Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The emergence of feminism
Essay about the history of feminism
Essay about the history of feminism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The emergence of feminism
When I think about feminist, I can’t help myself but to think that feminist just hate men. After reading the book, Thinking about Women: The Sociological Perspective on Sex and Gender, I wondered if I was really a feminist. I went on Gotoquiz.com, a website that asked variety of questions to determine if someone was a feminist. I was appalled when the results said that I was a “full blooded feminist”. I believe in women’s rights and equality for all women around the world. Liberal feminism emphasizes the importance of equality for all people around the world, who can exercise individual freedom (Andersen, 367). However, liberal feminism does not explain the start of gender inequality, nor does it explain the effects of race and class stratification on women’s lives (Andersen, 382). Liberal feminist states …show more content…
that all people should have equal rights, but it doesn’t explain how it has different effects on subordinate groups like middle-class women and women of color. For example, if a white women were to fight for equal rights pay then she would only be at a disadvantage because of her gender, but privileged because of her race. However, African Women are heavily affected by race, class, and gender. Race, class, and gender make up the interlocking systems of oppression or the matrix of domination (Collins, p.3).
Collin states that when thinking about oppression, black feminist thought includes “paradigmatic shift” because it rejects additive approaches to oppression (Collin, p.1). This means that equality does not just start with gender then add other variables such as race, class, and sexual orientation. . Although, there are different forms of domination, they are all part of the “one overarching structure of domination.” (Collins, p. 2). Collin does not believe that oppression only occurs to black-white and male-female groups. Rather, oppression is related to age, sexual orientation, and ethnicity (Collin, p.3). Placing African-American at the center of analysis can open up new ways of thinking about feminism. For example, black feminist state that it would be difficult for them to remove race and sex oppression because it occurs to them simultaneously (Combahee River, p.3). Instead of focusing on how one group is affected the most, Collin’s matrix of dominance focuses attention on how these systems of oppression interconnect in different people’s
lives. The matrix of domination explains why feminism had become so divided. For instance, a person’s “matric of domination” will be very different depending on who they are. Collin’s matrix of domination rejects the ideal white liberal feminism because it ignores race and class factors when considering equality for women (Anderson, p.382). Collin states that “Each group speaks from its own standpoint and shares its own partial, situated knowledge” (Collin. P.11). This means that we learn to view our experiences as partial and unfinished. This also emphasizes that no one group can be placed at the center to speak on the behalf of all women. Therefore, I do not believe I am a liberal feminist, I am feminist who believes in the matrix of domination. I cheer for equality of all women and liberal feminism does not address issues pertaining to minority groups. All in all, liberal feminism cannot speak on the behalf of all women because different people experience different forms of oppression.
Collin thinks “race, class and gender represent the three system of oppression that most heavily affects African American women”. She also believes there are other groups than Black Women being affected by this oppression.
Collins, Patricia. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge, 2000
According to feminist Victoria L. Bromley, if feminism is about combating all forms of inequalities, including oppression, towards all social groups, then feminists must study how masculinity oppresses both men and women. Patriarchy, men’s powers and dominance, hegemonic masculinity, the idea that the “dominant group” in society is most powerful, and hyper masculinity, the exaggeration of the emphasis on male characteristics, all lead to oppression through multiple forms: privileges and unearned privileges, hierarchies of power and exclusion. Bromley argues that the feminist approach towards eliminating oppression, is to use an intersectional analysis, a theoretical tool used for understanding how multiple identities are connected and how systems
Focusing on gender as a construct that perpetuates inequality between men and women in society, the ideology of Feminism is based on the fundamental principles of Liberalism. While Feminism summarily promotes social, political, and economic equality between men and women, historically it’s fulcrum was and remains to a significant extent the fight for women’s rights and interests.
In the U.S., feminism is understood as the rights of women (usually affluent white women) to share the spoils of capitalism, and imperial power. By refusing to fully confront the exclusions of non-whites, foreigners, and other marginalized groups from this vision, liberal feminists miss a crucial opportunity to create a more inclusive and more powerful movement. Feminist movements within the U.S. and internationally have long since accepted that, for them, feminism entails the communal confrontation of not only patriarchy, but capitalism, imperialism, white supremacy, and other forms of oppressions that combine together and reinforce their struggle. It means the fighting for the replacement of a system in which their rights are negated in the quest for corporate and political profit. It includes fighting so that all people anywhere on the gender, sexual, and body spectrum are allowed to enjoy basic rights like food, housing, healthcare, and control of their labor.
Society has long since considered women the lessor gender and one of the most highly debated topics in society through the years has been that of women’s equality. The debates began over the meaning between a man and woman’s morality and a woman’s rights and obligations in society. After the 19th Amendment was sanctioned around 1920, the ball started rolling on women’s suffrage. Modern times have brought about the union of these causes, but due to the differences between the genetic makeup and socio demographics, the battle over women’s equality issue still continues to exist. While men have always held the covenant role of the dominant sex, it was only since the end of the 19th century that the movement for women’s equality and the entitlement of women have become more prevalent. “The general consensus at the time was that men were more capable of dealing with the competitive work world they now found themselves thrust into. Women, it was assumed, were unable to handle the pressures outside of the home. They couldn’t vote, were discourages from working, and were excluded from politics. Their duty to society was raising moral children, passing on the values that were unjustly thrust upon them as society began to modernize” (America’s Job Exchange, 2013). Although there have been many improvements in the changes of women’s equality towards the lives of women’s freedom and rights in society, some liberals believe that women have a journey to go before they receive total equality. After WWII, women continued to progress in there crusade towards receiving equality in many areas such as pay and education, discrimination in employment, reproductive rights and later was followed by not only white women but women from other nationalities ...
