Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Just war theory paper
A war that meets the just war theory
A war that meets the just war theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Just war theory paper
For years now, the Syrian people have endured many attacks, many of which including the use of supposedly eliminated chemical weapons. The U.S., with aid from the French and British forces, launched missile strikes against Syrian weapon facilities to halt any further use of Chemical agents against the Syrian civilians. Though the attacks may seem unjustifiable since the U.S. initiated the attack, the missle strikes were in fact justified due to the fact that its intentions were to help the Syrian people. By the standards of the Just War Doctrine, the attacks by the U.S. are justified. In response to a recent chemical attack on the people of Syria, the U.S. launched strikes on Syria to prevent the use of chemical weapons for future use. The …show more content…
The objective of the Soviet Union is the “total subjective submission of the peoples now under its control”, which would not qualify it as a justifiable war (Class Syllabus, Naval War College Review). In accordance to the principles of the Just war, the main goal of the war must be to re-establish peace, yet the Soviet Union wanted to do nothing of the sorts, aiming to instill fear and total submission from the people under their control. The Fundamental design of the Kremlin and communist movement is to retain their absolute power, first over the Soviet Union, and then to expand and continue to do so in other areas (Class Syllabus, Naval War College Review). To do so, the Kremlin felt as though they must eliminate any opposition to their authority, which in this case would be the U.S., as the U.S. was the biggest opposition to soviet expansion. The Kremlin's means of war is not at all justified, as they are not fighting with the “right” intention, according to the principles of Just War, as their only intention is complete and utter dominance (Class Lecture, March 26-28). On this account, their reasons for fighting are not justified, unlike the Syrian attacks or the U.S. involvement in
i. Difficulties faced by soldiers due to the nature of fighting in the Vietnam War - Personnel had difficulties with transportation supplied with adapted vehicles back seat faced rear to provide additional fire power (Source A) – It appears as if the government didn't worry enough to supply men with safe and capable equipment - Threat of traps led to fear as vehicles had to be parked on street at night (Source A) o Check for traps each morning became a daily ritual particularly in fuel tanks (Source A) o A request for a locking fuel cap was denied because weren’t entitled to one” (Source A) • What circumstances would have needed to arise for them to be entitled to one? The Offensive full guard was set up (24hrs a day), personnel got no sleep and were constantly on alert (Source A) – How significant would this have been in the personnel’s mental frame of mind?
Jouejati, Murhaf. “Syrian Motives for Its WMD Programs and What to Do about Them.” Middle
The night before the anniversary of 9/11 in 2013, Barack Obama delivered a speech to the United States of America on the subject of Syria’s inhumane use of chemical weapons on its own citizens. The United States’ intelligence analysts estimated that more than 1,400 civilians were killed due to the chemical warheads that were launched on the area right outside of Damascus. In President Barack Obama’s address to the nation on Syria, he attempts to persuade the American people to support his plan of a targeted air strike on Syria. By describing the victims of Syria, giving reasons for the inhumanity of the Syrian government, and reinforcing his credibility,
The just war theory is described by Thomas Massaro in his book Living Justice as the “principle that warfare might be justified under certain conditions” (108). The complexities involved with international relations makes determining a just war very difficult. Even though historically pacifism hasn’t gained much traction within Catholic circles, it currently is gaining popularity with many mainstream Catholics. With so many differing views on military action, one might ask, “What determines a just war? How can we balance the need for peace with self-defense?” An examination of criteria for a just war and critiques written on this topic might shed light on these two questions.
World War II is cause for much debate over the morals and ethics of wartime attack strategies.
There is a possibility that America might not be able to pull together like the citizens did during World War Two. However, there is a possibility that the citizens might be able to pull together. The direction it would go depends on how the American citizens would react to having to go to war. The reaction of citizens is based on what the reason for fighting in the war is. If they think that the reason is worth it, then most of the American citizens will come together and help with the war cause. Although, it will be different then the efforts made during World War Two, the efforts made by the citizens today will still be just as efficient and productive.
