Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social impact of slavery
Social impact of slavery
Effects of slavery
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social impact of slavery
Lucretia Mott was involved in wanting to end slavery and support the rights of women. In “Abuses and Uses of the Bible” Mott wants to make people realize that you do not always need to go by the bible. She believes that some theories in the bible are indeed true however; we need to be aware of “our opinions and denunciatory in our conduct.” (pg 42). The bible is the word of God, our loving perfect God. The scriptures in the bible are claimed to be testimonies from God “as being able to give knowledge of that which is to come, being able to make wise into salvation; giving knowledge of a purer way, but only through the faith of Jesus Christ.” (pg 43). The bible has given us an insight to what the word of God is. The word of God we believe is our guide to the closest thing to perfection. For example, baptism, communion, and confirmation are all forms of devotion and steps we feel we need to take to become closer to God. …show more content…
The life that we live now in the present day is only possible because God loved us, and gave himself up for not only us but, our sins.
Mott states that since God is a loving God; why is there slavery and the “crushing of woman’s powers, the assumption of authority over her”? (pg 43) We are losing a sense of humanity based on what the bible says. In Mott’s last sentence “we see them going out satisfied with their forms and devotions, taking comparatively little interest in the great subject of truth and humanity.” (pg 44); she wants us to be aware that we aren’t looking at the bigger picture. Humanity is treating everyone equally with kindness, sympathy and mercy. If God is all loving and perfection, he would want everyone to be treated equally because he accepts us for who we
are. I agree with Lucretia Mott because the bible isn’t flawless. Mankind created the bible and most of it was lost in translation and misquoted. Politics were also involved with some of the scriptures. I believe people shouldn’t go by the bible word for word but just to grasp the main message of God; which is to love one another and be peaceful. Most people who read the bible interpret the word of God in their own way, and disagree with some points. For example, people claim that the bible states being homosexual is wrong. Yet, God created each one of us in a different way and made us who we are. He created us in a unique way different from everyone else. God is perfect and loving, therefore, if someone was a homosexual God would love them equally just as much as a heterosexual. We shouldn’t segregate people who are different from us. God wants us to treat people with kindness not hatred. Homosexual people have feelings just like heterosexuals.
That rights to anybody were the same that it didn’t matter on race or gender. While at the convention she had heard speeches given by local ministers and their agreement that men where on the higher on the society ladder then that of women. Giving arguments on four main categories: Superior intellect, how Christ would wanted equality he would of given the rights to the women before his death, and that of the first sin of Eve (Aint I A woman). All of the points the ministers made were why it was that women did not possess much power in a religious view. One minister had made a pointed out if Christ had intended to give women rights he would have done it before he had died. Sojourner having stated back, “He says women can’t have as much right as men, ‘cause Christ wasn’t a women! Whar did Christ come from?” (Aint I, pg. 2). That Christ had been born by a woman and had nothing to do with men at all. In a later speech she had stated,” the Bible says, sons and daughters ought to behave themselves before their mothers, but they don’t I’m watching…” (What time of night is it?). Many slave women had served as maid hands to young misters and misses of the plantation owners. They had served as second mothers to these children most of the time neglecting their own children. Much like Harriet and her grandmother, who had worked for the same women who now demanded
Does Phyllis Wheatley use religious references to warn her readers about slavery and sin and its repercussions?
In 1863 Abraham Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation declared “that all persons held as slaves” within rebellious states “are, and henceforward shall be free”. In my perspective this was a command from God through Abraham. The sad thing about it is we still don’t follow it. Slavery and racism needs to stop before it gets out of hand.
Slave-owners forced a perverse form of Christianity, one that condoned slavery, upon slaves. According to this false Christianity the enslavement of “black Africans is justified because they are the descendants of Ham, one of Noah's sons; in one Biblical story, Noah cursed Ham's descendants to be slaves” (Tolson 272). Slavery was further validated by the numerous examples of it within the bible. It was reasoned that these examples were confirmation that God condoned slavery. Douglass’s master...
...s and upheld her views, even though she began to experience spiritual isolation and a great deal of criticism from many of the clergy, modern day feminists who disagreed with her methods and ideologies, and the general public, leading her to publish The Women’s Bible in 1895, a study of sexism in the Old Testament. The Women’s Bible consisted of all the texts concerning women and the main purpose of this revision was to expose the contradictions and the traditional teachings and interpretations in regard to women of the time.
Her deviance from the Puritan belief that salvation is earned by “good works” and advocating that salvation is derived from “grace from God” brought attention to her weekly women’s Bible studies. She stood firm in her convictions and defied the Puritan leaders and Governor which was prohibited for women living in this era. Puritan women were not allowed to speak or think for themselves, yet Anne Hutchinson chose to fervently express her beliefs. Her views on salvation and admission to heaven created a following that threatened the Puritan ideas and would eventually lead to a new Protestant doctrine. She was a prominent figure in the realization of religious freedom, women in ministry and the feminist movement.
In writing this paper, I believe, God has given me wings, strong wings, to help me fly above common literary convention. The prophet Isaiah said, "[T]hose who hope in the LORD will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles. . ."(Isaiah 40:31). Because I believe the Bible is the complete word of God, I must conclude that that "The Awakening," by Kate Chopin, is "not a healthy book"(Culley 146). The truths presented in the Bible that lead me to this conclusion are the following. "The Awakening" has a central message that is contrary to Biblical Christianity, denying the headship of Christ and making it seem that people are basically animals and should be able to do whatever they want. It would be possible to argue that Kate Chopin is simply projecting that man is an animal lacking moral obligations without bringing Christianity into the picture, but Kate Chopin made several attacks on Christianity in her fable, and her seeming obsession with tearing down Christianity opens her up to Biblical criticism.
