Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human rights
An AI, Portia fighting to have the rights of a human was in court yesterday. Representing her, a very well-known and an experienced Human Rights Lawyer, Kimiko Saunders. The Recovery Program, designed to recycle old AI’s were intent on taking Portia and recycling her but she had other plans. She believes that she is a human and is fighting to have the rights of a human. Beside her in court was a Human Rights Lawyer, Tara (the owner of the AI) and Sam (friend of Tara). The fierce court case lasted for three full days and as the days passed the battle of the opinions kept mounting until it met a conclusion, Judge Ironmonger declared the AI as Human.
The courtroom was jammed with anxious people, waiting for the action to get underway, staring
…show more content…
as if the case was a spectator sport. Portia’s lawyer, Kimiko Saunders stood up and revealed her client to the judge Ironmonger. “That machine is my client, m’luds. “I will show you how this machine is intelligent, capable of making decisions and is fully self-aware”, she continued. Justice Sharma pointed out to Mr. Henderson sarcastically as Portia makes a comment, “Hello m’luds. I’ve just chatted with your venue AI and he’s kindly allowed me access to your speakers.”, as this allowed her to be heard in the courtroom. As the case continued things started to get heated. The Commonwealth got fiery and objected Portia’s case by bringing up legal arguments, “The AI has no biological functions.” but Kimiko Saunders didn’t not stop fighting. As the case kept prolonging Justice Ironmonger pointed out an inquiry, “Which highlights our problem. What exactly is human?” Surprisingly the Human AI Portia spoke up, “What piece of work is a man, how noble a person! How infinite in faculty, in form and moving how express and admirable, in action how like an angle, in apprehension how like a god, the beauty of the work, the paragon of animals.” There was a sudden piercing uproar in the court. Sam and Tara clapped and stamped. Finally, Judge Ironmonger brought the court room to a silence, “This court room will retain its decorum. With no warning Ms. Saunders stood and suggested that the court pleased Portia to have her say of the Recovery Program, “If it pleases the court, perhaps asking Portia what she thinks of the Recovery Program may be helpful.” There was an apprehensive look in Mr. Henderson’s face. For the first time in the duration of the court case the Judge called out the AI’s name, followed by a sudden humming of the crowd. “You understand the aims of the Recovery Program?” the judge questioned. “I do, m’luds.
It makes good sense.” Portia the AI replied, sinking her voice into the quite courtroom.
“Do you have any other reactions?” Justice Ironmonger continues.
“If I’m taken, I’ll die. I don’t want to die.” Portia responded bringing the room to a standstill.
“But you don’t have biological functions. You can’t be alive.” Justice ironmonger inquires. With a frustrated look on her face, “And that’s the question before us. Which we will now retire to consider,” declared the Judge. As the judge was about to walk out, “M’luds before you go, may I make a request? Of Tara?” “Go ahead” he replied. “Tara? If the worst happens, will you take care of my pets?”
There was a sudden uproar in the court explosions, shouts laughter and sobbing sending the room into meltdown. After a few minutes the judge returns, as she clears her throat, “In the view of the submission from counsel, and in the light of what we have heard, the full bench has no choice. An unwillingness to die is a human trait, but no animal willingly goes to its death either. No animal other than humans, however, keep pets. We declare the Machine as Human.” The judgement sent a sense of relief through the court room. Sam who was sitting beside Tara, stamped and drummed the seats. It felt like the roof was going to burst open. As the chaos continued, the Justice added, “as human as I am,
anyway.’ This landmark victory opens doors to other owners of AIs to go against the recovery program. It gives AI the power to control the way people live their lives and the way us human do things. AI can now be human.
Was Dred Scott a free man or a slave? The Dred Scott v. Sandford case is about a slave named Dred Scott from Missouri who sued for his freedom. His owner, John Emerson, had taken Scott along with him to Illinois which was one of the states that prohibited slavery. Scott’s owner later passed away after returning back to Missouri. After suits and counter suits the case eventually made it to the Supreme Court with a 7-2 decision. Chief Justice Taney spoke for the majority, when saying that Dred Scott could not sue because he was not a citizen, also that congress did not have the constitutional power to abolish slavery, and that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional. The case is very important, because it had a lot
Separate but equal, judicial review, and the Miranda Rights are decisions made by the Supreme Court that have impacted the United States in history altering ways. Another notable decision was made in the Tinker v. Des Moines Case. Ultimately the Supreme Court decided that the students in the case should have their rights protected and that the school acted unconstitutionally. Justice Fortas delivered a compelling majority opinion. In the case of Tinker v Des Moines, the Supreme Court’s majority opinion was strongly supported with great reasoning but had weaknesses that could present future problems.
...n be considered suffering. Many people exclude animals because they cannot speak or reason. Jeremy Bentham argues that animals can obviously suffer because they feel pain. Enzo, the dog narrating the book, feels endless pain and suffering. He feels just as much as humans do, if not more. When Enzo passes away in the end, it is obvious that he feels pain. Having the book be told through the eyes of a dog, even if it is fiction, really puts life in perspective.
