"Wasted talent is a waste I cannot stand." This is a quote from economist professor Larry Smith during an interview for the global media company Forbes. Larry Smith is an economist who works at the University of Waterloo in Canada. In the year 2011, he gave a very influential Ted talk to an audience of millions. In a brief 15 minutes, Larry Smith provides humor and blunt honesty in order to inform his audience as to why a person may fail to have a prosperous and successful career. Throughout his Ted talk, Smith adopts a humorous, but subjective tone to appeal to his audience while also using many real life examples. Smith begins his speech by describing how people have the mindset to pursue a great career, but tends to not follow the steps to do so. The credibility of his speech is well established by his subjective tone. Rather than using statistics, he uses his own opinions and real life situations in order to convey a sense of credibility behind his …show more content…
reasoning. The fact that he is also a successful economist adds to his credibility since it usually takes a Masters Degree in order to become an economist. For a person who may not know, a professional economist is someone who is a very knowledgeable at understanding the logistics of economics. Although Smith comes off a bit rude with his use of humor, the logic behind his thoughts are likely to grab the attention of the audience. He does not exactly relate to one specific audience, however his message is intended for everyone. Particularly, it is meant for people who have not achieved their lifelong goals while giving warning to the people just now starting to pursue careers. He instantly catches the audience's attention when he repeatedly uses real life excuses as to why people fall off from realizing their true potential. For example, he says, "Ah, but I still want a great career. I'm not prepared to pursue my passion, so I know what I'm going to do, because I have a solution. I have a strategy. It's the one Mommy and Daddy told me about. Mommy and Daddy told me that if I worked hard, I'd have a good career. So, if you work hard and have a good career, if you work really, really, really hard, you'll have a great career. Doesn't that, like, mathematically make sense? Hmm. Not. But you've managed to talk yourself into that." Smith's use of humorous examples such as this helps convince the audience that they have been thinking the wrong strategies the whole time which helps persuade people to go beyond hard work. Along with his use of examples and excuses that relate to the lives of the audience, Smith also appeals to the audience's emotions by using blunt honesty. By bringing up the point that "if you don't find the highest expression of your talent, if you settle for "interesting," what the hell ever that means, do you know what will happen at the end of your long life? Your friends and family will be gathered in the cemetery, and there beside your gravesite will be a tombstone, and inscribed on that tombstone it will say, 'Here lies a distinguished engineer, who invented Velcro.' But what that tombstone should have said, in an alternative lifetime, what it should have said if it was your highest expression of talent, was, 'Here lies the last Nobel Laureate in Physics, who formulated the Grand Unified Field Theory and demonstrated the practicality of warp drive.'" This technique seems quite crude, however it is very eye-opening for the audience because they then begin to wonder if they have wasted their entire lives coming up with pity excuses. Smith tries to show people just how bad the situation has become and how right he actually is. He even goes deeper and states that "[I]n spite of all these excuses, you will find, you will find your passion. And you'll still fail." Triggering the emotions of the audience is a useful strategy for Smith due to the fact that he is trying to convince the audience exactly why they will fail. Furthermore, it makes the audience feel more like the subject of the matter and that they should change their attitudes and lifestyles in order to avoid the possibility of making excuses. In addition to his credibility and emotional appeals, Smith uses the deductive enthymeme technqiue by giving his audience a few propositions and then drawing together a truth. Also, when describing these propositions, Smiths' tone is extremely cold, just as the real world is in many ways. In this specific case, he gives examples of situations and excuses which ultimately leads to the truth that one will not succeed nor achieve a great career unless they understand exactly what it takes to do so. As mentioned in his speech, Smith believes that people will fail due to their inability to overcome the fear of failure. However, he relies mostly on his own point of view and appealing emotionally to the audience rather than adding more logical terms to his argument. In other words, he fails to provide statistics or facts that could be used to support his claim. Although he fails to provide this information, he does indeed add many examples and reasons which counter balance his logical appeal. It is obviously clear that Larry Smith makes many great points which could easily convince people to reevaluate their motives and better themselves. Towards the end of his speech he states, "But the 'unless' word is also attached to that other, most terrifying phrase, 'If only I had …' 'If only I had …' If you ever have that thought ricocheting in your brain, it will hurt a lot." This one point alone makes the purpose of his essay stand out and become hard to take in. It really begins to go beyond simple words and becomes more meaningful to the audience. He gets really personal throughout his speech and relates the situations with the audience in ways that will truly have them thinking. It is almost as if he knows all the touchy subjects to discuss in order to mess with the hearts and minds of his audience. Through the use of rhetorical and effective techniques and with a brilliant emotional appeal throughout the entire speech, Smith informs the audience as to why they will fail.
