Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critique of the story of Romeo and Juliet
Romeo and juliet how does the setting connect tothe theme of love and hate
Critique of the story of Romeo and Juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critique of the story of Romeo and Juliet
The famous Romeo and Juliet, thinking that it could be a tragic love story that existed in the past, yet the Tomba di Giulietta is not true. William Shakespeare’s play is famous, but famous to the point where people speculate Juliet’s tomb is an actual tomb of Juliet because Verona is an actual city. If the tomb of Juliet is an actual burial of Juliet, then why would it be accessible to the public. The tomb of Juliet doesn’t seem right because someone could be actually profiting off of the tourist attraction, yet the evidence of Juliet’s tomb is too vague.
Verona, Italy is a city in europe. Verona is the setting of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet the play took place in. The play is renown for it’s tragic love and how it’s put together by Shakespeare. “Unknowingly he was about to set the stage for the biggest fake attraction in history.(Dioni, Wandering Mee)”. If Shakespeare’s setting of Romeo and Juliet was a fictional city, the tomb of Juliet in Verona wouldn’t exist. For example, imagine if I made the most known story about two
…show more content…
people who battled each for years, but became lovers in the end and died in a coffin together. If that story had a setting was in London, people would think that grave exists in London, but if the setting was in Velen, people will assume that place doesn’t exist and will just forget about it being realistic. Renown or popular monuments and landmarks are usually are not accessible to the public. Some monuments that are private to the public due to reasons such as preserving history, prevent public from vandalizing or the popularity of the monument. The tomb of Juliet is a piece of the famous Romeo and Juliet, but this story is famous and almost everyone knows the plot. It’s definitely a public tourist attraction meaning it would be filled with vandalism and tourists. In the courtyard that was once Juliet’s home, the place is full of tourists and sticky notes planted on the wall. In the room where Juliet was buried, drawings of hearts of people are made (Dioni, Wandering mee). Juliet’s house and tomb, must’ve been an idea for profiting and built after Shakespeare’s play became popular. Tomb of Juliet could be a true place of Juliet’s burial, but no one in the past to now hasn’t come forth and explain why the tomb of Juliet is fake.
It would be most certainly that the mansion of where Romeo and Juliet had originated is being profited off of for money from believing tourists thinking that they’re visiting a famous and good masterpiece of history in reality. Yet only if it was possible to the tell the truth, but they don’t want to see the truth. The evidence of Juliet’s house being a legit piece of Romeo and Juliet, is too little to understand it’s the legit mansion of the capulets. The Del Capello family was thought to be related to the Capulets due to their names almost being the same (Zainoo). We humans make mistakes, and those mistakes sometimes result in misconception filled with fame. Casa di Giulietta or the self proclaimed Capulet house is one of them, believing that the Del Capello is related by its
similarity. Since the Tomba di Giulietta is fake, tourists or people who think that the Casa di Giulietta is legit should be notified that the place is unreal due to it being an fake tourist attraction for years. Maybe the majority of the tourists don’t know it’s origins or why it’s there in first place. Stories that are fictional and popular, but including a real location where the story originated or took place doesn’t mean it would actually exist. Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is an exception since it's based on a tragic love story and debated on whether it’s an actual piece of history or simply a fake attraction. Romeo and Juliet is known for it’s tragic love and how it was put together by Shakespeare, but not for it’s reality.
