One Hundred Foreskins Vicious battles between the rich and the poor have always managed to make their way into literature. The same conflict exists in Louis Berney’s “100 Foreskins.” After Lyman Mays realizes that Bill Eagle intends to marry his daughter, he becomes furious. He despises the idea of his beautiful daughter marrying a poor Indian who slaughters cattle for a living. While both seeking a similar goal of defeating each other, Berney’s creative juxtaposition of the two also demonstrates their differences. Lyman Mays and Bill Eagle both seek to defeat their enemies by proving one is better than the other. Mays tries to use the power of money to dwindle Bill’s determination and put him down by providing him a challenge of coming …show more content…
up with “one hundred one-dollar bills by sunset,” (35) on Sunday.
Then, Bill and Katie could be married. Mays also tries belittling Bill’s willpower by expressing that his “daughter is worth many, many times more than one hundred dollars. If [he is] not willing to provide that much for her, perhaps [he] should think about what kind of husband [he would] make,” (35). As Bill made his way back to the slaughterhouse, “Lyman Mays stood by the fireplace in his den, warming his hands and savoring [the] imminent victory” (37). Mays shows no faith in the boy as he is considering his demand for one hundred dollars an early defeat. The next morning, when Bill arrives back at the slaughterhouse, he asks the foreman to assign him not one, but two killing stalls. Until midnight on the first day, “Bill Eagle hacked away at the torrent of cattle that swept over him,” (36) with no rest in between. By the third day, “the vessels in his eyes burst from fatigue and blocked his vision with a sticky red mucous, [so] he used his fingertips to find the throat arteries of the steers,” (36). Finally, “on the fifth day, Bill Eagle’s fingers began to bend and snap against the heavy carcasses,” (36). It is not “his love for Katie Mays,” (37) that is motivating him, but the
“hateful vision of Lyman Mays’s face,” (37). Bill could not stop butchering the cows though, for he must continue to feel the satisfaction of beating Lyman Mays. Now, Bill was “no longer able to close his broken fist… [he] knotted his knife to his palm with a strip of cloth,” (36). Even though his body was soon to fail, Bill could not resist the sweet scent of victory. The event lasts for 7 days and 7 nights. Suddenly, a man from the crowd of people surrounding the boy shouted “‘he’s killed a thousand just this week,’” (37). Bill, comparable to Lyman Mays, continues pushing until the battle is won. Barney characterizes Lyman as a stubborn, self-centered man, while Bill is quite the opposite. Bill realizes that it is not just himself that Mays is tormenting, but it is Katie, too. Many times when Katie tries convincing her father to let her marry Bill, Mays always finds an excuse as to why they would not be well together. One night, Katie looks at Mays “with eyes full of fury and rancor,” (38) after her fathers kicks Bill off of their property. Mays then goes to hug Katie, hoping that she would understand why he does not want them to be together, but she hits him in the face. In shock, he “clubbed her a blow that shook a thread of blood and saliva from her mouth,” (38). If Lyman were not so selfish and self centered, he would see that Katie and Bill could have a wonderful relationship. On the last night of the week, Bill returns with his 100 foreskins in exchange for Katie. Mays, however, rejects the proposal because of his dishonest and greedy personality. He just wants to keep Katie and her beauty so he can get what he wants. This can be seen in beginning of the story, when Mays feels no sympathy for “the dead shortstop’s father,” (24) or even the boy himself. Instead, he is worried about losing the upcoming baseball games. Without even considering sending a letter of condolence to the poor boy’s father, Mays tells Katie to “bring [him] the telephone from the other room… there is much to be done,” (24). He instantly begins the search for another player. When Mays goes to find his new shortstop, he also brings Katie, with hopes that her beauty would draw in Bill’s attention. In the slaughterhouse, “the heat, the fumes, [and] the sight of death, squeezed [Katie’s] lungs tight,” (27) and she soon fainted. Bill’s quick reactions allowed him to catch Katie before she crashed into the bloody floor. This event was “all it took for Lyman Mays to secure a new shortstop,” (27). It does not even come across Mays’s mind that his daughter has passed out, expressing his ignorance and how he is only seeking good for himself. Later, when Bill goes to have dinner with Mr. Mays and Katie, Katie shares how her “daddy always said he wanted a son,” (28). Katie too understands that her father only likes her because of what she can get for him; else he would prefer a boy.
