Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Three theories of language acquisition
Three theories of language acquisition
Cognitive development in language learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Three theories of language acquisition
Learning The Native Language Most of the child language acquisition theories all have the same general idea, that language is acquired through repetition and imitation. The behaviourist approach states ‘that children learn to speak by imitating the language structures they hear’. Covering both aspects of the statement at the beginning which is ‘hearing English and trying to speak it yourself are the only tools’. The interactive approach states ‘recent studies have shown the importance of interaction’ which again is the tools of listening and speaking in order to acquire the language. All of these approaches support the statement at hand. However some approaches disagree with it all together. The cognitive approach believes ‘language acquisition is directly linked to intellectual development’ in other words that as the child matures so does the language somehow. At the extreme end of the scale we have the nativists. The nativists believe that ‘children are born with an innate capacity for language development’. Meaning that children are though to be born already with the capacity to learn language. But this approach does not cover all the aspects of humans such as deaf people. So how does language acquisition work in the first place? First language acquisition is remarkable for the speed at which it takes place. All normal children, regardless of culture Develop language at roughly the same time, along much the same schedule. However there are some general ‘basic requirements’ such as the first two or three years are vital and require the interaction between the child and other language users to help with t... ... middle of paper ... ... a book.’ This is called a holophrase. If a baby wants a bottle and is just beginning to learn to use language to manipulate, he may point to his bottle, say (or scream) ‘ba’ or ‘baba,’ which obviously means, ‘give me my bottle, now!’ Of course this becomes problematic when a child yells ‘BA!’ and the parent do not know whether he wants a bottle or a ball or a book, or if he just feels like yelling. So in conclusion, I believe that the opening statement ‘Hearing English and trying to speak it yourself are the only tools you have at your disposal when you are learning your native language.’ Is a true statement. This is because of all of the theories and known facts about child language acquisition all say basically that hearing and speaking English is all that a child will use in order to acquire that language.
In Suzette Haden Elgin’s Native Tongue, infants of linguistic households are required to acquire various alien languages to become native speakers of Earth for the new languages studied. Our society, for the most part, understands that adults acquire foreign languages differently from the acquisition of a second language by a child. Furthermore, most people generally have the understanding that children learn languages quickly and easily compared to adults. Adults, however, are able to acquire foreign languages in fair or controlled conditions. There may be resulting differences between language acquisitions of new languages, but the rate at which adults acquire second languages should not be a factor.
When most people think of the process of language development in “normal” children, the concepts that come to mind are of babies imitating, picking up sounds and words from the speakers around them. Trying to imagine that a child who cannot hear one single sound a person makes can learn to speak a language is absolutely fascinating. These children range from amazin...
Ajou Language Immersion program, all of the 30 students visited the Native American Museum on the last Thursday, on July 30th. Coordinated as part of the summer JHU-SAIS, we students went to the site with the professors and some interns by taking metro. All of us listened to the docent who was telling us about the history of a lot of different tribes exhibited in the Native American Museum. We started seeing around at the fourth floor.
Nearly every member of the human race learns a language or more to the degree of proficiency only in the first few years of life. How children achieve this astonishing skill in such little time has sparked controversial debates among linguists, psychologists, and scientists throughout centuries. Some believe that language is an innate ability possessed by all human beings due to the remarkable function of the brain, while others maintain that language is learned from childhood experience. However, many are beginning to realize that nature and nurture go hand-in-hand when explaining how children develop their language(s). Despite the claims that language is either pre-learned or environmentally learned alone, the combination of both genes and experience better explains the aspects of first language acquisition.
