Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership style during the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership style during the civil war
War
As of 2014, the VA estimates there were 22 million military veterans in the U.S. population. Over time the population of those to fight in war have grown. General Douglas Macarthur was an american general and also chief of staff of the United States army. He writes his speech: Sylvanus Thayer Award Acceptance Address, in this he presents the importance of war and encourages others to follow his steps to be a leader to the United States.The thayer award was a an award that the the United States Military Academy at West Point gave out to one individual each year .General Douglas Macarthur encouraging words create a powerful tone, and also attracting who the audience and purpose is intended for.
In the beginning ,General MacArthur
…show more content…
intended audience would be to General Westmoreland, General Grove, distinguished guests, and gentlemen of the Corps. While he is explaining the definition of the award that is has more meaning than others think of . For example, “ But this award is not intended primarily to honor a personality but to symbol a great moral code”(Macarthur). In this sentence, he explains how it is not off your personality but how you hard you work with the moral code; duty, honor, country. He sees this award more than just an award but to keep the moral code going in war. Also, his audience could be to young people because of his encouraging words about military. He views it as whoever goes to fight is being noble to our country. “ They teach you in this way to be an officer and a gentlemen”( MacArthur). In this sentence, he points out how not only does the war prepare you to fight but to mature more. Hes strongly encouraging young people to join the army since he was a general. For example, “ They build your basic character. They mold you for your future roles as the custodians of national defense” (MacArthur). Again he is describing that war makes you more mature and a man than how you were before becoming a soldier. The purpose of the General Douglas MacArthur is addressing that the awards comes with a code which are duty, honor, and country as motivation to soldiers. These words represent who you are and what you will and can be .“ They are your rallying points: to build courage when courage seems to fail; to regain faith when there seems to be little cause for faith; to create hope when hope becomes forlorn” ( MacArthur). This quote means how these three simple words can push them more when the lose their faith and hope into the war. During tough times they can look back and have motivation to push themselves. “ However horrible the incidents of the war may be, the soldier who is called upon to offer and to give his life for his country is the noblest development of mankind.” (MacArthur). He praises those who fight for our country because it is respectful and noble. War is not easy at all , but being able to stand up and say you will give it your all is noble. In addition, he explains his experience that he had in his first world war which adds more details in the experience he had as a general.
First World War, bending under soggy packs, on many a weary march from dripping dusk to drizzling dawn, slogging ankle-deep through the mire of shell-shocked roads, to form grimly for the attack, blue-lipped, covered with sludge and mud, chilled by the wind and rain, driving home to their objective, and for many, to the judgment seat of God.
He explains after everything he went through at the end of the day it was worth it. Every single pain and hard work was worth the feeling that you are doing something right to fight for your country. Overall what General Douglas is getting out there is motivation and encouragement to join and lead the country we live in. “But you are the ones who are trained to fight. Yours is the profession of arms, the will to win” (MacArthur). In this sentence, he wants you to know that to succeed and the fight is in your hands to win the war for our
…show more content…
country. As a result , General MacArthur tone throughout the speech is positive, formal , and encouraging.
He is trying to get out that becoming a soldier is a good thing so he list examples that will benefit you if you are one. He has formal tone to explain his purpose with encouraging and positive words. For example, “The code which those words perpetuate embraces the highest moral laws and will stand the test of any ethics or philosophies ever promulgated for the uplift of mankind” (MacArthur). The quote means that the words duty, honor, and country are a code to follow when in the battlefield. As he is trying to get the reader's attention he uses proper tone so he will be taken serious of. For
example: Everything else in your professional career is but corollary to this vital dedication. All other public purposes, all other public projects, all other public needs, great or small, will find others for their accomplishment. that the very obsession of your public service must be: Duty, Honor, Country. In his sentence, he uses strongful wording and professional words to have others also dedicate their life and motivation for our country. Also he repeats the the code of duty, honor, and country making it clear war has to involve the moral code. In conclusion, General Douglas MacArthur uses encouraging words to young people who might want to fight for the country we live in. His main purpose of this speech was not only to address the award to those who were there attending, but also to young people. Words are powerful and attract those that need the help the most. Some young men are confused in their life and once they have that little motivation it could push them to where they should be at. He provided good examples to explain why the moral code is needed in the war. Also reasons why the war helps you in what needed but also makes you more mature.
