Luis Buñuel: The Manifesto Of Surrealism Movement

2360 Words5 Pages

In 1924 Andre Breton wrote, ‘The Manifesto of Surrealism’, which sets out to define the movement and its intentions.

“Psychic automatism in its pure state, by which one proposes to express — verbally, by means of the written word, or in any other manner — the actual functioning of thought. Dictated by the thought, in the absence of any control exercised by reason, exempt from any aesthetic or moral concern.”

Surrealism focuses on the subconscious or un-conscious and is not concerned with any form of rationality or reason. It is a movement which explores the flowing internal imagery or thought processes one might experience at any given moment, dreams, nightmares, day-dreams, intrusive thoughts etc. The less sense a surrealist piece …show more content…

This essay will focus mainly his on his first film which was made in collaboration with Salvador Dali. It is a surrealist film called, ‘Un Chien Andalou’, (Luis Buñuel, France, 1929) which is 15 minutes long. Luis Buñuel moved to Paris at a young age where he became heavily involved within the cinema-going scene. He eventually became an apprentice under Jean Epstein, a celebrated film-maker of the time but ended up falling out with him on account of refusal to work under a certain other Director. During their departing argument Epstein suggested that Buñuel was like a surrealist and warned him to be wary of those people. Obviously Buñuel took exception to this statement since he ended up becoming one of the greatest surrealist film-makers in history. His work still echoes strongly today and continues to be influential amongst new, young and aspiring film-makers.

“Give me two hours a day of activity, and I’ll take the other 22 in dreams.” – Luis …show more content…

He then falls towards the camera before re-emerging in a field behind the same woman from earlier in the film. Following this we cut back to the woman in her apartment again, arguing with another man. She grabs her scarf and proceeds to leave the room, sticking her tongue out at the man and making faces before slamming the door behind her. She then turns around only to find herself standing on a beach, a beautiful sea view before her. The man is there once again, in Summer clothing, and they start to walk together before a title card pops up once again saying, ‘In Spring’, the film then cuts to two half-buried corpses in the sand, and it is obviously the two characters we have witnessed throughout the film. This final scene completes the rollercoaster of temporal manipulation which we go through throughout the movie. It is another manipulation utilised through the use of title cards, once again signalling that a random amount of time has passed which has zero

Open Document