Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Synopsis of the book Thief
The book thief analysis
Synopsis of the book Thief
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
At one point in time, it is inevitable for one to experience character building struggles. How these struggles affect individuals depends not only on themselves, but on those who suffer these burdens alongside them; whether they are literally going through the same situation or they are someone that is confided in. In Markus Zusak’s novel The Book Thief, Liesel Meminger’s struggles against imposed laws and societal expectations effectively reveals the rebellious aspect of human nature. Rather than allowing these struggles to conquer her, Liesel keeps a tight grip on her closest of connections and allows them to fuel her to rebel against and reject what is forced upon her and stand out. She is empowered by her close familial, friendly and brotherly …show more content…
relationships. Throughout her childhood, Liesel holds many close relationships with her family.
Although she has to leave many family members behind in the past, she maintains deep connections to them on an emotional level. Liesel has also been able to build a very strong relationship with her foster family, to an extent where she treats them like biological kin. Even as she has gotten used to her new home and to her foster parents, Liesel still constantly thinks about her mother and continues to care deeply about her. When Liesel learns that Hitler took her mother away, she states bluntly and out of anger that she “hate[s] the Führer” (Zusak 115). With no more than these few words Liesel rebels, not merely against the Führer, but against societal standards. In Nazi Germany, everyone is expected to love Hitler and the Nazi party. They are expected to salute, not by hello or Guten Tag, but rather by “Heil Hitler” (50). This is taken very seriously by some; Frau Diller, an owner of “the corner shop at the end of Himmel street” (49) refuses to serve customers who enter her shop without saying “Heil Hitler”. One must also remember that Liesel once dreamt that “he crouched down and smiled at her” and then “she returned the smile” (20). This means, not only did she not hate Hitler, but she also admired him and wanted him to recognize her. Out of affection towards her mother , Liesel changes her views towards the Führer, rejecting social and political standards; it is only natural that her love …show more content…
for her mother outweighs the opinions of others and what she is supposed to think and do. Displayed prominently throughout the novel, the encouragement that Liesel retains from her close relationships does not only benefit others, but herself as well. At school, Liesel is known and made fun of as the girl who can not read, with even her teacher saying “she cannot do it” (76) when it is supposed to be Liesel’s turn to read; her teacher, someone who is meant to support and help the students, simply puts her down. This illustrates that the society expects and assumes that Liesel will never be at the reading level of someone of her age. However, Liesel continues to develop her ability to read during nightly sessions with her foster father, Hans Hubermann. Hans’ constant encouragement and display of affection towards Liesel fuels her to ignore what other people say and strive to her final goal. Though human beings are often victims of peer pressure and influence, the words and actions of encouragement of those closest to one will always have the biggest impact on one’s confidence, letting one rebel against labels and expectations set upon them by others. Although Liesel’s brother, Werner, appears but once in the novel, having died at the very beginning, Liesel remains closely connected to him and his memory spurs the beginning of her journey through the world of literature. The Grave Digger’s Handbook, the book that Liesel collected at her brother’s burial, is notably significant to Liesel. She constantly dreams about him and this book is “her last link to him” (38). Liesel’s urge to read this book was fueled by her need to reinforce this link, to avoid losing the connection she has with her dead brother. The content of the book is insignificant; it is the connection that she holds with it, on a deep, emotional level that matters. As with Hans, her brother, although dead, plants her goal of reading and writing as The Grave Digger’s Handbook was the first book she read, and the reading of this book was sparked by his memory. This is a goal that many people at her school, her teacher and her fellow classmates, as mentioned earlier, believed that she would never accomplish. This further emphasizes the nature of her rebellion against societal expectations being seeded from her close connections. As early as their first meeting, it was evident that Rudy Steiner and Liesel were bound to become best friends. They are very similar, in a way that separates them from the rest of society. When Liesel becomes aware of the “Jesse Owens incident” (56) she reacts very differently from the actual bystanders of the event. Rather than shunning him, as did the society whom are unaccepting towards people of colour, and lecturing him for his “act of childhood infamy” (56), this knowledge brings Liesel closer to Rudy, letting her accept him for the fact that he is not the same as everyone else. This shows that Liesel does not care about what the society thinks, she does not fall in line with them. Instead, she supports Rudy, both because of her love for him and because it is what she thinks is right. Liesel’s support of Rudy reveals the rebellious element of human nature as she rebels against the views and opinions of society illustrating that her care and compassion for her friend is much stronger than the influence of others. Thievery is a skill that both Liesel and Rudy acquire and develop throughout the novel. It is what “cements their friendship completely” and it is “driven by one inescapable force―Rudy’s hunger” (149). The fact that this, an action that goes against the law and the beliefs of the community, is what completely seals their friendship, demonstrates the strength of the trust that they have for one another and how either one of them is willing to take risks for the other’s well-being, particularly Liesel. She goes against what society perceives as right and begins to help Rudy steal food. To Liesel it is more important that her friend, who barely eats, gets food is, especially if those whom they are stealing from are fortunate people who already have enough and are well-nourished. This can be viewed as an act of kindness and compassion; however, according to law and societal expectations this a grave act of rebellious crime. The building of such a close friendship between Max Vandenburg and Liesel results in a relationship so close that it resembles that of two siblings.
