Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Trickster archetype in literature
Who is a trickster in fiction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Trickster archetype in literature
Petyr Baelish, Lord Baelish, Little Finger, The Master of Coin; he goes by many names, which in a way adds to his ambiguity. Not only is he ambiguous, but he embodies all of Joseph Campbell’s characteristics of a trickster. Petyr Baelish is a good ally to have because he is so sly, but one must remember he always has a trick up his sleeve and could turn into a foe at any second, if that is what is in his best interest. Petyr Baelish is almost always playing a trick on someone. One of his tricks was turning on Nedd Stark and helping the Lanister’s gain control of King’s Landing. Here Lord baelish also shows signs of being a situation inventor by turning a bad situation good, and then bad again. because Nedd was in a bad spot, then was under the impression Little Finger was going to help him, when he finally turns on him and things get worse. Another one of Lord Baelish’s tricks was when he was able to get Sansa to have a part in delivering the poison to murder her King Joffery Lanister, without her knowledge; which also shows how Little Finger acts as a messenger. One can see how he is also being ambiguous by helping to conspire with the murder of …show more content…
King Joffery to gain a better alliance with the Tyrells even though the Lanister’s provided him with riches and made him Lord of Harrenhal. Here Petyr is being parallel to the court jester by mocking official decisions made such as conspiring to murder the King that he helped to get the throne by betraying Nedd Stark. Lord Baelish was very deceitful by taking advantage of Lysa Arryn’s feelings for him and tricking her into murdering her husband with the tears of Lys; once again being a messenger. He was also being a messenger by having Lysa write a letter to the Starks claiming that the Lanisters were responsible for John Arryns death which caused a lot of disorder between the families. Little Finger then was the cause of disruption by bringing Sansa to the Vale. Aunt Lysa becomes jealous of his feelings towards Sansa and results in Petyr throwing her through the moon door and to her death. He claims it was to save Sansa, but it did not have to be done and he really did it in hopes that he would be able to gain control of the Vale. Once again being a situation inventor by saving Sansa from the Lanister’s, bringing her to where she would be safe, but then murdering her aunt and selling her to the Boltons. Lord Baelish was also being very deceitful when he attempted to turn Sansa and Aria against each other. One can see that he is the prime cause for disruptions, disorder, and misfortune by turning sisters against sisters, families against families, and by the murders he has played roles in. Little Finger is ambiguous as well as being a deceiver by working with multiple sides and by causing disorder.
One thing that shows how much of a trick-player he is, is when he says, “A man with no motivates is a man that no one suspects. Always keep your foes confused” (1:38-1:43). When Sansa questions Petyr further on the matter, he tells her that, he would risk everything to get what he wants. Lord Baelish then goes onto tell her that what he really wants is everything. This shows his need to fill his belly, which obviously his desires will never be completely fulfilled. Little Finger states how his relationship with the Lanisters was productive, but he had to kill King Joffrey because he was not a reliable ally which shows how it takes a trickster to know one. He even says that he would not wants friends like
himself. Petyrs ability to move from friend to foe so easily is one way that he embodies a shape-shifter. Lord Baelish does everything he can to avoid punishment by skirting the letter of the law. One example of this is when one of the first things Little Finger had to say to Sansa when he saw her again after selling her to the Boltons was that he was so glad to see her unharmed and claimed that he was coming to her aid, when in fact he was not really concerned about her safety at all. He states that he will do whatever she asks and that he wishes he could undo what had been done to her which just shows how deceiving he can really be. Once again he acts as the court jester by telling Sansa that her uncle has taken River Run and that she should try to find him. He then tries to install doubt into her head by questioning her when she says her army and he asks her if she meant her half brothers army, once again showing how he is ambiguous and likes to try to deceive people. Once more Little Finger shows this characteristic of a shape-shifter when he says he was trying to protect Sansa, and that he loved her and her mother but he only made those claims because his life was at risk. He is a messenger by bringing the Starks the dagger made of Valyrain steel which back fired on him and made the Starks aware of his involvement in the attempt to assassinate Bran Stark. Another characteristics Petyr portrays is being a lewd bricoleur by being the owner of a brothel. This also relates to him being parallel with the court jester because he is being a profaner of beliefs by challenging peoples social beliefs. Obviously he is also parallel to the court jester by always being really close to the royal families, them having a great deal of trust in him and how they use him as their information source which he sometimes he would skew the information. One can clearly see how Petyr takes on all of Campbell’s traits of a trickster and is a force to be reckoned with. Lord Baelish was a great ally to have as long as one stayed on his good side, which was never permanent because no one could ever fill his belly. Little Finger was a trickster, trying to talk his way out of the inevitable til his very last dying breath. Petyr had played one to many tricks and his game was finally brought to an end.
The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.