The Thirty Years War was a series of conflicts, not-knowingly involving most European countries from 1618 to 1648. The war, which was fought mainly in Germany, was started when Bohemian Protestants furiously attacked the Holy Roman Emperor in terms to impose a restriction on their religious and civil liberties. By understanding the Thirty Years War, you will notice the notable religious, political and social changes. The changes paved the religious and political maps of Europe. Not only did this war affect the religious and political demographic, it caused populations to perish and lose large amounts of their goods. What was known as a religious battle, turned out to be a political feud in competition of which state has the greater power affecting men, women, soldiers and civilians. “[The bohemians] had no idea that their violent deed would set off a chain reaction of armed conflict that would last thirty years and later be called Europe’s “first world war” of the modern era.” When the war ended, the lands were defiled and over 5 million people were killed.
The anti-war movement is war a social movement during the Vietnam War to show to allow people to express their opinions on the war. The number of people who participated in anti-war movements started out low, but as the involvement of the United States persisted the numbers began to rise. The people involved in the movement ranged from college students to political figures. People were angry at the government for forcing the American people to sit back and watch as large amounts of money were being spent and as the causality number grew. During the 1960s the Anti-war Movement became a something larger than most people expected. As the Anti-war Movement grew throughout the United States, it could be seen that the movement had different effects not just on the home front but on the war front as well. Many American felt as though this war was a waste, and they wanted it to stop. The media played a large role in helping people decide whether or not to support the Vietnam War.
“United in this determination and with unshakable fain in the cause for which we fight, we will, with God’s help, go forward to our greatest victory,” said General Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1944. Eisenhower referenced America in this quote, and how they came together from children and women’s support at home, to the men fighting the war overseas. America showed loyalty to their country throughout World War 2 from the home front to the battlefield, gaining the prestigious effects on America by winning the devastating war.
The 30 Year war was a series of multiple battles and wars that lasted in central europe that lasted from 1618 to 1648. It was the longest and most destructive war in European History. Initially there were battles between the protestant and catholic states in the fragmenting Roman Empire it later developed into more larger conflicts involving most of the great powers including the great powers of Europe.
World War II, which started in 1939 and ended in 1945, is considered the “Good War”. Quite frankly, is any war to be considered a good war? There are certain reasons that this War could be known as a “Good” War. For instance, toward the end of the war we see the defeat of Hitler’s Nazi system. In addition to that, the U.S. was not only stronger than ever, but also was considered a greater world power that other nations could depend on. Also during and after the war, the growth of women in the work industry. Not only doing jobs fit for men but succeeding at doing so. In addition, African American involvement in war issues occurred more during this “Good War”. Although the creation of the atomic bomb took place, this can be a turning point to
The impact of the war was soon to leave a mark in history. The use of chemical weapons adversel...
We are told that this war wasn’t about killing; but about serving and honoring your country. However, one question always stirred up, but can never be answered. What did cause the most horrifying war to ever take place on the battlefield? Nothing. One word could describe World War I: stupid. WWI did not have to happen; there was no explicit reason and was an absolute mistake. To think that during every battle about 19,000 soldiers were killed all for nothing. But there was no legitimate reason to why everyday people were ‘serving’ and ‘honoring’ their country, only to die. People had the choice of peace or war, and yet, time after time, they chose war.
A war crime is an unjust act of violence in which a military personnel violates the laws and acceptable behaviors of a war. Despite all the violence in a war, a soldier shooting another is not considered a war crime because it is not a violation to the laws and practices of a war, and it is considered just. A war crime is defined as a “violations [violation] of the laws and customs of war” (“War Crimes”), and are attacks “against civilian populations, prisoners of war, or in some cases enemy soldiers in the field” (Friedman). War crimes are typically committed with weapons or by uncommon, cruel, devastating military methods and are “…Committed primarily by military personnel” (Friedman). There are many different types of war crimes one can commit, including “murder, ill treatment…murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages or devastation not justified by military necessity” (Friedman). Originally constructed as international law by the London Charter on August 8th, 1945 and further developed by the Hague Conventions of 1899, 1907 and the Nuremberg trials, war crimes are aggressive, unacceptable and unjust actions performed by military workforce that occur during a war.
War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.