Managing Library Education

4505 Words10 Pages

Managing Library Education

Managing for change is just as controversial in library schools as it is in corporations.The advances in technology over the past decades have forced library schools to educate technologically astute librarians.At the same time, many educators fear that the emphasis on technology may be eroding the concepts of service that have always been a part of the profession.The issue of incorporating technologies into a core curriculum without eviscerating the historical and ethical portion of the professional education has been debated widely.The question is how can the library schools bring technology into the program and still keep the traditional aspects which are important to the profession and to the accrediting body of the American Library Association.This paper will explore a variety of issues relating to redefining the education of librarians and address several models that are emerging from some of the highly regarded programs.

The “L” Word

The issue of technology in libraries and thus the need for librarians to be technologically literate is not the matter of much debate.What is debatable is the organizational framework within which the technological education of librarians will take place.In fact, one of the most contentious issues is whether it is librarians being educated.Tenopir (2000) points out that the word “library” has been dropped from the names of such schools as the Universities of Tennessee, Michigan, and Syracuse.The new schools are called more generic names like “School of Information.”The emphasis on information sciences, especially information technologies, is of concern to many.Wiegand (2000) worried that “LIS educators [are] so eager to drop the ‘L’ word from their program ...

... middle of paper ...

...s.indiana.edu/Debrees/mls.html

University of Michigan (1999) The School of Information. [WWW document] URL:http://www.si.umich.edu/

University of North Carolina (1999). The School of Information and Library Science [WWW document] URL http://unc.edu/ils/catalog

University of Pittsburgh (1999). Planning your MLIS Program/Degree. [WWW document] URL:http://www.sis.pitt.edu/~lsdept/planning.html

Van House, N. and Sutton, S. A. (1996). The Panda Syndrome. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 37 (2), 131-147.

Watson-Boone, R. and Weingand, D. (1996),Deans Rank Indicators of effectiveness for schools of library and information studies.Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 37 (1), 30-42.

Wiegand, Wayne A. (2000). Core curriculum:A white paper. [WWW document]. URL. http://www.ala.org/congress/wiegand_print.html

Open Document