the chances of influencing communism. Cold War did not involve the use of physical arms but was intensely fought. Propaganda, economic aids, Arms Race, and the creation of alliances were the main methods to fight the war. The use of propaganda played a crucial role in containment by criticizing the other power and raised the morale and spirit of their nation. The economic support for nations helped them recover from the desperate situation after World War II, which prevented the nations from falling under communism. Also, the Arms Race and forming alliances between the two main powers were important weapons for competition and rivalry in Cold War.
The Japanese government believed that the only way to solve its economic and demographic problems was to expand into its neighbor’s territory and take over its import market, mostly pointed at China. To put an end on that the United States put economic sanctions and trade embargoes. We believed that if we cut off their resources and their source of federal income than they would have no choice but to pull back and surrender. But the
Japan was strongminded to get new and fresh territories. Once the league decided to take action against Italy this is when the decided enough was enough and they left the league continuing its spiral of failure. These was almost a sense of loss of faith within the league as many of the nations no longer thought they could rely on the system in many different aspects. Clearly the military proneness was one of the major reasons as these countries soon realized there was no presence within that category. Overall in the end, these were all of several reason the League of Nations failed as a power and countries all left on their own. So in conclusion, because not all countries joined, their lack of military, and their inadequate ability to act was the reasoning for the failure to stop an additional world
Thus, the Japanese began to resort to ghastly measures to prevent a humiliating defeat. Japanese aggression originated in the fall of 1931 when the explosion of a section of the South Manchurian Railway in northern China occurred, causing Japan’s Kwangtung Army, who was guarding the railroad, to exchange fire with the Chinese Army and then proceed to occupy all of Manchuria. Soon after, the Kwangtung Army set up a puppet government and renamed the region Manchukuo. The Chinese Army claimed that the Japanese purposely blew up part of the railroad to initiate a confrontation and therefore a reason to occupy Manchuria.2 Later, in 1937, Japan decided to go ahead with plans to further invade China, and conquered most of the northern and eastern regions within a year. This was later termed the "China Incident" because Japan had never formally declared war on China.... ...
The Manchurian candidate is focus around the cold war period and it was originally a novel that concentrated on the idea of brainwashing. The cold war brought fear among the American community and this fear is seen through the film when numerous members of congress are falsely accused of being part of the communist party. The main character of the movie, Raman, is program to be an assassin. He is brainwashed to kill on command and then to forget about it so he is unable to feel guilt, and even if someone were to find him suspicious he would have no idea what he or she were talking about. The whole process happens when he is in Korea and he is captured by Korea’s army along with his unit whom are all brainwashed.
Despite Germany’s withdrawal from the League of Nations in 1933, their rearmament program which directly violated the Treaty of Versailles and Italy’s occupation of Ethiopia in 1935, Britain continued to appease the leaders in order to avoid conflict. Firstly, Britain was suffering from an economic crisis following the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression making it extremely vulnerable in the event of a war. Additionally, Britain couldn’t reach out to anyone for support; the USA practiced isolationism and communist Russia wouldn’t make a good ally. Furthermore, the British people were against another conflict and were still recuperating from World War I. The aforementioned reasons explain the rationale behind British appeasement policy in the
China and Japan’s main differences in responding to the Western invasion was that Japan accepted Westernization and China did not, which resulted in Japan becoming a modernized nation while China failed to do so. In order for China and Japan to keep their trade to a minimum, but also have a spread of trade goods that they wanted, each nation had opened one port specifically for trade: Guangzhou and Nagasaki, respectively (Fruhstuck, Lecture). Both countries had limited trade with the West and maintained isolation from around the sixteenth century to the late eighteenth century. China opened Guangzhou by the late seventeenth century but the western merchants that landed there had no rights or privileges and were confined to the borders of Guangzhou (Edwardes, 1973).... ...
