Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pierre elliott trudeau impact on canada
Pierre elliott trudeau impact on canada
Pierre elliott trudeau impact on canada
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pierre elliott trudeau impact on canada
Justin Trudeau Wins Victory as New Canada Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau has won an overwhelming victory as the new Canada prime minister. Trudeau is the son of a previously very popular Canada prime ministers, Pierre Trudeau, who spent 16 years as the Canadian prime minister. Trudeau’s victory was for the Liberals that also got the needed 170 seats to have a majority.
Trudeau thanked supporters during a victory speech and proclaimed that politics don’t need to be either negative or personal in order to succeed. This was a subtle jab at his opponents, the Conservatives, who had attacked him during the election, saying he was not ready to lead the nation as the new Canada prime minister.
Popular Support Was Shown For Liberal Party
Trudeau is
…show more content…
the first leader to raise a political party candidate from being in third place, to being able to win an election. The fact that the people supported the Liberal party was shown in the amount of votes cast in the popular vote, as they got 40 percent of the vote and the Conservatives got 32 percent of the vote. In the 2011 election the Tories got the same 40 percent when they won a majority vote.
In that same vote the New Democrats got 30 percent, but in this year’s election they only got 19 percent. The remainder of the popular vote for the new Canada prime minister was the Greens at three percent and Bloc Quebecois at five percent.
New Canada Prime Minister Government Faces Hard Tasks
With his victory speech completed, the new government of Justin Trudeau faces some hard tasks in the next few weeks prior to several international summits that will take up all of his time. Summits scheduled include a G-20 summit in Turkey in the middle of November, a United Nations climate conference in Paris in November, as well as a leader summit in the Philippines for the Pacific Rim nations.
Before these occur, the new prime minister must meet with his country’s premiers to discuss his promise to create a national plan to cut carbon emissions. Trudeau also has to choose future cabinet ministers, and predictions are that there will be only 25 cabinet members. Some of the possible people chosen include Andrew Leslie, a previous Canadian Forces lieutenant-general, and Bill Blair, who previously worked as a Toronto police chief. Trudeau has also said that half of the cabinet will be female
members. Trudeau also stated that he can’t afford to be egotistical as he starts his role as the country’s new Canada prime minister and that he has to be the top most public servant of the land.
The article was written a couple years before Justin Trudeau became Prime Minister. The Author focuses on Justin’s liberal attitudes, especially regarding a hot topic such as the legalization of marijuana. He comes across as a “hero for the people” type of politician. The author of the article skims over a variety of topics concerning what Justin spoke of in Calgary. It is a very short story, but I think that the writer got his point across on the subject of Trudeau’s progressive views, mainly when it comes to marijuana.
“Just watch me.”Joseph Philippe Pierre Yves Elliott Trudeau said in 1970. He meant it as he fought to keep Quebec a part of Canada. Not only did he do that, he managed to be prime minister for 16 years, as well as being Canada’s youngest leader at the time. He brought greater civil rights to Canadians, Quebec citizens mainly. His charismatic personality matched his innovative ideas, that enhanced Canada for the better. For his entire political career, not only did Canada watch him, the whole world watched him change the country for the better. He made a radical change to Canada by championing the idea of officially implementing bilingualism. Trudeau was a trailblazer from the moment he was elected.
Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson was a prominent figure in Canada in the 1960s. Pearson was Canada's most significant post WWII prime minister because of his government's many innovations that still benefit Canadians today. He fostered Canadian nationalism, which continues to the present day, promoted equality throughout Canada – equality that now thrives as part of Canada's identity – and he introduced many social services that are still implemented today.
even his opponents admitted "there does not exist in Canada a man who has given
...n of their cabinet, while others may choose to create a new political path without consulting the views of their party. Mellon thinks that the Canadian government is under dictatorial scrutiny, whereas Barker contradicts this belief. The idea of a prime-ministerial government is certainly an over exaggeration of the current state of Canada. There are too many outside and inside forces that can control the powers the Prime Minister of Canada. Furthermore, there are several outside sources that indicate a good government in Canada. The United Nations annually places Canada at the top, or near the top of the list of the world’s best countries in which to live. These outcomes are not consistent with the idea of a one ruler power. Canada is not ruled by one person’s ideas, suggestions, and decisions, but by government approved and provincially manipulated decisions.
