Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature vs. nurture debate with regard to human development
Nature vs nurture on human development
Nature vs nurture on human development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The impact of genes and environment on human development has been a controversial debate for a long time. On one hand, some people claim that nature is the sole determiner of human development; on the other hand, others assert that nurture is the only determiner of human development. In this paper, possible roles of both biology and environment on cognitive abilities will be discussed through providing a balanced interpretation based on the text and relevant readings from the class. Nature’s influence is not limited to appearance but extends further than that. Studies have shown that people inherit cognitive abilities and temperament patterns from their parents. The new question in today's research is: to what extent does nature’s role play in the formation of a human personality and whether the environment can favorably or adversely affect one’s personality (Sigelman & Rider, 2009). There are 23 pairs of chromosomes in each individual’s heredity. Of these 23 pairs, 22 are similar in males and females. The 23rd pair determinates the sex of an individual. As it is seen in this case, the genes are the sole determiner of the sex of an individual (Sigelman & Rider, 2009). Even though some human body traits are only determined by genes, it is not that black and white in many cases. For example, in a study by Bouchard and McGue (1981), the intellectual abilities of some family members are compared to reveal the degree of interaction between genes and environment. According to this study, the average correlation between identical twins is 0.86 if they are raised together and 0.72 if they are raised apart. The average correlation for fraternal twins who are raised together is 0.60 and those fraternal twins who are raised apart is 0.52. M... ... middle of paper ... ...cal characteristics (Sigelman & Rider, 2009). Let’s go back to the study by Grilo and Pogue-Geile (1991). In this study, the correlation for height between twin pairs is 0.80. Even if we assume that 80% of height is determined by genes, there is a huge 20%. Let’s suppose that your genes determined your height as minimum 5 feet. With a healthy diet, exercising, staying away from smoking, drugs, and excessive consumption of alcohol, the remainder 20% of environment factors may enable you to height up to 6.4 feet. Even though nature and nurture is still being a hot topic, in the light of recent research, most of the people now believe that both play a significant role in development. Instead of separating and handling their contributions one by one, it is more realistic to adopt a holistic approach and understand how these forces work together to make us what we are.
Life span development is “The concept of the lifelong process of development that is studied scientifically.” (Papalia, 2012, 5). I chose to observe the development on an individual named Zyrion Williams. Zyrion is African American boy, born in February of 2013. He is a very energetic toddler that is 2 years old (31 months). Zyrion family structure consists of a nuclear family. “Nuclear family is a household unit consisting of one or two parents and their children, whether biological, adopted, or stepchildren.” (Papalia, 2012, 11). He is raised by his mother, who is a single parent, and he also has an older brother that is 7 years old. To encourage his development he is currently attending daycare. Lapetite Academy is a childcare center where
Over the last couple of decades scientist, psychologist, and people have questioned over the idea, and the stereo typical question of nature versus nurture. Using twin studies, scientist have been given the understanding that the environment and heredity influence their behavior development. With using the adoption in twin studies, the doctors and scientists have been able to tell the extent to which the resemblance and families is due to the jeans that are shared and due to the environment that is shared. Because of the jeans that are identical carried by the monozygotic twins, identical twins, there has been a great appeal to most scientists and doctors. Psychologist have been able to link the strong genetic
Today, realising that genes and environment cooperate and interact synergistically, traditional dichotomy of nature vs. nurture is commonly seen as a false dichotomy. Especially operant conditioning, i.e. the learning of the consequences of one's own behavior can lead to positive feedback loops between genetic predispositions and behavioral consequences that render the question as to cause and effect nonsensical. Positive feedback has the inherent tendency to exponentially amplify any initial small differences. For example, an at birth negligible difference between two brothers in a gene affecting IQ to a small percentage, may lead to one discovering a book the will spark his interest in reading, while the other never gets to see that book. One becomes an avid reader who loves intellectual challenges while the other never finds a real interest in books, but hangs out with his friends more often. Eventually, the reading brother may end up with highly different IQ scores in standardized tests, simply because the book loving brother has had more opportunities to train his brain. Had both brother received identical environmental input, their IQ scores would hardly differ.
