Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Failure of the League of Nations
Causes and failures of league of nations
League of nations and causes of war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Failure of the League of Nations
The League of Nations did not prevent another World War due to numerous different reasons. First of all, the League of Nations whole identity was to maintain peace, discourage aggression from any nation, and to inspire other countries to cooperate especially in the field of trading different resources. One of the main ideas involved in the non-prevention of another war by the League of Nations was the Treaty of Versailles. The League of Nation was fully responsible for the process of the treaty going through the International Court of Justice. One the treaty was signed, Germany was reprimanded unethically. The Germans soon started cheating and developed military forces like submarines in the region of the Netherlands and placed tanks in Russia. …show more content…
The league also did not have any of its own forces of its own which caused many of the nations that joined to exit and create a conflict with others. The United States actually never joined the league and this did not help at all as the USA was the strongest nation out of all of the other countries. The countries that were in Europe were divided post World War one and did not want anything to do with establishing a functional government that were all about creating world peace and understanding between all of the nations. For example, Japan actually left and upon leaving they created a dispute with the league and caused a major problem. Most of the time this meant that nations looked to the league to be the first to take action when they were not willing to act upon things themselves. Actually, there were many nations that would have gradually helped the league but just weren’t invited to join. This did nothing but cause more instability between nations rather that bringing them all together with came in the conclusion of a war. Colonialism had a major play in the role for the league not preventing an additional world war. Colonialism was just not well-matched with the presence of the league. The united nations were actually able to endure during the period of colonialism. The league expected that their territorial entitlements were way above and different from their extent. There was much instability with the league and there was plenty of evidence to prove this. All of the different members simply extracted from it as they all became aware that the league was unbalanced and that their certain interests collided with other ideas. France and Britain dominated the League of Nations during this period of time and this is when the other nations started to lose their confidence within and left. Upon the rise of dictatorship within Italy, Japan, and Germany this was also a major factor in the weakening of the League of Nations preventing it from stopping another world war.
Japan was strongminded to get new and fresh territories. Once the league decided to take action against Italy this is when the decided enough was enough and they left the league continuing its spiral of failure. These was almost a sense of loss of faith within the league as many of the nations no longer thought they could rely on the system in many different aspects. Clearly the military proneness was one of the major reasons as these countries soon realized there was no presence within that category. Overall in the end, these were all of several reason the League of Nations failed as a power and countries all left on their own. So in conclusion, because not all countries joined, their lack of military, and their inadequate ability to act was the reasoning for the failure to stop an additional world …show more content…
war. During the 1930s, the internal differences and external challenges that complicated the Chinese and Indian paths to national independence varied in many ways. Once India attempted to make their independence they became faced with several challenges. First of all, the reasoning for the independence movements for the Chinese and the Indians was due to Japan and how the occupied the area of Southeast Asia. Once this action occurred both of these regions decided they would attempt to gain independence but it did not work out as planned. One of the main challenges that the Indian natives faced when attempting to become independent was Mohanda Ghandi and his actions that brought together nonviolent protests to help the successfulness of Indian independence. This issue when this occurred was the idea of civil disobedience and the refusal to follow precise laws specifically the ones that were viewed as being unmerited. These nonviolent protests used peaceful methods to help with the expansion of political gain. Many of the people of India were intrigued by the views of Ghandi as he gained more and more followers for these such views. In 1930, Ghandi actually led hundreds of people on a protest towards the sea due to the boycott of British made goods such as salt. In the aftermath, Ghandi’s views many of the people to continue this movement but eventually he was sentenced to prison and was later assassinated even when begging for peace. There was also the challenge of certain religious perspectives, mainly being communalism. During this period of time, the merge of Hindus and Muslims faced a difficult challenge. There were many different methods that were experimented with to see if this could somehow work out. One of the being gaining different machinery to educate the people of the region to help teach them about the relationship and tradition of the Hindu and Muslim agreement. Within the Asia region, there were other external challenges and internal difference once the movement of independence was attempted.
Due to the fact that this area was constructed in colonial form, decolonization was attempted so that they could gain independent status. Once this started, these are when the challenges presented themselves. A sense of insurgency erupted and rebellion against the government occurred. The Muslim separatists and the communist rebels went against the government and challenged it. The problem was that Southeast Asia attempted to decolonize, but since the Americans won the Philippines from Spain in war they had their own rules. This caused problems between the both and mad an even bigger challenge for the regions of Southeast Asia to gain their independence. Once independence was gained, dictatorship with the region became a major challenge. For example, a man named Ferdinand Marcos inhibited many bad influences and was known for rigging the
elections. Once the areas of Southeast Asia and India gained their independence this changed, especially relationships with other regions. As Asia gained their independence, the conflict they had with the United States subsided. Although, areas in the Philippines continued to be faced with political and economic issues their relationship with the United States strengthen and their differences subsided. It was not until the ending of World War two that Asia actually gained its independence. Clearly within the regions there were many different complications and differences between the nations that made it difficult for the act of decolonization. Once they were finally able to gain independence their relationships became stronger to the countries they once had so many issues with. Within their paths there were different complications but in the end they both were trying to gain the same thing, independence.
Around the beginning of the sixteenth centruy, many countires had started to explore farther away and finding new territories. New products like sugar and taobacco began to emerge around the world in many places. Many countries in Europe were gaining power due to the control of colonies in the Americas. Asian countries did not explore as much, but still managed to remain large and powerful for a while. The global flow of silver had economic effects on inflating prices of goods and stimulating econimic policy of mercantilism, and social effects on negative effects on the lower class around the world during the mid-sixteenth century to the early eighteenth century.