Their relationship develops throughout the novel. They started as strangers when Max first stumbled into the Hubermanns’ house, then it developed as they started talking, “swapping nightmares”(220). As acquaintances, they would read together. Slowly they would become good friends, sharing wisdom and relying on each other. Liesel, at heart, is a very compassionate and caring person. She is willing to burden herself for the sakes of those close to her, telling her mother to come and get her if Max wakes up, to “scream out” and “start swearing” at her because “everyone will believe it” (319). The moment that her mother does so results in a slap on face from her teacher, Liesel, however is overjoyed, as a slap in the face means “Max is alive” (333). She is selfless in her actions towards her friends and brotherly figure, Max, in particular. It is a social and political expectation that all Germans detest the Jews. Liesel’s care for Max outweighs her care for following the rules leading her to rebel against them. Her care for Max is further emphasized by the fact that she is willing get humiliated in front of everyone and getting slapped for the sake of knowing that he is
alive. Liesel’s decision to get injured at the soccer game was based solely off her strong emotions and urge to protect Max; she began to panic, “come on, Liesel, think, think”(340). Her panicked emotions lead her to the solution of getting injured to warn her family. Once again, the fact that he is a Jew fails to affect her decisions to love and protect him, although according to laws and social standards, it should. The fact that he is a Jew and is fragile rather enhances her caring emotions for Max and fuels her rebellious urge to protect him The uninhibited nature of Liesel’s emotions is strongly demonstrated when Liesel runs at Max, in front of everyone, soldiers, civilians and Jews alike, careless towards what they see or believe, putting herself at risk, once again, for Max. Even when Max tells her to “let go” (511), for her own safety, she persists, getting physically thrown out. Still, Liesel went back to Max, which results in her brutal whipping. This is her most outright and rebellious act yet, as her rebellion in this particular situation is open and extremely evident to the population whilst, for the most part, Liesel’s rebellions have been secretive. Despite the fact that she had gotten kicked out multiple times, Liesel kept on going back to see Max. Driven by her care for Max, imposed laws and rules fail yet again, to keep her away from him. Countless times throughout Markus Zusak’s novel The Book Thief, Liesel exhibits the rebellious aspects of human nature through her struggles against societal and political standards. These acts of rebellion are fueled by those intimately connected to her, her family, Rudy Steiner and Max Vandenburg. Her rebellion against societal standards is something that everyone must follow. One must always keep close, tight connections with those that one loves and help them in anyway possible, even if it will go against what other people judge as ‘right’, going against these social standards for a better cause what proves to be more important. Although she is only a young girl, Liesel has a big heart and she can serve as a role model for everyone, young and old.
Elli talks about daily life in her neighborhood. Her mother does not show any compassion for her. When Elli complains of this, her mother brings up excuses that are unconvincing. Elli believes her mother does not care for her and that her brother is the favorite. Hilter’s reoccurring radio broadcast give nightmares to Elli, whos family is Jewish. The nights when the Hungarian military police would come and stir trouble did not provide anymore comfort for Elli. One night, her brother, Bubi, comes home with news that Germany invaded Budapest, the town where he goes to school. But the next morning, there is no news in the headlines. The father sends him back to school. He learns the next day that a neighbor’s son who goes to school with Bubi has said the same. The day after, the newspapers scream the news of the invasion. Bubi arrives home, and the terror begins.