Prince Hal is initially portrayed as being incapable of princely responsibilities in light of his drinking, robbery and trickery. Yet, Shakespeare reveals that Hal is in fact only constructing this false impression for the purpose of deceit. Prince Hal’s manipulative nature is evident in his first soliloquy, when he professes his intention to “imitate the sun” and “break through the foul and ugly mists”. The ‘sun’ Prince Hal seeks to ‘imitate’ can in this case be understood as his true capacity, as opposed to the false impression of his incapacity, which is symbolised by the ‘foul and ugly mists’. The differentiation of Hal’s capacity into two categories of that which is false and that which is true reveals the duplicity of his character. Moreover, Hal is further shown to be manipulative in the same soliloquy by explaining his tactic of using the “foil” of a lowly reputation against his true capacity to “attract more eyes” and “show more goodly”. The diction of “eyes” symbolically represents public deception, concluding political actions are based on strategy. It is through representation and textual form that we obtain insight into this
The story Sir Gawain and the Green Knight provides an excellent example of Hyde’s trickster figure in the character of Bernlak, also known as Bertilak, Bercilak, or simply as the Green Knight. The tale of Sir Gawain pits him against the daunting and formidable Green Knight; a mystical and intriguing character, who rode into Arthur’s court, brandishing a great axe and clad all in green. He challenges the knights to a game, and only after Arthur concedes to play the Green Knight’s game, does Gawain instead offer to take his place, thus setting in motion the story. In Sir Gawain, the Green Knight displays several key characteristics of Hyde’s trickster such as: crossing boundaries, being contradictory, and questioning
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
Foil Characters are important to the development of a play, for the prime reason of creating contrast that lead to a deeper understanding of the characters. Lady Macbeth in the beginning of the play, persuades and manipulates her husband into committing murderous deeds that classify her as an evil person to american society. Her husband, Macbeth, however, understands the outcome of his actions and seems to have withdrawls about killing king Duncan. Lady Macbeth is a foil to Macbeth, highlighting his flaws with manipulation and greed. Reminding the reader that greed can be very blinding.
Incomplete An exploration of Shakespeare’s presentation of trickery and deception in his play ‘Much Ado about Nothing.’ In William Shakespeare’s play ‘Much Ado about Nothing’, there are many instances of trickery and deception, which seem to surround the whole of the play. These instances are as follows: Don Pedro wooing hero for Claudio, Don Pedro wooing hero for himself, Claudio pretending to be Benedick to find out information from Don John and Borachio, Don John and Borachio both know that Claudio is not Benedick but trick Claudio into thinking that they believe that Claudio is in fact Benedick, Benedick pretending to be somebody else whilst talking to Beatrice, Beatrice pretending to believe that she is in fact talking to Benedick, Beatrice having romantic feelings for Benedick, Benedick having romantic feelings for Beatrice, Beatrice not having romantic feelings for Benedick, Benedick not having romantic feelings for Beatrice, Hero is unfaithful with Borachio, Hero is dead, and Antonio having another daughter.
...h you can fret me, yet you cannot play upon me.”(29-38) Hamlet is insulting Rosencrantz and Guildenstern by comparing the deceitfulness to an instrument and saying they aren’t equipped enough to trick him. Deception seems to be flowing in every direction when it comes to Claudius and multiple foil characters.
As the plat goes on it shows that Hamlet is not the only one trying to appear to be doing one thing but has another motive. "Polonius appears to be a loyal councilor to Claudius, honest trusting man and a caring father to Laertes and Ophelia when in reality,
Hal is the Prince of Wales and heir to the British throne was able to manipulate both the nobles and the court in order to satisfy his needs. Firstly, his ability to speak confidently between the lower class and upper class allowed him to gain authority of many things. In the beginning of the play, Poins tells Hal and Falstaff there is a robbery planned for...
Machiavelli states that "it is necessary for a prince, who wishes to maintain himself, to learn how not to be good, and use this knowledge and not use it, according to the necessity of the case." Machiavelli's ideas both compare and contrast to the methods used by Hamlet. Hamlet's desire to drive the king mad and eventually kill him, is what he thinks he must do in order to set things right. Hamlet struggles to maintain his position as prince. Perhaps he lacks the essential qualities of a prince outlined by Machiavelli.
There are many factors that lead Hamlet into putting himself in a difficult position. There are many incidents where it’s not Hamlet’s poor attitude that gets him in trouble, but his great ambition to uncover the truth. Once Hamlet discovers that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are spying on him, he never lets them out of his sight. Hamlet suspects that his mother, Gertrude, was an accomplice for the murder of his father. Polonius was slain by Hamlet who had mistaken him for Claudius. His pretense of madness drove Ophelia to her death. All of these incidents show that its Hamlet’s great ambition to uncover the truth that gets himself in difficult positions.
Balthazar¡¯s Marvelous Afternoon ( Why didn¡¯t Balthazar receive the money?) ¡° Balthazar¡¯s Marvelous Afternoon ¡±, written by Gabrial Garcia Marquez, is a story about a birdcage and a poor carpenter, Balthazar. In the story, Balthazar made a beautiful birdcage that was commissioned by Pepe, the son of a rich man, Jose Montiel. However, when the carpenter took it to the boy, his father refused to pay and rather said to sell it other people. Although Balthazar got really angry, he gave the cage to Pepe as a present. At the end of the story, he told townpeople that he got much money from the rich man and bought everyone cerebratory drinks. Then, why didn¡¯t Balthazar receive the money. First, he had no intention of money when making beautiful cage. In the story, he was accustomed to makin...
Prince that Hal reminds him of the way King Richard acted before Henry took the
Firstly, William Shakespeare in his play demonstrates the use of manipulation though the main character Hamlet. Hamlet acts mad in order to manipulate Ophelia into believing he is gone crazy. Hamlet planned to create a dominos effect that would start with Ophelia thinking he has gone mad which would lead her to pass this information onto Polonius further passing it onto Claudius. His actions are illustrated through this quote from the text, “Alas, my lord, I have been so affrighted!... My lord, as I was sewing in my closet, Lord Hamlet, with his doublet all unbraced; No hat upon his head; his stockings fouled, Ungarter’d, and down-g...
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, “Hamlet”, Hamlet discovers the truth about his father’s recent murder. Hamlet learns that his uncle and newly crowned king, Claudius, is his father’s murdered and promises to avenge him. Many characters in the play appear to be honest and sincere but in reality are filled with mischievousness. The them of appearance versus reality is a constant theme throughout the play. Four particular characters in the play hide behind a mask of evil. Hidden behind this mask are Polonius, King Claudius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. While behind this mask Polonius, King Claudius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern appear to be pure and trustworthy but on the other side they are filled with evil and dishonesty.