Kant Vs Hobbes Essay

667 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Comparison of hobbes kant and locke

The ideology between philosophers Kant and Hobbes differ in terms of how one another look at the way society treats government. They particularly have opposing views when it comes to the topic of punishment. In general terms Hobbe’s ideology was highlighted in the Leviathan that our society is self centered, that we have a “natural condition” of man where we have the ability as humans to cause complete and total anarchy. Comparing his theory to savagery prior to the formation of government, he states that we need higher forms in order to prevent physical harm to one another. Therefore his belief that with the using of government constructs we, as humans are able to function effectively in physical security. His belief is that society should …show more content…

Hobbes is a believer in deterrence. He believes is that the presence of police or any higher authority controls society. Kant does not discredit this theory. They clash on the subject of punishment in regards to violating the law or committing crimes. Hobbes is a believer in brutal punishment, such brutal punishment that is be considered torturous. His ideology centers on the fact that you in a sense lose your rights when you chose to go against the government and fail to be an obedient citizen. This is an extreme idea and Kant goes back to his categorical imperative theory and states that criminals are not necessarily bad people, but people who have chosen to do bad things. He believes retributional justice is the answer, which is what you get what you earn in life and to punish those criminals they must endure dignified punishment. Tortuous punishment isn’t the answer like Hobbes would believe but Kant believes the punishment must fit the crime. Kant places more value on morality that the law as opposed to Hobbes. Kant believes in balance when it comes to punishment, that we as humans should discuss to another and explain what is right and wrong as opposed to Hobbes that believes that we must be punished for every mistake we made. Kant is a firm believer in respect especially to

Show More
Related

  • Nicolo Machiavelli And Thomas Hobbes Concept Of Ideal Government

    1314 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, I believe the concepts Hobbes maintains are of a more ideal, and proper functioning society. First, he indicates that having a higher power in place eliminates the threat of violence amongst society, and enhances peace amongst people (Hobbes [1651] 2013). Through the achievement of a sovereign, society will avoid reverting back to a state of chaos. Secondly, he presents the idea of a democratic government, in which members of the state make a unified decision on who represents them(Hobbes [1651] 2013). This method of government is still present, and highly effective to this day. It allows individuals who are in power

    Read More

  • Comparing John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

    1242 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though they both believed that men naturally have to some extent equality and freedom, what makes their concepts differ is the presence or absence of the natural law. In Hobbes' theory, men at their natural state are at constant war, the war of all against all. Another Hobbes' belief is that most people are selfish and tend to do everything for their own reason. To Hobbes humans are driven to maximize personal gains so in a world where there are no rules humans are in constant fear of each other as they each try to get as much as they can, enough is never enough. Men act in basically the same ways to get what we desire and if two men desire the same things then they inevitably become enemies, no...

    Read More

  • Human Nature as Viewed by Thomas Hobbes and David Hume

    1952 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hobbes views human nature as the war of each man against each man. For Hobbes, the essence of human nature can be found when we consider how man acts apart from any government or order. Hobbes describes the world as “a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man.” (Hobbes mp. 186) In such a world, there are “no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” (Hobbes mp. 186) Hobbes believes that laws are what regulate us from acting in the same way now. He evidences that our nature is this way by citing that we continue to lock our doors for fear of theft or harm. Hobbes gives a good argument which is in line with what we know of survivalism, and evidences his claim well. Hobbes claims that man is never happy in having company, unless that company is utterly dominated. He says, “men have no pleasure, (but on the contrary a great dea...

    Read More

  • Hobbes Vs Bossuet

    1461 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though he made moral and political works, he is be known for his political ideas. Hobbes believed that in a state/country a “sovereign authority” must be appointed and have total control over its people. This was due to Hobbes’ philosophy, that in “state of nature”, a civilisation without government/authority, one would be blind and lost in the world, and would always try to compete over leadership. He believed that this would lead to “bellum omnium contra omnes”, war against all. Ultimately, the “Sovereign Authority” should rule by fear, for in a country/state where one is afraid of death, then and only then, can there be true peace. Hobbes believes that there are two ways to achieve this, “Sovereignty by institution” and “Sovereignty by acquisition”. In “Sovereignty by institution”, people are ruled by a “common authority” that the people have either decided on or have already had power over the state for long period of time. While in “Sovereignty by acquisition”, however, the “Sovereign authority” is usually a conqueror that promises “ protection for obedience”. This idea was based on a “Social Contract”, which confirms trust and obedience to a “Soverign Authority”. Hobbes also believed, that it did not matter how a “Sovereign Authority” came to power, but obedience and legitimacy of the authority’s power comes to

    Read More

  • Hobbes Vs Rousseau

    1582 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hobbes believed that man is selfish and violent by nature, and therefore only acts kind to others for personal reasons. On the other hand, Rousseau believed that man is naturally good and only seems to act unkind because of the influence of outside influences. These ideas greatly influenced their ideas of the morality of man, and what exactly constitutes right and just behavior.

