Is The Juxtaposition In King Henry's Soliloquy

534 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on king henry iv part 1

Shakespeare shows King Henry to be a politician who practices deceit by juxtaposing his expressed intentions with his ulterior motives in the plays opening monologue. The expressed intention is one that preaches unity, as is conveyed when King Henry IV denounces war as “civil butchery”, which is a clear indication of an anti-war sentiment, highlighted through the use of ‘butchery’ and its negative connotations of brutality. Moreover, when King Henry IV declares “those opposed eyes” are “all of one nature”, the synecdoche represents the idea that he is against war, which is reinforced by the ironic juxtaposition of ‘opposed’ and ‘one’, which alludes to his view on the absurdity of the conflict. The ulterior motive of King Henry IV is soon after …show more content…

Prince Hal is initially portrayed as being incapable of princely responsibilities in light of his drinking, robbery and trickery. Yet, Shakespeare reveals that Hal is in fact only constructing this false impression for the purpose of deceit. Prince Hal’s manipulative nature is evident in his first soliloquy, when he professes his intention to “imitate the sun” and “break through the foul and ugly mists”. The ‘sun’ Prince Hal seeks to ‘imitate’ can in this case be understood as his true capacity, as opposed to the false impression of his incapacity, which is symbolised by the ‘foul and ugly mists’. The differentiation of Hal’s capacity into two categories of that which is false and that which is true reveals the duplicity of his character. Moreover, Hal is further shown to be manipulative in the same soliloquy by explaining his tactic of using the “foil” of a lowly reputation against his true capacity to “attract more eyes” and “show more goodly”. The diction of “eyes” symbolically represents public deception, concluding political actions are based on strategy. It is through representation and textual form that we obtain insight into this

Show More
Related

  • Trickery and Deception in Much Ado about Nothing

    1678 Words  | 4 Pages

    An exploration of Shakespeare’s presentation of trickery and deception in his play ‘Much Ado about Nothing.’

    Read More

  • How Is Hamlet A Noble Prince In A Corrupt World

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ever since I was acquainted with tragic plays, I fell in love with the ideas, concepts, and even moral beliefs of these tragic style writers.  Having never truly understood or read any of William Shakespeare's work, it was hard to see where he was coming from.  After reading and analyzing Hamlet, my first instincts depicted Shakespeare as a dramatist who was bent on creating an overly tragic, unfathomable drama.  That is why this essay is based around defending the opinion that "Hamlet is a noble prince who suffers from a corrupt world that is not suitable to his sensitive moral nature."  By doing this, the original implications will hopefully be disproved.  Maybe in the end, it will bee seen where Shakespeare is coming from in this enigmatic play.

    Read More

  • Claudius Betrayal In Hamlet Essay

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, the revelation of Claudius’ betrayal of the late King Hamlet becomes the causation of a slippery slope of events that revolve around a revenge on Claudius for his betrayal against the late King. Consequently, this key act of betrayal forms the plays overall theme of revenge while also showing the connection between power and corruption and the idea that ‘”what goes around, comes around.”

    Read More

  • Honor in Henry IV, Part One

    2377 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Henry IV, Part One Shakespeare revels in the opportunity to suggest the idiosyncracy of character through his command of a wide range of both verse and prose. As a result the play is full of rich and different character parts (Wells 141). Two in particular, Falstaff and Hotspur, hold diverse beliefs concerning the main theme of the drama, honor. In Shakespeare’s time, honor was defined as the special virtues which distinguish those of the nobility in the exercise of their vocation–gallantry in combat with a worthy foe, adherence to the accepted code of arms, and individual loyalty to friends, family, and comrades in arms (Prior 14). Throughout the play, honor plays an important role in differentiating characters, yet, ultimately the reader ponders what place can honor have in a world in which subjects rebel against a usurper king whom they placed in office, the prince plays at robbery with a dissolute knight, and the contending parties in government seem guided by "policy" rather than "principle"? (Prior 14). The reader is invited to think about the concept of honor in a variety of contexts as it pertains to the different views of Falstaff and Hotspur. The pursuit of honor is Hotspur’s chief motivation and goal, yet his obsessive commitment becomes dangerous as the quest for honor blinds him from all else. Falstaff’s concept of honor directly contrasts that of Hotspur: to Falstaff, honor is rejected due to its limitations of life and seen as empty and valueless. To Hotspur, honor is more important than life itself, and his blind pursuit of honor ultimately drives him to his death. While he stands for images and ideals, Falstaff hacks at the meaning of honor until he has stripped it to almo...

    Read More

  • King Henry's Use Of Literary Devices In Act 1 Scene 2

    326 Words  | 1 Pages

    For my close-reading essay assignment, I have chosen lines 290-310 from Act 1, Scene 2 of Henry V as my passage for explication. This particular text was selected because of the many literary elements that I was able to unveil while analyzing it earlier. For example, the fact that there are several hyperboles, strong diction and tone, and an anaphora all within this passage signify how symbolic it is. Through King Henry’s usage of different forms of literary elements in his monologue, it sets the base for a more profound and thought-provoking dialogue about the significance of his tirade, and why he chose to include such barbaric language when addressing the Dauphin’s messenger. Additionally, this scene epitomizes King Henry’s violent and hot-headed

    Read More

  • Hamlet Formal Essay

    847 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many characters present in William Shakespeare’s, Hamlet, showcase their intelligence in a variety of ways throughout the play. One character in particular is the greatest example of this familiar quality. Through a variety of mediums such as deceit, schemes, and personal development, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, proves himself as an exceptionally intelligent character. Initially, Hamlet’s intelligence is displayed through his development of schemes such as calculated false madness, and staged traps. Secondly, through knowing which colleagues to trust, and mentally distancing himself from those whom he cannot, Hamlet’s superior intellect is seen utilized once again.