In July 1937, the second Sino-Japanese War broke out. A small incident was soon made into a full scale war by the Kwantung army which acted rather independently from a more moderate government. The Japanese forces succeeded in occupying almost the whole coast of China and committed severe war atrocities on the Chinese population, especially during the fall of the capital Nanking. However, the Chinese government never surrendered completely, and the war continued on a lower scale until 1945.
In 1927, Prime Minister Baron Tanaka Giichi revealed this to the Emperor Hirohito. It provided the necessary steps to conquer Asia. Their effort on world domination, for the most part, succeeded. But by introducing to the world to a new kind of war. A war of deliberate terrorism, of deliberate mass murder. Military advisor, General William Mayor said, when explaining Japanese justification on the un-declared war with China, that “once more Japanese honour had been insulted, once more the insult must be avenged.” This is an example of how strong the Japanese nationalism views were held, and how focused they were on seeing themselves as the leaders of Asia. Japan relied heavily upon American oil and metals to supply its war effort in China. Any threat to stop those exports would have a significant impact on Japanese plans. In hopes of giving pause to Japanese plans, the United States in May 1939, notified Japan that it was withdrawing from the 1911 Treaty of Commerce. According to terms of the treaty, in six months the United States would be free to limit or terminate exports to Japan. But to surrender or back down for the Japanese is worse than suicide, as it harms their honour. And so Japan continued its war in China. Even after the six months passed, the U.S government hesitated freezing assets to Japan. Believing that it would force Japan to invade to get new sources of
Instead of limiting their military power,Japan strengthened it even more when invading Manchuria.When the League became aware of what Japan had done,“...the council dispatched an inquiry commission to China under the leadership of the British diplomat,the Earl of Lytton.”2However, when the League arrived half a year later, destruction had already been made and Japan had set up puppet state of Manchukuo. The league now told Japan to withdraw from this tension and advised China to create peace in the region by not fighting back. China accepted the Leagues commands while Japan ignored them then withdrew from the League. 3 The light force that the League put on Japan and the confidence Japan had to withdraw from the League depicts the weakness of The League of Nations and growing power of
The main reason Japan took over Manchuria was because it did not want to fall victim to the vast European Empires at the time and be conquered. Instead, it was looking to be on par with major European nations such as Britain and France. As a result, it tried to expand its empire and had already taken control of Korea in 1876. In 1931, Japan invaded a North-eastern region of China – Manchuria. Manchuria was rich in resources and shared borders with Russia and Mongolia. Because both Japan and China were members of the League, China turned to the League for support and collective security. However, 20th century China was a country in decline and not considered a major country globally. In contrast, Japan was seen as the League’s most powerful member in the Far East and a permanent member of the League sitting in the League Council – which had full authority to make decisions, while China was not.
The Manchurian incident was a turning point in Japanese history in which it abandoned its somewhat general policy of cooperation and peace and instead chose to pursue their personal interests in Asia (S,191). The Japanese interest in China was evident even before its invasion in 1931. In both the Sino Japanese war from 1894 to 1905 as well as the Russo-Japanese War from 1904 to 1905 Japan secured specific locations in Manchuria and other areas in China (U,351). Overall, the consensus for the extensive needs of the empire ultimately drove its policy making until the end of World War 2. To take control of what they believed to be the most mineral rich section of China in which they controlled expansive holdings in such as the South Manchurian Railroad, officers part of the Kwantung Army that were stationed there hatched a plan that would become to be known as the Manchurian Crisis. On September 18th 1931, Japanese soldiers located at the South Manchurian Railroad set off an explosive that they blamed on China (launching both nations into hostile relations for years to come.?? (P,115)) The Japanese invaded Japanese Invaded Chinese controlled Manchuria in 1931 because they wanted to accommodate the rising of the Japanese population, obtain more natural resources, and to stimulate their nearly collapsed economy.
The League of Nations has been seen as a seriously flawed international organisation and its failure to prevent World War Two has been well documented. Provide something of an alternative perspective by identifying and highlighting important policy-areas in which the League made valuable progress.