    Read More

  • Equality: Comparing Hobbes and Locke

    2000 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ideal forms of government. They do interlock in ideas very frequently because they both believe in man having god given equality such as their equally right to compete for resources. They do differ in how they view man’s state of nature because Locke believes that man is a rational and social being who will avoid being in a constant state of war while Hobbes says there is no way to prevent that constant state of war without an absolute sovereign as government. Their theories are both based on scarcity of goods because man’s goal is to obtain these scarce goods to self-preserve. Locke and Hobbes both have ideal forms of government, with Locke believing in a unified government that is maintained by the will of the people and Hobbes absolute sovereign as a government. They attest that these forms of government is what is needed to achieve equality and to preserve man.

    Read More

  • Comparing Machiavelli and Hobbes

    1482 Words  | 3 Pages

    While both Machiavelli and Hobbes agree that there should be rule by a sovereign, and that this individual will probably make better decisions than individuals, the two disagree on basic assumptions. While Machiavelli believes that the ends justify the means, Hobbes tends to align religion and politics and sees the way in which policies play out as vital for the moral good of society. Machiavelli embraces the idea of a virtuous republican citizen similar to how one might consider a citizen today. To give power and authority to the individual in charge, and trust in what he is doing, is to be virtuous. Hobbes' idea of a subject who properly understands the nature and basis of sovereign political power is more important than the simple, unquestioning support of the leader.

    Read More

  • Hobbes's Theory Of Political Nature And The Theories Of Human Nature

    1286 Words  | 3 Pages

    In sophisticated prose, Hobbes manages to conclude that human beings are all equal in their ability to harm each other, and furthermore that they are all capable of rendering void at will the covenants they had previously made with other human beings. An absolutist government, according to Hobbes, would result in a in a society that is not entirely focused on self-preservation, but rather a society that flourishes under the auspices of peace, unity, and security. Of all the arguably great philosophical discourses, Hobbes in particular provides one of the surest and most secure ways to live under a sovereign that protects the natural liberties of man. The sovereign government is built upon the idea of stability and security, which makes it a very intriguing and unique government indeed. The aforementioned laudation of Hobbes and his assertions only helps to cement his political theories at the forefront of the modern

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes´ Influence on Modern Day Politics

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the work, Hobbes incorporates several concepts, such as inalienable rights in the state of nature, self-interest and civil rights, which show support for a republican form of government. One of his major points throughout his famous work comes in the first section of the work, of man, which introduces the concept of inalienable rights. Hobbes begins by describing the state nature as one which is in a continual state of war, where the life of man is "poor, nasty, brutish, and short" . However, even in this state of war, several rights of nature are suggested, rights which everyone in the sta...

    Read More

  • Thrasymachus Vs Hobbes

    678 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hobbes, on the other hand argues that justice is needed for people to live together in civil society. He outlines this idea down to human beings in the

    Read More

  • Individual Liberty: Thomas Hobbes and John Rawls

    2100 Words  | 5 Pages

    ����������� Thomas Hobbes is an important political and social philosopher. He shares his political philosophy in his work Leviathan. Hobbes begins by describing the state of nature, which is how humans coped with one another prior to the existence of government. He explains that without government, �the weakest has the strength to kill the strongest� (Hobbes 507). People will do whatever it takes to further their own interests and protect their selves; thus, creating a constant war of �every man against every man� (Hobbes 508). His three reasons for people fighting amongst each other prior to government include �competition,� �diffidence,� and �glory� (Hobbes 508). He explains how men fight to take power over other people�s property, to protect them selves, and to achieve fame. He describes life in the state of nature as being �solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short� (Hobbes 508). Hobbes goes on to say that if men can go on to do as they please, there will always be war. To get out of this state of nature, individuals created contracts with each other and began to form a government.

    Read More

  • Comparing Thomas Hobbes And Locke's Theory Of Government

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two English philosophers who were very similar thinkers. They both studies at Oxford, and they both witnessed the civil Revolution. The time when they lived in England influenced both of their thoughts as the people were split into two groups, those whom though the king should have absolute power, and the other half whom thought people could govern themselves. However Hobbes and Locke both rejected the idea of divine right, such as there was no one person who had the right from God to rule. They both believed in the dangers of state of nature, they thought without a government there is more chance of war between men. However their theories differ, Hobbes theories are based on his hypothetical ideas of the state

    Read More

  • Hobbes' View of Human Nature and his Vision of Government

    446 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hobbes view of human nature lead him to develop his vision of an ideal government.  He believed that a common power was required to keep men united.  This power would work to maintain the artificial harmony among the people as well as protect them from foreign enemies.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes and the Realist School

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hobbes was a strong believer in the thought that human nature was evil. He believed that “only the unlimited power of a sovereign could contain human passions that disrupt the social order and threatened civilized life.” Hobbes believed that human nature was a force that would lead to a constant state of war if it was not controlled. In his work the Leviathan, he laid out a secular political statement in which he stated the significance of absolutism.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau are all social contract theorists that believe in how the people should have certain rights with allows them to have individual freedom. They also believe that the people must give consent in order for the government to work and progress. Although Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau have similar aspects in their theories, they differ from each other through the reason why a government should be created.

    Read More

More about Kant Vs Hobbes Essay

Open Document