Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison between biological and psychological theories of crime
Comparison between biological and psychological theories of crime
Comparison between biological and psychological theories of crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When someone thinks of a serial killer, they probably imagine some sort of
knife-wielding maniac who does his dirty work in the depths of night, silencing the
screams of the innocent for his own sick pleasure. Just looking at him, it would be clear
that he's crazy. However, Lydia Sherman was the opposite of all that. The Queen
Poisoner managed to kill all 3 of her husbands and seven of their children in the light of
day with nothing but a little bit of arsenic. Maybe she was insane, but maybe she had
motives to kill such people.
Lydia Sherman, the Arch Murderess of Connecticut, has a story that may be hard to
understand, but should be known. There have been many people who kill with poison,
and from all different eras. In 2012, a woman named Deborah Cain was drinking her
morning cup of coffee prepared by her husband when she noticed something strange
about it: it appeared to be tinted green. Suspicious of this strange coloring, Cain called
the police immediately. After a police investigation, rat poison was discovered at the
bottom of the coffee pot. The entire case was just dripping with suspicion; the woman's
husband wouldn't usually make coffee for her. William Cain claimed that he had been
trying to do nothing more that make her sick, but Deborah confirmed that a friend had
warned her that he was going to kill her. William Cain was arrested and tried on
Wednesday, May 16th, 2012.
Long ago in Ancient Rome there was a woman named Locusta who was considered
Rome's professional poisoner. She was employed by Agrippina the Younger, Emperor
Claudius's last wife. She wanted him dead, so she entrusted the job to Locusta. Locusta
was able to kill him by serving him a plate of poisoned mush...
... middle of paper ...
... that
Lydia Sherman was guilty of all charges. Connecticut in that era didn't allow women to
be hanged, so she was sentenced to life in prison, where she died at age 54.
Lydia Sherman was a mysterious killer, and even after her wrongdoings she is still
relevant. I found it interesting that Sherman would kill the people she should have loved
most: her family. I don't think, however, that the world would be better off without her.
All life is sacred, and we can learn from her mistakes. She may leave a bitter taste on
those who know of her, but she's still important. Without people like her in the past
people today would have no morals, since there would be nothing to have based them
on. The Poison Fiend was a strange, maybe troubled person, and I hope that after the
things she did we can be wise enough to know that they should not be repeated.
In The Murder of Helen Jewett, Patricia Cohen uses one of the most trivial murders during the 1800’s to illustrate the sexiest society accommodations to the privileged, hypocritical tunneled views toward sexual behavior, and the exploitation of legal codes, use of tabloid journalism, and politics. Taking the fact that woman was made from taking a rib from man was more than biblical knowledge, but incorporated into the male belief that a woman’s place is determined by the man. Helen had the proper rearing a maid servant, but how did she fall so far from grace. Judge Weston properly takes credit for rearing her with the proper strictness and education. Was Helen seduced at an early age and introduced to sexual perversions that were more persuasive that the bible belt life that the Weston’s tried to live? Was Helen simply a woman who knew how to use what she had to get what she wanted? Through personal correspondence, legal documentation, census reports, paintings, and newspapers we are able to make our own determinations. Cohen provides more than enough background and history to allow any one to make their own opinion how the murder of a woman could be turned into a side show at a circus.
After doing her best to fight the poison that curses her family, she finally succumbs.
	Even though most people believe those young girls were the only ones accused, also grown men and women were too. History tells about how a neighbor’s pig fell astray into the Nurse family’s yard and Rebecca Nurse yelled at her neighbor. Soon after the neighbor feel ill and died of a stroke.
her position and truly valued the fact that she was helping people and at the same time, felt that
...d few such as Anna, Stella, and Alice who broke free of the poison, lived their lives as Sam Toms’ did who rooted the family. They as he did lied, cheated, manipuled, and kept secrets to try to live a happy life which in actuality their lives were anything but.
In 1872, Anthony registered and voted in the election in Rochester, New York. She was arrested for voting for a representative to the congress of the United States. She was fined $100 dollars but she said she would never pay a penny of and two years later she went to congress and claimed that her conviction was unjust and that the fine should be
reported that she had been abducted from a parking lot and raped by a black male ("A.B. Butler").
everything and everyone who could have hurt her. One aspect of life and time in
herself, and how she was brought up, as I think this has had a big
In November of 1843, Amelia Norman of New Jersey was arrested for the attempted murder of successful merchant, Henry S. Ballard. The defendant claimed to be a victim of seduction, which in the mid-nineteenth century was a felonious crime punishable by anywhere from 5-20 years in prison (Murray 5) and defined as "the act of a male person in having intercourse with a woman of chaste character under promise of marriage, or by the use of enticement or persuasion" (Humble 145-146). In February of 1844, noted columnist, feminist, and abolitionist Lydia Child published "Letter from New York [The Trial of Amelia Norman]," detailing the extraordinary fanfare that surrounded Norman's trial, including the surprisingly strong (and favorable) tide of public sympathy. Legally, Norman's case is rarely mentioned except in reference to a particular period in American jurisprudence where legislation (and its inevitable influence on social consciousness) was remarkably provincial.
"And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in
Now I know what you are thinking: ‘Abigail Williams should be hanged for her crimes and for the false accusations of women in Salem.’
...ghout the rest of the book. On the other hand, if she had misrepresented his words, or meaning, then it disrupts the rest of the book in her meanings and examples that she uses throughout the book. My critical attitude toward the book would be the same. I am not completely sure how correctly Cain used the source, and therefore my criticism would be better known if someone were to explain to me if she used it correctly or not. But based on the definition of both authors that I gave earlier, I would say it is not completely correctly used because the definitions do not completely match, but have some similar word choices in them.
cruel deed Claudius has done, the reader does not know yet but Claudius is the reason that King