Markus Zusak’s novel The Book Thief depicts the life of a certain young German girl named Liesel Meminger during World War II. Her story was told through the eyes of Death, who narrates both the blessings and devastation that occurred during that era. Liesel experiences living with her new foster parents and come across a boy named Rudy Steider who will later on become her best friend. As the story unfolds, Liesel gradually discovers the horrifying truth behind the Nazi regime as her foster parents take refuge of a Jewish man. Despite being in the midst of destruction and recently coping from her traumatic background, she undertakes on a journey of self-discovery and
Throughout the novel Liesel reaches new highs and new lows, overcoming her fears and succumbing to her anger. Liesel's sudden outburst at Ilsa Hermann after Ilsa asking to stop the laundry services caused her to finally accept her brother's death and even helped Ilsa accept her son's death as well. Ilsa's guilt consumed her and caused her to become a house ridden woman overcome by her grief while Liesel overcame her guilt and grief by learning how to read and write not allowing them to overcome her. "“It’s about time,” she [Liesel] informed her, “that you do your own stinking washing anyway. It’s about time you faced the fact that your son is dead. He got killed! He got strangled and cut up more than twenty years ago! Or did he freeze to death? Either way, he’s dead! He’s dead and it’s pathetic that you sit here shivering in your own house to suffer for it. You think you’re the only one?” Immediately. Her brother was next to her. He whispered for her to stop, but he, too, was dead, and not worth listening to. He died in a train. They buried him in the snow. […] “This book,” she went on. She shoved the boy down the steps, making him fall. “I don’t want it.” The words were quieter now, but still just as hot. She threw The Whistler at the woman’s slippered feet, hearing the clack of it as it landed on the cement. “I don’t want your miserable book. ”[…] her brother holding his
In The Book Thief, author Markus Zusak tells the tragic story of Liesel Meminger and her experiences in 1939 Nazi Germany. Zuzak incorporates compelling literary devices such as toe curling foreshadowing, personification, and vivid imagery in the form of simile and metaphors to grasp the readers’ interest. Zusak’s use of various literary devices helps to deepen the text and morals of the story, and makes the dramatic historical novel nearly impossible to put down.
Liesel experiences abandonment throughout her life, and the novel during a suppressed time in World War II Germany. Through her experiences Liesel’s learns to equate abandonment with love knowing that circumstance have forced her loved ones to leave her.
One may hear the words love and abandonment and believe they are opposites, but this is not the case in The Book Thief. Markus Zusak uses abandonment to bring together two characters. One night Liesel and Max reveal to one another their reoccurring nightmares. Liesel has a dream where she feels abandoned by her mother and brother while Max has a dream where he abandons his family. Even though Liesel is abandoned and Max is the abandoner they both feel the same way toward what had occurred to each of them. Through this sharing of nightmares comes a special unspoken connection between the two. Liesel and Max go from strangers to practically brother and sister who love one another, which may seem odd for the love came directly from abandonment. Liesel’s first encounter with abandonment came from her brother dying on the train on the way to Liesel’s foster home. Liesel was very upset and hurt by her mother and did not under stand why she was doing this until later. “She saw it all so clearly. Her starving mother, her missing father. Kommunisten” (Zusak 111) Liesel connected the dots and realized that her mother was married to a communist, which was a great danger during the reign of Hitler. Liesel came to comprehend that her mother gave her up to keep her safe and away from Hitler. Her mother did all of this out of love for her. All the pain and suffering that Liesel has gone through has been caused by
I chose this quote because as I said before, it was one that stuck with me throughout the book. Not the direct text of the quote, but what the quote means to me. I see it as, Liesel does not agree with the Nazi party and how they view and treat Jews, however, to ensure her safety she says a 'hail Hitler'. Actions like these, ones that the Germans do so that they don't angry the Nazi party and ensure they are safe. In the case of the Hubbermans, they are people that do these actions out of an obligation to fulfill their duties as Germans, the leaders of the Nazi party. They are not doing things like saying, "hail Hitler" to every German they see because they believe in Hitlers actions, but they were doing it to keep themselves and their family safe from the cruel acts of punishment. In the quote and many times in the book we can see examples of the hesitation of acting towards the German
Loss can be a heartbreaking experience or just an inconvenience. It is significant in both books because of what the characters loss or what the characters loose. Whether it is a family member or an object, all the losses have some significance to the war or symbolism. In the novel, the book thief Liesel loses her mother. “ There was a chaos of goodbye”(Zusak 25). “The sudden realization that this would all be for nothing - that her mother would never write back and she would never see her again.” (Zusak 99). These two quotes explain Liesel's loss of her mother. When Liesel joined her new family and she never got a letter back, she realized that her old life is behind her and she can never go back to her mother. Her mother is thought to have
1.The Grave Digger’s Handbook: Represents the last time Liesel saw her mother and her brother. It is the first book Liesel steals and reads, and it helps her start reading.
