Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lead and its effects on fetus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Article Review: Econometrics
“Lead and Mortality” by Clay, Troesken, and Haines presents evidence suggesting that leaching of lead from service pipes into water caused higher infant mortality rates, using US city level data from 1900-1920. The study used multiple sources of city level data to gain insight on the effect of lead exposure via water pipes on infant mortality. This paper will examine the internal and external validity of their research.
Internal Validity Internal validity has two components. First, the estimator of the causal effect must be unbiased and consistent. Second, the standard errors of the estimator must be appropriate to conduct a hypothesis test. Threats to internal validity include omitted variable bias, functional
…show more content…
To control for city characteristics, they used IPUM data to include information regarding population quartiles, white or foreign born, women aged 20-40, and regional fixed effects. It was also necessary for them to control for temperature and precipitation, as these are both believed to effect infant mortality. Other variables included were water quality, milk quality, and women’s suffrage. Water quality can both directly effect infant mortality or through the mother’s health. During this time, increased milk quality was believed to be the reason for the decline in infant mortality. Women’s suffrage may have potentially caused omitted variable bias because it is shown that suffrage led to increased public health spending. Since these variables were found to be correlated with other independent variables and the dependent variable, not including them would have caused omitted variable …show more content…
Many other populations would differ from this regardless of the year. For example, a population that tends to have children at younger ages may differ sufficiently to threaten external validity. Another example could be a population that different percentage of individuals native to the country or foreign born. The setting in the study was large urban cities in the US from 1900 to 1920. For either a different year in the US, or a different location entirely there will likely be differences in setting. Increased or better health care, in later years in the US or in different countries could differ significantly. Regulation regarding water treatment, milk treatment, and water pipe material could likely also cause a significant difference between
People living in areas such as Playford, has shown to have a lower socioeconomic position, which made them at highest risk of poor health (WHO, 2017). Then, the social determinants of health support the understanding the difference between populations health levels, but also the reasons behind why some groups are healthier than others (Marmot, 2005) and the issue becomes a little bit deeper as people living in different areas related to others differently, so then the social stratification of health is affected by differences in gender, marital status, residential areas and ethnicity (Elstad,
USEPA, (2011). Water: Lead & Copper Rule. United States Environmental Protection Agency website. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/lcr/index.cfm
The sampling procedures that can be utilized in evaluation research is vast. The selected sampling procedure is important in the consideration of external validity. External validity generalizes the findings to individuals in the study sample with characteristics that are alike (DiClemente et al., 2013). Although, not all research studies will require a sampling procedure that would deliver an external validity.
This is why the Flint water crisis is so critical today. Because young children are being exposed to lead and they should actually be screened from the lead. The pipelines with lead in the water system and the whole community of Flint, not being able to drink water out of the facet as well as not being able to
When lead enters the environment, it starts to become a problem. After a period of about ten days, depending on the weather, it falls to the surface. Here lead builds up in the soil particles. Where it may make its way into underground water or drinking water due to the fact the grounds acidic or if it's soft enough. Either way it stays a long time on the soil or in water. Months or years down the road after the lead has built up it starts to become a problem for children that play outside of their homes . This lead containing soil particles get on the child's hands or clothing and end up in the child's mouth. After the build up of so much lead it leads to lead poison. Lead poisoning has been an issue since the early 1900s, when the use of lead started being banned from the manufacturing of paint in foreign countries such as Australia. Unfortunately, the United States did not start banning it until 1978, when it finally became illegal in our nation. Today 90% of the lead in the atmosphere comes from the burning of gasoline. This problem has been a large issue since the 1920s, when the Environmental Protection Agency started making laws on the amount of lead allowed in gasoline.
Wilkinson, R. M. (2003). Social determinants of health - the solid facts. [S.l.]: World Health Organization.
... water crisis will have a long term affect on those who are consuming this water on a daily basis. Lead attack the brain and can cause coma and possibly death. Children who survive lead poisoning are left with serious health issues such as metal defects and leave a child mentally unstable. Even at lower levels of exposure symptoms such as behavioural changes such as reduced attention span, reduced intelligence quotient (IQ). Children with smaller amount of lead exposure also showed increased anti social behaviour, it also reduces educational attainment. These side effect of high lead exposure can leave children scarred for life. The water crisis in Flint Michigan car scar children for life. This could all be resolved if they could come to an agreement and replace the water pipes, allowing for cleaner and healthier water to be accessible to citizens in Flint Michigan.
Within public health sciences there has been a tendency to ascribe much geographical variation to compositional differences, and until recently there has been resistance towards contextual explanations. Contextual explanations of health are frequently rejected due to the fear of falling prey to the ecological fallacy. The ecological fallacy deduces that relationships observed at an aggregate level will be observed in the same direction and magnitude at the individual level. When observing the relationship between the health of African Americans and residential segregation, what may be true for large groups measured in the aggregate may not hold true on the individual level. Not all individuals are displaced as a result of gentrification and not all of those that are displaced remain in a situation where they are destitute.
It is the interrelationships among these factors that determine individual and population health. Because of these, interventions that target multiple determinants of health are most likely to be effective. Determinants of health reach beyond the boundaries of traditional health care and public health sectors; sectors such as education, housing, transportation, agriculture, and environment can be important allies in improving population health. Policies at the local, state, and federal level affect individual and population health. .Some policies affect entire populations over extended periods of time while simultaneously helping to change individual
There are differences in the primary routes of exposure, Babies and children can swallow lead through breast feeding. They can be exposed to lead in the womb if their mothers have lead in their bodies. In children ingestion is the major route of exposure. Lead paint is the major source. In older houses as the lead paint deteriorates, peels, chips or is...
The major variables studied included the dependent variable of the intervention of the individuals and the independent variable of presumed negative
PB5: Identify potential sources of bias in the investigation and any possible confounding variables. (2 marks) Individual differences may affect the findings. For example, the individual may not understand a particular word, and therefore will
Symptoms of lead poisoning include loss of appetite, weakness, anemia, vomiting, and convulsions, sometimes leading to permanent brain damage or death. Children who ingest chips of old, lead-containing paint or are exposed to dust from the deterioration of such paint may exhibit symptoms. Levels of environmental lead considered nontoxic may also be involved in increased hypertension in a significant number of persons, according to studies released in the mid-1980s. As a result, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in recent years have been revising downward the levels of environmental lead that it would consider safe.
The health of an individual and their communities is affected by several elements which combine together. Whether an individual is healthy or not, is determined by their circumstances and environment.1 To a greater extent, factors such as where an individual lives, their relationships with family and friends, the state of their environment, income, genetics and level of education all have significant impacts on health, however the more frequently considered factors such as access and use of health care facilities regularly have less of an impact.6 Determinants of health is a term which was introduced in the 1970s as part of a broader analysis of research and policy on public health. Researchers argued that there was a lot of attention and too much expenditure on health being dedicated to individuals and their illnesses, and little or no investment in populations and their health. It was decided that public health should be more concerned with social policies and social determinants than with health facilities and the outcomes of diseases.7 The determinants of health include social and economic environment, physical environment and an individual’s behaviour and characteristics. The environment of an individual determines their health, holding responsible an individual for having poor health or acknowledging them for good health is inappropriate. Individuals are not likely to be able to control several of the determinants of health. These determinants that make individuals healthy or not include the factors above, and numerous others.6
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS ADMINISTRATION, AND BUREAU OE THE CENSUS. (1994) Eds. F'.A. London, H.A. Scarr and M.L. Turner, Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington, D.C., pp. 750.