Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius Caesar
Gaul Campaign At the start of 52 b.c. Gaius Julius Caesar led a campaignrebellion against Gaul. His army was dispersed and vulnerable, but Caesar himself was far away in the Alps taking care of Roman politics. It was 58 b.c. when Julius first got involved with Gaul. At first many of the tribes welcomed Caesar as a friend and a redeemer. but as time went on all but a few allied tribes turned against him. The ironic part of it all was that the people leading the revolt were chieftains he had rewarded showing them favor and friendship. The reasoning for all this conflict was that Caesar felt that he needed to redeem himself and uphold his family name. He was on a conquest to have the most power and and money. And it would also help him keep
his place in office. Caesar Augustus had much more widespread trouble, although not as much as the rebellion of 52 b.c. Caesar’s conquests in Gaul will remain part of the Roman Empire for at least another five centuries. He based his success as much on careful diplomacy as much as it was also on military strength and skill. He also wasn't the last, imperialist Sir Arthur Wellesley found this to also be true. Its very seldom that imperial powers have enough troops to maintain hold of a largely populated area only by force. “Remarkable range and degree of talents combined in The victory won, Caesar had the political skill to follow it up with a lasting settlement, and turned Gaul into a stable province of Rome. Few commanders throughout history have possessed the Julius Caesar, but it is also fair to say that many of his greatest successes came in getting himself out of tight spots of his own creation.”
He wanted to expand his empire, power, and get the Franks out of the Dark Ages. They both had new goals and ideas for their empires, and they would both do whatever it took to achieve them. Many may say that Julius Caesar and Charlemagne are extremely similar, but one could argue that they are also very different. Caesar won peoples loyalty and trust. He also looked out
Caesar sees himself as a protector of the Romans against the northern attackers, he wages war against those who threaten his city. Here, he recalled the great failure—when the Helvetians showed no remorse and killed the Consul of Rome and enslaved his legion. Caesar does not let the Helvetians pass through the Province because of the memory of the killed Consul. In Book I, Chapter 7 of Commentarii de Bello Gallico, it says, “Caesar, inasmuch as he kept in remembrance that Lucius Cassius, the consul, had been slain, and his army routed and made to pass under the yoke by the Helvetii, did not think that [their request] ought to be granted: nor was he of opinion that men of hostile disposition, if an opportunity of marching through the Province were given them, would abstain from outrage and mischief.” This shows the constant war between Rome and invaders and it drives Caesar to pursue his goals, such as, killing the Helvetians—making him a powerful force .
What was Julius Caesar’s motive for launching the Gallic Wars? Multiple arguments can be made to better understand his intentions. The first argument is that Caesar was responding to aggression in order to preserve the sovereignty of Rome. The second more likely explanation is that Caesar took over the Gaul to improve his political strength within the Roman republic and did so by exploiting the Celts. Caesar’s war commentaries, show evidence of his conflicting motives and actions in his invasion of the Gallic regions.
Caesar for some what of a good reason. Brutus killed him because he thought it would be better for Rome while the others just did not want him to become more powerful than themselves. They are the same. Brutus felt that the death of Caesar would be the end of the absolute rule that Caesar presently had a. Brutus is a supporter of the republican government. Brutus says, "We all stand up against the spirit of Caesar /
He doesn't like Caesar because he does not want him to have power. In some way he is also jealous ...
Caesar is all about conquering power and he is afraid of nothing. Before he is murdered, he says “The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on my back. When they shall see the face of Caesar, they shall vanish” (II, ii, 575). This shows how his mind is only set on killing others to get rid of a problem.
Gaius Julius Caesar, born 100 B.C.E. in Rome to the impoverished patrician Julian Clan, knew controversy at an early age. Nephew to Populare Gaius Marius, he was earmarked by the Optimate dictator Sulla for prosciption after his refusal to divorce his Populare wife, Cinna. Fleeing Rome, and not returning until after Sulla’s resignation in 78 B.C.E, upon his return he gained a position as a pontificate, an important Roman priesthood. Slowly but surely throughout his lifetime he worked his way up the political ladder, eventually becoming Consul, and finally Dictator Perpeteus – Dictator for life. One of the most influential political and military leaders of all time, Caesar was also a highly intelligent man and an exceptional orator. However, acquiring this absolute power was no mean feat, and Caesar had well equipped himself through previous expeditions with all the resources necessary to gain power in Ancient Rome.
