Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Different ways environment can affect childrens development
Different ways environment can affect childrens development
The namesake jhumpa lahiri literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The short story cycle is the idea that stories can be independent yet interdependent through common standards and themes. This remains the case in both the novels Krik? Krak! by Edwidge Danticat and Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri as they connect stories such as “A Wall of Fire Rising”, “Children of the Sea”, “Mrs. Sen’s”, and “Mr. Pirzada Came to Dine” through accentuation of setting and denial of loss. This idea of connectivity is present through all the stories as the individual characters face their unique challenges. For instance, in Krik? Krak! characters such as the girl and Céalinne in a “Children of the Sea” have to witness horrors imposed on their compatriots when they can do nothing to stop it and grasp onto the only constant …show more content…
Pirzada Came to Dine” young characters have been placed in combative environments that cause them to refuse to let go of what they have lost. For example, within Children of the Sea the main girl watches abdominal scenes play out right before her eyes, even as she tries to escape to a safe haven. While she travels to her new home she expresses, “on our way to ville rose, we saw a dog licking the two dead faces. one of them was a little boy who was lying on the side of the road with the sun in his dead open eyes” (Danticat 19). Danticat utilizes juxtaposition in this quote to highlight how atrocious the environment is in Haiti. The dogs are licking these faces which is typically seen as a cute way of showing affection. However, in this case, it is paired with the placid stare of a dead child, which is a gruesome image. The instance of a horrific setting being experienced by someone of a young age is present in Interpreter of Maladies as well. While eating dinner with her family Lilia’s father has her watch the new with them. She recounts, “On the screen I saw tanks rolling through dusty streets, and fallen buildings, and forests of unfamiliar trees into which East Pakistani refugees have fled, seeking safety over the Indian border” (Lahiri 31). Lilia watches the unpleasant images before her eyes and discusses how uncomfortable and broken Dacca is. The author's use of imagery in this piece of quotation helps to exemplify …show more content…
Sen's” are connected in much of the same way as older characters battle cruel settings and yet again cannot let go of the things they clung to for so long. Particularly, the adult citizens of the shantytown from “A Wall of Fire Rising” struggle to deal with the harsh environment with which they are presented. They have a corrupt government controlling a majority of what they do. Danticat informs, “They made bonfires with dried sticks, corn husks, and paper, cursing the authorities under their breath” (Lahiri 60). The people of this town are living in poor conditions that force them to gather together whatever scraps and trash such as “corn husks” and “dried sticks” they can spare in order to be warm. They do not have the courage to stand up to the government as they only deny them “under their breath” showing how cruel and uncomfortable this setting is. Withal, in the short story “Mrs. Sen’s” a similar cruel environment is evident as Mrs. Sen drives home and experiences American nature. The author proposes, “A car beeped its horn then another. She beeped defiantly in response, stopped, then pulled without signaling to the side of the road. ‘No more,’ she says, her forehead resting against the top of the steering wheel. ‘I hate it. I hate driving. I won’t go on’” (Lahiri 131). This instance shows how the new setting Mrs. Sen is part of is uncomfortable to her. As she tries to assimilate into the culture she
Danticat's Krik? Krak!, are a collection of short stories about Haiti and Haitian-Americans before democracy and the horrible conditions that they lived in. Although it is a mistake to call the stories autobiographical, Krik? Krak! embodies some of Danticat's experiences as a child. While the collection of stories draw on the oral tradition in Haitian society, it is also part of the literature of diaspora, the great, involuntary migration of Africans from their homeland to other parts of the world; thus, the work speaks of loss and assimilation and resistance. The stories all seem to share similar themes, that one story could be in some way linked to the others. Each story had to deal with relationships, either with a person or a possession, and in these relationships something is either lost or regained. Another point that was shared throughout the short stories was the focus on the struggles of the women in Haiti. Lastly they all seem to weave together the overarching theme of memory. It's through memory and the retelling of old stories and legends that the Haitians in Danticat's tales achieve immortality, and extension to lives that were too often short and brutal.
In coming to understand this book, we must also take into account the fact that no work of literature exists in a vacuum, and all literature is affected by the social and cultural contexts of its author and its reader. MAUS is no exception. In MAUS, the use of frame stories helps to establish personal, social, and cultural context for the "main" stories told within.
To sum up, the comparison of these two stories, 「The Story of an Eyewitness」 and 「Leaving Desire」 lead me to understand deeper about the stories. The type of disaster, setting, atmosphere and the style of writing. The four elements have correspondence while some parts of them differ. However, as I am repeating, the all of them conducts to the same topic. The horror of the disaster might be nothing. The grief of death, loss and so many things that cannot be transferred into words penetrate one’s heart, telling us how dreadful the calamities are. To put it another way, disasters should be reduced into minimum. I hope not many people to feel the distress which could be found in 「The Story of an Eyewitness」 and 「Leaving Desire」 in the future.
In conclusion, two stories from two different genres can be compared and contrasted by an author’s writing style and point of view. After analyzing the two stories, “Araby” and “A Good Man is Hard to Find” the reader is able to come to the conclusion that “Araby” is the more interesting story because one can relate to it.