Flannery O’Connor once noted that all good stories are ones of conversion (Wood, 217), and Wise Blood is no exception. The central spiritual struggle of the book is that of the character Hazel Motes. The protagonist goes through not simply one but several conversions throughout the book. His spiritual quest is his realization of the Church Without Jesus, and his search for a new jesus. As analysis in this paper will elucidate, Hazel spiritual arc is a critique of approaches to knowing God. The first such method, nihilism, is a belief in nothing. This exists not only as a rejection of belief in an areligious sense, but is an active love of the concept of nothing itself. The second method comes in the debate of how one can come to know God, and whether or not one can accumulate concrete knowledge as a method of understanding the divine. O’Connor, as a Catholic, creates the window of an outsider to view the Protestant dominated South. From a Catholic perspective, Hazel Motes’s quest for an alternative approach to God is one which mirrors the alternative approach to God by the predominantly Protestant South. Hazel’s rejection of his paternal influences is not one which rejects religion or God, but instead is one which seeks his own path towards God based on his terms and conditions, and not His. Hazel’s spiritual trajectory is one which pursues a path of nihilism, to Gnosticism, to despair. His understanding of his own perception, especially sight, leads him to search for Jesus through both sight and non-sight, as he seeks a knowable, corporeal new jesus.
“The Bible is a special revelation from God to man of truths concerning Himself, His purposes, His plans, His will, man and his sinful nature, and God’s redemptive plan for man.”
Many people during the time of Harriet Beecher Stowe and even now regard religion as a means of getting out of the requirement of having to go to Hell by being a part of a religion. What these people do not realize is that there is more to just being able to say that they are Christians and getting out of the punishment for their sins. They must be examples of what it is like to be religious and practice it with fervency and commitment. Miss Ophelia was Stowe's embodiment of these people that are trying to cheat their way out of spiritual punishment. She admits to having feelings of bigotry toward blacks. "I've always had a prejudice against negroes [ ] and it's a fact, I never could bear to have that child touch me; but, I didn't think she knew it" (246). Miss Ophelia's aversion toward African Americans shows that to be human is to be flawed; however, it is still unchristian to be so.
According to the text,” Abolitionism arose out of a deep religious conviction that slave-holding was a sin that the truly god-fearing had the obligation to eliminate.” (DuBois, 2012, p. 268). In 1936, Boston Female Anti-Slavery Society implored that each woman in the land must do a Christian woman’s duty, and the result cannot fail to be instant, peaceful, unconditional deliverance. Unlike any other movement seen before, women along with men would join into open conflict with America’s basic political and religious institutions. Sarah and Angelina Grimke rose to the roles as the leaders for the movement. They made many speeches to men and women regarding the issue and even found themselves condemned from the church for their actions. The need for change was growing over the overwhelming feel for abolishment of slavery as well as a role for women. In the 1840s, many leaders seen from the abolitionist movement moved to seek not only freedom from slavery but for the future of women as a whole. The Grimkes defense of their equal right to champion slaves led many women into the women’s rights movement. Female abolitionists faced discrimination within the movement, this then led to the need for a women’s rights movement. Pushback was also seen when women who supported the abolishment for slavery were treated the same as those being prosecuted by white religious women and men who saw their views as incorrect. A change was needed and
Women and men shared similar roles; however, men had more rights while women had limitations. For instance, male slaves were freed after six years of service while female slaves (Ex. 21:7) were freed only if their master failed to provide clothes, food, and marital rights. Furthermore, the book of Judges (19:24) portrays how a concubine and virgin daughter were offered to satisfy a group of men who wanted to sexually assault another man. As a result, the group of men rape and abuse the concubine leading to her subsequent death. This story illustrates how women’s lives were regarded less valuable than men’s.
Within three Puritan works, Rowlandson and Edwards displayed their religious beliefs through their thoughts on God and mankind. One of the many Puritan beliefs was that the bible is the basis of all teaching. Such examples of this are evident in Mary Rowlandson’s work “Captivity”. Even though she was a captive, she still took note of “the wonderful mercy of God” for the simple fact that He “[sent her] a bible” (Rowlandson 67). Feeling lost, the bible brought her back to her faith in a time of need, and enlightened her on the hope that “there was mercy promised again”(67). From then on she looked to the Bible for guidance in times of despair. Throughout her imprisonment, she often pondered about “the wonderful goodness of God” when she felt anguish (66).
According to Janet Chismar, of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, the Bible is a “collection of books, written by dozens of authors over many hundreds of years…. But in spite of their diversity, when you examine them, you discover they all have a common theme: God’s relationship with the human race.” The Bible is believed to be the inspired word of God. Chismar continues to explain the Bible’s significance by stating, “The Bible isn’t just a collection of men’s ideas about God, nor is it a guidebook for living that people developed over the centuries. It is the Word of God–and that makes all the difference. This means the Bible is our authority in everything it touches. This means the Bible is our guide to show us how to live. Most of all, this means the Bible is our instructor, teaching us about God and His plan of salvation in Christ.” Those of Christian faith believe that the Bible is God’s definitive doctrine.
G.D. Anderson asserted, “Feminism isn’t about making women stronger. Women are already strong. It’s about changing the way the world perceives that strength.” Feminism is not a new idea, but it has been more rapidly spreading throughout the world in recent decades. However, Christian feminism is a concept less discussed. To explore the relationship of the terms “Christianity” and “feminism,” one must know what exactly the two words mean. Feminism is “the advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes” (Oxford Dictionary). The goal of feminism is to change the degrading view of women so they would not be seen as an insignificant gender. Christianity is “the religion based on the person and teachings of Jesus Christ, or its beliefs and practices” (Oxford Dictionary). Many people mistake Christianity for a religion that suppresses women, when there are actually many Christian men and women who identify as feminists. People also mistake feminism as