Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is emotional intelligence
Interpersonal dimensions of emotional intelligence
The relationship between emotional intelligence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is emotional intelligence
Everyday life is always full of events that a person can organize and enjoy through the ability to think, to determine, to analyze and to feel. Logic and emotions are tightly connected in different senses of human life: at home doing common things, while studying or working, while driving back home, organizing a trip. Logic can be examined as a studying course in the framework of philosophy, or as a method of reasoning in everyday life. It dates back to Ancient Greece and Rome and still develops applying its rules to everyday life. By logic a person can more precisely and purely help to build the argumentation of some statements, as well as it can help to estimate other people arguments and to criticize. Emotions are part and parcel of everyday life and they are in dialectical interaction with logic. Some scholars research the topic of logic in emotions trying to study approaches and mechanisms of their appearance.
Logic is relevant in everyday life as it is related to performance of different kinds of works and professions. For example, being an air controller in the airport does not permit a person to be guided by emotions, because of responsibility and a duty to follow instructions clearly and strictly. Logic helps to construct reasoning and to make conclusions logically. It is important in science, law, technology (Introduction to Logic, 2014). At the same time, for some professions like an actor that cannot be imagined without expressing emotions, or an art critic that has subtle understanding of beauty, esthetics, or a chef that has delicate perception of tastes and of esthetics of food, logic is less important. For such creative people logic is present in performing technical and obviously needed actions to achieve result b...
... middle of paper ...
...en logic and emotions do not seem problematic when they are balanced: every person and audience has different range of perceptions of emotion or logic (The Rule of Balance, n. d.). In everyday life these tensions can be seen when a person buys something, for example, a new car. In this case a person is guided by emotions reflecting on desire and wishes and by logic when reflecting on price and better option for purchase. According to Solomon (1977) emotions are not a set of brainless or “stupid drives”, because he considered them as a “judgment” that interprets experience. Consequently emotions are “extremely subtle, cunning, sophisticated, cultured, learned, logical and intelligent” (Solomon, 1977). Emotions are something that can move a person, whereas logic is a reason for decision. They cannot be separated, as well as emotions cannot be stated as inappropriate.
Many fatal consequences, caused by illogical reactions to problematic situations, can be avoided through a few easy, simple and “common sense” steps. In the essay “Deadly Mind Traps” author Jeff Wise writes to the everyday man and woman. Mr. Wise in his essay explains how the average person can make deadly mistakes even though logically they make little sense. Wise, offers multiple key terms to help the reader better understand his reasoning for his thesis. As well as, Wise produces multiple examples for the reader to connect the key terms to real life situations. Moreover, Wise not only gives key terms and examples to support his thesis he also gives examples of how to stay out of those situations. Wise from his essay demonstrates that his reader is an everyday person by using words such as we, us, you and our. And he uses everyday simplified words and terms which suggest inclusion instead of exclusion.
This paper will examine Robert C. Solomon's Emotions and Choices article, to best identify what anger is, and to what extent a rational human being is responsible for their anger. Firstly, Solomon's argument must be described. A quick summation of Solomon's argument can be found in the following four points: Emotions are judgements, emotions are chosen, emotions serve a purpose, and emotions are rational.1 To quote Solomon, he explains that “Emotions are not occurrences, and do not happen to us. They ... may be chosen like an action.”2
Logic affects our lives everyday. We use it both subconsciously and consciously to make decisions which can be as important as our careers, or as insignificant as what to eat for lunch. Logic can also be used in other ways. Ironically, others’ bad logic can result in us learning something just as much as we learn from our own bad decisions. This is shown in Monty Python’s Quest for the Holy Grail.
Logic is the language of reasoning. According to Kit Fine, a Professor of Philosophy, logic is a systematic way of explaining what makes an item valid (Films for Humanities and Science, 2004). As humans seek to validate their thoughts and find truth in the world, this science of reasoning is what allows us to develop conclusions, which can then be accepted as truths. Uniting mathematics, philosophy, language, and other disciplines together to help generate these widely accepted truths, numerous logical theories have emerged since the time of Aristotle to shed light on how our minds deduce and arrive at logical conclusions. Two such theories, Bayesian confirmation theory and syllogism can be used to provide humans with a means to more accurately and easily arrive at truthful conclusion.
