More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership in shakespeare plays
Why did shakespeare use the theme loyalty in romeo and juliet to convey what
Richard ii shakespeare leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A Question of Loyalty in Julius Caesar
Loyalty defined means faithfulness to one's friends, country,
ideals, etc. What should one do when these loyalties conflict with one
another? One would have to choose. A choice that can
make or break a man, which I believe broke many men in the play Julius
Caesar. One did not know who was friend or foe. One's dearest friends
actually your foes? Not possible, is it? Yes, it is. That is the story
of Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar, a great, noble man. A man for his
country. A man loved by many and respected by all. Even respected by the
men that cursed him with death. Why would men that loved and respected one
kill them? Loyalty is the answer. A feeling of loyalty for your country
that surpassed the loyalty of righteous virtues. Perhaps if loyalty had
not been involved, the country of Rome would not have been torn apart. Or
perhaps if loyalty to all and everything had been involved a great ruler
named Caesar would have reigned for years. If the people of Rome would
have remained loyal to Caesar perhaps a war would not have occurred, in
fact, it most certainly would not have. After the death, the angry mob
should have put the conspirators to death, not let them toy with their
minds as they would a five year old. The mob, like a great many people,
believe what is easiest to hear. In the mob of people did loyalty exist?
Doubtful, little if any. What coexisted in the crowd with that little
loyalty was ignorance, and much of it.
I believe that Brutus showed the greatest amount of loyalty to his
country. He just went about showing it in a corrupt manner. He sacrificed
a great friend for what he thought would better Rome. Perhaps Brutus was
one of the most noble in the play, but he was also the most misled. He was
noble for assassinating not for selfish needs, but for the needs of the
country. However, I believe he was weak. Weak for believing that Caesar
was "ambitious". Brutus believed the one side of things that he heard, and
that was from Cassius. Brutus is a prime example of people believing what
entering Brutus had said to himself that Caesar must die. Brutus is also a very smart
One friend kills another. Speeches are presented. A war breaks out. This is the story of Julius Caesar, the emperor of Rome who was killed by Brutus and a group of conspirators. Many argue that Brutus was a patriot, and many argue that he was a betrayer. People argue that he was a betrayer because he betrayed Caesar’s trust and gave a speech against him. However, when you think of Caesar’s personality, arrogant and slightly reckless, he could’ve made bad decisions and caused Rome a great deal of trouble. Brutus was a patriot to Rome since he did what was best for the country and even took his own life instead of running away. He put his own feelings aside to do what was right.
Antony and Brutus are both loyal, noble men and their loyalties shape their characters, drives their actions, and decides the very future of Rome. Brutus loves Caesar, but he loves Rome more. Antony has no need to choose between his country and best friend. Before Caesar's death both men are guarded and somewhat a secret to the reader. After Caesar's murder, however, their true personalities emerge. Antony and Brutus may seem the same, and that was they are in theory, from their positions, character traits, to the very friend's they keep they are alike almost to a point of absurdity. In practice, though, you will find them rather different due to the mistakes and decisions made by both parties.
Rome was one of the greatest empires of all time. It had it’ s up and times though but starting in 46 b.c. Julius Ceasar led Rome and brought them into one of the most prosperous times in their history. Caesar’s military excellence brought more power and land that led to increase in size and strength of Rome. His leadership helped the prosperity and stability in Rome. Julius Ceasar was a natural born leader. His military expertise and social and political reforms led him to become one of Rome’s greatest rulers.
Brutus was a very selfish and self-centered person. He continually ignored Cassius’ and the conspirators’ ideas. He was the leader and everyone was supposed to go along with them. Not to mention that all of his decisions went against Cassius and they were all the wrong moves. Brutus refused to admit that he was wrong or listen to other people.
Brutus shows loyalty by his never ending will to make Rome the best it can be. Brutus had a very hard time killing Caesar because he was his best friend and he cared a lot for him.
Julius Caesar was the dictator of Rome in his prime. Some say his journey to the top was paved in corruption, other claimed he was a man of the people. His enemies knew to fear him for his ruthlessness. His followers adored him because everything that he had succeeded in was done for them. Unfortunately, his betrayal transpired by his senators who felt he had grown too powerful and stabbed him to death. However, Julius Caesar’s connection to the political world, his innate ability as an army general, and his desire to advocate for the rights of his people made him a great leader.