In the Elizabethan period, woman of higher social classes were supposed to embody “obedience”(Gerlach et al. 1) and this is shown throughout the text. In the beginning of the book, Lady Capulet tells Nurse to summon Juliet, so she can inquire about her getting married. As Juliet enters the room she says,“Madam, I am here. What is your will?” (1.3.7). Here, we can see not only Nurse being obedient to Lady Capulet’s wishes, but also Juliet being obedient and going to her mother after she is summoned. Similarly, after a discussion with Count Paris, a noble man who seeks Juliet’s hand in marriage, Lord Capulet decides that Juliet will marry him and tells Lady Capulet to deliver the news to Juliet. Not happy with this, Juliet expresses her opposition
Both the Capulet and Montague’s families are wealthy, noble and even founding families of Verona. Evidence of the family’s wealth is displayed when the Capulet’s have a classy party and Romeo meets Juliet for the first time. Proof of the two rival families superiority is even shown in the opening Prologue where the families are described by the line “Two households, both alike in dignity.” In the Elizabethan Era the word “dignity” can be interpreted to “Elevated rank, office,” or “station”. Hence both families are of high social status and in a position of power. Additionally in the prologue the families are described as ancient with this line “From ancient grudge break to new munity”. We can then determine that the Montague and Capulet families were Ancient and influential and the upper class in the social hierarchy of Verona. The Montages and The Capulet’s reputation and high values were the only thing the families and the people working for the houses cared about and their servants would never consider betraying their masters, the house they worked in was like their family. Servants working in the houses were considered normal when Shakespeare wrote Romeo And Juliet, in the Elizabethan Era most powerful or rich people had people of a lesser class working for them. An example of hierarchy in Romeo and Juliet is the Nurse and Balthazar the servant
We have now read both Pyramus and Thisbe, and Romeo and Juliet. The question we have yet to answer is what has a greater impact on what happened, destiny, or personal choice? We believe that personal choice affected the characters more because they chose to fall in love, Romeo and Juliet rushed into marriage, Pyramus and Thisbe left home on their own terms, and in both stories, the main characters decided to commit suicide. This is something that cannot be determined by the stars, your choices determine what happens, not some mystical prophecy. Though that is what we believe, it is also believed that destiny has a greater impact because they were doomed from the stars.
Lurhmann sets the film in a fictitious border city between the United States and Mexico. The city is called ‘Verona’ so it maintains its original name from the play. It is extremely built-up and urban just like New York or London so that a modern audience can relate to the film and understand where the film is set. In other modern films, a big urban city is usually the setting where there are big gang rivalries and Lurhmann makes this clear by showing that the Montague’s and Capulet’s are the big two families in the city and they are not to be reckoned with.
An act of dishonesty carried out by haste can result in very unlikely consequences to an individual’s life. Firstly, the dishonesty of Friar Lawrence in choosing to marry Romeo and Juliet without the knowledge or permission of their parents, results in undesirable after effects. Secondly, the sudden cessation of support from Juliet’s Nurse, to continue the relationship of Romeo and Juliet causes harm to Juliet’s feelings as a young lover and contributes to their fatality. Finally, Romeo’s haste to marry Juliet to prove his intentions, accounts for a future filled with even more hasty decisions. In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, the dishonesty of Friar Lawrence and Nurse and the haste of Romeo and Juliet, results in the deaths of the young lovers.
There are many tragedies to be found in literature, but only a few are like Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. It is a story of forbidden love in which a young couple are torn apart by their families’ feud in Renaissance Italy; the play’s tragic ending has both main characters die. Many aspects of this play have sparked a heated debate: is Romeo and Juliet a tragedy or is it simply tragic? Some critics claim that the play lacks elements that are necessary for a tragedy. Yet Aristotle explicitly states the essential components of a tragedy in his Poetics, and Romeo and Juliet meets those requirements. Romeo and Juliet can be considered an Aristotelian tragedy because of Romeo’s impetuousness, Juliet’s loyalty to Romeo, and the play’s peripeteia.
We all know the story of Romeo and Juliet, the star crossed lovers who kill themselves for each other. But when you think of Romeo and Juliet, you probably think of a great romance story. But is it really? Romeo and Juliet is a play written by the great William Shakespeare and most people think this play was written as a love story that just ends very badly. Well I think otherwise. Most people are tricked into thinking that Romeo and Juliet is a love story from what others say, but in all reality Romeo and Juliet is more of a tragedy.