According to Hofmann and Chilla (2015), hearing children of deaf parents are also referred to as codas (p. 30). Authors describe codas as “bimodal bilingual children” (p. 30) since they use two distinct modes to acquire languages – visual mode to acquire sign language from their deaf parents and auditory mode to acquire spoken language from their hearing relatives and other hearing acquaintances (p. 30). Hofmann and Chilla (2015) claim that educators generally assume that codas have no difficulties acquiring spoken language as they grow up in predominantly hearing society and research on language development in codas has traditionally showed contradictory results (p. 30). However, some studies indicated that codas with prevailing exposure
... (p. 116). In her article, “Babies Prove Sound Learners,” Sohn (2008), states, “Such studies show that, up to about 6 months of age, babies can recognize all the sounds that make up all the languages in the world” (para.24). B.K. Skinner suggest that the materialization of language is the result of imitation and reinforcement. According to Craig and Dunn (2010), “Language development is linked to cognitive development that, in turn, depends on the development of the brain, on physical and perceptual abilities, and on experiences. Biological and social factors also jointly influence the early development of emotion and personality” (p. 117). In her article, A natural history of early language experience. Hart (2000), states, “Talking is important for children, because complexity of what children say influences the complexity of other people’s response” (para. 1).
Child development language is a process by which children come to communicate and understand language during early childhood. This usually occurs from birth up to the age of five. The rate of development is usually fast during this period. However, the pace and age of language development vary greatly among children. Thus, the language development of a child is usually compared with norms rather than with other individual children. It is scientifically proven that development of girls language is usually at a faster rate than that of boys. (Berk, 2010) In other terms language development is also a crucial factor that reflects the growth and maturation of the brain. However, this development usually retards after the age of five making it very difficult for most children to continue learning language. There are two major types of language development in children. These include referential and expressive language development styles. In referential language development, children often first speak single words and then join the words together, first into –word sentences and then into th...
The aim of this essay is to explore language acquisition and compare and contrast different theories of language acquisition and language development. Language in its most basic form is used to communicate our needs and wants. It encompasses a range of modes of delivery including signing, spoken and written words, posture, eye contact, facial expressions and gestures. So how do we learn ‘language’? Are we born with the skills for communication, or is it something that we have to learn or have taught to us? Four theories are looked at in this essay to determine how children acquire and then develop language. These theories include behaviourist, nativist, cognitivist and sociocultural. This essay will highlight some similarities and differences in each theory and what impact these have on a child’s acquisition and development of language. Lastly we will look at the implications of these theories when working with children. Can a classroom teacher deliver a quality literacy program based on just one of these theories or does it need to incorporate components of all four? Sims, (2012) pp. 21 states ‘’High-quality learning experiences in the early years of life enhance children’s cognitive and language skills’’. This places a great responsibility on educators and teachers alike to provide an environment which is rich in learning opportunities that will encourage both the acquisition and development of language.
There are three main theories of child language acquisition; Cognitive Theory, Imitation and Positive Reinforcement, and Innateness of Certain Linguistic Features (Linguistics 201). All three theories offer a substantial amount of proof and experiments, but none of them have been proven entirely correct. The search for how children acquire their native language in such a short period of time has been studied for many centuries. In a changing world, it is difficult to pinpoint any definite specifics of language because of the diversity and modification throughout thousands of millions of years.
The biological theoretical perspective comes from a man named Noam Chomsky. He believed that all children have a language acquisition device. This is defined in the book as “a biological endowment enabling the child to detect the features and rules of language, including phonology, syntax, and semantics”. The evidence found was that throughout cultures, children tend to have the same language milestones. Most begin at age two to four months by cooing and develop at 13 months with their first words.
This essay is going to illustrate the different stages in language acquisition that children pass through and elicit the theories in accordance.
There are many factors as to how a child may be able to learn their
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.
Second language learning is the process of learning a different language other than one’s mother tongue resulting in the ability of an individual to use one or more languages different from his first language. It can take place in a natural setting or through classroom instructions; however, the degree of proficiency differs (Gomleksiz, 2001).
This meant that humans have a built in mechanism to help them recognise and speak language. Chomsky believed that children simply neede... ... middle of paper ... ... rmal language acquisition early in life. q Sachs reported the case of Jim, whose parents deaf but who was surrounded by spoken language from the television and radio in the hope that he would learn normal language.