However, Caesar had the approval of many citizens in Rome, which gave him more power of Pompey. Most citizens of Rome wanted him to run the Republic instead of Pompey, therefore, they supported and even encouraged his battle against Pompey. By having more power, he was essentially more easily persuaded to cross the Rubicon with his troops. Doing so, he crossed the Rubicon and began the fight due to the power of the people. Once he crossed the Rubicon, he was hailed as a hero (Civil Wars by Julius Caesar) and was persuaded to continue fighting for power in Rome. With Caesar’s army of troops growing and the support rising, he felt he had no choice but to continue fighting for power over Pompey. However, Pompey also had supporters on his side, making the battle longer and more difficult. Obviously you can not stop a war in the middle of The civil war lasted four years and Caesar eventually won power of Rome over
Gaius Caesar Germanicus is the name given to the Roman Emperor who so quickly went from being loved, to being hated by many. Gaius was a man of leadership that unfortunately, due to health issues, caused him to lose all his love from his people. He grew up having role models that taught him how to rule at such a young age. His yearning to lead showed to many allowing him to be put into a high position of leadership so early in life. Many items were changed in his power that brought the people a great deal of joy. Unfortunately, due to falling ill he was changed for the worse. Germanicus was a great Roman Emperor until he was changed from an illness.
Julius Caesar was a general and a politician of the late Roman Republic. He greatly influenced the size of the Roman Empire before seizing power and making himself dictator of Rome, which paved the way for the Imperial system. (Julius Caesar 100BC-44BC, April 29th, 2014)
One of Caesar’s greatest victories in battle was just after he had gained control over the lands of Bituriges, Vercingetorix. He started to lead his army to the Boii oppidum of Gorgobina, another city under his control. On the way, he stopped his troops at Vellaundunum, oppidum of the Senones, and set up siege. He did not want to leave any enemies behind him who might get in the way of the grain deliveries and supply. The Carnutes, one of Rome’s enemies, had just heard of the siege at Vellaundunum. They gathered troops to Garrison Cenabum, the Carnutes stronghold. Caesar’s army camped out right in front of the fort.
Caesar was sole consul and at times acted like a king. The senate did not like this because the Romans held the tradition of a hatred of kings. It was then that the senate believed that Julius Caesar was a threat to the Republic. The senate and everyone liked Caesar, but they had decided that the best way to save the Republic was to assassinate Caesar. This was yet another piece of the game that was pulled out of the structure of the Roman Republic. Yes, the Romans were able to destroy the person that they thought was the threat to the Republic, but it was the position not the person that was the threat. With Julius Caesar gone, the void was still there for someone to fill.
...e murder because of his jealousy of Caesar's elevated power and mounting dominance over everyone, even his friends. Though they were close friends, their motives and descriptive character traits display a distinct contrast between them.
According to many, no one can rival Gaius Julius Caesar’s accomplishments in conquest and politics; however, his means of achieving these lofty accomplishments is often debated. Chiefly, the use of his account of the Gallic Wars (namely the first, which I will cite as evidence) as well as his thought out use of propaganda in order to further his already imposing accolades and the honor that accompanies them. Evidence of Caesar’s intent for his account of the Gallic Wars to be used as propaganda largely lies in half-truths that I deem directly affect the perception of Caesar and his conquests in a positive manner. These half-truths consist of the embellishment of certain characteristics and features of the Gallic Wars and are most certainly
He makes sure to have the power to gain Romes support and loyalty after the murder Caesar “Let us be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius. We all stand up against the spirit of Caesar; And in the spirit of men there is no blood: O, that we then could come by Caesar's spirit, And not dismember Caesar! But, alas, Caesar must bleed for it!” This shows he is cautious in what Rome will think of his actions, he needs the country to be on his side for him to gain power after his death. He knows killing Caesar is wrong and doesn't want more blood on his hands then he already