Madela Rugby Vs Temple Grandin

An Art and an Industry: Temple Grandin Versus Nelson Madela Rugby

Temple Grandin and Invictus: Nelson Mandela Rugby are two true to life—outstanding and exceptional films. However, as a member of the Academy Awards Committee, only one of two I will vote to be the first-rate overall "Best Film." The Temple Grandin is autobiographical of a woman who is autistic icon— a high functioning autistic woman who become very popular on advocating humane slaughtering practices, and became an expert on animal husbandry. On the movie "Temple Grandin," she begun to show her interest and establish a brilliance for all mechanical things. In spite of her disability "Autism," Grandin attended college and upswings intellectually and become an innovator in the

field of animal care, and become a lifelong advocate for humane slaughtering practices. Similarly, Invictus: Nelson Mandela is about a South African President icon—former prisoner Nelson Mandela embraced the Springboks lacks that sporting thrill and passion for the game—and misses a fine metaphor for the racial struggle. Invictus is the film that is right to suggest that rugby was intensely political game in South Africa. The process of film making is both an Art and an industry. A best film is considered to be an important source of popular entertainment with strong audience impact, a powerful medium for educating—or indoctrinating— citizens, and the visual basis gives it a universal power of communication that conveys the values and belief of the culture.
First, watching movies can be one of the fun and exciting ways to spend a day off, or enjoy watching a films after an exhausting day from work. Deceptively, I look at each film not just a single subject, but a universe of subjects, because I believe films offers a wide range of entertainment. Director of World Cinema: American Hollywood Lincoln Geragthy said, "The dominance of narrative over spectacle is perhaps central to film becoming the popular form of entertainment it is today. On the movie Temple Grandin, beyond the fact that I can simply relate too much of experience and difficulties, the film is exceedingly well prepared, and I highly recommends it. It is highly enjoyable and entertaining to watch regardless of whether or not I have any connection to autism. Temple’s life, and her character is an inspirational. On the other hand, Invictus: Nelson Mandela’s story—in general— is controversial and politically driven. An audience who despise politics—like me, have difficulty comprehending the political aspect of the movie, in spite of the sports structures and entertainment added of the movie. “Rugby was the opium of the Boer,” said Makhenski Arnold Stofile, an African National Congress activist who later serves as sports minister. The Popularity of Invictus: Nelson Mandela's film steered by a Victorian poem "I am master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul," titled Invictus.
Secondly, I classified best film to be useful tool to educate the viewers, audiences, and citizens.

Temple Grandin film takes a completely new approach to autism. Predominantly, the film grabs my mind and expands it for I am one of many that are unfamiliar with the disorder. It also allows me to experience the remarkable, but at the same time challenging life of Temple Grandin. Clair Danes is fantastic and brings strong emotions when displaying the biographical character of Grandin. Strongly, the film accurately captures what it is like for me, at least to be an autistic. Autism is extremely diverse, and what is true for one autistic will not be true for all. It almost feels like this movie is something I can proudly show to my friends and family that are never expose to the remarkable and positive side of autism. In the same way, Nelson Mandela film is expose me to a great sense of leadership. I am able comprehend the qualities of a good leader, and how effective Nelson Mandela as a leader. On the film, Mandela inspire his team not to be intimidated by the challenges, instead be thrill of the challenges. Impressively, Mandela uses charm and friendliness is more effective than direct confrontation. By treating "adversaries" with the same respect I will treat my friends, so I can gain their trust and hopefully theor loyalty. On the contrary, the film has some situations that are full of contradictions and competing interests. Although, every problem has many causes and many

solutions. The film--somehow-- allows me to keep an open mind to the possibilities and preserve the participation of everyone involvement.
Thirdly, I categorizes a best film by how it embodies, and conveys the values and beliefs of the culture within which and for which it is made.

Popular art forms, such as film that has special importance because film speak to the most central of values and beliefs. Temple Grandin has outstanding performance—a fascinating true story, and fine production values all around. Ultimately, the film not only changed the face of the livestock industry, she also changed the face of autism. Conceptually, in a rapid changing world where complexity is changing day by day, the film has taken me to see Temple’s life and character is an inspirational and the lessons of her life can apply to anyone across the board that are suffering from autism and found no hope for a better—more normal and adaptable—life to live by. Comparatively, Nelson Mandela movie conquers the concept of "Nothing is black or white" in life. In other words, Life is never either/or. Nothing is ever as straightforward as it appears; every problem has many causes. Mandela's perception was always, "What is the end that I seek, and what is the most practical way to get there?" The man that gave birth to his country and refused to hold it hostage. Mandela knows that a leader lead as much by what the leader choose not to do as what he

do.
Given this points, in fact these two films holds strong concepts that is entertaining, educational, and valuable. Both films portray different characters that are conveying, but only one holds the best story, characters, actors, director, scenery, dialogue, and style to be voted as the “BEST FILM."