Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
THESIS:effectiveness of group dynamics
THESIS:effectiveness of group dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: THESIS:effectiveness of group dynamics
1) What are the advantages of leading groups? Phase 1 Group leaders have the advantage to educate the group on the topic they will discuss. After that the leaders will ask questions that may be a concern. Throughout the discussion, the leaders will have the ability to intervene when the topic is going off topic. As a result, there is more interaction within the group. The group will be able to voice their concerns and learn from others in the group. Phase 2 In my previous paragraph, I thought more about the leader’s aspect and not really what the members will get out of the group. According to Jacobs, Schimmel, Masson & Harvill, 2012, one of the advantages of leading groups is to have the members experience commonality. If the members feel …show more content…
like they belong, they will talk more. They will also see that they are not the only ones going through the problem (p.3). Also, groups make people more aware of their problem and what they are going through. This really stood out to me because people never know they have a problem until someone else address it. The more people interact, the more they will realize how serious it is. And the group is the perfect way for people can change because of the support that is given from the group. 2) What kinds of groups are there? Phase 1 There are multiple groups such as, drug and alcohol addiction groups, book clubs, groups that help people with mental illness. There are also groups that help plan engagements. In addition, there are teen pregnancy groups and a group that helps first time mothers adjusts to having a new born. There can also be groups that deal with self esteem issues; where they are there to help them grow as a person. Phase 2 The groups that are mentioned in Group Counseling by Jacob etc at., 2012, are discussion groups, task groups, education groups, support groups, growth groups, and counseling and therapy groups. The groups that I mentioned above are examples of some of these groups in detail. While, I was reading I did not know there were so many groups that can be made to help people. 3) What happens in groups? Phase 1 In groups people are able to voice their opinion on how they feel about the question the leader asked. They can express their opinion through past experiences, experiences they are going through right at that moment. They can even bring up situations that happen to other people, so other people in the group can understand where they are coming from. The people in the group may disagree and it may lead to arguments and fights. Phase 2 I will not change my answer that I wrote above.
However, I did read something that was interesting. According to Jacob etc al., in the group members can experience “emotions, human behaviors, and attitudes such as confrontation, rigidity, fear, anger, doubt and jealously” during their discussion. With these different feelings being exposed in the group, it educates each individual to learn how to cope with their feelings and to deal with people who are trying to cope with their own feelings (p.5). I have also learned that group feedback is powerful than one person because “the suggestions, reactions and perceptions of others can be valuable” for a person who is getting information from a group …show more content…
(p.4). 4) How do I prepare for leading my groups? Phase 1 To prepare for a group meeting I would create multiple questions to engage the group. I would also think of ice breakers to get people comfortable with each other. In addition, I would find an environment where it is not a lot going on to avoid any distraction. I would have some light refreshments when I provide a break. Phase 2 In Group Counseling by Jacob et al,2012., the leader have to first understand the “group dynamics, group process, group leadership group and group develop” and also knowledge of what will be discuss in the group (p.28). I would not change my answer in Phase 1 because I think after all of these situations are understood than the next step will be to come up with what I have above. The one thing I did not know while I was reading chapter 1 is a person can get the agency charged for ethic violation if they are not trained to lead a group (p.28). 5) What do I do if nobody talks? Phase 1 If no one talks after five minutes, I would elaborate on the questions to make sure the members of the group understand the question I am asking. Usually, when people do not talk, they do not know what the question is asking or they are afraid to answer the question wrong because there are other people listening. If they still do not answer the question, I would ask another question and then go back to the question later on in the group discussion. Phase 2 In Group counseling by Jacob etc al, 2012., they did not mention a situation where no one did not talk. However, they did mention in an example, where one person did not speak. The leader asked the person how they felt about what one of the members said and eventually the member did talk. I think the leader’s approach to get the one person to talk was a good because some people are not as brave as others to talk immediately (p. 17). 6) What should I do if someone talks too much? Phase 1 If a person is talking too much, I would politely ask the person to let other people talk and express their feelings. It is important to get other peoples input because everyone has different perspectives. In fact some people may have been through the situation and are willingly to talk about it and how they got through the situation. Phase 2 I would not change anything I have mentioned above because in one scenario in the group counseling book by Jacob etc al, 2012., I read the leader kindly stopped one member from talking because the leader was focusing on one person issue to get the whole group involved with the discussion (p.
