Entertainment is available in many ways, shapes, and forms in today’s world of technology. Oftentimes we may find that these methods of entertainment are tools for information or even criticism. These criticisms often extend over various forms of media, with the same message being delivered in a different way. This is seen in The Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, which is not only a classic literary novel but also a play. The play version of Lord of the Flies, in which I attended, although staying true to the novel, differed in significant ways from the book itself. Upon attending the Carnegie Mellon version of the play of Lord of the Flies, the first thing one may notice is that the theme is very different from the book. A theme, in …show more content…
These camera operators merely stood at the site of the acting and did not interfere at all with the storyline. This addition allowed for screens which broadcast the recordings from the camera to the rest of the audience. Thus, although some may have seen that the camera operators were simply getting in the way, the focus at that point should not have been directed to the actors, but to what was being captured and projected on the screens. One interesting attribute of this feature was that it allowed the audience to enter the play as if they were there while it was going down. The novel version of Lord of the Flies is within a third-person objective omniscient perspective. A third person objective omniscient perspective “is like a camera following the characters around, showing actions and dialogue, and not entering into the internal thoughts of the characters.” (Using Third Person Omniscient Scribophile). Thus, the play at Carnegie Mellon not only stood true to the actual book in narrative style, but also even added a layer to the enjoyment of the play with the cameras! This aspect was simply one of the most impressive things about the play and certainly played a vital role in its performance. Even if the narrative style remained true to the book, however, a difference existed in the form of …show more content…
This varies from the book because every character in The Lord of the Flies is a young boy from England. However, the argument that these differences in character are arbitrary may be implemented. For example, due to adaptation of a fraternity setting, it would not be unexpected to see college students take the roles of the main characters. One surprising part, however, cast roles were given to women, even as main characters. This does not stay true to the storyline but did appear to make a large difference in how the play was perceived by the audience. For example, Jack—played by a woman—pounced upon Ralph, who is played by a man. If one did not read the literary version of Lord of the Flies, they may mistakenly assume this as having a sexual backdrop. When cast members erotically rubbed mud on each other whilst dressed in their undergarments, confusion about a sexual theme arose. Golding himself stated that Lord of the Flies did not have sexual themes, and although the play attempted to stray away from this, one could argue that this portrayal of the play allowed for the confusion of the audience to occur. The basis of any play is casting, and it is important to obtain the right kind of people. To allow for a clearer understanding of Golding’s message, the exclusion of women should be taken into consideration. Despite this, the women did an excellent job of
Many works of literature inspire new works to be made every day. From things as old as beowulf to the many shakespeare plays, current day writers keep pulling ideas from the classics to create their own stories. Because of this, many older works of literature are still relevant today. The novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding is more current than ever with allusion from Popular television shows, music that is heard on the radio and the newest blockbuster movie. The many allusions in modern day literature and works of art to lord of the flies are too numerous to count.
Writer Steven James said, “The true nature of man left to himself without restraint is not nobility but savagery.” This quote can be used to accurately describe Jack Merridew, one of the young boys who becomes stranded on an unknown island in the Pacific. Lord of the Flies was written by William Golding; the novel explores the dark side of humanity and the underlying savagery in even the most civilized person. The novel opens on a group of British boys between ages six and twelve stranded on a tropical island without adult supervision. The boys elect a leader in an attempt to form a civilized society; however, their peaceful island descends into chaos as Ralph and Jack continuously argue over who should be the leader of the island. From the beginning of the novel, Jack is seen as power hungry, envious, and manipulative to further his own agenda, the anti-thesis to Ralph’s concern with social order and their future.
Ralph, the first character introduced to the audience, is probably the most likable character in the entire story. Although he does not ponder such deeply like Piggy, is not as spiritual like Simon, or as energetic as Jack, there is something in him that attracts the audience. Ralph serves as the protagonist of the story. He is described as being a playful, innocent child in the beginning, but towards the end he matures significantly. In the first chapter where he takes his clothes off and goes swimming like any child would do, he seems to be Adam in the Garden of Eden, a child left to play with the nature.
