Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on identity
Solipsism is the theory that oneself is the only known entity to exist and thus has various moral implications that allow one to justify their maltreatments of others. Vladimir Nabokov’s controversial novel Lolita delves into the outlandish mind of Humbert Humbert, an aging and obsessive man with a very peculiar taste in romantic partners. He is a self-proclaimed lover of nymphets, specifically girls between the ages of nine and fourteen. Along with this, Humbert also demonstrates a solipsistic worldview which in turn makes him view everything that happens around him solely from his point of view, as he is sure that his mind is the only thing that exists. This tendency from Humbert marks everyday happenings as acts of fate and the people he …show more content…
Moore dubs Humbert as a “deceiving individual” because Humbert seems to speak in two different voices, which is representative of his solipsistic worldview (Moore). He goes on to say that Humbert’s first voice represents facts and reality while creativity characterizes his second voice. Humbert’s second voice is merely a tactic employed to distract his audience from the morally unacceptable actions he ensues. Moore goes on to say that Humbert “is in character when his sense of entitlement presumes that he fools an intellectually enfeebled readership with burlesques of various forms of narrative” (Moore). Instead of characterizing Humbert as schizophrenic, Moore believes that Humbert knows that he opts to use two voices, utilizing the latter one as an act. He becomes a magician of words and can hide the disgusting truth behind linguistic tricks. Moore goes on to reference Humbert saying, “Oh, my Lolita, I have only words to play with!” (Nabokov 32), calling it “a truism seasoned with wistful lyricism.” However, the only truth that Humbert can offer up is still sugar-coated artistic language as an attempt to coerce his audience into believing his horrific
The second instance of Humbert goes into a mental asylum he manipulates the doctors making them believe false diagnoses. He gets a certain joy from tricking the doctors. Humbert describes the joy:
In this extract, Nabokov’s use of wordplay is evident, notably through the repetition of “H.H” in the protagonist’s name and the name of Lolita’s deceased father. The use of this repetition aligns the characters into the same role, as both older male figures in the novel. Moreover, the idea of Humbert as a father figure to Lolita is noteworthy as, due to her biological father’s death, she is notably absent of such a figure in her life and would, therefore, look to Humbert to fill that role. However, Humbert is shown to believe that Lolita’s feelings towards him are sexual, most evident where he claims that she seduces him in the motel room, which may not be the case and may be an altering of the truth on Humbert’s part. This links to the extract
Franz Kafka’s character Gregor Samsa and T.S. Eliot’s speaker J. Alfred Prufrock are perhaps two of the loneliest characters in literature. Both men lead lives of isolation, loneliness, and lost chances, and both die knowing that they have let their lives slip through their fingers, as sand slips through the neck of an hourglass. As F. Scott Fitzgerald so eloquently put it, “the loneliest moment in someone’s life is when they are watching their whole world fall apart, and all they can do is stare blankly”. Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis and T.S. Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” are both exceptional examples of such lonely moments. Both authors use characterization, imagery, and atmosphere to convey the discontentedness and lack of fulfillment in the life and death of both Samsa and Prufrock.
But the most significant aspect of Humbert's description of Lolita in this passage, the controlling idea guiding it, is Lolita's loss of innocence. There is a ...
The relationship between Humbert Humbert and Lolita is no doubt a unique one. Many people who read the novel argue that it is based on "lust", but others say that Humbert really is in "love" with Lolita. However, there is some astounding evidence that Humbert has an obsessional-compulsive disorder with Lolita. The obsession is clearly illustrated when Humbert's actions and behavior are compared to the experts' definitions and descriptions of obsession. In many passages, Humbert displays obsessional tendencies through his descriptive word choice and his controlling personality. Many people are obsessive, so this is not an alien subject. We see it everyday in the entertainment industry as well as in everyday life. Comparing Humbert Humbert to clinical and other definitions, it seems as if Humbert is one person who is an obsessed person.
In 1958, Vladimir Nabokov created two of the most unrelenting characters in the history of literature: Humbert Humbert and Lolita Haze. His narrator's voice and main character, Humbert Humbert, explains the complex story of a man and his obsession. To set this book off from other books about obsession, Nabokov gives Humbert possibly the most socially unacceptable obsession of all: pedophilia. This obsession leads Humbert on a cross country journey to find his precious Lolita upon the discovery that she has run away and decided to marry. It is this Lolita that causes much of the controversy in the book. Is she an innocent child who is caught up by a wave of "Humbertism" that seems to control her life? Or is she simply an adult in a child's body who plays off of Humbert's obsession to gain things for herself? The answer is one that involves not only an analysis of the text, but also an analysis of the context in which the text is read. It is this analysis of context that will supply a new appreciation for not only the basic plot of Lolita, but also the underlying satire that riddles the book.