14). Sometimes when the person talks too much he or she go off topic and the leader has to guide the person back to the question asked. For example, in one scenario the mother goal was to get her child back. In the meeting the leader had to direct the mother back to the issue because she started mentioning visitation policy (p.
10). 7) What leadership style should I use? Phase 1 The leadership style a person should use is the controlling method. He/she should always be asking questions, so people in the group can go in to detail about each question. In the group the leaders should do less talking and have people come up with ideas themselves and if it’s a good idea tell them. It’s not about the leader talking all the time because at the end of the day a person should walk out of the group with more information they came in with, with many different viewpoints. Phase 2 According to Jacobs, Schimmel, Masson, & Harvill, 2012, there is and direct and indirect approach to leading a group. The indirect approach is similar to what I addressed in Phase 1. The leader should talk less about how to solve problems and rely on the members of the group to contribute to the solutions to help one another. Also, they address a leader can also use interpersonal versus intrapersonal styles. The difference between the interpersonal and intrapersonal styles is that the interpersonal deals with interactions between the members and the groups as a whole. However, the intrapersonal deals with the concern of each individual in the group (p.22-23). I learned in a group discussion a leader has to know which one to use to have a productive meeting.
Topics explored with this group included; conversational skills, internet safety, bullying, conflict resolution, social media, and personal appearance. Accordingly, I was able to gain insight on how to plan activities tailored to the needs of the group as well as obtain tips on conducting groups effectively. Additionally, I was able to get a sense of the group dynamics, attain knowledge on the stages of a group through observing all the individuals belonging to the group, their uniqueness and how their personality impacted the group itself. Individuals were able to join the group at different stages hence; the forming stage was repeated each time a new member was recruited. This also provided me with the opportunity of gaining first-hand experience of the interaction on the basic dynamics on group stages of forming, norming, storming and
Leadership is an important element in the functioning of group interactions toward an organized goal. Leadership has been defined in many different ways by sociologists and social psychologists alike, numbering too many to discuss here. The most common element found in these definitions is "that leadership involves a process of influence between a leader and followers to attain group, organizational, or societal goals" (Hollander, 1985). In small group interactions, leadership is usually an assigned status, with the "followers" designating, both consciously and subconsciously, someone as a leader. This is a person who, according to the group members, is believed to have those characteristics which are most suited to accomplish the task and objectives of the group (Bales and Slater, 1955). Much of the available early research that I was able to attain focused on leadership and the concept of leadership in terms of political situations. When viewed from a political standpoint, the study of leadership pertains to the analysis of relationships between those who possess power and those who don't possess power (power will be discussed in det...
... that areas of expertise can be exploited, different people are good at different things. Groups can discuss material, and that discussion can improve the quality of the decision. Groups are less likely to suffer from judgmental biases that individuals have when they make decisions. People are more likely to follow through on decisions made by groups that they are connected to. Also, more monumental decisions can be made in groups, because one member will not be singled out for blame, making the entire group responsible.
The overall goals of the group is what attracted group members. Their common goals are to provide quality services to East Chicago residents. Group members are clear about the task they need to accomplish. They all work in the same department which provides them with common work experiences. Other factors that may have attracted members to this group is the size of the group. There are only four members which can facilitate communication between members.
Leaders will often separate in-group and out-group members based on similarities of the group member and the leader. Other characteristics that can play into it are age, gender, or even a member’s personality. A member can be granted in-group status if the leader thinks the member is competent and is going above and beyond to perform the job functions. As mentioned the two groups that members can fall into are in-group and out-group. In-group members are those that share similarities with the leader. Those similarities can be personality, work ethic, common interests, or even alma maters. In-group members often go above and beyond their job description and the leader does more for these members. In-group members will have their opinions and work ideas looked at in higher regard than out-group members. In-group members typically have higher job satisfaction within the group and are less likely to experience turnover. In-group members are often promoted within the organization f...
...and show an open mind to everyone’s ideas. I’ve found that this makes for a lighter and more fun environment and we’ve shown success in completing our task. Most times I’m put into groups, I don’t know the other people very well. This is common at school with my classmates. I’m used to having no leader in the group and everyone fighting to have their ideas chosen. Once a leader was chosen in the group we started discussing openly everyone’s ideas with the chosen leader voicing their opinion on which idea to choose and why. Usually when it comes to my friends I take the leadership role and make an try to hear everyone’s opinion before making a decision. I believe that for a team to find success and reach their goal someone needs to take leadership and voice an unbiased opinion. The team needs to hear everyone’s ideas and choose one based on which will lead to success.