Van Goozen, Stephanie H. M. (ed.). Emotions: Essays on Emotion Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, N.J., 1994
According to Maturana, logical contradictions are not serious mistakes because they are supposed to be prompt and plentifully solved. In contrast, emotional contradictions would be really dangerous, because they occur as an opposition between our doing and our desire, generating suffering and immobility. Nevertheless, it seems that he accepts the logical method as a philosophical and argumentative method because he uses logic...
In Chapter 4 of Lesbian Ethics, Sarah Hoagland argues that desire is a socially and politically constructed perception and that in today’s heterosexual society the current concept of desire forces and perpetuates the split between reason and emotion. Hoagland focuses on sexual desire, however her analysis can be applied to the desires of any person, object, or action. I will give an account of Hoagland’s view on desire, and reason and emotion; I will analyze three things that I desire: my career, developing a family, and making enough money for that family to live comfortably, why I desire them and how my desires are socially constructed; I will finish by determining, based on my analysis of desires, that I agree with Hoagland, that reason and emotion are inseparable and attempts to separate them are damaging.
First of all, it is important for us to know what logic in itself is. Logic comes from a Greek word “ logike”Firstly it describes the use of valid reason in performing an activity. Secondly it tends to name normative study of what reasoning is.Logic was studied in several civilizations from China to Greece.
A multitude of opinions are found on the subject: are emotions more a function of the heart or of the head? According to Antonio Damasio (1), emotions and feelings are an integral part of all thought; yet we as humans spend much of our time attempting to disregard and hide them. In the view of source (2), experience is the result of integration of cognition and feelings. In either view, it remains indisputable that emotions are not what we typically make them out to be: the unwanted step-sister of our cultural sweetheart reason. Reason in our culture denotes intelligence, cognition, and control. Emotions seems such a "scary" concept to our collective m...
Getting a result from a process of logical thinking does not mean that I cannot be emotional. I can also feel, to love someone or hate someone but I insist that emotions should be led by logical facts and the other way around. When it comes to real business, we should not let emotion clouds our judgments and we should get happy or furious by the facts that presented to us.
Emotion and cognition are intricately intertwined and hard to tell which is influencing us in our everyday lives. While the former are sometimes referred to as feelings and affects (this term would be used interchangeably with emotion in this article) or “hot cognition”, the latter is often thought as our reasoning, or “cold cognition” (Zajonc, 1980). However, it is quite evident from our day-to-day account of events that it’s always the emotional parts of life that catch our attention - especially the bad ones. For one thing, as a general phenomenon, bad news is considered more newsworthy and can easily attract more reader attention (Baumeister,
Before describing chosen theories, it is necessary to define the notion of “emotion”. Due to the definition that is made by a psychologist Hockenbury, emotion is “a complex psychological state that involves three distinct components: a subjective experience, a physiological response, and an expressive response” (Micallef-Trigona, 2014, n.p.).
The Logic of Care is a philosophic book. The book is written from a patient perspective. Therefore it is easy to understand and easy to read. This review is written for people working in the health care and for the patient’s movement. It is important that people in the health care start thinking about the choices the patients have to make.
After, one semester trying to understand what is logic about and how it works, finally, I understood that Logic is always present in our life.
From the moment they wake up, people experience events that trigger certain emotions. How people react to these events may depend on that person feels during that event. In terms of whether our emotions control us or we control our emotions, I believe that to some extent emotions control us. Because we cannot change how we feel in response to certain stimulus, emotions control us. However, people have some control over whether or not they act on their emotions. Emotions at that given moment can influence our actions. If people can control their reactions, then to some degree we are controlling our emotions. However, the prompts raises several important questions. How can one’s emotions alter other ways of knowing such as perception or reason?