O’Brien argues the multiple Indians who are put forth in histories as being the last of their tribe: Eunice Mahwee of the Pequots, Esther of the Royal Narragansetts. This phenomenon falsely narrates the disappearance of Indian people, being relegated to anonymity except for the “last of their kind.” These stories also discuss the purity of Indians, downplaying their current environment. Indians were only Indians if they had complete pure blood, one drop of anything other than their own tribe meant they were not Indians. The racist contradictions in this logic is pointed out by O’Brien. For whites, any claim to one “drop” of New England Puritan blood meant this person could claim to be a descendant of the Puritan Fathers. The children or grandchildren of the “last” Indians were not truly Indian because they did not grow up in a wigwam, or possess their native
The inimitable novel “A Confederacy of Dunces” written by author John Kennedy Toole was not even published until after his suicide. The story in the pages of this novel reveals a hilarious, funny, sidesplitting, yet brilliantly crafted fictional masterpiece. The picaresque novel focuses on the life of the main character Ignatius J. Reilly. The character of Ignatius is a protagonist against the modern age. In his writing Toole saturates the narrative of the novel with an absurd sense of humor that stimulates both laughter and sympathy from readers. With his unique writing style Toole seamlessly combines, symbolism, sadness and humor in a literary
The concept of war has existed since the dawn of creation. Throughout the years, advancements in technology contributed to the increase of hate and violence. However, war gifted the world with influential and strong leaders. The Civil War showcased a multitude of these leaders throughout its harsh years. Although the Union won the war, the Confederate Army was the quintessence of character and determination. With the help of various militia and guerrilla bands, the Confederate Army won many battles, which could have been easily lost. “Bloody Bill” Anderson was a prime example of distracting Union forces. Though historians debate that he was sadistic and a cold blooded killer, “Bloody Bill” Anderson played a key role for the aid of the
We turn back the clock as Welch draws on historical sources and Blackfeet cultural stories in order to explore the past of his ancestors. As a result, he provides a basis for a new understanding of the past and the forces that led to the deciding factor of the Plains Indian tribes. Although Fools Crow reflects the pressure to assimilate inflicted by the white colonizers on the Blackfeet tribes, it also portrays the influence of economic changes during this period. The prosperity created by the hide trade does not ultimately protect the tribe from massacre by the white soldiers. It does, however, effectively change the Blackfeet economy and women's place in their society. Thus, it sets the stage for the continued deterioration of their societal system. Although their economic value is decreased, women still represent an important cog in the economic structure. Indeed, women are central to the survival of the Blackfeet tribal community that Welch creates and in many ways this strength and centrality provide background for the strength of the women depicted in his more contemporary novels. Welch's examination of the past leads to a clearer understanding of the present Blackfeet world presented throughout his work.
The novel “Through Black Spruce”, written by Joseph Boyden, details life of Native Culture and the corruption within its society. Will Bird and his niece Annie Bird alter narrations every chapter telling their individual stories of their struggles to remain pure in Native culture. Both characters experience a detachment from their roots and must learn to rely on each other for the livelihood of their culture. All characters in the novel show negative effects of being impacted by the white culture, seen through the use of drugs and alcohol leading to isolation from the community. Through detailed analysis of both Will and Annie’s narrative, their connections to their Native roots seem to be vanishing and the need to integrate the traditional
To understand Jackson’s book and why it was written, however, one must first fully comprehend the context of the time period it was published in and understand what was being done to and about Native Americans in the 19th century. From the Native American point of view, the frontier, which settlers viewed as an economic opportunity, was nothin...
Greed is a large part of the American culture whether we realize it as a society or not. Many countries around the world view the United States as a selfish country that does what it wants on a global scale, and does not share or allocate its predominate wealth. I am very thankful and proud to be a citizen of this country. Even though I would risk my life to protect our country and its freedom, there are aspects about our civilization that I wish could be different. Black Elk, “a holy man and a warrior of the Lakota Nation Indians,” was a member of the Oglala Sioux tribe during the most horrific period for Native Americans in the Western part of the United States. In excerpts from the novel of his life story Black Elk Speaks, he is able to relate the differences in the ways of life from his people and the white settlers. Although he lived in the late 1800s, he is able to make reference to issues that are relevant to us today. His observations display issues such as human bonds, ethics, economics, and politics. He describes how the excessive acquisitiveness of one society led to the cultural displacement of another.
The narrator’s father, who was freed from slavery after the civil war, leads a quiet life. On his deathbed, the narrator’s bitter grandfather advises the narrator’s father to undermine white people and “agree’em to death and destruction” (Ellison 21). The old man deemed meekness to be treachery. Despite the old man’s warnings, the narrator believes that genuine obedience can win him respect and praise. However, this is not entirely right because while the whites reward him with a calfskin briefcase, he is made to engage in a humiliating battle royal and the rush for imitated gold coin in an electrocuted rug.
Sarty’s dilemma arises from his father’s destructive envy of his wealthy employers. Abner Snopes frustration with being a poor sharecropper owned “body and soul”(280) by the South’s rich and elite leads him to exact his revenge on the undeserving blue bloods in the only way he knows how-by burning down their barns. While Sarty’s loyalty to Abner is proven after a court hearing held by “his father’s enemy . . . our enemy . . .ourn! mine and hisn both,”(277) after which he challenges and is beaten by a boy “half again his size”(278) because the boy called his father a “barn burner”(278) he is left to make a critical decision between saving his family or his own morality.