To begin, I personally don’t believe Liesel is wrong for stealing a book from the bonfire because it was going to be destroyed anyways. It shouldn’t harm or have a huge impact on someone else. The book could have been thrown out by someone who did not want it anymore. Her family cannot really afford books and Liesel is
Max showed her a side of the world that was technically forbidden for her German roots and family. Either way, her family housed a jewish person. Which was illegal at that time and punishable by death. Not a topic to take lightly. Anyways, Max wrote Liesel a book called “The Standover Man”. A quote from the book makes his story ironic. “It makes me understand that the best standover man I’ve ever known is not a man at all…” (Zusak, page 205, line 5-8) This is ironic because Liesel could be a man with her guts, but she is different. She doesn’t put up with any crap from anyone (but her parents of course), but she can also at the same time be very caring. She is as mean as an angry bull, but as nice as a caring mother with her newborn child. It’s kind of hard to think of any female being like that but that is how Liesel is
In Markus Zusak’s novel, Liesel does not like Hitler because he took her mother away from her. She is allowed to talk to Hans about her hatred of the Fuhrer because he agrees with her views, but she can not discuss this with anyone else, including her best friend, because most people in her country love Hitler and will either have Liesel, or Hans and Rosa, taken away or will have Liesel killed. She lived in a time where talking against her government result in extremely dire consequences. Her father, whom she idolized and told everything to, slapped Liesel when she told him she hated Hitler after his birthday celebration. Hans did stand up for what he believed in when hate crimes against Jews started. He helped a Jew fix his door after it had been vandalized and it...
Liesel’s mom leaves her with foster parents because she wishes to protect her from the fate she is enduring. The words Paula, Liesel’s mom, uses go against Hitler because she is a communist which resulted in her being taken away and Liesel to lose her mother and experience the loss of her. This shows Liesel experiences unhappiness because of her mother’s disappearance which is caused by the words she openly uses that contradicts Hitler.
“Like most misery, it started with apparent happiness” (84). In the beginning, we are introduced to the narrator by the name of Death. He informs the readers that he has many stories, but only remembers the ones that interest him. The tale of Liesel Meminger is one such tale, as he was always fascinated by her will to live through the most horrible instances. It should be duly noted however, that this story does not have a happy ending. Death makes this clear before we even have a chance to get our hopes up. He tells us that everyone dies; the amount of time that they last is truly the only difference. After this sordid fact is in place, he mentions just Liesel first attracted his attention.
Many people, such as Liesel, conform to societal expectations in public while keeping their rebellion in private most of the time. They do this to survive in a culture that persecutes anybody that they disagree with or disagrees with them. For example, “‘I hate the Führer,’ she said. ‘I hate him.’… ‘Don’t ever say that!’… ‘You can say that in our house,’ he said, looking gravely at Liesel’s cheek. ‘But you never say it on the street, at school, at the BDM, never!’’ (p. 115-116) This was when Liesel found out that the Nazis took away her mother for being a communist and was naturally upset. Her foster father, Hans Hubermann, slapped her for saying that, at