Novels and plays are essentially the same in the sense that they assemble the means necessary to showcase a variety of stories ranging in diversity. The quintessential underlying difference between the two is the format in which the stories are displayed. Plays, like Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun use literary techniques such as dialogue, acts and scenes, and stage directions contrary to novels to guide the audience’s response and interpretation of the characters and actions in the
Olsen, Kirstin. "Literary Analysis." , "The Ignoble Savage." Understanding Lord of the Flies: A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and Historical Documents. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2000. 14-15, 35-35. Print.
Director Peter Brook based Lord of the Flies on the novel by William Golding. The film, released in 1963, is the tale of a group of upscale British schoolchildren who are being flown out of London to the supposed safety of the South Pacific before war erupts. Their airplane crashes and the lads are left to fend for themselves on a remote island. The storyline takes the boys from innocence to savagery. The film did not receive rave reviews from critics. “The film version takes away some of the creative imagination that comes from reading the story, but its images are as shocking as one might imagine – little boys turned into violent savages”(Webster, Apollo Guide). The reviews could be in part from the inexperience of the actors. “The little boys were almost all non-actors whose parents volunteered them for the job out of respect for the book” (Webster, Apollo Guide). However, Peter Brook did an excellent job of depicting the possible outcome of the situation with which the children are faced. This film shows human nature in its truest form. Society is faced with people who are vulnerable to others, those who are capable of making the right decisions, and some who feel the need to violate the rules.
Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, at first glance, is an incredibly dark read. However, that trait evaporates after one's first cursory read. Once it's text is more thoroughly perused, a pattern of optimism erupts between passages. If one dares to dive deeper into the meaning behind the book, many reasons surface. For example, the story, all in all, had a happy ending. Also, the themes were only represented among a very small pool of data. Lastly, the representation of evil in the book insinuates even greater things of goodness.
...s. Whether the characters show Jack’s manipulation through the beast or Simon’s helpful characteristics, they all have a purpose. Ralph is a civilized and direct character who is trying to lead the group. Simon is helpful and insightful. Simon’s traits are shown through many actions such as helping the little kids or seeing the Lord of the Flies before passing out. Jack’s savage behavior is displayed in the killing of the sow, Piggy and Simon. Jack’s manipulative trait gives him dominance and his group becomes more hostile. All of the actions that Jack has done display his savage and hostile behavior give him this characteristic. All of the character’s actions help symbolize their characteristics in the novel. Lord of the Flies is an allegorical novel because of these individual characteristics and personal qualities that are represented by Ralph, Simon, and Jack.
In Lord of the Flies, Golding is able to exemplify intelligence, violence, and leadership, through the behaviors, responses, and actions of Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, respectively. Golding provides insight into the delicate touch-and-go basis of human nature, something that to this day has yet to be fully understood.
Olsen, Kirstin. "Understanding Lord of the Flies: A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and ..." Google Books. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000. Web. 27 March. 2014.
William Golding, in his fictional novel Lord of the Flies, has created one of the most stunningly elaborate, captivating works of American literature. It is a straightforward story of a few shipwrecked schoolboys that dramatically turns into a multifaceted tale of endless deceit, trickery and all out jealousy. It is in this story that three boys, Ralph, Piggy, and Jack, come to play the pivotal parts of leaders to a group of children who are fighting for the right of survival.
The movie and the book Lord of The Flies are very similar, but they do have slight differences that differ the movie and the book a lot. One of the major differences is how the boys react to conflict. The differences end up impacting the movie and the overall conflict/resolution. In the book Lord of The Flies I thought it was a very good book.
In literature, authors procure to convey a message to the reader. Whether the message is good or bad, a reader can always learn something from a work of literature. When an author conveys a strong message, directors will want to create films that portray the same message. That desire to portray a novel’s message in a film will result in a film inspired by a novel. With this being said, a film may be created, but it will not always portray the message the same way a novel does. When comparing William Golding’s Lord of the Flies with Peter Brook's 1963 film, the novel provides more in depth development, allowing the readers to understand the message in depth. William Golding's Lord of the
People are privileged to live in an advanced stage of development known as civilization. In a civilization, one’s life is bound by rules that are meant to tame its savage natures. A humans possesses better qualities because the laws that we must follow instill order and stability within society. This observation, made by William Golding, dictates itself as one of the most important themes of Lord of the Flies. The novel demonstrates the great need for civilization ion in life because without it, people revert back to animalistic natures.
"Review: Second look at William Golding's 'Lord of the Flies'." All Things Considered 29 Mar. 2004.Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 May 2014.