He establishes his credibility as a successful economist and uses subjective tone to set the stage for why the audience should believe his reasoning. Along with his credibility, he concentrates on real life situations in order to appeal emotionally with his audience. In doing so, he manages to gain a relationship and establishes authority by managing rhetorical distance between the audience and himself. He then focusses on logically appealing to the audience by displaying their weaknesses due to the fear of failing and looking ridiculous while trying. In addition, he exemplifies humor and a candor attitude to inform the world as to why they will not succeed in having a lucrative career. By the end of his speech, Smith was able appeal to the audience's sympathy and leave them with that everlasting and heartbreaking feeling of "what
if?"
“The Onion’s” mock press release on the MagnaSoles satirical article effectively attacks the rhetorical devices, ethos and logos, used by companies to demonstrate how far advertisers will go to convince people to buy their products. It does this by using manipulative, “scientific-sounding" terminology, comparisons, fabrication, and hyperboles.
Soon after launch on January 28th, 1986, the space shuttle Challenger broke apart and shattered the nation. The tragedy was on the hearts and minds of the nation and President Ronald Reagan. President Reagan addressed the county, commemorating the men and woman whose lives were lost and offering hope to Americans and future exploration. Reagan begins his speech by getting on the same level as the audience by showing empathy and attempting to remind us that this was the job of the crew. He proceeds with using his credibility to promise future space travel. Ultimately, his attempt to appeal to the audience’s emotions made his argument much stronger. Reagan effectively addresses the public about the tragedy while comforting, acknowledging, honoring and motivating his audience all in an effort to move the mood from grief to hope for future exploration.
Advertisements are constructed to be compelling; nonetheless, not all of them reach their objective and are efficient. It is not always easy to sway your audience unless your ad has a reliable appeal. Ads often use rhetoric to form an appeal, but the appeals can be either strong or weak. When you say an ad has a strong rhetorical appeal, it consists of ethos, pathos, logos, and Kairos. Advertisers use these appeals to cohere with their audience. Nike is known to be one of the leading brands of the sports shoes and apparel. It holds a very wide sector of followers around the world. In the Nike ad, Nike uses a little boy watching other basketball players play, and as the kid keeps growing, his love for basketball keeps growing. Eventually, he
In pursuit of the education and experience that will lead us to our chosen profession, it is important, if not vital, that we carefully choose a path that will take us where we want to go. As we journey down this path, we will most likely encounter obstacles or opportunities that will take us in different directions, possibly leaving us at the end of the trail in a place quite different from that which we set out for. Like us, both Edward Zigler and Howard Gardner set out on career paths that ended in much different places than those they anticipated, both for very different reasons.
“He say Mr. Parris must be kill! Mr. Parris no goodly man, Mr. Parris mean man and no gentle man and he bid me rise out of bed and cut your throat!” (Miller 47).
Ender is first shown as intelligent and skillful, and Peter shows the same attributes throughout the story. Ender uses his intellect to triumph over his bullies, and this translates to his experience in the Battle Room. He has to outsmart the enemy, rather than beat them physically, and it worked in his favor the majority of the time. Ender understands when he has to use his physicality to beat a bully, but also knows when he has to strategize to avoid a certain situation. When Ender is encountered by Bonzo after he won the battle by disobeying Bonzo’s orders, he has to use his judgement rather than his fists to get what he wants. Ender argued with Bonzo, “‘... I’ll pretend that you won this argument. Then tomorrow you can tell me you changed your mind.’ ‘I don’t need you to tell me what to do.’ ‘I don’t want the other guys to think you backed down. You wouldn’t be able to command as well’” (Card 87). Ender understands what his enemy, in this case Bonzo, wants, and knows how he can make both of them get what they want. He doesn’t resolve to violence when he knows that he can use a different method that benefits him. Ender’s intelligence and strategizing helps him overcome the difficulty he approaches throughout his life. Peter also uses his intellect to benefit himself throughout the events that happen.
