Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of training & development on employees
Why organization change is inevitable
Reflection of organization change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of training & development on employees
Explain how a change can be managed or implemented in the organisation.
Organisational change can be distinguished as the procedure implemented by an organisation by altering its framework, operational methods, strategies, technologies, business processes as well as organisational culture, in order to bring an effective change within an enterprise. This change is brought about by carefully reviewing and modifying the current management structures and processes, thereby providing a head start against the companies competition more efficiently and cost effectively. Both internal and external forces can affect organisational functioning (Pollack, 2015). For instance, at Asliya Group, implementation of new technologies is crucial to thrive in
…show more content…
One or many methods collaboratively can be utilised to successfully reduce resistance change during unfreezing. Ensuring proper education and frequent communication lines with the employees, where there is a lack of information or inaccurate information and analysis [insert company example]. Transition period involves the implementation of a revised organisational structure, process changes and development techniques by initiating a new outlook in terms of morals, work ethic and attitude within the workplace. The final stage, also known as refreezing ensures the solidification of the newly adopted changes, thereby establishing the stability of the proposed business model (Burnes, 2004). Application of Kotter's 8-Step Change Model also outlines essential 8 steps required in the organisational change. By increasing the urgency, the potential crisis and major opportunities could be clearly analysed. This is followed by assembling a group of individuals capable of forming a dynamic coalition to forecast the change. This is achieved by actively communicating the vision by utilising multiple channels and vehicles of communication, …show more content…
According to Cascio (2000), work teams and groups constitute of two or more individuals who collaboratively work together to achieve organisationally assigned specific tasks with similar vision, showcase task interdependencies, interact socially, preserve and maintain boundaries, while influencing interchanges with other broader entity units. Asliya Group employs both formal and informal groups in order to achieve its organisational goals. Formal groups are proposed and structured deliberately to subserve organizational interest and includes command groups, task groups, and functional groups (Greenberg and Baron, 2000). Such groups are categorised by an organisational chart, usually involving the subordinates reporting directly to the supervisor[insert departmental example]. Task groups are assembled in order to achieve a specified set of goals within a specific time frame [insert example]. Functional groups are devised by the organisation so as to execute particular within a undesignated time period and are not restricted to its next proximate hierarchal superior. Sub categories of functional groups namely counteraction and coaching; the counteraction groups resolve conflict via negotiation and compromise, whereas coaching involves members conducting
Institutionalize Change in Organisational Culture – One important question is when does the process end. The successful culmination of change process is when the objectives of that process become a part of the daily organisational culture. When the next generation of management takes over, the objectives should be a part of the whole organisation and not just a single process or department.
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
The first chapter of “Working in Groups” focuses on group communication, the first aspect being the key elements of group communication (Engleberg and
In this paper, I will identify and describe a group I recently observed. The description will include information about the group process and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the leader’s style. I will also consider what I might do differently if leading the group and think about how I could apply what I learned from this observation into my own work.
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
Throughout this essay I hope to analyse theoretical organizational behaviour by drawing on my own experiences from working in groups. The groups I am going to use as part of my examples are all from formal groups. Huczynski and Buchanan (2007, p. 291) gives a good definition of Formal groups in a few bullet-points, where one of them is task-orientation which in my opinion has clearly characterized the groups I am talking about. The groups are not necessarily consisting of like-minded people, but individuals randomly picked by the lecturer/tutor which in many cases leads to different disagreements as the groups try to establish itself and the members of the group try to find their role within the group. Bruce Tuckman came up with a theory in the 1960s to explain how a group goes through several different stages on its way to success, which is known as the Tuckmans Stages of Group Development (Anon 2009, 12manage.com).
Discussed earlier was the fact that there are factors in place that should have identified the need for change. This organization has a yearly health and wellness survey that is completed anonymously to gauge technical growth and morale. This survey has been flagged for four years in a row as being “red” which indicates that there is a leadership issue. The other factor is a program that logs the organizations ability to do their job which has also been flagged for five years. These flags should have initiated a “Tiger Team” who would have been tasked to analyze the problem and generate courses of action to resolve the issue. However, this did not occur and business continued as is until recently when several outside agency inquisitions
Change usually comes with resistance in any workplace because change disrupts the employees’ sense of safety and control (Lewis, 2012). Kurt Lewin (1951) created a three step process for assisting employees with organizational Change (Lewis, 2012). The three stages are Unfreeze, Change and Refreeze. These are the steps to a smooth transition for change within organizations. Further, these steps are not possible without good communication from upper Management through line staff. Communication was consistently listed as an issue in surveys conducted by the department.
In order to evaluate my role within the group it is important to identify what makes a group. A group must firstly consist of more than three members, “Two members have personal relationships; with three or more there is a change in quality” of the personal relationship. (Bion 1961, p26) The group must have a common purpose or a goal in order to succeed.
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
Organisational change is when a “Company or organization going through a transformation. Organization change occurs when business strategies or major sections of an organization are altered.”[1] This means that areas of an organisation progress from one position of action to another in the attempt to improve an areas efficiency or ability. The motivation for change can greatly impact on the support of those involved, this could be due to extrinsic factors such as financial gain or intrinsic factors such as ethical practise, this motive however must be strong enough and required with a realistic view for success will promote support from those in the organisation who care for the causation of the change. Those it does not affect will often be ambivalent to the effort required to make the change.
The world is constantly changing in many different ways. Whether it is technological or cultural change is present and inevitable. Organizations are not exempt from change. As a matter of fact, organizations have to change with the world and society in order to be successful. Organizations have to constantly incorporate change in order to have a competitive advantage and satisfy their customers. Organizations use change in order to learn and grow. However, change is not something that can happen in an organization overnight. It has to be thought through and planned. The General Model of Planned Change focuses on what processes are used by the organization to implement change. In the General Model of Planned Change, four steps are used in order to complete the process of change. Entering and Contracting, Diagnosing, Planning and Implementing, and Evaluating and Institutionalizing are the four steps used in order to complete the process of change in an organization. The diagnostic process is one of the most important activities in OD(Cummings, 2009, p. 30).
One of the first scholars to describe the process of organizational change was Lewin (1974). He described change as a three-stage process that consists of unfreezing, moving and freezing stage. During the unfreezing stage the organizations become motivated to change by some event or objective. The moving stage is like implementation when the organization actually makes the necessary change. Furthermore the freezing stage is reached when the change becomes permanent. Organizational change has also...