Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short essay on the age of exploration
Short essay on the age of exploration
Short essay on the age of exploration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short essay on the age of exploration
It seems that in at least in a historical context, letters should be considered a genre of their own. Indeed, a substantial amount of our knowledge from the past comes from such correspondence. Such letters provide not just the perspective of the actual person who is writing, but also the perspective of the entire cultural which the author is from. For example, letters made during the Age of Exploration generally detail the European sentiment towards the native people they were conquering. Another example can be letters from the Hellenistic Period, which present the view of a contemporary of this era living in a time of immense cultural diffusion. However, the feelings expressed in these letters vary, specifically when one examines both the …show more content…
One famous example of letters from this time period that express such a feeling are the ones Hernan Cortés wrote to Charles V on his escapades in Mexico. These letters not only allow the reader to experience the narcissism and self-importance that Cortės possessed, but also his crude and inhumane exploitation of the indigenous persons of the area. The letters also recount Cortés’ disapproval of the cultural norms of the Aztec people, which ultimately led to him usurping control of the land from them and slaughtering them. Obviously, the accounts of Cortés are laced with a deep resentment to a differing society and culture in which he could not bring himself to condone what in his mind were ridiculous and odious acts of sacrilege. There was little to no attempt by the Spanish conquistador to appreciate the culture of the Aztecs and see the beauty that they had to offer to the world. Granted, Cortés does mention that the Aztecs practiced human sacrifice which is inherently morally abominable, but nonetheless the eradication of a culture can be considered more a less just as …show more content…
It is true that in the being of Aristeas account, he refers to the Hebrews as “primitive men”, demonstrating an insensitive and ignorance to the ways of the Jews. However, once he arrives at the land of the Jews, Aristeas’ perspective of these people does change. In reference to the many questions the translators were asked by the king, Aristeas writes, “I admired these men tremendously, the way in which they gave immediate answers which needed a long time (to ponder) …” The predominate reason why his perspective does change is because Aristeas does take the initiative to actually learn about the Jewish heritage and practices, questioning the ones he finds strange instead of viewing it as utterly ridiculous. Aristeas may not agree with the views of the Jews, but he does have a reverence for their practices because of his inquiry. Additionally, he immerses himself in the culture during his stay with the Jews in Egypt, fully immersing himself in the beauty of their traditions. Indeed, Aristeas frequently comments on the elegance of Jewish
Cortes letter had the sound of someone attempting to explain or justify their actions. This is reasonable since we know that he had disobeyed orders. He wrote, “Having passed six days, then, in the great city of Tenochtitlan, invincible Prince, and having seen something of its marvels, though little in comparison with what there was to be seen and examined, I considered it essential both from my observation of the city and the rest of the land that its ruler should be in my power and no longer entirely free; to the end that he might in nowise change his will and intent to serve your Majesty, more especially as we Spaniards are somewhat intolerable and stiff-necked, and should he get across with us he would be powerful enough to do us great damage, even to blot out all memory of us here in the land; and in the second place, could I once get him in my power all the other provinces subject to him would come more promptly to the knowledge and service of your Majesty, as indeed afterward happened” (Cortes, 1929). Cortes was explaining his reasoning, and attempting to make it appear that he did the right thing. Also, the Florentine Codex’s tone was angry and spiteful. Then again, that is understandable seeing as how they had just lost their home. The codex said, “And the Spaniards walked everywhere; they went everywhere taking to pieces the hiding places, storehouses, storage places. They took all, all that they
In his letters, Cortés also gave justification and explanation of the actions he took in Mexico. He attempted this primarily through his portrayal of Montezuma’s system of governance as brutal and his people as disloyal to him. He described the apparent willingness of the peoples he encountered to abandon the Aztecs and swear allegiance to the King of Spain, “Although they were subjects of Montezuma. they had been reduced to that condition by force.and when they had obtained through me some knowledge of your Highness.
The perspective of another society is always subjective, especially when two completely different cultures interact for the first time. In Bernal Diaz del Castillo’s The History of the Conquest of New Spain, the first hand account illustrates a barbaric and pagan society where sacrifices are pervasive in everyday life. However, David Carrasco’s essays titled “The Exaggeration of Human Sacrifice” and “Human Sacrifice / Debt Payments from the Aztec Point of View” shed a significant amount of insight into the religious roles that human sacrifice played in Aztec society rather than the cruel and barbaric connotations which Díaz heavily implied. Based on the readings of Bernal Diaz del Castillo, Carrasco’s essays offered an outside perspective
...tence it at least allowed him to educate the natives about Christianity and that their experiences before now with the Europeans were not of a Christian nature. Throughout the letter, Las Casas seems careful to be very consistent and never veers from ensuring that his audience knows of the atrocities of the people of their own land to the natives fellow humans. God has a plan for everyone and this is not it.
