More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of long distance relationships
Negative effects of long distance relationships
Long distance relationship statement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of long distance relationships
By the same token, The Relate Institute notes introduces the loss of “autonomy”, “relational adjustment”, and “relational de-escalation” as some of the factors that lead to the downfalls of LDRs. Loss of autonomy occurs when a partner perceives a loss of freedom after starting a long distance relationship on the basis of independence. When the distance closes, the interaction shifts from independence to interdependence which may lead to feelings of estrangement. Couples can address their loss of autonomy by reminding themselves that they are entering a new stage in their relationship and discussing ways to foster independence in the relationship, for example, couples can slowly transition by maintaining passions, core values, and relationships
with friends without their partner. Couples can prepare two lists; the first names important things about the relationship and the second list should be dedicated to continuing to to do what the individual loves to to maintain their own passions and foster a life outside of their relationship. In order to maintain core values, couples should remember that their values do not have to be a copy of their significant others. By maintaining some semblance of independence, couples in LDR’s can avoid the loss of independence all together before addressing relational de-escalation.
Daniel Challahan attempts to argue that Euthanasia is always seriously morally wrong in his article, “When Self-Determination Runs Amok.” Callahan discusses several reasons depicting why he believes that Euthanasia is morally impermissible. John Lachs, however, does not see validity in several of Callahan’s points and responds to them in his article, “When Abstract Moralizing Runs Amok.” Two points from Callahan’s article Lachs challenges are the fundamental moral wrong view and the subjectiveness of suffering.
Chapters 5 and 6 in Extraordinary Relationships gave a good introduction into new concepts relating to Human Interactions and Relationships. These new concepts give a better idea in understanding relationship patterns and the various emotions that come along with relationships. Two concepts that stood out to me that were discussed throughout the chapter were relationship patterns and relationship emotions. Over time many relationships develop their own unique patterns. In many cases these patterns have been part of the individual all along. Gilbert (1992) states “Usually what people do in a relationship crises is more of the same thing they have been doing, only more intensely and more anxiously” (pg.36). When individuals go through relationship
In “Autonomy and Benevolent Lies” Thomas Hill presents the case of benevolent lies and if they are morally troublesome. Philosophers have been debating the moral difference between a malicious lie, told in order to hurt people, and a benevolent lie. According to Hill benevolent lies are “intended to benefit the person deceived, for no ulterior motives, and they actually succeed in giving comfort without causing main” (Thomas E. Hill). Many argue that benevolent lies are no different from a malicious lie because telling a lie is morally wrong. Others argue benevolent lies and malicious lies differ because of the deliberate intentions. Hill provides the reader with three cases of a benevolent lies. The three cases he presents are the possible suicide of a student which a Professor lies to the student’s mother, the
A simple definition of autonomy is that patients are able to participate and decide on treatments concerning their care (Edge and Groves, 2007). In other words, the patients have a voice. In the Tuskegee study, every man in the area was tested and later was put on a list that kept them from getting treatment, joining the war, and leaving town. The government doctors do not ask the men if they wanted to participate in the study. The nurse who participates in the study with the doctors is also forced to deny patient autonomy because of the government’s assumed authority over her. The doctors did not give the patients informed consent or allowed them to have a say in whether or not they wanted to stay in the study (Strait and Diianni, 2011). Because of gender and race, the nurse and black men were forced to stay in this study. Overall, this ethical principle was nonexistent.
Never become complacent and let my interpersonal relationship becomes stagnant, which can lead to resentment and conflict. Weighing the cost verses the rewards may not always be the solution for my relationship; simply, because the cost may ultimately outweigh the rewards. The need for autonomy can have reverse effects and may not lead to the closeness that’s expected. In, turn the very thing that, I try to be open about in my relationship can inadvertently cause me to protect my feelings in the
In “The Conflict of Autonomy and Authority” Robert Paul Wolff argues that the state’s authority is in conflict with having genuine autonomy. He reasons as follows. If there were a supreme political authority, which have a right to rule, there would be an obligation for a man to obey its laws. However, a man has an obligation to be autonomous, which means taking responsibility for making one’s own decisions about what one should do. Autonomous man has primary obligation to refuse to be ruled. Therefore, a supreme political authority does not have a right to claim authority over a man who has a moral obligation to be autonomous. He concludes by denying the concept of de jure legitimate state.
