Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social influences on behaviour
Social influences on behaviour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social influences on behaviour
Introduction
Merton (1968) states that there are five levels to adaptation to social structure: conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism and rebellion. Social structure states that society gives people goals and means to achieve them. Some people conform while others might not have the means to achieve goals given to them by society which can lead to crime. Another factor is identifying the stigmas that are associated with labels. Chambliss (1973) labeling theory suggests that stigmas are placed on people who are seen as criminals. Therefore, when a person is labeled as a criminal they will be perceived as one by their community which in return can lead to criminalizing all the community’s behaviors.
As an example, The Saints and the
…show more content…
Similar to crime as culture and culture as crime (Ferrell J, 1995). Labeling theory suggests that people who are labeled as criminals, either because of their appearance, nationality, or neighborhoods will start to act like criminals. Racialized policing and practices can lead minorities to not only lose respect and trust in the police but can also lead to strain. Sanchez, C (2015) conducting a study in two different Chicago neighborhoods to see the the difference if any in policing. In a neighborhood that was predominantly Latino, labeling was very clear. Police officers targeted youth who fit descriptions of gang …show more content…
When an individual is pulled over, it is not in a closed setting but out in the public. A professor, neighbors, or potential boss can see the individual and automatically assume that they did something wrong versus believing the cop is doing it based on race. Chambliss (1973) In Saints and the Roughnecks, as noted, although there were two groups of adolescents studied with similar behavior only the roughnecks were labeled and penalized. That is because they were seen by the community; they did not have the recourses to leave the city to live their delinquent behavior, they were seen by community members as they drank, fought, etcetera. The article identifies the issues with labeling and the need to get rid of demonizing
In the United States of America today, racial profiling is a deeply troubling national problem. Many people, usually minorities, experience it every day, as they suffer the humiliation of being stopped by police while driving, flying, or even walking for no other reason than their color, religion, or ethnicity. Racial profiling is a law enforcement practice steeped in racial stereotypes and different assumptions about the inclination of African-American, Latino, Asian, Native American or Arab people to commit particular types of crimes. The idea that people stay silent because they live in fear of being judged based on their race, allows racial profiling to live on.
The factor of racial profiling comes into play as federal grant programs award police for rounding up as many people as possible. This very tactic was demonstrated by the CompStat system in New York City and further expounded by Victor M. Rios’s analysis of the themes over-policing and under-policing. These themes focus on how officers, police certain kinds of deviance and crime such as, loitering, or disturbing the peace, while neglecting other instances when their help is needed . Rios also stresses how the accumulation of minor citations like the ones previously mentioned, play a crucial role in pipelining Black and Latino young males deeper into the criminal justice system. Rios implies that in order to decrease the chances with police interaction one must not physically appear in a way that catches the attention of a police or do anything behavior wise that would lead to someone labeling you as deviant . Unfortunately, over-policing has made it difficult even for those who actually do abide by social norms because even then, they have been victims of criminalization . However, since structural incentives like those that mimic CompStat are in place, police simply ignore constitutional rules and are able to get away with racial profiling, and thus interrogate, and search whomever they please. Since these targeted minorities acknowledge the fact that the police are not always present to enforce the law, they in turn learn strategies in order to protect themselves from violence that surrounds them. Young African American Americans and Latino youth thus become socialized in the “code of the street”, as the criminal justice system possesses no value in their
Police are using modern license plate reader technology that can read on spot and collect general information about the vehicle and the driver. The technology helps the police to get information; however, the police decides who to stop for violation. There are tremendous evidence that indicates African Americans men and women pulled over by police for minor traffic violation but ends up on body and vehicle search. This fact indicates discretion is exercised in the way one feels racial profiled. In the meantime, police are using these information collected to target African Americans like Imani Perry. Secondly, the author assumes police treated her wrongly and unfavorably because she is African American. Race and class remains an important social factor in understanding disparities in many important parts of life. Even though there is no simple way to show that a correlation between her case and wide police practice, her personal experience is quite similar with most African Americans victim of bad policing. Some critics may also assume this as an isolated
For the past few years there has been an ongoing debate surrounding the issue of racial profiling. The act of racial profiling may rest on the assumption that African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to commit crimes than any individual of other races or ethnicities. Both David Cole in the article "The Color of Justice" and William in the article "Road Rage" take stance on this issue and argue against it in order to make humanity aware of how erroneous it is to judge people without evidence. Although Cole and William were very successful in matters of showing situations and qualitative information about racial profiling in their articles, both of them fail at some points.
Labelling theory: The theory that the terms crime, deviance, or punishment are labels, variously applied by act of power and not some natural reflection of events – American criminologist Howard Becker
Bernburg, J., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. J. (2006). Official Labeling, Criminal Embeddedness, and Subsequent Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test of Labeling Theory. Journal Of Research In Crime & Delinquency, 43(1), 67-88. doi:10.1177/0022427805280068
Despite the fact racism has been around for hundreds of years, upcoming generations are becoming more open minded and less likely to publicly berate minorities; racial profiling, however, is the one loophole of racism America overlooks. Police officials often use the practices of racial profiling to discretely single out minority races. A common approach to this is through traffic patrols. According to a statistic based in San Jose, CA, nearly 100,000 drivers were stopped; during the year ending in June 2000; and of these drivers less than 32% were white, the remaining 68% of drivers were a... ... middle of paper ... ...
Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously
This definition leads us to discussion on what racial profiling has been over the years and how it cannot be combined with other aspects of discrimination. Racial profiling has been solely based on, (1)The use of race, ethnicity, or national origin and not (2) the use of an individual’s behavior or information that helps apprehend somebody who has been identified as being, or having been, engaged in criminal activity. (1) provides different investigative methods( race, ethnicity or national origin) while (2) tells us about investigative methods and the goals or outcomes of these investigative methods and uses specific information on suspicious activities like individual’s behavior. Including this contrast in the definition raises two problems. Even though, because of these classifications, this article would be concentrating on combining above two opinions which contribute to profiling. And concentrate why more blacks have been stopped in driving as compared to whites or more Muslims of Middle Eastern origin were stopped at airport as compared to other people.
Many people in the world today criticize and objectify specific people, merely by their outward appearance, as more likely to commit crime or other violent acts. A theory well known to criminologists is one devised by criminologists of the Chicago school, scholars whose main area of focus were urban, impoverished areas, and called their findings the Social Disorganization Theory in which it offers an idea as to why crime occurs in urban settings. The theory explains how American society is centered on the economy and individual achievement, otherwise known as “The American Dr...
Some people think that the police are targeting minorities, because there is more police activity around minorities; however, police officers are not targeting minorities. Accordingly, one reason people might think minorities might be being targeted are because of the color different races of the individual and the police officer. Based off recent events the public believes that if the police officer and the suspect have different color of skin, the officer is targeting that suspect. However; the literature does not agree, “In addition, officers’ race and racial interaction effects between officers’ being white and arrestees’ being non-white did not produce a significant relationship” (Lee Jang, Yun, Lim, & Tushaus 2010). The police are not looking at the suspect’s skin color before the officer justifies the arrest, police judge the arrest justified if there is probable cause that the suspect broke the law. Police officers look for criminal activity, and people who match the description of a criminal, but the police do not just go after people of an opposite race. Additionally, people believe that the police use more force around people of color because those individuals are being targeted. “Police officers use deadly force when they believe they have no choice in order to preserve human life, their own or that of other citizens… Police officers characteristically restrain their use of force with citizens, sometimes at the cost of their own safety. However, certain types of attitudes, personalities, and job experiences may make some officers more prone to use force in police-citizen” the types of attitudes are common in minorities (Miller, 2015). This is not true though, police officers are not targeting minorities. Minorities might be more aggressive because many might think the police are racially profiling. Police officers do
their acts as criminal and extending this judgement to them as people. Having been labelled, there is an expectation that this criminality must be expressed. With this attached stereotype, the general population will perceive them to be criminal and treat them accordingly. This produces unanticipated effects: the label of criminal is intended to prevent individuals from participating in criminal activities but it actually creates the very thing it intended to stop. It produces a self-fulfilling prophecy which is defined as a false definition of a situation, evoking a new behaviour that makes the original false assumption come true (Burke, 2005).
Label theory is based in the idea that behaviors are irregular when the society labels them as irregular. The label theory implies that a person commits a crime in some time of a life, but that person is not seen as deviant, while other people are deviant. Label theory explains how a behavior of a person conflicts with the norms of the society. For example, A black young men, who lives in a neighborhood controlled by gangs may be labeled as a gang member. In consequence, that young man can start to act as gang member or became one. He incorporates the label that was given to him.
Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).
Labeling theory basically revolves around one singe idea which is that a behavior is only really considered to be deviant when society labels it as deviant. In an article written about label theory, Labeling Theory in Deviance Research, Nanette J. Davis discusses how in labeling theory “deviance is a property conferred on acts by selected audiences” (Davis, 1972) meaning that it is the audience holds control as to what is known as deviant. David goes forward to discuss how “Audience reactions, definitions, categorizations, stigmatizations, and exclusionary strategies, are procedures that label a behavior as deviant” (Davis, 1972). These are all factors that can help label a behavior as deviant. Overall in the remainder of the article Davis discusses different cases in which the labeling theory has labeled certain behaviors deviant. This theory ties back into my experiment in the way that I will be performing a behavior that is not considered to be very normal, if the labeling theory is correct the audience will choose to label me as something, could be a student, a tired worker, a homeless man, etc. This label will the be the basis of how they respond to my action and whether or not they consider my behavior to be deviant. An example of this labeling theory could be seen if we imagine two men sleeping on a bench on a park, all other factors like time, place, audience are the same only difference is that one of the men is a business professional while the other is a homeless man. Because of that the labeling theory predict the homeless man is more likely to be negatively labeled as being deviant just because of the stigma that exist against the homeless and not the business