In 1763 the Seven Years’ War ended with the British Empire emerging as victors. The victory came at great cost to Great Britain’s economy. The national debt almost doubled from 75 million pounds to 133 million pounds between 1755 and 1763. Given that Britain fought in North America to uphold the security of her colonial possessions, British ministers deemed it fair that the cost of the war should be shared with the colonies. Subsequently, import duties on popular goods were raised and a number of Acts regarding excise taxes were passed. These included the Sugar Act of 1764, the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend duties beginning in 1767. The consequences of these actions were to place great financial burdens on the North American colonists, but more importantly, to
During the period 1550-1800, the colonization of the Americas by European civilizations led to massive shifts in economic power from the West to East and vice-versa. An increase in global competition among western civilizations and against their asian counterparts drove Europeans to search for wealth elsewhere, and thus colonizing the Americas. One of the easiest ways to generate a profit, increase a civilizations wealth, and ultimately their military power was through the silver trade. In monopolizing said trade, Europe was able to establish a somewhat steady economic connection to the very wealthy Asian civilizations. However, european nations were struggling to keep control of the silver trade out of Asian hands, which caused major shifts
The First World War and Why It Wasn't The War to End All Wars The allies, following great losses especially Britan and France, were keen to prevent such a tragedy from re-occuring, they did this by not preventing Germany from rearmaring, they also didn't stick to what they planned to in the treaty of Versailes. Britan and France seemed more concerned with the spread of communism then what Hitlar was doing. Both Britan and France remembered the horrific experences of the first world war. Hitlar believed that Germany would become a great nation again under his rule. People thought that the treaty of Versailles was unfair to Germany, once a proud nation, now under the control of a foreign nation, helpless to do anything to stop.
The Treaty of Versailles was supposed to end in peace but instead it ended in disaster . The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28,1919 (exactly 5 years after Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie were assassinated), the treaty was created in hope that it would stabilize Europe and ensure that another catastrophic war like World War 1 would never happen again. Although the Versailles Treaty didn’t cause World War 2 it did have a great affect on it, by taking away land, limiting Germany’s military, and making Germany pay for all the damages done after World War 1.
Winning the Seven Years War had cost Britain a large sum of money, after winning the war King George II wanted the colonies to help pay for the expenses. The first of several laws to come that would tighten control on the colonies and derive funds from them was the Proclamation of 1763, which forbade the colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains. This proclamation was followed in 1764 by a law that would prevent the colonists from printing and using their own money. These and several other laws brought about frustration with the monarchy among the colonists. One law that had angered the colonists the most was the Stamp Act of 1765, under which all printed paper from wills, licenses, newspapers, diplomas, and even playing cards
The Treaty of Versailles, initially created to keep peace in Europe and ensure that another war like World War I wouldn’t happen again, had in fact, backfired and spiraled the world down into a deeper, bloodier battle. The treaty discriminated strongly against Germany, with the loss of territories, military restrictions, economic reparations, and the War Guilt Clause. It caused humiliation and anger within Germany, and led to Hitler and the Nazi Party coming to power. World War II was not only started by Adolf Hitler and Germany, but had a lot to do with the humiliation that Germany felt when the terms for the Treaty of Versailles were laid down. The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles may be indirectly related to the cause of World War II, but nonetheless was a huge factor in starting the war.
In Asia however there was a different dominant country, Japan. Japan had stayed and watched things go by in Asia for years, they were like a dormant volcano waiting to erupt. They had watched countries like America, England, France and even Holland take islands and turn them to colonies, so why couldn't they do the same thing? Japan was eager to expand its borders, they knew that they could do it, however there was one problem, The U.S. They were currently the dominant country in the southern islands of Asia. With bases situated in Pearl Harbour and the Philippines, Japan had to weaken the American Navy before they could expand. Japan attacked pearl harbour by surprise, thinking that they could put the American Fleet out of action. This would give them a year to expand all they wanted to. Japan first moved west and took Manchuria and parts of China.
If one strips the story to its generalities rather than specifics, it is easy to relate this to World War II through the attack on Pearl Harbor and subsequent actions. Japan had relatively recently entered onto the world stage and faced issues that plagued other youthful nations. Japan required expansion to feed its growing populace. The easies...
I do not think that World War II could have been prevented, but it may have been lessened in its severity had America joined. If America, being the biggest and fastest growing country and economy in the world at that time, had joined The League I think that even more countries may have followed. Even if others did not follow, The League would have been significantly stronger with US backing due to the mere strength and booming voice America had in society at that
There are several reasons why the League of Nations was unable to stop Japan from taking over Manchuria. Firstly, most of the respected countries in the League were powerful European nations such as Britain, France, Italy and Germany. Because the League had no army of its own, an army would be gathered from its member nations should it go to war. If war was t...
With the conclusion of the First World War the League of Nations was founded in the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. It was the first intergovernmental organization that would keep peace and settle world disputes.
Assessment of the Success of the League of Nations In 1914 war broke out in Europe. The war ended in 1918 and Germany solely blamed. The end of the war was signed with the treaty of Versailles. From the war was born the League of Nations; who helped nations resolve disputes peacefully without going to war. When the League was formed, the defeated nations were not invited to join.
The League of Nations has been seen as a seriously flawed international organisation and its failure to prevent World War Two has been well documented. Provide something of an alternative perspective by identifying and highlighting important policy-areas in which the League made valuable progress.