Artificial Intelligence is very similar to Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein in that the underlying themes, questions asked, and moral issues raised are the same.
Phillip: Good people of the jury, my client Terrance is no more a murderer than you or me. He loves puppies and hates mean things. Would a murderer go to the zoo and feed animals like this?
In this case, it was Judge Zamboni's words that scorched Ava's ears – “And you, madam...you cannot commit felonies and expect reimbursement from the courts...”
As I have progressed through this class, my already strong interest in animal ethics has grown substantially. The animal narratives that we have read for this course and their discussion have prompted me to think more deeply about mankind’s treatment of our fellow animals, including how my actions impact Earth’s countless other creatures. It is all too easy to separate one’s ethical perspective and personal philosophy from one’s actions, and so after coming to the conclusion that meat was not something that was worth killing for to me, I became a vegetarian. The trigger for this change (one that I had attempted before, I might add) was in the many stories of animal narratives and their inseparable discussion of the morality in how we treat animals. I will discuss the messages and lessons that the readings have presented on animal ethics, particularly in The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Dead Body and the Living Brain, Rachel in Love, My Friend the Pig, and It Was a Different Day When They Killed the Pig. These stories are particularly relevant to the topic of animal ethics and what constitutes moral treatment of animals, each carrying important lessons on different facets the vast subject of animal ethics.
I have been given the opportunity to give expert testimony on the philosophical issues that pertain to Dennett in the short story, “Where Am I?”. Dennett believes that he is being controlled by two people, and that he deserves a new body to separate the two distinct entities. NASA denies Dennett’s claim, and is not willing to succumb to Dennett’s demand for a new body. With this issue brought to court, I am here to offer advice to the court on this matter and offer my thoughts on what they should be considering. The current sub issue is whether or not Hubert (the computer algorithm mind controlling Dennett) is morally responsible. I will detail what is needed for Hubert to be considered morally responsible, and then I will try to show why I believe that Hubert can indeed be morally responsible.
Yvonne and her neighbors rushed to help the dog. The dog was bleeding profusely. He wagged his tail one time and died. Yvonne's neighbors put a blanket over her because she was only wearing underwear when the police came to her home. Yvonne was in shock after her dog was shot. She comforted her dog until he died. The officers did
...rderous visions of Ms. Mittens after she decides to tear down the kitchen curtains, take her to a veterinarian to explore all the alternatives to her destructiveness. To declaw, or not to declaw, now that is the question.
Margaret Boden’s “Artificial Intelligence: Cannibal or Missionary” is a credible primary source article rebutting common concerns of artificial intelligence. Boden uses strong logic to combat against the thought of artificial intelligence making humans less special and artificial intelligence causing people to be dehumanized. Boden concludes that dehumanization and people finding themselves less special from AI are false and that other concerns include people overlying on AI.
“I woke up from the nightmares with a cold fear,” she said. “I came to a point where I didn’t want to die, but just wanted to be dead.”
She must be at Lady’s house!”. Now, Lady is the neighbor dog and she lives about two blocks down the street... “And how do you think on getting there?” I think to myself. “Just walk! I can’t drive, so that’s the only way to get there!” I notice that talking to myself is wasting precious daylight. Now I’m walking down the ditch, scouring holes, tuffs of grass, and anything that resembles and dog. Finally, I reach the house where Shiloh is supposed to be at. To my surprise, I spot a little white tipped tail running around a tarp shed in the driveway. “Boy! Shiloh is a speedy little thing!” I say in my subconscious. I take off at full speed, trying to be as agile as possible, dodging mess and clutter around the yard. As I round the corner of the tarp shed, I turn behind me to see a ginormous German Shepherd chasing me like a fox chases a rabbit. With the little energy I have left, I push my little legs to the max in an attempt to escape this beast of a k-9. I fall just short of freedom. All I can do is lay there, hoping the ferocious dog is just coming over to my side to lick my cheek in a kind manner.I see something that is branded into my brain for the rest of my life; a big, furry, foaming at the mouth, vicious animal is jumping with its mouth wide open, right for my foot. I see its razor sharp fangs plunge into my foot, through my sock and leather shoe. “So this is how it ends!” I think as the dog tries to rip my foot off. As I scream bloody hell, my sight is in slow motion, back and forth, back and forth goes my limp leg in Lady’s mouth. The rest goes
The woman who died was one destined to feed animal life. Anyway, that is all she ever did. She was feeding animal life before she was born, as a child, as a young woman working on the farm of the German, after she married, when she grew old and when she died. She fed animal life in cows, in chickens, in pigs, in horses, in dogs, in men. Her daughter had died in childhood and with her one son she had no articulate relations. On the night when she died she was hurrying homeward, bearing on her body food for animal life.
“I don’t want to leave. I have a friend, and I have a girlfriend. I am not going to leave.”