Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

1098 Words3 Pages

Most would agree that logic should overcome emotion when making decisions, but as studies have shown, up to 90 percent of the decisions we make are based on emotion. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, this is very evident. In this play, we follow the Roman Senate members, Mark Antony, Marcus Brutus, Caius Cassius, and the soon-to-be king of Rome, Julius Caesar. After secretly conspiring against Julius Caesar with other Senate members, Cassius convinces Brutus to aid in the killing of Caesar. Their justification for this decision was their fear of Caesar’s ambition once he was king. They all agreed and believed that Caesar could do much harm if he was crowned, and although they all cherished him as a friend, they ultimately went through with killing him. After killing Caesar, Brutus gave a speech to the people of Rome explaining why the Senate members killed the Roman’s beloved Caesar. Following this …show more content…

Although simple, this is very effective in persuasion in general. Using this clever appeal to emotion, Antony very effectively persuaded the crowd, especially compared to the logos of Brutus. When trying to persuade a crowd against another, discrediting one’s opponent can always be helpful. In both Antony’s speech and Brutus’ speech, they each equally used their ethos to build their credibility with the Romans. Antony, however, discredits Brutus, leaving his speech much more effective. Antony’s speech’s effectiveness is much due to Antony’s tactical discrediting of Brutus and his character. How does Antony discredit Brutus you may be asking? Surprisingly enough, he discredits Brutus using sarcasm and repetition. Throughout his whole speech, Antony repeats the phrase, “yet Brutus is an honourable man,” (Antony, Section 1). This seems like a compliment, but in context one can see that it is actually

Open Document