Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effective communication in early childhood
Effective communication in early childhood
New findings in infant’s language growth suggest that it is critical to discover
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effective communication in early childhood
The biological theoretical perspective comes from a man named Noam Chomsky. He believed that all children have a language acquisition device. This is defined in the book as “a biological endowment enabling the child to detect the features and rules of language, including phonology, syntax, and semantics”. The evidence found was that throughout cultures, children tend to have the same language milestones. Most begin at age two to four months by cooing and develop at 13 months with their first words. The environmental perspective talks about how the environment and their parents affect how the children talk. Roger Brown determines that children learn what words mean through the way that parents are responding to them. He defines terms like
recasting, expanding, and labeling that helps restate, rephrase, and identify things from the children’s simple sentences they say. Betty Hart and Todd Risely found some evidence to prove that language is more environmental through their research on children in welfare homes and children in professional homes. The children in professional homes had a wider vocabulary and the professional parents talked to their children more. The interactionist view focuses on the importance of biology and environment. They think that “every child benefits enormously from opportunities to talk and be talked with”. This evidence is show through a rich verbal environment with children reaps many positive outcomes, and it is important that the parents pay attention and are involved with the child’s learning or speaking. I think that I would agree most with the interactionist view because I agree with the environmental position, but it is important to acknowledge the parts of speech that happen on their own biologically. I agree that outside sources can affect the child’s learning, and that they can learn from imitation and soaking up information from others around them. I also agree with the language milestones that children to have certain age ranges that they have similar speaking patterns. The interactionist view takes both of these perspectives into account and combines them.
When most people think of the process of language development in “normal” children, the concepts that come to mind are of babies imitating, picking up sounds and words from the speakers around them. Trying to imagine that a child who cannot hear one single sound a person makes can learn to speak a language is absolutely fascinating. These children range from amazin...
Evolution has been arguably one of the largely discussed topics in the advanced institution of science. The theory of evaluation, first presented by Charlies Darwin (1990), states that all biotic organisms were developed and advanced from primitive organisms through gradual changes occurring over time. The relevance of this fundamental theory is witnessed throughout the disciplines of the pathology department in the subject area of biomedical science. Biomedical science consists of seven major disciplines; hematology, transfusion science, clinical chemistry, histology, virology, cytology, immunology and medical microbiology. However, significance of evolutionary theory had a drastic impact mostly on hematology and some virology.
Language acquisition during early childhood could be determined by a biological explanation. This may show how the brain is wired so children can acquire language ev...
A child goes through various stages in language development before they have a complete social understanding. When a child is born, they already have perceptual abilities, and can understand the speech sounds of any language, but, by 12 months the child loses that ability, and their understand of the sounds in their own language increases. Werker and Tees (1984) conducted an experiment and found that infants of 6-8 months could distinguish changes in speech sound, but by the time they were a year old, the could no longer hear the differences. Around 11-12 months, a child will begin to speak their first words, and will begin to apply labels and begin to name things, which stems from their pretend play. By 2 to 3 years old, a child will begin to understand everything that is said to them, and by 3 and a half years, their speech becomes more adult like. By 4 and a half years on, children have a much better understanding of language, and an understanding of metacommunication, such as tone, body language
Another supporting fact that dispels the thought that language is “taught” at a young age is the vastness of the human language. If language was “taught” by a parent, for example, a mother who didn’t go to college vs. their Ph.D child, the child would have a greater bank of words to express ideas. This proves that language is not “taught” but it is acquired for necessary communication early on, then is transformed into a well of optional words and phrases.
Biological Perspective The biological perspective focuses on how our physical body affects our actions. Our body affects our actions in two main ways, genetics and external stimuli. Through our genetics, the biological perspective asserts that we are predisposed to have certain personality characteristics.