Particularly, two members within my group began to emerge as leaders due to their knowledge, skills, as well as experience working with our chosen population. Although I always view them as ‘experts’ in this topic, our group became less focused on our goals and more concerned about the ‘power struggle’ between our two leaders, before we could reach any consensus. Essentially, our group had two authoritarians butting heads and trying to take lead throughout the beginning of the group process. Thus, the other members or ‘followers’ contribution, like mine, seem to not matter unless they adhered to either leaders’ opinions without question. According to Stringer (2014), “Leadership… Is defined according to its function of facilitating organizational and operational processes, rather than defining and controlling them” (p. 31). The researcher further states that active participation is the key to encourage and motivate group members to invest their time and energy to shape the quality of the group's production. Therefore, our group needed to find ways for all members to have a chance to participate fully and apply their individual strengths, in order to enhance our group’s
Of course, that was not always the case, however, when the group leader or facilitator is qualified and knows what they are doing it does make a difference because things get done, tasks get completed, and deadlines that are established get met and the goals of the group get accomplished because things run smoother and the issues get resolved and so forth.
pp. 309-329, 371-393, 241-259. Engleberg, I., Wynn, D., & Schuttler, R., (2003). Working in Groups: Communication Principles and Strategies (3rd ed.) Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
- In my own experiences, I have been both a leader and a manager in my professional life and find that leading can be difficult. Inspiring others to get on the same page and work together toward the same goal has its own challenges. It is much easier to manage the actual tasks associated with the project or the goal than it is to get buy in from others to complete those tasks.
Feedback influences the amount of time the group members spend discussing the topic and could be used to dispute flows. The experiment was conducted and presented to a dozens of individuals in large electronic rooms with the "Lost in the Desert" survival scenario. Participant were given a list of fifteen objects where they must select five that would help them survive. After the picked their items were instructed to enter an assigned chat room and discus the possible choices, they had no obligation choose the same item as other groups. The discussing ensued with no one knowing whose group they are in. This created disconnect to all for a more analytical process. The results indicated that positive feedback results more in the production blocking and less effective decision-making. Negative feedback increases the amount of time spent on group discussion. Evidence suggests that groups whom receive negative feedback during decision-making process engage in more argumentation, likely an effort to support their own argument in the face of criticism. The use of devil 's advocacy by a group requires more discussion to reach agreement than is normally needed. In comparison, groups who receive positive feedback will likely require less time to reach consensus by virtue of not requiring the same amount of argumentation. (Marler & Marett, 2013).
In most group settings, there are many different personalities working together and this can cause a great deal of conflicting positions on various issues being discussed during meetings. This can also influence the particular way that participants interact with each other during meetings. If group members can approach these meetings with an open mind and the concept that the greatest likelihood is that not everyone will share your opinion within the group. The larger the group, the greater the dispersion of ideas and this can cause the length of meetings to be extended in the effort to have all voices heard. If these meetings are approached with a plan to guide the discussions, meetings can stay more on track and allow the group to move on to new topics in a reasonable time frame and reach a consensus
Through the process of this class I have been able to reflect and analyze how I am as a leader as well as a co-leader in a group setting. I believe throughout this process of being part of a group as a member and leader has help me further define the roles that I will play in group counseling in the future. The evolution that I am seeing are an abundance of growth in areas that I thought I was already comfortable in such as being an active listener and co-leading. I see that there are more to becoming a powerful leader and facilitator. There are various aspects of becoming a well rounded group leader as learning the skills to endure especially building your endurance. Also, being able to take risks, being competent and confidence in your ability to lead a group of any sorts. Moreover, I have found that my communication style has shifted especially learning about the process in which you communicate your informal introduction as well as the lingo that is being used as a counselor. Also, the way in which we approach each member of
The time I spent in Group Dynamics, was an eye opening experience. Going into any group setting, you expect people to come from all different backgrounds nonetheless; you have no way of knowing how those differences will play out, unless you watch the dynamics first hand. While observing people in a group, I have seen personalities unravel and clash into one another, inevitably leaving one wounded while the other down plays the exchange. Learning to integrate those situations into a learning experience is one key to being a good leader.
Formation of groups or teams is not something that occurs overnight. Because it involves human beings that come from various backgrounds with different sets of values, forming a group and anticipating them to integrate and function dynamically cannot be expected to