Dialectical theory takes on the notion that particular tensions between contradictory impulses or are inherent towards personal relationships.
This was developed in the course of an insightful explanation made on Leslie Baxter’s with respect she had been the main scholar in the dialectical theory.
Interpersonal communication is highlighted by relational dialectics in an effort to maintain those individual ties with relationship partners, regardless of a pattern to confront paradoxical struggles founded on multiple perspectives and aspirations.
Communication is significant for individuals to retain over the stream of the any kind of interpersonal relationship, and yet their negatives is routine for its existence.
It goes on to makes sense on the dynamics or elements of communication behind how relationships are able to function, change, and evolve.
…show more content…
Integration–Separation captures the basic tension between social integration and social division [or needs of solidarity versus independence], Stability–Change focuses on the opposition between continuity and discontinuity, and Expression–Privacy [or non–expression] captures the oppositional tension between what is disclosed and what is not disclosed [to open and expressed or kept hidden and private]. (Simmons, Lowery-Hart, Wahl, & McBride, 2013, p. 378)
Each relationship necessitates a continuous negotiation, compromise, and management emerge from these theoretical concepts as opposed to experiencing an ideal outline or
Deborah Tannen wrote “ Talk in the Intimate Relationship” to help people learn something about how men and women's interactions differ. She is a language scholar and has past experience of failed relationships and she feels as though this was because of lack of communication. Her main focus is on metamessages, these are messages that go beyond what we say. She states that the people that are literal minded, miss out on the context of what communication is. What this essay will consist of being what Tannen calls metamessages, summarizing her article on how men and woman talk, deciding whether Tannen is favorable to both genders and last but not least if I agree to an extent with Tannen says in her article.
James Petersen’s book, Why don’t we listen better? Communicating and connecting in relationships, outlines the requirement for a continual use of good communication, through a series of actions and steps, by the practice of comprehending, dynamic listening, and actively perceiving. Listening then becomes a creative force that creates a context in which the development of a communicative relationship can foster.
Petersen, J. C. (2007). Why don’t we listen better? Communicating & connecting in relationships (1st ed.). Portland, OR: Petersen.
Petersen, J.C. (2007). Why don’t we listen better? Communicating & Connecting in Relationships. Tigard, OR: Petersen Publications
Interpersonal relationships are something that we go through every day in our personal lives. We have the need to have contact with others on a daily basis. Major benefits to these relationships allows us to see ourselves in many different perspectives and it takes away feelings of loneliness. When we examine our relationships throughout our lives we learn what is important to us and if these relationships are healthy or unhealthy and whether or not we should continue the relationship. There are relationship stages and interpersonal conflicts within relationships that we go through, so we identify the stages of conflict and then learn strategies to combat these conflicts. This paper will identify several relationship stages and illustrate
Baxter and Montgomery argue that, “social life is a dynamic knot of contradictions, a ceaseless interplay between contrary or opposing tendencies,” (Griffin, 2009, p.154). This paper agrees with Baxter and Montgomery’s explanation of relational dialectics. Moreover, this paper expands that Baxter and Montgomery’s ability to state that relationships are striving for balance is the key component. Balance is vital in relational dialectics because it produces positive outcomes and is the reason that contradictions occur. This paper will look at the main components of relational dialectics theory, current literature that supports this argument, and future application of the research (Griffin).
This theory has been subject to many articles and studies in the communication and social departments. Indeed, studying this theory can help us understanding human relations in interpersonal communication. Each of us has been one day confronted to uncertainty, whereas in initial encounters, or moving to a new a new place, or beginning a new work.
Large components within this theory is that humans wish to have predictability and novelty, protectiveness and openness, autonomy and connection. Within a relationship people communicate in attempt to reconcile disputing desires, but they never completely lose their desire for both of the opposing pairs. Balance is vital in relational dialectics because it produces positive outcomes and is the reason that contradictions occur. Similarities and differences within a relationship are created and sustained by communication or dialogue. A main concept of relational dialectics is unity, to construct one's reality is a unified process created by every relationship maintained within one’s lifetime.
Interpersonal conflict is very common with many relationships. It occurs when two people can not meet in the middle or agree on a discussion. Cooperation is key to maintaining a healthy debate. More frequently; when dealing with members of your own family, issues arise that include conflict and resolution. During this process our true conflict management style appears “out of thin air”. (Steve A. Beebe, 2008, p. 191).
‘Every day we create relationships by means other than formal contracts... As individuals form relationships they necessarily bring their accumulated experiences and developed personalities with them. In ways unknown to them, what they expect from the relationship reflects the sum total of their conscious and unconscious learning to date.’ (Spindler, 1994, p328)
Floyd, Kory. Interpersonal Communication: The Whole Story. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009. 140. Print.
On a daily basis, we come in contact with individuals that we have to communicate with, wither it be for work purposes, educational purposes, or social practices. As active humans we cannot escape the idea of socializing or communication, therefor; we make it a daily routine who we communicate with, how we communicate with them, what we listen to and how we listen it. With this routine habits are formed, some are strengths but others are weaknesses that diminish the communication quality. It is extremely important for individuals to recognize these strengths and weakness within their communication routine. By recognizing their strengths, they are able to improve even further and use their ability to get them closer to goals they may have set for themselves. Recognizing their weaknesses is just as important if not more important.
Among the various types of relationships including love, friendship, marriage, family and work, the fundamentals of any relationship are essentially similar. All relationships with similar goals require honesty and open communication. Clear, concise communication can be difficult even in an optimal situation. Negative communication tends to have a much stronger influence than positive communication affecting mood and behaviors. So, if not addressed immediately, negative communication can ultimately elicit an avoidance response. Repetitive negative communication and experiences will create avoidance oriented individuals that will likely continue this vicious cycle of negativity and avoidance behaviors (Kuster, Bernecker, Backes, Branstatter,
Interpersonal communication is very important in everyday life. It helps us build a relationship with another, also it helps us to satisfy our physical needs, identity needs, social needs and practical goals. Communication lets people exchange their feeling and information through verbal and non-verbal communication through social media or face to face communication. Communication can be effective and ineffective depend on the individual communication skills. The ways we communicate with another can be influenced by family, friends, significant other also within the culture and region where we stay. Each person has a different set of rule to communicate with another, so this is how miscommunication happen. There are some expectation and way
One basic context of communication is interpersonal communication. Interpersonal communication can be defined as “the ongoing, ever- ch...