In 1996 an australian film director Baz Luhrman introduces the new adaptation of the ageless love story – “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare. The action is moved to America and happening in the end of 20th century. In an imaginary city Verona Beach the two powerful clans Montague (Anglo-Saxon) and Capulet (Latinos) brutally rival. The swords are substituted with the guns, the ancient costumes with jeans and shirts. The art director Catherine Martin didn’t have any lack of materials, since the 20th century brought a great variety of heels, lighters, shirts, bikers, rockers, leather, tattoos, piercing, etc. The creators originally approached the small details: the street posters
When one looks closely at the story of Romeo and Juliet, one will see that it is a story with many ethical aspects. The first ethical concern was the two feuding families. How moral is it to hate someone only because they have a certain family name? This all come from a time period when people were fairly focused on religion, which teaches us not to hate. I also question this because I think it is ironic that both Romeo and Juliet seem to be fairly religious, since the first person Romeo went to for help was Friar Lawrence, and a few scenes in the play took place in or around the church. I think that this hatred is especially bad in the case of the Capulets and the Montagues, because I was always under the impression that the families had been feuding for so long that no one really knew why they hated each other anymore. This was the beginning of the problems for Romeo and Juliet. They had a moral decision to make. Should they stay true to their families, and deny their love, or should they stay true to their feelings and disgrace their families? In order to resolve this dilemma, Romeo turns to Friar Lawrence, who perhaps could be seen as the most moral character, to begin with. Because he was a holy man, he was the most logical confidant of anyone in the play. People see men of the cloth as reliable and a good source of advice. Of course, Friar Lawrence has every intention of helping the two lovers, also hoping that he could reunite the feuding families. However, unbeknownst to him, everything he will do throughout the play will have an unnerving consequence. No matter what he did to correct what he had done wrong, it only drug him deeper into trouble. Who ever would have thought that by marrying the two young lovers, he would have caused all of this heartache for the families, and really for all of Verona? No one ever considered the fact that two young people wanting to get married would have affected the entire city. Friar Lawrence was only trying to be a good friend and ally, but everything he did just ended up backfiring for him.
Everybody knows who William Shakespeare is and that he is one of the most famous play writers in history. His most famous pieces are Romeo and Juliet and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Shakespeare has written different types of plays from comedies to histories to tragedies to love stories. But it is Romeo and Juliet a love story? Romeo and Juliet is not a true love story because it has characteristics of both a tragedy and of a love story.
Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy- but it did not have to be. Romeo and Juliet is the tragic story of two star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet, who are the son and daughter of two feuding families, the Montagues and the Capulets. Written by the famed playwright Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet takes place in the 14-15 century in the cities of Verona and Mantua, cities in northern Italy. After a series of events that involves Romeo getting banished from Verona and Juliet getting forced to marry a count, Paris, they kill themselves. It has been argued for centuries about who is to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.
The play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare is set in the fictional city of Verona. Within the city lives two families, The Capulets and the Montegues, who have been feuding for generations. One night there is a celebration held at the house of the Capulet's. At the party the only son of the Montegues, Romeo, and the daughter of the Capulets, Juliet, see each other from across the room. The moment their eyes meet we are supposed to believe that they instantaneously fall in love with each other. Because they are from two warring families their love would most likely be forbidden. Juliet's father has also promised her to his good friend Paris. Because the love between the young couple is so powerful they go to Friar Lawrence and they are secretly married. On the day of their marriage Tybalt, Juliet's cousin, challenges Romeo to a duel. In the midst of all this chaos, Romeo's best friend, Mercutio, is murdered by Tybalt. Romeo then slays Tybalt out of revenge. When the prince of Verona finds out what Romeo has done he banishes Romeo from Verona forever. When the friar hears of this he devises a plan so that the two lovers can be together.
In the play “Romeo and Juliet”, Shakespeare shows that love has power to control one’s actions, feelings, and the relationship itself through the bond between a destined couple. The passion between the pair grew strong enough to have the capability to do these mighty things. The predestined newlyweds are brought down a rocky road of obstacles learning love’s strength and the meaning of love.
Both of the 1968 and 1996 films have clarified the setting right at the start of the film- 13th century (the medieval times) in Italy for the 1968 version, and modern but trouble-filled society at California’s Verona Beach in the 1996 version. Scenes were set on the beach or at the Capulet’s grand mansion, which sets a big contrast to classic and antiquated cobblestone castles of the medieval centuries. The 1996 film being a modern adaptation, starts with the TV newscast reporting the fire caught in the petrol station caused by Romeo and Juliet’s cousins’ gun fight, which gives the audience a sense of danger, fast-pace and risk as well as gaining some knowledge of the hostile relationship between Romeo and Juliet’s families. The 1968 version pulls open its curtain and gives the audience a panoramic view of the Italian landscape. As the camera pans around, the narrator reads out the famous prologue from Shakespeare’s original play, indicates that the trend of the film will closely follow the classical play.
Although fictional, the real storyline is the writing of "Romeo and Juliet" by Shakespeare. The story line is wonderful. In addition, there are very educational aspects to the movie, which focuses on theatre in the days of William Shakespeare. The theatre life is educational and the reflection of scenery in theatres of this time seems well depicted. The theatre life of these times is called Elizabethan.