The debate nature/nurture has been a fascinating open question for many years in the field of language development and acquisition. The focus of the dichotomy aspires to understand if language depends on an innate biological endowment or because of the environmental input we receive from the external world. The literature about the nature/nurture debate counts many different theories that have as crucial topics of discussion whether either nature or nurture plays the leading role in language development. One of the most famous theories is the nativist approach, whose father, Noam Chomsky, maintains that language is innate in human because of the Universal Grammar. Actually, according to Chomsky, this ‘gift’ is the child’s initial language faculty and exists prior to any linguistic experience, so that it gives the child the ability to acquire any language (Karmilloff, 2002). In contrast to this theory, the cognitive approach states that language is not innate because we do not have a Universal Grammar, but we learn language through general learning mechanisms. In other words, language is acquired through input and experiences in the environment. Another interesting point of view about the debate nature/nurture are the researches carried out by Lenneberg, who was influenced in his theoretical and practical studies both by Chomsky and by Piaget, father of the cognitive approach that I briefly introduced below. Lenneberg studied atypical language development and carried researches in particular on deaf children, children with focal brain damages and c...
Biological View The Biological Perspective was theorized by neurophysiologists and psychiatrists Allan Hobson and Robert McCarley. Also known as the activation-synthesis hypothesis, the theory states that dreams are simply created from the by products of the random stimulation of brain cells during REM sleep. Part of their theory suggests that there is a part of your brain in the brainstem, the pons, that can be activated to produce electrical impulses in your sleep periodically.
Positivists live by the assumption that human behavior is determined versus being a matter of free will (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). Since their belief is on the cause-and-effect of relationships rather than the free-will to self-determine an active choice (Bohm &Vogel, 2011). Positivists biological theories and psychological theories are often hard to decipher since the two theories overlap (Hagan, 2017). Although it is clear that both biological and psychological factors play a role in criminal engagements and activities, understanding the difference between the two may present a challenge (Hagan, 2017).
This essay is about a child’s development and learning, focusing primarily on language development. It will describe the main stages of developmental "milestones" and the key concepts involved for children to develop their language skills, discussing language acquisition and social learning theory. The essay will also look into the key theorists involved in language development, primarily Vygotsky and Chomsky, and how these theories have had an impact on the way society views language and their implementation within schools. The essay will describe the factors affecting language development, both biological and environmental. While also discussing key arguments among theorists, one being the nature vs nurture debate, and how these play a part in the teaching in schools.
I do not believe that any of the biological perspectives hold merit for explaining criminal behavior. The answer to this question if complicated, as Bernard, Snipes, and Gerould (2016) note, biological factors may increase the likelihood of one committing a criminal act, but it is in no way a guarantee that one will engage in criminal behavior. People may have certain biological factors engrained in their DNA that may cause them to gravitate towards a certain mindset or even lifestyle, however just because someone may be predisposed to a certain action or feeling, it does not mean that they will commit a crime.
There are three main theories of child language acquisition; Cognitive Theory, Imitation and Positive Reinforcement, and Innateness of Certain Linguistic Features (Linguistics 201). All three theories offer a substantial amount of proof and experiments, but none of them have been proven entirely correct. The search for how children acquire their native language in such a short period of time has been studied for many centuries. In a changing world, it is difficult to pinpoint any definite specifics of language because of the diversity and modification throughout thousands of millions of years.
According to Chomsky the children have a sort of natural and innate predisposition for acquiring the language and they own this ability from when they are born. This peculiarity distinguishes us and them from the other animals. Children do not copy the language they hear, but they learn a repertoire of infinite sentences.
The early thinking for biological theories was the belief that individual difference could be scientifically measured. Early biological theories see deviant behavior as a defect in the individual as a result from something else. This defect can be biological or genetic and is there to separate the criminal who is doing wrong in society from the law-abiding citizen that follows all the rules set by the law. Punishment serves a different goal in biological theories. While punishment may be a good thing in terms of protecting society, it will not have a deterrent effect because there is a known defect or abnormality within the individual, that deterrence or the threat of punishment will not affect their behavior. They can not help that they committed the crime. It is not an excuse for committing the crime but they honestly do not have control over their actions. Early biological theories lacked validity, they were among the first to use the scientific method which is an old process. The process of measuring the body parts of a person to include the shapes, and sizes of their brains were very inaccurate. Biological theories trace back to Lombroso,.The so called “born criminal” was a problem within the civilized society. He was always going want to commit a crime no matter the
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.