Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Osha quizlet
Responsibility for project risk management
Osha inspection report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Osha quizlet
To: Professor Valdes
From: Max Swienton
Date: 11/27/15
RE: Assignment #7 – [Safety Article]
Name of Company: Leopardo Companies Inc.
Name and location of Project: Gold Coast Project-Luxury Condo Building
Summary of the accident:
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration opened an investigation into the death of a construction worker who was killed Friday in the Near North Side neighborhood. Joel Ogiego, 45, of the 5100 block of Lakeview Avenue in Portage, Ind., was crushed in a construction in an unfortunate accident, according to the Cook County medical examiner's office. Chicago Fire Department Chief Michael Fox said the victim was unresponsive when he was found pinned by part of a crane”.
Ogiego was about six floors, or 60 feet, above ground and was working inside a crane during the construction of a high-rise residential building at 4 E. Elm St. in Chicago. He was leaning into a shaft where a cage, or "Elevator," was
…show more content…
For starters, whoever was operating the crane at that point in time was clearly not paying attention and proceeded to do work without checking his or her surroundings before moving forward, which is a major violation especially when on a job site that involves use of heavy equipment around workers. Next, when operating the crane, instead of carrying a load one on top of the other, they could have done it from side to side therefore preventing the individual from getting hit and trapped. Lastly, someone from the company should have been there to oversee the work, therefore possibly preventing the crane from hitting the individual in the first place and saving a precious life. All in all, accidents happen on job sites and in order to prevent them, safety regulations need to be followed precisely without question and construction companies need to make their employees aware of this at the
Professional Safety, 46(10), 20-25. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5367632&site=ehost-live&scope=site McGuire, C. (2011, April). Workplace Safety 100 Years Ago! Safety Compliance Letter(2524), 1-6.
Department of health (2007) say that there are 3 types of risk assessment:the unstructured clinical approach, the actuarial approach and the structured clinical approach (DOH 2007). Many Mental health Professionals over the past years have used the unstructured clinical approach to risk assess. This is based on your experience and judgement to assess the risk. However this way has been criticized for not being structured and this then leads to inconsistency and to be unreliable (Turner and Tummy 2008). This approach would not be useful for the case with Julie as she is not known to services and every person is different as you may not have seen her symptoms before if you base the risk assessment on experience.
My belief is that all agencies are responsible for this accident (Local, State, and Federal). The Mining Company, the Government and overall leadership is responsible for not protecting the mine workers’ safety. The Miners had concerns and voice out, begging for safe working conditions.
Accidents are an inevitable part of life. Children learn this at an early age by bumping their head, scraping their knees, or falling off the swings. They learn that sometimes painful experiences just happen, seemingly without cause or reason. These children carry these lessons into adulthood, and then project their tolerance for accidents onto their families and occupation. The chemical industry, while one of the safest industries, has the potential for catastrophic accidents. Through experience and renewed focus on the conservation of life, the chemical industry has improved its safety considerably. In 2005, chemical industry fatality rate (the number of fatalities per year per total number of people in the applicable population) was the third lowest when compared to industries such as agriculture, coal mining, and construction1. However, accidents still occur, sometimes with regrettable repercussions. In 2005, Formosa Plastics Corporation in Point Comfort, Texas experienced an accident with severe consequences.
The accident pointed out a flawed hoisting process during the investigations. When the bolts failed and the tower crumbled, five people lost their lives. Preliminary investigations revealed extreme negligence on the part of Antenna Inc. In other words, there was a deliberate attempt to violate the fundamental canon of holding paramount the welfare and safety of the public. Generally, the disaster would have been avoided if the rules of practice for engineers had been adhered to.
Reese, C.D. and Eidson, J.V. (1999). Handbook of OSHA construction safety and health. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press
In this case a large engineering consulting firm was contracted by the government to perform civil engineering work for the installation of equipment that would be later used to train firefighters. Prior to the actual work being commenced on site, Donald J. Giffels, president of the consulting firm soon realized through careful observation that there was a significant amount of ambiguity in how critical safety systems were to be designed. In this situation, what are the ethical issues that the consulting firm faces in accepting such a contract from the government. What is the optimal strategy in responding to what Donald J. .Giffels identified as an unacceptable lapse in safety. These two important questions are discussed in further detail with a conclusion of noteworthy facts surrounding this case following.
As opined by Cassidy (2006), these are intrinsically demanding, hazardous and actually challenging lines of work. Consequently, it is important to consider workers’ health related issues and others connected to the place of work to diminish the effects of drug use in construction sites and to augment the protection contained by the workers in addition to the place of work.
Most importantly, increased safety in the workplace can lead to fewer workplace injuries and casualties. Workplace health and safety issues are different today than they were at various points of time in Canadian history. Employers are not responsible for injured workers or accidents that happen in the workplace. The main legal doctrine of Assumption of Risk governs workplace hazards, which requires workers to assume and accept all the risks associated with their occupation (Share, 2012).
While no one was injured it was a very costly mistake and this Carman was punished with 10 days off with no pay. This could have been easily avoided by taking more time and better communication. If employees are urged to always stay aware and safe it will cut down on accidents on all fronts. Incidents like this happen many times a year at rail yards across the country. It normally doesn’t make the news because it happens so often.
Public safety covers a wide variety of people and organizations, but carries one common theme and that is, the public’s safety. This course has broadened my knowledge on the many roles that make the public safety sector go around and the role the public plays in it as well. My thoughts before the course were close minded and to the point. I quickly realized that policing is not as cut and dry as I once portrayed it to be. Society is always changing and adapting, and it is the job of the those in public safety to adapt and change with it. The mindset that I grew up with, in rural Saskatchewan, was the police are good people and you will only need to deal with them if you break the law or see someone break the law. My answers in the module 1 survey reflected my upbringing. My first thought for
A hazard is defined as an activity or object that has the potential to cause harm if contact is made with the person, object or activity (MHS, 1996; Harmse, 2007; HSE, 2006). These hazards in a work place need to be identified and dealt with accordingly to prevent any harm to employees or any individual acquainted to a certain activity or establishment. The key roles and principles of occupational hygiene are Anticipation, Identification, Evaluation and Control (Schoeman and van den Heever, 2014; Harmse, 2008; SAMTRAC, 2012). To practise in accordance to the above principle; a hazard identification and risk assessment needs to be conducted. Anticipation is the foreseeing of the activity
The report I am going to write about is to do with electrical safety devices and safety practices which contribute in reducing and eliminate specific risks. The workplace I have chosen to write about is electricians in power stations. The report I am going to write is going to show a clear understanding of electrical safety devices and the improvements of electrical safety devices.
Chemical and fire hazards in the workplace cause serious injuries that in most cases are fatal.
It’s true what everyone talks about safety – you are the key to your safety, when you do it safely you do it the right way and the best gift you can give to your family is to always stay safe. We have been taught by our parents and teachers to be cautious while doing a number of things. That’s very essential in our daily lives, because one needs to be extra cautious to prevent unavoidable accidents. However, mishaps do happen everywhere in the safest of places, no matter how careful we are in our actions. It is highly unpredictable, what’s going to happen the very next instant. There are numerous incidences we come across like simple trips, falls, cuts due to sharp objects, burns or sudden worsening of a person’s health condition, causing