Because relationships are evolving and couples involved experience adjustment at different points in their life, the Locke & Wallace Marital Adjustment Test (LW-MAT) studies dyadic adjustment by looking at the process only at specific points on the continuum “focusing on characteristics and interactions of the relationship” (Spanier, 1976, p. 16). Spanier (1976) defines dyadic adjustment in five ways: troublesome dyadic differences, interpersonal tensions and personal anxiety, dyadic satisfaction, and dyadic cohesion, and consensus on matters of importance of dyadic functioning.
Lack of communication is a major cause of separation. When couples confront a problem, they don’t have the communication skills that could help them resolve the problem. In addition, due to work and other activities, husbands can fairly stay busy and away from their wives and children. Therefore, wives will spend less time talking to their husbands, so she might feel lonely. Moreover, sometime relationships tend to be cold when one side does not put an effort into listening, expressing feelings or discussing problems to the other side. Some problems will escalate when couples don’t talk with one another about them from the beginning because they are afraid of hurting the other partner. For instance, having children is one of the important matters in marriage life, but some people don’t want to talk about it. Therefore, one of the spouses might think that he or she isn't able of raising a child. So they avoid trying not to hurt the other partner emotionally. On the other hand, sometimes spouses don’t give each other the opporionity to express their feeling and opinions. In a...
There is “approximately 3.6 million married U.S. Americans involved in a long distance relationship in 2006” and “4 to 4.5 million U.S. college couples in a long distance relationship (LDR)” (Hassenzahl, 2012,p. 2). There are many challenges that couples in long distance relationship face, for instance, lack of face- to- face communication, and physical closeness. Couples in LDRs are also prone to experiencing extreme idealization, for instance, experiencing false ideals due to distance and not spending physical and quality time in their relationship. Recent study found that when those in long-distance dating relationships moved to a proximal relationship, they were likely to terminate the relationship (Beebe et al, 2011, p. 286). In other words, the transition from LDRs to geographical close relationship (GCR) may come to rapid termination of the relationship. This may happen because couples who live far apart obtains fewer information about their significant other. However, high idealization leads to high satisfaction in LDRs which increase longevity. “Couples in long-distance premarital relationships had less communication but surprisingly greater satisfaction and higher expectation for the likelihood of marriage than those in proximal, or geographically close, relationships” (Beebe et al, 2011, p. 286). My personal interest to the topic is based on by experience. Before my husband and I were married; we had a long distance relationship. Both of us are in the Military and in different branches we were always miles apart. Despite the long distances between us, we still manage to make our love flourish through communication. Now that my husband and I are married and are now geographically close to each other, we are learning more...
Long distance relationships (also known as LDR’s) are one of the toughest types of relationships to maintain. Many variables can affect this type of relationship
...ls in long distance relationships should communicate their expectations for the amount of texts, phone calls, video chats, to maintain a gratifying connection with their partner while not overcompensating for time spent apart.
The article “Love Via The Internet”[3]. The writer started the article by showing her own opinion clearly about the long distance relationships through the dating websites “I'm having doubts about a long-distance relationship that started through a dating site.”[3]. Then she started to give an example of a relationship via the...
In 2005, approximately 3.6 million Americans were in a long distance relationship and the numbering are surprisingly increasing. People believe that long distance relationships are almost impossible to maintain. People usually prefer short distance relationships because there are less challenges and therefore, less effort require. Americans believe that a perfect marriage or relationship is one where both persons are together. However, there has been reasons such as school, work, and military, that forces couples to separate. Geographical distance tests both partners’ love, commitment, and faith. Although people prefer short distance relationships, the advantages and disadvantages that com with being geographically apart strengthens the relationship, which ultimately make it successful.
Throughout the years endless amount of research has been done regarding communication in a romantic long distance relationship. Many scholars state that a long distance relationship consists of a couple who lives separated from one another (Neustadeter & Greenberg 2011). However, numerous other scholars define this type of relationship as a limitation in the daily togetherness of two individuals who would like to be together more than they can be, as well as, them only being able to communicate through technology (Billedo, Kerkhof, Finkenauer 2015; Brody 2013). There are new definitions that are slightly different being created every single day depending on the situation, location, time frame, and scholar presenting the information.
Many issues arise within marriages/relationships that cause separation and, thus generate long term psychological and behavioral effects on children. According to Dombeck (2006), “there is no single reason why a relationship begins to break down. However, once a relationship starts to break down, there is a sequence of events that tends to occur.” This is an approved utterance, because as seen today, divorce/break down of family has become a social widespread pattern across the globe.