    Read More

  • A Man is Born Free and Everywhere He is in Chains

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to “The Prince”, a book written by an Italian politician named Machiavelli; that in order to be a good leader, the prince must understand the notion of appearance vs. reality. That is to say, it is good for a prince to be manipulative but he needs to appear good to the public. In Elizabethan politics, this notion is often rejected and the term “Machiavellian villain” is given to people who share similar traits with the “Prince”. In this passage, one may argue that through Macbeth’s uncertainly in his language, he is driven mad with ambitious thoughts by his surroundings rather than being someone who is inherently evil with the characteristics of a Machiavellian villain.

    Read More

  • The Relationship between Hamlet and the Bible.

    2425 Words  | 5 Pages

    It may appear that anything could be twisted into a typological pattern. Such interpretations appear to suffer from the structuralist faults of skating too lightly over actual texts, ignoring details that cannot be forced into a preconceived mold, and robbing narratives of their concrete shapes through abstraction. I would stress that there is more to Shakespeare than typology, but I would also insist that typology is often an important part of his drama. To make this claim plausible, however, requires more detailed attention to the text of his plays. In what follows, I will call attention to the textual and dramatic details that justify a typological reading of Hamlet.

    Read More

  • King Henry Iv Part 1

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme of the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play. Through characterization Shakespeare explores moral conflict, and passage three is a prime example of Falstaff’s enduring moral disorder. By this stage in the play Hal has ‘reformed’, moved away from his former mentor Falstaff and become a good and honourable prince.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of King Henry V: Spiritual Or Scheming

    1149 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout Henry V, Shakespeare explores the relationships of King Henry of England. When considering his character, Henry’s relationships are called into question: is he using his associates for his personal gain or is he truly devout in his acclaim to God? The differing interactions with his people, his enemies, and the clergy reflect on his genuine motives. The strong comparison of his pious and conniving actions are evident while conversing with all his acquaintances. King Henry’s relationships bring to light the contrast between his piety and his utilitarian rule.

    Read More

  • Branagh's Interpretation Of Henry V

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    In any of Shakespeare’s works much is left up to interpretation. His plays, though teeming with masterful dialogue, are severely lacking when it comes to stage directions. Seldom can any stage directions, aside from ‘enter’ and ‘exeunt’, be found; furthermore, there is rarely, if ever, any mention of a character’s emotions. Because of this distinct feature of Shakespeare’s plays, directors are essentially given carte blanche regarding set design, actions, and character emotions. Kenneth Branagh makes many interesting decisions in his interpretation of Henry V. Some of the most important decisions made by Branagh are in regards to the character development of King Henry, played by Branagh himself. Two scenes in particular stand out: Henry’s

    Read More

  • Character Analysis Of Prince Hal In Henry IV, Part 1

    1590 Words  | 4 Pages

    In William Shakespeare’s play Henry IV, Part 1 Prince Hal is a young man who is trying to find his way while dealing with the pressures of the crown. Like many teenagers Hal has reached his rebellious stage, and spends his time with a group of rogues. Hal experiments living life as a commoner, drinking his days away, playing jokes on his companions, and committing crimes. The weight of his responsibility ways heavily on him, and his father, King Henry, is disappointed with the way he spends his time. So Hal feels he must make excuses for his behaviour; however, everything he does helps to shape him into a man who puts the good of the kingdom ahead of himself. Prince Hal is a young man who is trying to find his way, and must put his childish

    Read More

  • Essay on Falstaff in Henry IV Part I

    2514 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Henry IV Part I, Shakespeare presents a collection of traditional heroes. Hotspur’s laudable valor, King Henry’s militaristic reign, and Hal’s princely transformation echo the socially extolled values of the Elizabethean male. Molding themselves after societal standards, these flat characters contrast Sir John Falstaff’s round, spirited personality. Through Falstaff’s unorthodox behavior and flagrant disregard for cultural traditions, Shakespeare advocates one’s personal values above society’s.

    Read More

  • The Theme of Deception in The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare

    375 Words  | 1 Pages

    William Shakespeare attained literary immortality through his exposition of the many qualities of human nature in his works. One such work, The Merchant of Venice, revolves around the very human trait of deception. Fakes and frauds have been persistent throughout history, even to this day. Evidence of deception is all around us, whether it is in the products we purchase or the sales clerks' false smile as one debates the purchase of the illusory merchandise. We are engulfed by phonies, pretenders, and cheaters. Although most often associated with a heart of malice, imposture varies in its motives as much as it's practitioners, demonstrated in The Merchant of Venice by the obdurate characters of Shylock and Portia.

    Read More

  • The Theme of Actors and Acting in Hamlet

    1907 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many would perceive madness and corruption to play the most influential role in Hamlet. However, it could be argued that the central theme in the tragedy is Shakespeare's presentation of actors and acting and the way it acts as a framework on which madness and corruption are built. Shakespeare manifests the theme of actors and acting in the disassembly of his characters, the façades that the individuals assume and the presentation of the `play within a play'. This intertwined pretence allows certain characters to manipulate the actions and thoughts of others. For this reason, it could be perceived that Shakespeare views the `Elsinorean' tragedy as one great puppet show, "I could see the puppets dallying".

    Read More

More about Is The Juxtaposition In King Henry's Soliloquy

Open Document