In An American Soldier in World War I, David Snead examines account of George Browne, a civil engineer who fought as part of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) during World War I. Snead shares Browne’s account of the war through the letters he wrote to his fiancé Martha Ingersoll Johnson. Through Browne’s letters and research conducted of the AEF, Snead gives a concise, informative, and harrowing narrative of life as a soldier serving in the camps and front lines of the Great War. Snead attempts to give the reader an understanding of Browne’s service by focusing on his division, the 42nd Division, their training and preparation, combat on the front lines, and the effects of war on George and Martha’s relationship. As Snead describes, “Brownie’s letters offer a view of the experiences of an American soldier. He described the difficulties of training, transit to and from France, the dangers and excitement of combat, and the war’s impact on relationships.” (Browne 2006, 2) Furthermore, he describes that despite the war’s effect on their relationship, “their
Throughout MacArthur’s service to the United States, he went through various situations which tested him as a man, but because he had formed such a strong opinion of duty, honor, and country, he was able to overcome the troubling situations which led to his receiving of the Thayer Award. MacArthur’s ability to overcome dilemmas is one of the reasons he was the powerful leader he was, and to fully grasp the importance of his speech that shaped the future, one must know his past. At the age of twenty-three, MacArthur graduated from West Point with the highest grades the academy had seen in twenty-five years showing his determination to succeed. After moving
General Douglas MacArthur at the end of the speech, in order to again arose the feeling from the audience uses pathos. To get audience feel how the battlefield full of gunshots and how they felt living on a battlefield in which they can just die instantly with one wrong move. MacArthur starts the sentence with, " In my dreams, " telling audience these soldiers sleep traumatic in their nightmares. With this, audience can understand how much these soldiers had devoted themselves to their country and may as well want to do the same to be a loyal
"First World War.com - Feature Articles - Life in the Trenches." First World War.com - A Multimedia History of World War One. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Mar. 2011. .
Everyone knows what war is. It's a nation taking all of its men, resources, weapons and most of its money and bearing all malignantly towards another nation. War is about death, destruction, disease, loss, pain, suffering and hate. I often think to myself why grown and intelligent individuals cannot resolve matters any better than to take up arms and crawl around, wrestle and fight like animals. In All Quiet on the Western Front, Erich Maria Remarque puts all of these aspects of war into a vivid story which tells the horrors of World War 1 through a soldier's eyes. The idea that he conveys most throughout this book is the idea of destruction, the destruction of bodies, minds and innocence.
The war was said to bring fire blood & anguish in to our lives. WW1 -
"Feature Articles - Life in the Trenches." Firstworldwar.com. First World War, n.d. Web. 05 Apr.
In The Red Badge of Courage, Henry Fleming was drawn to enlist by his boyhood dreams. His highly romanticized notion of war was eclectic, borrowing from various classical and medieval sources. Nevertheless, his exalted, almost deified, conception of the life of a soldier at rest and in combat began to deflate before the even the ink had dried on his enlistment signature. Soon the army ceased to possess any personal characteristics Henry had once envisioned, becoming an unthinking, dispas...
In the history of modern western civilization, there have been few incidents of war, famine, and other calamities that severely affected the modern European society. The First World War was one such incident which served as a reflection of modern European society in its industrial age, altering mankind’s perception of war into catastrophic levels of carnage and violence. As a transition to modern warfare, the experiences of the Great War were entirely new and unfamiliar. In this anomalous environment, a range of first hand accounts have emerged, detailing the events and experiences of the authors. For instance, both the works of Ernst Junger and Erich Maria Remarque emphasize the frightening and inhumane nature of war to some degree – more explicit in Jünger’s than in Remarque’s – but the sense of glorification, heroism, and nationalism in Jünger’s The Storm of Steel is absent in Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front. Instead, they are replaced by psychological damage caused by the war – the internalization of loss and pain, coupled with a sense of helplessness and disconnectedness with the past and the future. As such, the accounts of Jünger and Remarque reveal the similar experiences of extreme violence and danger of World War I shared by soldiers but draw from their experiences differing ideologies and perception of war.