Throughout our lives, we encounter promising advertisements from desperate companies attempting to campaign the next innovative product. The Onion's satirical article on MagnaSoles utilizes several rhetorical devices to sell its latest, groundbreaking item. By applying the MagnaSoles as a model for modern day products, The Onion humorously mocks the ridiculous promises and claims that companies offer their customers to market such "marvelous and unmatched" novelties. By presenting a sarcastic, exaggerated tone throughout the essay, we are able to dwell in the true hilarity of advertisements' impetuous pleas. The Onion uses doctors and "experts" to explain the revolutionary technology that MagnaSoles offers the public, even going as
In 1729, Jonathan Swift published a pamphlet called “A Modest Proposal”. It is a satirical piece that described a radical and humorous proposal to a very serious problem. The problem Swift was attacking was the poverty and state of destitution that Ireland was in at the time. Swift wanted to bring attention to the seriousness of the problem and does so by satirically proposing to eat the babies of poor families in order to rid Ireland of poverty. Clearly, this proposal is not to be taken seriously, but merely to prompt others to work to better the state of the nation. Swift hoped to reach not only the people of Ireland who he was calling to action, but the British, who were oppressing the poor. He writes with contempt for those who are oppressing the Irish and also dissatisfaction with the people in Ireland themselves to be oppressed.
Nishan Panwar said, “Follow your passions, follow your dreams, but most of all follow your heart.” Steve Jobs advocated for this type of attitude at his Commencement Address at Stanford University in 2005. Using tricolon, antithesis, and pathos, Jobs urged the graduates to follow their dreams despite struggles in life.
Have you ever realized the importance of manners, morals or even customs? There was once a time where it mattered to many people. In July of 2001 the realization came about that it does not mean as much in present times. In the essay by Judge Till it explains the importance of manners, morals, and customs through the perspective of Southern people. The organization techniques Till uses in his essay clarifies the relevance and effectiveness of his overalls points within the essay. Using different forms of description, symbolism, and figures of speech Judge Till clearly shows the audience the effectiveness of the organization structure of his essay.
Rhetoric stands as an author’s most powerful weapon. It has the ability to persuade politicians, challenge ideas, and even influence the everyday worker. Olaudah Equiano wrote his narrative with one purpose in mind: to encourage masters to treat their slaves with respect. Equiano tells his Interesting Narrative from his time in Africa to his visitation in between as a way to bring about change in the slave industry. Equiano most effectively does this through his use of rhetorical strategies, such as imagery and Biblical allusions and references which prove he knows his audience to successfully influence his readers to reform- and maybe even abolish- the slave industry,
Joe Smith is a logical method man who was able to state out facts from his speech. Facts are convincing an audience by the use
Smith begins his speech by describing how people have the mindset to pursue a great career, but tend to not follow the steps
Talent is the foundation of a success, without it commitment and opportunity have nothing to build on, even so, talent alone is not success. Take Christopher Langan for example, the media has dubbed him “the smartest man in America.” In fact he may even be the smartest person in the world. Einstein is the embodiment of intellectual success; his IQ is document to be 160. In 1999, the TV show 20/20 aired and interview with neuropsychologist Robert Novelly, in which he confirmed that Christopher Langan’s IQ was 210. Dr. Novelly also described Langan’s IQ as “the highest individual that I have ever measured in 25 years." In high school he earned a perfect score on the SAT even though he fell asleep during the test. Langan attended Montana State University, but his financial problems, and his belief that he could teach his professors more than they could teach him led him to drop out Langan is known mostly for his part in developing the "theory of the relationship between mind and reality." Beyond that his name rarely surfaces while defining success. Even though he possessed such amazing talent Langan did not become a billionaire entrepreneur, instead he took a strin...
When people sit down and reflect on their lives, they look at the things that they’ve achieve and the things that they wanted to achieve, but didn’t get to. Most of the times when people sit down and reflect on their lives they consider themselves to be successful or to be a failure; there really isn’t any in between. There are a lot of things that people take into consideration when they analyze their lives and how they’ve succeeded at doing the things they truly wanted to. One of the most important things that I think most people take into consideration when analyzing their lives is whether or not they were successful in the workforce, growing up in the type of society that we have and have had, we are taught that the things you have matter.