Jhumpa Lahiri, who won the Pulitzer Prize in the year 2000 for her Interpreter of Maladies, is a brilliant novelist. Her first novel The Namesake forms the basis of the present study. Lahiri has the first-hand experience to authentically portray the diasporic experience of the second generation of immigrants in America. At the same time, she had taken pains to imagine the experience of loss and nostalgia of the first generation immigrants also. Jhumpa Lahiri was born Nilanjana Svadeshna on July 11, 1967 in London to Bengali parents. As a child, Lahiri moved with her family to Rhode Island where Jhumpa spend her adolescence. Lahiri went on to attend Bernard College, graduating with a Bachelor of Arts in English and later attending Boston University.
To conclude, Kundera’s narrative technique is very complex and unusual, it is also very rich in history and fiction. It might being difficult the easy flowing of the reading, but I have to accept that he is a very good author, who knows what is doing. He uses the “intrusive narrator” technique, because he does not want to be a dissident writer. (Contemporary Literay Criticism-Select 1).
Krik? Krak! is a book with a set of stories which somehow seem to go in a cycle and could be related and linked to each other . Davis Rocio G. states in his critical essay “A cycle may be defined as “a set of stories linked to each other in such a way as to maintain a balance between the individuality of each of the stories and the necessities of the larger unit.”” Krik? Krak! is made in such way to make the story telling easier to understand and remember because it gives a sense of storytelling for both the speaker and reader.
The Namesake Literary Analysis In The Namesake, Jhumpa Lahiri illustrates several factors contributing to an individual’s life, such as the struggle faced by settling immigrant families and their growing second-generation children. This fundamental idea, developed by Lahiri, explains that the absence of strong roots heavily affects an individual’s identity. This is clearly depicted through Gogol and the conflict he faces with his identity, the central theme and the symbolism found in Gogol’s names.
Although Mirikitani uses prose to tell the greater part of Hatsuko's narrative, her treatment of this genre easily allows for the incorporation of poetry. The transition between these literary styles is not at all surprising or abrupt to the reader, but rather makes sense given the experiences of the character. By switching between Hatsuko's past recollections and her present search for self-actualization, Mirikitani's prose creates a broken and almost schizophrenic effect in her tale. She often uses short, fragmented sentences and switches frequently between stories. The additi...
... the conventions of the short story cycle into the extended medium of the novel; the deconstruction of perceptive is thoroughly consistent with the experience of modernity, the end of communality and an increasingly individual, internalized encounter with the conditions of reality.
The present paper is an effort to deal with the exhaustive analysis of Jhumpa Lahiri’s fictional writings from a cultural perspective that demonstrates that she has addressed herself to all the issues associated with expatriate experience. It also aims to explore the novels of the author that strike largely a common chord as regards the diasporic experience. Since she has lived abroad as a writer belonging to Indian roots, hence to a great extent, the themes in her works also bear issues related her native country. By choosing her protagonists from all parts of the world having divergent ethnic, religious and cultural preoccupations, the writer has attempted to explore the multiplicity of this theme which is centered in her struggles to outgrow inherited values. With her evolving creative vision the canvas of her thematic content enlarges and the complexity
There are certain ‘big questions’, questions on purpose and meaning, questions on life and death, that constantly hang over humanity. Some people go on with their day to day lives either blissfully unaware or choosing to hide in naivety. But for others, these questions can become a consuming struggle, something that drives their every moment. Murakami, in After the Quake, writes stories about the second kind of people. These questions that Murakami has his characters struggle with are hard to tackle in such brief, condensed works as short stories, but by giving the elements of the story several layers of meaning and interpretation he is able to unpack the idea more fully and set the reader on the right track to begin unpacking the stories
This Blessed House by Jhumpa Lahiri is a short story that follows a small period of time in the two characters’ lives. Having known one another for only four months, newlyweds Sanjeev and Tanima, called Twinkle, are finding it difficult to adjust to married life. Both have very different personalities, a theme that Lahiri continuously points to throughout the story,. Their conflict comes to a head when Twinkle begins finding Christian relics all over the house. Sanjeev wants to throw the relics away, but Twinkle collects them on the mantle and shows them off at every opportunity. As a character, Sanjeev is unadventurous and exacting, while Twinkle is free-spirited and does not care for the fine details. The root of the conflict between Jhumpa Lahiri’s characters Sanjeev and Twinkle in “This Blessed House” is the clashing of their two very different personalities in a situation that forces them together.
In conclusion, the three short stories, “Everyday Use,” “Two Kinds,” and “A Worn Path” have similarities and differences that utilizes the literary elements of plot, theme, and characterization, however “A Worn Path” delivers an approach that makes its story more memorable from a more proficient level. Each story has its own way of utilizing the literary elements, which is needed to help readers appreciate, interpret and analyze a literary work. Writers cannot create a desired work without including literary elements. Once the reader notices the elements, it can allow the readers compare works from one writer to the next to determine its worth. It also allows readers to be motivated to use their imagination and visualize the characters and scene more vividly.
In this paper, two stories, “The Child Returns” by Rebindranath Tagore and “The Voyage” by Katherine Mansfield, are explored in the way their differences are portrayed through narrative style and the writing of the author. Fenella, the child in Mansfield’s story, is portrayed as a young, confused girl after her mother died and is sent to live with her grandmother because women were expected to raise and nurture their children. In Tagore’s story, a man named Raicharan loses the son of his rich master and raises his own son as the replacement. The son has little empathy for his birth father’s sacrifices, due to his upbringing as a rich man’s son. While the stories have similarities regarding the way they are