MacArthur, Douglas. “Duty, Honor, Country.” Sylvanus Thayer Award Acceptance. West Point, NY. 12 May, 1962.
Whenever one reads or hears about World War I or World War II, you hear of the struggles and triumphs of the British, Americans or any of the other Allies. And they always speak of the evil and menacing German army. However, All Quiet on the Western Front gives the reader some insight and a look at a group of young German friends who are fighting in World War I. “This story is neither an accusation nor a confession, and least of all an adventure, for death is not an adventure to those who stand face to face with it. It will try simply to tell of a generation of men who, even though they may have escaped its shells, were destroyed by the war.....” The soldiers of this war felt they were neither heroes nor did they know what they were fighting for. These soldiers were pulled from the innocence of their childhood, and thrown into a world of rage. Yet somehow they still managed to have heart and faith in man kind and could not look the opponent in the eye and kill him. For he was man too, he too had a wife and children at home, he too was pulled out of his home to fight for a cause he didn't understand.
In the book All Quiet on the Western Front, author Erich Maria Remarque reveals a dimmer sense of the cost of war. The main character in the book, German soldier, Paul Baumer, embodies the cost of war before he reaches his ultimate fate. The tactics and weapons used in World War 1 were more advanced compared to the past as a result of the industrial revolution. Germany was forced to fight a two-front war and this intensified the losses suffered by soldiers like Paul and the other men in the Second Company (Gomez 2016, German Strategy for a Two-Front War – Modern Weapons: War and the Industrial Revolution). Remarque’s observations that he shares with readers are not to World War 1 because it portrayed not only the physical but mental consequences of combat. Regardless of what era of war soldiers were involved in they were the ones who paid the price for facing so much death.
...the appeal of the life of the soldier and even of the validity of his Novum as a government form (he makes explicit reference to Technocracy, the nearest equivalent (199)). I do find the argument convincing, but perhaps not as much for the younger reader. The best advantages of military service presented are acquiesce and contentment, in short, the death drive - the desire to live less – a desire I hope is not well formed in the young reader. The arguments for the superiority of the military man are less convincing since they rely on a pretty problematic altruism founded on species survival over the individual but they are serviceable and no one debates with someone who wants to sacrifice himself anyways. Overall, if the capitalist game of meritocracy appears a bit too rigged and the death drive kicks in a bit early, military service is shown to be a good option.
...though people believe that, those on the home front have it just as a bad as the soldiers, because they have to deal with the responsibilities of their husbands, there is nothing that can compare to what these men have gone through. The war itself consumed them of their ideology of a happy life, and while some might have entered the war with the hope that they would soon return home, most men came to grips with the fact that they might never make it out alive. The biggest tragedy that follows the war is not the number of deaths and the damages done, it is the broken mindset derives from being at war. These men are all prime examples of the hardships of being out at war and the consequences, ideologies, and lifestyles that develop from it.
Autobiographies, diaries, letters, official records, photographs and poems are examples of primary sources from World War One. The two primary sources analyzed in this essay are the poems, “Anthem for Doomed Youth” by Wilfred Owen and “In Flanders Fields” by John McCrae. Primary sources are often personal, written from the limited perspective of a single individual. It is very difficult for the author to capture their own personal experience, while incorporating the involvement and effects of other events happening at the same time. Each piece of writing studied describes the author’s perception of the war. Both of the poems intend to show to grave reality of war, which often was not realized until the soldiers reach the frontlines. The poems were both written at battle within two years of each other. However, the stark difference between the two poems is astonishing. “Anthem for Doomed Youth” gives a much different impression than “In Flanders Field” despite the fact that both authors were in the same war and similar circumstances. The first two lines in “In Flanders Fields” “…the poppies blow, Between the crosses, row on row.” are an image o...