Louise Erdrich’s short story “American horse” is a literary piece written by an author whose works emphasize the American experience for a multitude of different people from a plethora of various ethnic backgrounds. While Erdrich utilizes a full arsenal of literary elements to better convey this particular story to the reader, perhaps the two most prominent are theme and point of view. At first glance this story seems to portray the struggle of a mother who has her son ripped from her arms by government authorities; however, if the reader simply steps back to analyze the larger picture, the theme becomes clear. It is important to understand the backgrounds of both the protagonist and antagonists when analyzing theme of this short story. Albetrine, who is the short story’s protagonist, is a Native American woman who characterizes her son Buddy as “the best thing that has ever happened to me”. The antagonist, are westerners who work on behalf of the United States Government. Given this dynamic, the stage is set for a clash between the two forces. The struggle between these two can be viewed as a microcosm for what has occurred throughout history between Native Americans and Caucasians. With all this in mind, the reader can see that the theme of this piece is the battle of Native Americans to maintain their culture and way of life as their homeland is invaded by Caucasians. In addition to the theme, Erdrich’s usage of the third person limited point of view helps the reader understand the short story from several different perspectives while allowing the story to maintain the ambiguity and mysteriousness that was felt by many Natives Americans as they endured similar struggles. These two literary elements help set an underlying atmos...
[1] The silent film, With Daniel Boone Thru the Wilderness, was produced in 1926: a time of prosperity, an era without the skepticism of the modern American mind. People were not yet questioning the stories and histories they had been taught as children. The entertaining story told in this Robert North Bradbury film is loosely based on the life of an American hero. However, the presence of several insidiously inaccurate historical representations demonstrates how an entertaining film might not be as innocent as it initially seems. This film fails to question certain key issues concerning the Daniel Boone legend. In fact, it does quite the opposite. The creators of this film wholeheartedly bought into the many warped myths and distorted “facts” surrounding the story of Daniel Boone. Amazingly, the ethnocentric (read racist and colonial) ideals found in 19th century whites apparently still existed in 1926, and, to a certain extent, still do today. This essay will explore the factors that contributed to the twisted representations found in With Daniel Boone Thru the Wilderness. Hopefully, the work of this essay and many others like it will help the next generation of Americans (and filmmakers) to avoid the same injustices and societal pitfalls that have plagued mankind for ages.
Mary Rowlandson’s “A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson” and Benjamin Franklin’s “Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America” are two different perspectives based on unique experiences the narrators had with “savages.” Benjamin Franklin’s “Remarks Concerning the Savages…” is a comparison between the ways of the Indians and the ways of the Englishmen along with Franklin’s reason why the Indians should not be defined as savages. “A Narrative of the Captivity…” is a written test of faith about a brutally traumatic experience that a woman faced alone while being held captive by Indians. Mary Rowlandson views the Indians in a negative light due to the traumatizing and inhumane experiences she went through namely, their actions and the way in which they lived went against the religious code to which she is used; contrastingly, Benjamin Franklin sees the Indians as everything but savages-- he believes that they are perfect due to their educated ways and virtuous conduct.
The destructive nature of cultural collision is symbolized when Emily’s lover, Rose, kills herself because of “how fuckin’ hard it is to be an Indian in this country” (Highway 97). The suicide of Rose, which happened when Rose “went head-on” into a “big 18-wheeler...like a fly splat against a windshield” shows the brutality of cultural collision (Highway 97). The rape of Zhaboonigan is an indicator of the violence inflicted on Natives (especially Native women), and functions as a metaphor for the “intrusive, destructive impact of one society on another” (Nothof 2). Cultural collision results in a fragmented society, where the subdued struggle with their identity as a result of the violent colonization of the dominant
All in all, the treatment of the American Indian during the expansion westward was cruel and harsh. Thus, A Century of Dishonor conveys the truth about the frontier more so than the frontier thesis. Additionally, the common beliefs about the old west are founded in lies and deception. The despair that comes with knowing that people will continue to believe in these false ideas is epitomized by Terrell’s statement, “Perhaps nothing will ever penetrate the haze of puerile romance with which writers unfaithful to their profession and to themselves have surrounded the westerner who made a living in the saddle” (Terrell 182).
Dorothy Johnson in “A Man Called Horse” writes about a young man who was born and raised in Boston. He lives in a gracious home under his grandmothers and grandfather’s loving care. For some reason, he is discontent. He leaves home to try to find out the reason for his discontent. Upon leaving he undergoes a change in status and opinion of himself and others. He begins a wealthy young man arrogant and spoiled, becomes a captive of Crow Indians- docile and humble, and emerges a man equal to all.