Throughout the waves of liberal feminism, there is a new characteristic to be associated with the feminist group. In the first waves, it’s white, married, wealthy women who fit the criteria to be a feminist. The first wave begins in 1900 and ends around 1920, during the times of the Suffragettes. This wave began to introduce the inequalities between men and women, especially relating to voting and education. The second wave began to rise in 1950 which introduced reproductive rights, entitlement to sex, marriage, jobs, social lives, and politics. This wave continued to the 1970’s. It’s not until the third wave, which hits in the 1990’s, when inequalities among women are introduced to the feminist movement (FYS Class Notes).
Among the many subjects covered in this book are the three classes of oppression: gender, race and class in addition to the ways in which they intersect. As well as the importance of the movement being all-inclusive, advocating the idea that feminism is in fact for everybody. The author also touches upon education, parenting and violence. She begins her book with her key argument, stating that feminist theory and the movement are mainly led by high class white women who disregarded the circumstances of underprivileged non-white women.
The matrix of domination sheds light on the invisible hierarchy that entwines both the homeless black man and the upper middle class white women in these situations. Collins’ matrix includes an individuals separate levels of social superiority in race, gender and social status and measures their level of oppression by all these factors, not by each characteristic individually. In this societies system, white is seen as superior to black, male superior to female, and wealthy superior to poor. The individuals exhibiting the least superior qualities thus are the most oppressed, and the individuals with the most superior qualities are the least oppressed. (Collins 228)
Ecofeminism deals with ecological and feminist analyses and movements. It shows the relationship between women and nature in the view of historically, human-earth, patriarchal social structures and world views interconnected with oppression of women and nature. Feminist analysis mainly focused on Liberal, Marxist or Socialist, Cultural, Radical, Post-colonialist and Post-modernist approaches. Political ideology of feminism makes an effort to make women a self-conscious category, and it gives a power to generate a rational sensible attitude towards women, an approach to view the women in their own positions as well as own perspectives. Eco-feminist movements look for non-violent solutions to world problems. They always consider that feminine
In this week's readings, the subjects that writers, feminist theorists, feminist advocates, and (or) professors Bell Hooks, Sara Ahmed, Roxane Gay, Mary E. Swigonski, Salome Raheim, Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards explores tend to be broad, but this is not necessarily a bad thing. The topics that resonated throughout the readings included feminist “movements” as micro-events, the loss of feminism’s two long-standing goals (political equality and personal freedom), the buzz phrase of the early radical groups, the exclusion of African American Women in the feminist's movement, the interconnection of Social Work and feminism, the feminist’s lifestyle and its complexities, and most importantly, the evolution of contemporary intersectional
One of the biggest stereotypes about feminists is that they want to abolish the patriarchy, a government run by men, and replace it with a matriarchy, a government run by women. As I previously mentioned, I consider myself a liberal feminist who does not have a problem living in a world with a patriarchal government, I just care that it allows rights and equality for women. Also, feminism is not meant to bash men in anyway, it is mainly focused on empowering women. Every female is different, some of them were destined to be society’s depiction of a woman - a housewife who stays at home as she raises her children, cooks, cleans the house, and run errands. However, some are destined to work in a professional career field, and we just want those women to be able to do that without being bashed or denied. Liberal feminists do not want to stop men from having these jobs, nor do they have anything against men, they just want it to become a norm for woman to do
Throughout history, women have remained subordinate to men. Subjected to the patriarchal system that favored male perspectives, women struggled against having considerably less freedom, rights, and having the burdens society placed on them that had so ingrained the culture. This is the standpoint the feminists took, and for almost 160 years they have been challenging the “unjust distribution of power in all human relations” starting with the struggle for equality between men and women, and linking that to “struggles for social, racial, political, environmental, and economic justice”(Besel 530 and 531). Feminism, as a complex movement with many different branches, has and will continue to be incredibly influential in changing lives. Feminist political ideology focuses on understanding and changing political philosophies for the betterment of women.
“The logical outcome of liberal feminism is a society that is not based on dividing people into two, and only two, separate and distinct sex-gender categories” (Lorber 45). This point is interesting to me because of the way that feminism is generally viewed in society. Many people believe that feminism is man-hating and that the movement is only interested in uplifting and empowering women and taking power away from men. While most of that statement is true, there is more to the goal of feminism than those factors. First of, feminism is man-hating, and while it is about taking power away from men, it is not about leaving men powerless. Feminism is inclusive, and is about equality between men and women, and equality for all genders and people. Society and the media needs to research the core value and what feminism is based on in order to eliminate this bad wrap that the movement is
Michael Levin, a professor of philosophy and author of the book Feminism and Freedom, faults feminism for trying to impose an inappropriate equality on men and women that conflicts basic biological differences between the sexes (Levin, Taking Sides, 42). Women are not the same as men, neither physically nor psychologically. In the past, men tended to be the stronger more powerful gender, while women have traditionally been viewed as the weaker, more feeble one. The untrue assumption that men and women are the same in their ways of thinking and physical capabilities leads to the failure of the feminist message. Their agenda of eliminating all observable differences between men and women is doomed to fail and will inflict more pain than gain in the process. Recognizing the differences between the sexes and allowing each to do what they are strongest at will in the long run make society stronger, more efficient, and more effective.