Delegating tasks is one area that I must work on in my leadership skills. When a leader cannot delegate task appropriately, this can lead to their downfall. My action is to learn more of the reasons why I chose not to delegate tasks. When that piece is understood, I can then move forward in correcting and adjusting my delegating. The employee specialist along with the Vice President of Nursing give me projects where delegating is necessary. They both follow these projects closely and challenge my moves of when and what I delegate and to whom those tasks are delegated to. Attending a seminar on delegation is also in my action
The delegator is accountable for the acts of delegation and incur liability if found negligent in the process of delegating and supervising; while the delegate is accountable for the completion of the delegated task. The delegator is accountable for the transfer of responsibility and authority to a competent delegate (Porter-O-Grady & Malloch, 2016). The distinct concepts of accountability and responsibility are the key elements in the effectiveness of the delegation process. The difference of “accountability and responsibility relates to their orientation” (Porter-O’Grady & Malloch, 2016, p. 53). Responsibility emphases on the work, the competence of the delegator and delegate, the efficiency of the processes, the quality of work, and the excellence of the application; while, accountability focuses on the issues of outcome and demands attention to the effects of the work (Porter-O’Grady & Malloch,
Capital requirements to set up an assembly line to produce PC's are also relatively low, estimated at roughly a million dollars (Rivkin & Porter,1999 pg. 5) which means that virtually any firm can enter the market easily. Despite sky rocketing demands for PC's, PC producers are unable to capitalize due to increasing number of competitors. The PC industry is also affected by environmental turbulence due to price fluctuations of its components. Constant innovation in PC technology causes older components to be rendered obsolete and prices of older versions to plummet. PC producers who are stuck with inventory of obsolete products incur high costs of dumping these components.
Dell Inc. is a privately owned multinational technological company, which develops, sells repairs and supports computers and relates products and services. Dell Computer has a fully Internet-enabled supply chains, which is constructed by the extranet to automate interactions with suppliers, service partners and customers .
Delegation is the method of giving decision-making authority to lower-level employees. For the process to be successful, a worker must be able to obtain the resources and cooperation needed for successful completion of the delegated task. Empowerment of the workforce and task delegation is closely interrelated. Empowerment occurs when upper-level employees share power with lower-level employees. This involves providing the training, tools and management support that employees need to accomplish a task. Thus, the employee has both the authority and the means to accomplish the work. Even though authority can be delegated, responsibility cannot; the person who delegates a task is held responsible for its success in the end. Thus the assigned worker is liable for meeting the goals and objectives of the assignment (Camp 2006).
But while this trend bodes well for Dell, says Johnson, another does not: due to a slowdown in PC sales, what's fueling most of the online growth [in the PC market] at this point are second hand sales of computers. Auction sites like eBay and uBid are enjoying thriving growth rates in PC sales, she says, in contrast to new PC vendors like Dell. So the challenge for Dell now is figuring out how to grow sales in a tough market.
Historically, personal computer companies produced most of the components for a computer which they assembled into their final products and distributed to resellers. The manufacturing of these components was vertically integrated into the organisation. Dell, as a small start-up, could not build this infrastructure. Instead, they developed a model where they developed relationships with organisations that could provide these components, allowing Dell to focus on selling and delivering computers. By selling directly to customers, initially through mail orders and later by using the internet, Dell avoided reseller mark-up. Dell also enabled customers to order customised computers, which Dell then assembled after receiving the order (Magretta, 1998, p.73-74). “Customers got exactly the computer they wanted and Dell saved money making the computers only when they were ordered” (Hill & Seggewiss, 2008)....
Dell Computer was first known as PCs Limited in 1984, selling PC components and PCs under the brand name PCs Limited. Dell’s strategy was to sell directly to end users; by eliminating the retail markup, Dell was able to sell IBM clones at about 40% below an IBM PC price. By 1985, the company was assembling its own PC designs and had about 40 employees. Sales had reached $33 million by the year ending 1986.