Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The fatal flaws in king lear
Themes of king lear
The fatal flaws in king lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The fatal flaws in king lear
King Lear is often regarded as one of Shakespeare’s finest pieces of literature. One reason this is true is because Shakespeare singlehandedly shows the reader what the human condition looks like as the play unfolds. Shakespeare lets the reader watch this develop in Lear’s own decisions and search for the purpose of life while unable to escape his solitude and ultimately his own death. Examining the philosophies Shakespeare embeds into the language and actions of King Lear allows the reader a better understanding of the play and why the play is important to life today. Because Lear is rooted in flawed epistemology, attempting to find the meaning of life, he can only create corrupted actions and policies. Not only does Lear’s epistemology only cause him greater problems, but this epistemology also relates back to the political nature of the play. Politics must be understood as a process of fabrication in which the end utopian goal justifies and underpins rulership, control and domination (Saurette). Nowhere is this better shown than when Lear decides to step down from the throne and give his seat on the throne to the daughter who “loves” him most (Damrosch 1361-1363) and when he does, the two daughters who fabricate their “love” for their father rule his former kingdom through authoritarianism and totalitarianism. This paper seeks to analyze distinct philosophies in King Lear, such as existentialism and nihilism, to allow the reader a better grasp on why certain actions in the play occur and why these political philosophies drive Lear further into his problems. Although referred to as a distinct philosophy, it seems nearly impossible to find an exact definition for the term “existentialism.” This is primarily true because existen... ... middle of paper ... ...inia Military Institute. 2012. 8-10. Web. 21 Nov. 2013. Kain, Philip J. “Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, and the Horror of Existence.” Journal of Nietzshe Studies. Vol. 33. 2007. 49-63. Print. ---. “Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperitive. The Southern Journal of Philosopy. Vol. 45 Issue 1. 2007. 105-116. Print. Nighan, Raymond. Meditations. Dr. Nighan's British Literature and AP page: http://stjohns-chs.org/english/Seventeenth/Sev-bk.html. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. Pratt, Alan. “Nihilism.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 3 May 2005. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. Saurette, Paul. “I Mistrust All Systemizers and Avoid Them: Nietzsche Arendt and the Crisis of the Will to Order in International Relations Theory.” Journal of International Studies. Vol. 25. No. 1. 1996. Print. Yalom, Irvin D. “Yalom’s Ultimate Concerns.” Existential Psychotherapy. 1980. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. As reprinted in Elements of Literature. Toronto: Oxford University Press. 1990.
Jasper: Lear behaves a lot like child towards those who try to warn him against giving up his kingdowm to his two daughters, Regan and Goneril. He banishes Kent who tries to warn him, he threatens to whip the Fool who tries to warn him and he even ignores Cordelia's speech about the speeches her sisters have given.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig; G. E. M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte (eds. and trans.). Philosophical Investigations. 4th edition, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Print.
Despite its undeniable greatness, throughout the last four centuries King Lear has left audiences, readers and critics alike emotionally exhausted and mentally unsatisfied by its conclusion. Shakespeare seems to have created a world too cruel and unmerciful to be true to life and too filled with horror and unrelieved suffering to be true to the art of tragedy. These divergent impressions arise from the fact that of all Shakespeare's works, King Lear expresses human existence in its most universal aspect and in its profoundest depths. A psychological analysis of the characters such as Bradley undertook cannot by itself resolve or place in proper perspective all the elements which contribute to these impressions because there is much here beyond the normal scope of psychology and the conscious or unconscious motivations in men.
Throughout history, men have been depicted in literature in various ways: as warriors, heroes, rulers, fathers, brothers, sons and lovers. Shakespeare's King Lear gives a glimpse of a man's psyche in the course of the relationships he has with the women of the play. King Lear brings out the worst of Goneril and Regan, invoking within them deceit, greed and manipulation, portraying women as foul and loathsome creatures who give rise to suffering and discord. While Cordelia embodies a positive female image, King Lear is illogical in his actions toward her due to her sexuality and his opinion of how a female should honor her father.
In King Lear, Shakespeare portrays a society whose emphasis on social class results in a strict social hierarchy fueled by the unceasing desire to improve one’s social status. It is this desire for improved social status that led to the unintentional deterioration of the social hierarchy in King Lear. This desire becomes so great that Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall were willing to act contrary to the authority of the social hierarchy for the betterment of their own position within it. As the plot unfolds, the actions of the aforementioned characters get progressively more desperate and destructive as they realize their lack of success in attaining their personal goals. The goals vary, however the selfish motivation does not. With Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall as examples, Shakespeare portrays the social hierarchy as a self-defeating system because it fosters desires in its members that motivate them to act against the authority of the hierarchy to benefit themselves. A consideration of each characters actions in chronological order and the reasons behind such actions reveals a common theme among the goals for which morality is abandoned.
1-William Shakespeare. King Lear edited by Russle Fraser.(New York: Penguin Putnam Inc., 1982). All future references will come from this text.
Ain, Philip J. “Nietzsche, Skepticism AND Eternal Recurrence." Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13, (September 1, 1983): 365-388. Philosopher's Index, EBSCOhost (accessed November 8, 2013).
King Lear is an exceptional piece of art that provides insight into the human condition through existentialism. King Lear is challenged with existence in its plainest form and forced to adapt to that existence (Baker). His adjustment to the absurd provides a unique vision for all into the problem of existence. Lear is obligated to an existential evolution that will be traced to the marvel of realization. The outcome of his development throughout the story is viewed ironically in that Lear finds contentment in misery.
No tragedy of Shakespeare moves us more deeply that we can hardly look upon the bitter ending than King Lear. Though, in reality, Lear is far from like us. He himself is not an everyday man but a powerful king. Could it be that recognize in Lear the matter of dying? Each of us is, in some sense, a king who must eventually give up his kingdom. To illustrate the process of dying, Shakespeare has given Lear a picture of old age in great detail. Lear’s habit to slip out of a conversation (Shakespeare I. v. 19-33), his brash banishment of his most beloved and honest daughter, and his bitter resentment towards his own loss of function and control, highlighted as he ironically curses Goneril specifically on her functions of youth and prays that her
Bengtsson, Frederick. “King Lear by William Shakespeare.” Columbia College. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2015.
Individuals aim to have a profound lifestyle that is constructed by delicately crafted goals and ambitions, they in turn end up determining the “outlook” that an individual has on how to go about their daily lifestyle. Individuals are persuaded by the lust of ambition, regardless of the nuances that come with realism in terms of the legitimacy of their ultimate goals. In the play, “King Lear”, William Shakespeare effectively establishes the comparison of characters who have differing but relatively same ambition in terms of their validity, he vindicates the various consequences of their actions by juxtaposing the impact they have had on the life of others and self. The ambition that drives the
William Shakespeare's King Lear King Lear is universal - the tragedy is in a distantly remote and
The King Lear play resonates a clear distinction between good and evil. Within the structures of these antagonistic forces lies the personal schema of the individual. Through the circumstances of their harsh environment the characters of the play move toward a survival-of-the-fittest-type approach. The existence of a dog-eat-dog society forces this position. In such a world, to consider the collective good of the group or the well being of another is potentially hazardous to the individual - the virtue of selflessness perhaps harmful.