Charles-Émile Trudeau was a Conservative, and several of his friends belonged to the Liberal Party. When his father’s friends were visiting at their Lac Tremblant cottage, Pierre was exposed to political debates and rivalries at an early age. He found politics interesting, but could not understand much of it. His father invested in successful several companies at the beginning of the...
	Pierre Trudeau will certainly not be forgotten, even after his death. In my opinion he accomplished a lot for Canada but I disliked his crazy ways of politics, to me the way he does things don’t make much sense. Unlike other politicians Pierre Trudeau, had four central themes: the freedom of the individual; the political equality of all individuals; the superiority of rationality; and democracy as the best form of government. What is interesting about these principles is that at various points in his writing Trudeau's value for each one of them compromises and even contradicts his value for one or more of the others. In this way, irony becomes a part of Trudeau's liberalism.
"It is what we prevent, rather than what we do that counts most in Government." (Mackenzie King august 26, 1936) This statement sums up the best secrets of Mackenzie King's success as prime minister, and perhaps, the key to governing Canada effectively. King's record of prime minister is sometimes difficult to judge. He had no uninteresting images, he gave no repetitive speeches, and he champions no drastic stage. He is remembered for his easygoing, passive compromise and conciliation (Gregory, page 267). Yet Mackenzie King led Canada for a total of twenty-two years, through half the Depression and all of the Second World War. Like every other prime minister, he had to possess ambition, endurance and determination to become prime minister and, in spite if appearances, his accomplishments in that role required political acuity, decisiveness and faultless judgment.
If I were the prime minister of Canada, I would strive to accomplish and strengthen three major things. First, I would make sure that our educational system maintains strong and will make others succeed in life, second, I would make sure that everyone has equal and fair treatment in our society, and lastly, I would make sure every Canadian family can live happily by reducing tax.
"Prime Minister Promotes Open Federalism." Prime Minister of Canada. N.p., 21 Apr. 2006. Web. 15 July 2014. .
...ications with the world. If elected, the NDP promises to propose a new act called the Poverty Elimination Act which aims to eliminate all poverty in Canada by 2020.
Spicer, Keith. 1991. Citizen’s Forum on Canada’s Future: Report to the People and Government of
It is cold hard fact that Canadian government is not entirely democratic. The question remains of how to deal with this. Canadian government, as effective as it currently is, has major factors in their system that have a negative effect on Canadians. Our current voting system favors the higher-populated provinces and creates a tyranny of the majority. Our Senate is distinctly undemocratic as it is an assigned position. Our head of State, the Prime Minister, holds too much power. Unless we resolve these issues, our government will remain far from a perfect governing system.
The issue of electoral reform has become more important than ever in Canada in recent years as the general public has come to realize that our current first-past-the-post, winner-take-all system, formally known as single-member plurality (SMP) has produced majority governments of questionable legitimacy. Of the major democracies in the world, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom are the only countries that still have SMP systems in place. Interestingly enough, there has been enormous political tension and division in the last few years in these countries, culminating with the election results in Canada and the USA this year that polarized both countries. In the last year we have seen unprecedented progress towards electoral reform, with PEI establishing an electoral reform commissioner and New Brunswick appointing a nine-member Commission on Legislative Democracy in December 2003 to the groundbreaking decision by the British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly on October 24, 2004 that the province will have a referendum on May 17, 2005 to decide whether or not they will switch to a system of proportional representation. This kind of reform is only expected to continue, as Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty decided to take BC’s lead and form an independent Citizen’s Assembly with the power to determine whether or not Ontario will have a referendum regarding a change to a more proportional system. There is still much work to do however, and we will examine the inherent problems with Canada’s first-past-the-post system and why we should move into the 21st century and switch to a form of proportional representation.
This essay has argued that there are many limitations that the Prime Minister is subjected too. The three most important are federalism in Canadian society, the role of the Governor General, and the charter of rights and freedoms. I used two different views of federalism and illustrated how both of them put boundaries on the Prime Minister’s power. Next I explain the powers of the governor general, and explained the ability to dissolve parliament in greater detail. Last I analyzed how the charter of rights of freedoms has limited the Prime Minister’s power with respect to policy-making, interests groups and the courts. The Prime Minister does not have absolute power in Canadian society, there are many infringements on the power that they have to respect.