Kant's Argumentative Essay

1090 Words3 Pages

Philosophy is a compound of the Greek word for love, “phileo”, and the Greek word for wisdom, “sophe”; the term philosophy literally means the “love of wisdom”. Furthermore, philosophy is the study of the nature of knowledge, reality, existence and thinking. Essentially, philosophy is an activity that people undertake when they attempt to understand the truth about themselves and the world in which they live. As students of philosophy, we are seeking the answers to life’s most basic questions. Philosophy can be divided into several major areas of study (i.e. metaphysics, ethics, etc.), and each area of study involves seeking to answer different questions and understanding the truth about different areas of our life and the world we live in. …show more content…

In order to make this point, Kant made a distinction between hypothetical and categorical imperatives. The hypothetical imperative demands the performance of an action as a means to another end (i.e. on the condition that it resulted in a certain desired “end” that would justify the means). In contrast, the categorical imperative, which is one of his main ideas, demands the unconditional performance of an act for its own sake (i.e. as a duty rather than as a means to another end). He argued that the categorical imperative was the voice of our own rational selves/the rule our intelligence gave us. The categorical imperative stated that we should act only according to that maxim by which we can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. Basically, in order to test the morality of an action, we have to ask ourselves: What if this act is generally practiced and we were a victim of it? Can we imagine a world where everyone is doing it? Would we want to live in that world? Furthermore, Kant believed that the categorical imperative could also be stated as follows: act so as to treat people as ends, never as means. This shows that Kant, unlike Mill, valued the individual rather than the collective. In fact, he was strictly against harming even the dignity of an individual. Moreover, unlike Mill, Kant believed that the consequences of the action are meaningless because they don’t justify the action (which points us back to the categorical imperative: one should perform an act for its own sake, not as a means to another end). Finally, Kant believed that we were free only when we were acting in out best nature and under moral

Open Document