Moore, Anthony R. "How Unreliable Is Humbert In Lolita ?." Journal Of Modern Literature 25.1 (2001): 71. Academic Search Premier. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
In the novel, Nabokov introduces Humbert, a man with appeal and dignity. Yet shortly after reading the novel I began to learn to find he is a sexually disturbed man, lusting for young “Nymphets”. Humbert’s mind is always on his first true love, young Annabel. Humbert describes Annabel with having “honey-colored skin, thin arms, brown bobbed hair, long lashes, and big bright mouth (Lolita 11).” This is how the word “Nymphet” was put to work, Humbert words for his Annabel becomes his outline for the rest of the Nymphets. Humbert considers all his nymphets as a sexual objects for his enjoyment because he is a man who wishes to dominate these girls at such a young and delicate age. “And she was mine, she was mine, the key was in my fist, my fist was in my pocket, she was mine (Lolita 125)” Although this quote is a little later in the book you can almost hear the excitement from Humbert’s voice that he has successfully gained the control ...
Critics support Lolita’s censorship because they believe protagonist Humbert Humbert’s approval of pedophilia goes unnoticed, even though it is immoral. Critics regard Humbert as an unreliable narrator as he is writing from a jail cell with nothing to do but make excuses for himself. In this way, he paints Dolores Haze, the twelve-year old with whom Humbert is romantically and sexually involved with, as a predator and himself the victim of seduction. This degradation of an innocent child causes anger in critics because in the mindset of most Americans, an older man has more power and sexual drive than a twelve-year old girl. In his blaming of Dolores as the one who initiated sex between the two, Humbert is giving other pedophiles and child molesters a justification to blame innocent children for their evil. Mathew Bruccoli, when commenting on Humbert’s characterization, states, “The way in which Humbert portrays Lolita, for example, weakens her presence and therefore minimizes readers' response to his treatment of her” (1). Those in favor of censorship also present the argument of th...
Humbert, in his flowery description of Lolita, uses the word "nymphet" to refer not only to her but also to other girls of her age and characteristics. Little girls that came his way before Lolita, he describes as nymphets too. The purpose of this analysis will be to discover what exactly Humbert refers to as a nymphet in the novel Lolita in relation to the type of image today's society sees as a nymphet with the goal of establishing whether or not the novel portrays the influence of a nymphet. It will attempt to find the similarities and differences between the image of a nymphet that Lolita portrays and the real life image of today.
In his "On a Book Entitled Lolita", Vladimir Nabokov recalls that he felt the "first little throb of Lolita" run through him as he read a newspaper article about an ape who, "after months of coaxing by a scientist, produced the first drawing ever charcoaled by an animal: this sketch showed the bars of the poor creature's cage." The image of a confinement so complete that it dominates and shapes artistic expression (however limited that expression may be) is a moving and powerful one, and it does, indeed, reflect in the text of Lolita. Humbert Humbert, the novel's eloquent poet-narrator, observes the world through the bars of his obsession, his "nympholepsy", and this confinement deeply affects the quality of his narration. In particular, his powerful sexual desires prevent him from understanding Lolita in any significant way, so that throughout the text what he describes is not the real Lolita, but an abstract creature, without depth or substance beyond the complex set of symbols and allusions that he associates with her. When in his rare moments of exhaustion Humbert seems to lift this literary veil, he reveals for a moment the violent contrast between his intricately manipulated narration and the stark ugliness of a very different truth.
Lolita, by Vladimir Nobakov follows the story of doomed Humbert Humbert, a “nympholept”, as he courts a young girl named Lolita. Throughout the novel, Humbert thinks, says, and does things that a normal person would not. His actions make many a reader question whether or not Humbert is mentally sane. By observing his actions in Lolita, it is very easy to see that he is not sane; in fact, he most definitely has at least two psychological disorders. Unfortunately, these disorders do not excuse his actions. However, they do help explain them. Whilst these mental illnesses do not explain everything, they open a window that lets us see what really goes on in our infamous pedophiles head.
...n dishonesty and manipulation. Humbert is now creating vivid dreams to be deconstructed solely for his amusement and openly mocking Freud. “Primal scenes” was a term coined by Freud during the early 20th century that is used to describe a child’s first exposure to sexual acts. Humbert is concocting primal scenes and allowing psychiatrists to dispense meretricious worth to them. The establishment of Freudian dichotomy has created an individual externally and internally stripped of humanity and left only with the attributes of a demonized man.
Nabokov’s word choice enables the deep thought that is necessary to understand what the selected four lines of the afterword of Lolita say about trying to decipher if a novel “glows” or not (Nabokov 75). Nabokov’s images about the
There is a difference between the real love you have for someone and the unhealthy obsession you have over a person. In Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov the main character, Humbert, has an obsessive disorder. He is fascinated with nymphets, who are young girls between the age of nine and fourteen. The novel follows the journey of Humbert as he pursues young women.. Humbert completely neglects any feelings that he has toward the older women and even seems to be oblivious to his own aging. He is not only physically obsessed with nymphets but he is also emotionally obsessed. His obsession consumes him and he has little control over his feelings and impulses and does not think of the morality of his actions. When Lolita is taken from Humbert, he goes insane and becomes willing to give up his life for her. Humbert illustrates his obsessiveness through his word choice and also his manipulative personality. Humbert attempts to cover up the disturbing truth of his obsession with the nymphets. Through the characterization of Humbert, it is illustrated that one’s obsessive behavior can lead one to