Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of leadership in an organization
Visionary leadership characteristics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of leadership in an organization
Organizational Leadership Module 3
Leadership Practice Inventory Leadership Practice Inventory (LPI) is an assessment on leadership behaviors and activities. During the analysis, it covers five behaviors; challenging the process, inspiring a shared vision, enabling others to act, modeling the way, encouraging the heart. I first conducted the LPI assessment on myself, to analyze my own leadership strength and weakness. If on the LPI behavior I scored high then I am doing well, if I scored low then I need more practice. The outcome of the LPI for the behavior of challenging the process I scored low. Then on inspiring a shared vision, I scored high. On enabling others to act I scored high. Modeling the way I scored low and encouraging the heart, I scored high. Therefore my strengths of leadership are inspiring a shared vision and encouraging the heart. My weaknesses are challenging the process and modeling the way; however for my enabling other to act I was moderate. I chose four different people to take the LPI about me. The first a family member, I received a high score on challenging the process, inspiring a shared vision, enabling others to act, modeling the way, encouraging the heart. According to my father, I have no weaknesses, but there is always room for improvement. The second person was a
…show more content…
I do lack time management. I have acknowledged that I do better when my time managing and organization is in order. I have also found that I dedicate all of my time and energy for other people and leaving no time for myself. I love self-help books, but have no time to read them. I often distance myself, from my family, and friends, because I have no time. People have called me cynical, and by observing my LPI score from others who surveyed my leadership, I agree. I feel that I am cynical because I am unhappy. How can I become a better leader when my optimistic performance and energy is
Denisco & Barker, (2016) discusses the foundation of leadership and the four conceptual pillars that comprise it. Understanding the leadership is a responsibility of an APN, the following final question was posed to Ms. Gordner. “Of the four pillars of leadership; professionalism, inspirational motivation, interpersonal relationships, and business skills, do you feel that one is more important than another, and why?” She responded,
Encarta Dictionary within Microsoft Word defines leadership as,” the ability to guide, direct, or influence people.” Expanding upon that definition, my personal definition is influencing people to follow to achieve a goal, regardless of how unpleasant. Leadership is not something that happens overnight, it needs to be cultivated over time. During that process, it is necessary to identify delinquencies and make adjustments. Reviewing the feedback provided by my LPI/360 assessment, the three areas identified I need to improve on are, praising people for a job well done, actively listening to diverse points of view, and becoming more visible within the workplace.
“The study of leadership rivals in age the emergence of civilization, which shaped its leaders as much as it was shaped by them. From its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders- what they did and why they did it.”
Assessment tools can be a good start for individuals to assess their leadership characteristics and skills, such as Grossman and Valiga’s Leadership Characteristcs and Skills Assessment (Grossman and Valiga, 2013). These tools may be helpful but its accuracy is questionable. The assessment can overestimate or underestimate an individual’s skills since it is a self-subjective administered assessment that is biased towards the taker. An overconfident person may perceive their skills highly and an under confident person may have low results.
As stated above, the LPI offered a unique opportunity to examine how I recognized myself as a supervisor and mentor. As a leader this survey glanced into how I saw myself; modeling the way, inspiring a shared vision, challenging the process, enabling others to act, and encouraging the heart. Equally important, it gave my supervisors, peers, and subordinates the same opportunity to give feedback from their perspective. A phrase often heard is, “You are your toughest critic”. This LPI survey validated that statement by showing me the differences in the scores of the aforementioned categories. Results from my survey revealed I
Directive leadership is characterized as leaders taking the decision into their own hands and expecting the followers to just follow the instructions. We all have been in one of those groups where someone wants to become Adolf and control everything, am I right? Last but not least, Participative Leadership, which is my favorite, in which the leader involves the group in a goal setting to give input and share feedback with one another. This next theory completely opened my eyes. The dependencies for effective leadership is defined as situations where a mix of factors the control and influence productivity. The contingency theory used LPC to measure a leader’s motivation, and task motivation vs relationship motivation. People who are relationship motivated have an inclination to describe their least favored associates in a more optimistic, pleasant and efficient, and they also received higher LPC scores. Task motivated people have a tendency to rate their least favored associates in a more negative manner. Thus, they receive lower LPC scores. Therefore, the LPC scale is actually not about the least desired coworker. In fact, it is actually about the person who takes the test, and this person 's motivation type. This got me thinking - what kind of LPC am I? Apparently my leader member relationship is good, my task structure was unstructured, and my leader position power is strong. Also , my LPC was Low. I don’t think of myself as the all-out leader, but I have some great followership in my opinion. I feel that leaders can lead more effectively when there is a match between your motivation type and the situation. These matches exist between a task and relationship motivated leader. When a leader and the situation does not match, many things have to be altered. Since
Understanding one’s strengths and weaknesses is essential to becoming and being a good leader. “Purposeful leaders understand who they are” (Mayfield, 2013). The author of this paper has had previous opportunities to lead, and will reflect on her experiences using the assigned inventory. She will evaluate her skill set and discuss ways she can be an advocate for change with the hospital and community in which she is employed. Lastly, she will identify one personal goal for her leadership growth and explore different avenues for obtaining that goal.