The time and culture one lives in effects peoples’ thoughts, actions and writing. Writing affects the society it dwells in, this is Vico. These two writings are different, but can be contrasted to see great truths.
Ancient Greece has always been known as the civilization that created the mold of the Western society that we live in today. It had influenced the world in a way that no other civilization had. However, such a great civilization didn’t last long. The reason for this is its people failure to form unity.
Claudius letter to the Alexandrians was a valuable piece in Roman history that has given a personal insight into the social and political scene of Alexandria. Much has been said about the Jewish people of Alexandria, the most influential, as well as the most outspoken people in the community. Yet, the principal problem, which has provoked the publication of violent riots is the civic status that surrounds the Jewish people. While Claudius first discusses the statues, monuments, and temples that were given in his honor, he goes on to give his thoughts concerning the Jewish and Greek communities in Alexandria. From his decree we can infer that
The main point Hernando Cortés was trying to get through while writing his second letter was that he is dutiful and working for the King and for God. He also tries to tell of how the Indians are the ones forcing the Spanish to press attack because they do not want to conform to Cortés and convert to Catholicism. The quote “ I endeavoured to admonish them and treat them with peaceable words, the more fiercely they attacked us” describes how Cortés is basically saying convert or die. In his writing, Cortés describes the Natives as “a great multitude of people of such fury and skill in war” but says their skills are outmatched because God was fighting on the side of the Spanish. He claims his work is justified because “demands and protestations
There are three major shifts in ancient Greek sculptural development such as Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic. Each major shift is unique and has its own characteristics based on how Greeks perceived their natural and supernatural surroundings.
Ancient Greek culture first emerged around 1600 B.C. in Mycenae. This developed a powerful military and participated in a wide trading network. Over the next thousand years, Greek society organized itself into city-states. The most famous ones were Athens and Sparta. They served as centers of political, religious, and cultural life.
The Ancient Greek contribution ranged by the 1900-133 BC, however its influence on the Western Literate Society lasts to this day. As the Greeks expanded their empire, they spread their ideas to other countries, while also borrowing from other cultures. During this period of time, the Greeks made many significant and long-lasting contribution to our modern culture in Philosophy, Art, Democracy, Drama, Math, and Science. These givings of important ideas, inventions, and structures have had an extraordinary influence on the surrounding environment, society, and in the future. The essential contribution of Greeks to the Western Civilization are Democracy, Art, and Philosophy.
"When in Rome, live as the Romans do; when elsewhere, live as they live elsewhere." Have you ever wondered what it would be like to be a Roman or Greek? Well, Ancient Greece and Rome have influenced American society throughout the Roman Republic, Greek architecture, and Greek Olympics. There are many interesting facts you should know about Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome! Did you know that the first Olympic Games were held in 776 B.C. at the Greek city of Olympia? Or that the Colosseum received millions of visitors every year, and is the most famous tourist attraction of Rome? You can learn many things about how American society has been influenced by the Ancient Romans and Greeks.
Judaism and the Greco-Roman world had significant influences in early Christian communities. Each notably impacted the ways these communities defined themselves and related to the greater Greco-Roman culture in the earliest era of Christianity. As many authors and audiences in the New Testament were Jewish and lived in the Greco-Roman world, the connections between these communities and the earliest stages of Christianity are diverse and sometimes conflicting. The earliest Christian communities defined their identities in relation to Judaism and the larger Greco-Roman context in many and conflicting models, some of which include the relationship between Hebrew scriptures and the community, the inclusion of Gentiles based on faith, and accommodation
The letter is addressed to “the beloved Gaius” (vs. 1), who seems to be standing almost alone in his cordial reception of the traveling preachers and in helping them on their way. Apparently the writer (who is John) has received repeated testimony to the kindliness of Gaius (vss. 3, 6), not only from the Church but from those who were welcomed by Gaius when they were strangers to others (vs. 5). The reference to what the elder has already written the Church (vs.9 ) may refer to Second John or to some other bit of correspondence he has had with these Christians. John also wrote to Gaius to indirectly warn him about the rebellious and prideful leader, Diotephes. Why was Diotephes going to become rebellious and prideful? After doing some research,
Greek and Roman culture, although similar, are very different and an interesting blend of other cultures. The connections between cultures remind us that culture is not created and owned by a single group of people, but is enriched through the contributions of others. Since the Romans adopted culture from the Greeks, many traditions are the same. Through the expansion of Greece under Alexander, ideas from other cultures in the Middle East and Africa played a large part in the Greek teachings. When the Romans conquered the Hellenistic cities, they became fascinated with the idea of a Greek style of doing things. All things Greek were becoming popular. This is how much of the Greek way of life made its way into Roman culture.