In a study done on the genetic and environmental factors influencing the emergence of these traits it was shown that both of these play large factors. The researchers studied one hundred and twenty-three pairs of identical twins and one hundred and twenty-seven pairs of fraternal
"There can be of course no serious doubt that differences in environment experiences do contribute to variation in IQ [5]. The environment is made of circumstances, objects, and conditions by which a human, animal, plant or object are surrounded in science. It has been argued that the environment in a child's developing years could in fact be a factor that will determine this IQ. In a study of adoptive and biologically related familys psychologist Scarr and Weinberg recognized that with children between 16 and 22 years of age, environment was more powerful in influencing IQ level in the young child, than the young adult. Scarr and Weinberg reasoned that "environment exerts a greater influence on children, who have little choice; as they age, diversity age, diversity and availability of choices expands, and if these choices are at least partially determined by genetic factors, the influence of environment is there by diminished.
In the traditional fashion, a researcher might use a set of twins to conduct an observation in which the biological and environmental effects are determined and sorted through. In a more complex nature, the presence of the 21st chromosome is associated with mental retardation; however, the brain processes that affect it are not clear yet. Many researchers have determined that genetics are the cause for many physical behaviors. A growing concentration on genes and behavior has many more considering the belief that genetics is a great factor in determining human behavior.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
Heritability estimates from the most recent twin studies are as high as 83%. (Niemi, Suvisaari,
The level of genetic influences on a person’s behavior is called the heritability of the behavior. Based on previous research intelligence as measured by IQ scores is thought to be attributed mostly to genetic influences. However it has been suggested by several researchers that genetic influences are moderated by the environment a person grows up in. There have been several studies that have explored the effects of environmental effects on heritability. However these studies have been methodologically limited because they did not have a large enough sample size or they did not measure the zygosity of the twins they use. Other studies measured change in heritability across different birth cohorts. However these studies might have been influenced by the different circumstances that might have been present during the different time periods these people lived in.
Child growth and development is a process that consists of some building blocks, which are components that combine in an infinite number of ways (Cherry, n.d.). As a result of the variations of building blocks in a child’s development, educators, psychologists, and philosophers have been constantly engaged in the debate of nature versus nurture debate. Many researchers agree that child development is a complex interaction between his/her genetic background (nature) and his/her environment (nurture). In essence, some developmental aspects are strongly affected by biology whereas other aspects are influenced by environmental factors. From the onset of an individu...
As numerous research and studies' findings have shown, both nature and nurture work together. These shouldn't be considered as separate, but instead intertwined, as they both interact and depend on each other. An interaction of genetic and environmental factors are responsible for influencing and determining intelligence levels.
Genetics determines simple things as the ultimate height of a person. “The entire genetic code of a human is determined by the unique combination of a mother’s single ovum (egg) and a father’s single sperm” (Mossler, 2011). Therefore every person on the earth is a combination of their biological parents who in turn are a combination of their biological parents and the chain goes on and on. Genes are an important foundation of how one becomes and how they will develop from childhood to adulthood.
Where nature refers to how heredity of genes influences development. And Nurture refers to environmental influences. “The basic question is: How much of any characteristic behavior or emotion is the result of genes and how much is the result of experience?” (Berger, 2010, pg 5). Both biological and environmental factors work together to influence human development over an entire life span. “Exclusivity stems directly from the idea that only nature and nurture make us who we are. This leads to a paradigmatic requirement. No influences exist other than genetics and environment. (McLafferty, 2006, pg 177). In the real world having only two variables effecting development is
In the study of child development, nature and nurture are two essential concepts that immensely influence future abilities and characteristics of developing children. Nature refers to the genetically obtained characteristics and abilities that influence development while nurture refers to the surrounding environmental conditions that influence development. Without one or the other, a child may not develop some important skills, such as communication and walking. The roles of physiological and psychological needs in a person’s life are also crucial for developing children. Humanistic psychologist, Abraham Maslow, suggested that humans don’t only aim towards survival, but also aim towards self-actualization (Rathus, P. 94).
The problem of heredity and environment must be thought of not only as specific to each characteristic and to each environment, but as specific to each individual in respect to each of his characters and to each factor of environment. We cannot speak of a good or of a bad environment except in terms of a particular characteristic of particular individual and particular environmental factors ( John Mcleish).