I was not significantly surprised at my results of the Personal Inventory Assessment (PIA). My personal results indicated that I have a healthy balance of patience, competitiveness, and engagement when it comes to measuring my personality (Personal Inventory Assessments, 2016). Over the course of my career I have developed my leadership skills, along with my level of self-awareness, to understand the need to approach my work as a collaborative effort and not a self-fulfilling journey. My decision making preference rated highest as a participatory style (Personal Inventory Assessments, 2016). I do believe that there are many times when a decision needs to be group based and not individual given the impact that the decision may have on the group as a whole. I can
For me to be an effective leader, I must first evaluate my strengths. I took the Gallup 2.0 Strength Finder report which showed my strengths in an insight and action planning guide. The results indicated the top five themes for me were input, learner, responsibility, maximizer and arranger. I believe the evaluation offered an accurate assessment of my strengths. The input theme states my mind is like a sponge, soaking up information. As a lifelong learner, the second theme is also, correct. I have a quest for knowledge about things that interest me. I am responsible, in my job and life. As a maximizer, I focus on long term goals and strive toward excellence. As a nurse, working in an environment of change, the arranger strength in my personality allows me to adapt easily and figure out the best way to accomplish tasks (Strengths, 2012).
The NCO DLC has taught me a great deal about the leader I was before the course and the type of leader I hope to be in the future. Through the lesson concepts and exercises, I have recognized my own areas of strength and self-improvement. According to the Full Range Leadership Development (FRLD) leadership styles, I am a transformational leader that promotes positivity in my work center, and I inspire other within my team to complete the mission. My hope is to improve myself as a leader and change how people view me as a leader within the next three to five years.
What evidence is there in multidisciplinary cancer care, of a relationship between the role of oncologist and leadership outcomes?
Many individuals and organizations, uses these tools to evaluate leadership abilities. It is almost similar to a SWOT analysis, which measures strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and treats. I find the LCSI extremely effective because it assesses leadership competencies in five major areas: personal, analytical, communication, organizational and positional competencies. Then, it further operationalizes the five important skills into core qualities that exceptional leaders own. After completing my scorecard, I was able to do my SWOT analysis. It assisted me to identify my strong and weak areas. In this pape...
When reflecting on my leadership styles, strengths and weaknesses I am rushed with thoughts, memories, regrets and actions of personal ways that I have handled past situations in the work place and ways that I plan to handle new situations at my new work place. I have had many successes with the way I handle my leadership role but there are also things that I wish that I could go back in time and change. The way some situations are handled, I think to myself, well this could have been done differently or I could have done this instead of what I did to enhance the outcome of the situation. There is always room for improvement in whatever job or task someone takes on and this is just one of those things. During the development of my PLAP, I have had the chance to weigh out my strengths and weaknesses of my leadership and it has been very effective to seeing where improving needs to be met. The plan has also let me evaluate the direction I hope to head in to achieve my leadership goals.
What is it that drives the human spirit to accomplish such unbelievable feats? It can be said that each individual strives for a better life for themselves. Is that the case of is there a more external force of motivation for us? Do you believe that we can live our own lives in a way in which we maximize our life’s potential? There are, of course, many different types of personalities that exist. Certainly you don’t listen to exactly the same music or enjoy the same films that your coworkers do. So it goes that with each personality comes a different way of reacting to situations. Perhaps you’ve heard of the common “fight or flight response” stated first by Walter Bradford Cannon. While we can enter into a deep discussion on this response, the purpose of these pages is not to highlight what it is that causes people to react in a certain way but what cause people to spark reactions in others.
focus on. In addition to the great man/ woman theory, the trait theory investigated the effects that specific traits had on the determination of the greatness of a leader, but much like the first theory, this is somewhat narrow and only focuses on one aspect of the person that can predict greatness and effectiveness as a leader.