Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative Essay
Features of argumentative essay
Argumentative Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative Essay
The Use of the Toulmin Model When writing a valid argumentative paper, it is important to have all of the necessary parts to make it successful. The Toulmin Model is a method proposed by Stephen Toulmin in which the paper encompasses integral parts of an argument. The Toulmin Model consists of a seven step process to project the argument within the article. The steps used include: the claim, the stated reasons, grounds, the warrant, backing, the conditions of rebuttal, and the qualifier. The use of these steps in your essay can make your argument effective when trying to get your point across. The author, Jonathan Coleman, uses the Toulmin Model in his article, “Is Technology Making Us Intimate Strangers?” Coleman’s article will be used as …show more content…
an example for argumentative writing throughout this essay. Every argument has a claim, otherwise known as the main idea or the position that the author is standing for. The claim does not necessarily have to be at the beginning of the argument. Coleman proposed his claim in the eighth paragraph of his article and stated, “Technology for the most part, creates the illusion of intimacy” (Coleman 484). There are also the stated reasons that correspond with the claim. They are the ideas in which you feel the way you do about the main idea or the claim. In Coleman’s article, his stated reasons are that technology “foils us,” “keeps us from the best of ourselves, and enables us to avoid others,” and “it makes us intimate strangers” (Coleman 484). The author proposed these stated reasons right after he gave his claim. For your stated reasons you must have some type of evidence to make your ideas valid. Otherwise known as the grounds. An example of one of the grounds that Coleman used was from his own personal experience. He said “a father [was] more intent on the cell-phone call conversation . . .than on watching his daughter play” (Coleman 483). The three steps used are a main part in the argument when bringing your whole idea together. There is a belief that is beyond the claim, called the warrant.
The warrant is not stated in the argument, more so, it is what you interpret from the main idea. In Coleman’s article his warrant would be something along the lines off, the use of technology draws our attention away from humanity and we should be engaged in the connection with people and life.. Grounds are evidence of the stated reasons as to backing is with the warrant. Backing is the evidence that supports the warrant. The example that Coleman used for backing was how some people are too busy on their electronic devices to notice the little things in life like “. . .[how] the light hits the magnificent public library at a particular time . . .” (Coleman 484). Without the warrant and grounds, then there would not be statement for the claim to be made. It’s imperative to understand the oppositions beliefs in an argument. Without doing so, the audience may feel as though your argument is not fair. After stating the ideas that the opposition’s may have, you would propose reasons on why they were wrong. Usually, rebuttals are found more towards the end of the argument after the author stated the claim and warrant, but it can be placed anywhere. There are some arguments that do not contain all of the steps in Toulmin Model. It is unfortunate that Coleman did not include the conditions of the rebuttal in his
argument. The last step that is going be discussed is the qualifier. The qualifier is the way you limit the amplitude of your argument. The use of words like “most” would be qualified because it shows that you are not definite on whether your claim is completely true or not. Coleman stated his qualifier where he stated his claim. He said “technology for the most part . . .” and that is the qualifier. It is the qualifier because it shows not everyone feels the same way as he does. Within arguments people will doubt your claim, and if you have the qualifier it would be easier for those opposing to understand your claim. The Toulmin Model is a helpful technique that can be used in argumentative essays, articles, magazines, and such. It provides the author with certain steps that will make the argument succeed better. The seven steps are the claim, the stated reasons, grounds, warrant, backing, conditions of rebuttal, and qualifiers. In the article, “Is Technology Making Us Intimate Strangers?” The way Jonathan Coleman used these steps was mostly effective. However, including the conditions of rebuttal would have ensured it to be a well-thought agrument.
Overall, if the essay were to show the second side of technology as a whole, the argument against technology within the essay would be stronger, and appear to be more of an argument based in logic, rather than a person who refuses to come to the reality of the times and just attacks technology for this failure to understand
In doing so, they used 3 different logical structures in their arguments: precedent, degree, and analogies. Tim Cook debated with a constructive argument, “to guarantee such a powerful tool isn’t abused and don’t fall into the wrong hands is to never create it” (The Guardian, 2016). This is an example of degree argument, as the audience will automatically agree with any arguments with less of bad things because it is good. Apple knows there are no other cases like this one, so there’s nothing to compare to. Letting the government into the iPhone only this one time can set a dangerous precedent that can potentially force Apple to force open every iPhone in the future at government request. This became a heated legal battle, granting the access in their products for law enforcement was compared to “a political question” by Apple with an analogy (Yadron,
Attempt by Congress to strike a balance between society's need for protection from crime and accused right to adequate proce...
“Small Change” by Malcolm Gladwell is an essay that describes how technology has changed social movements. “Is Google Making us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr is an essay that describes how technology has made people have declining cognitive abilities. Both of these articles are about how people are using technology to accomplish tasks and goals they set to achieve. In my essay I’m going to compare the two essays and see where they excel and where they fail to expand their essay.
Tannen states, “In the argument culture, criticism, attack, or opposition are the predominant if not the only ways of responding to people or ideas. I use the phrase “culture of critique,” to capture this aspect. “Critique in the sense is not a general term for analysis or interpretation but rather a synonym for criticism.” Tannen states that she is calling attention to and calling into question the inherent dangers of the argument culture, however her article does not discuss an approachable strategy that would solve this social
The structure of the writing consists of the beginning of the article, the author talks about the cons and problems with technology for young adults (“... Watching too much TV can lead to obesity, violence, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.”) to talking about how technology in the modern era is important (“If you look at applying for college or a job, that's on the computer.”). The purpose of the structure is to leave the audience with the most important information. For example, the author first talks about the con with technology, than over time she transitions to the importance and why kids should be exposed to technology at an early age. Therefore, the author is leaving the point of view she wants the audience to have when they finish the
Technology is controlling us, the humans, and we do not even realize it. His thesis is “We should not serve technology and allow our gadgets to control our lives, social skills or decisions,” (Horvat.) The author wrote about this topic to let the people know that we are so caught with technology that we do not even realize how far it has taken us. The type of argument from this article is evaluation, because he does not use any type of real evidence to back up his argument and he is also not defining anything. He is just using a technique to persuade his
People deceive themselves that social technology improves human intimacy and help loneness. They think social technology give them opportunities to connect to other even they are far away, and give comfort to them if they need a listener, friend and even lover. Gopnik writes people have causal understanding since they were born by indicating example that “eat more to grow more”. It is the major abilities to make possibilities real. “Once you know how one thing is causally connected to another you can predict what will happen to one thing if you act to change another---you can see what a difference making things different will make. (Gopnik 172) When using social technology, people know that the relationship between it and people themselves help them change to other situation they want. They know phone can help them connect to other but they also understand what might cost them if they continuously pay attention to social technology. But they don’t quit using it because people are allowing it to bring us to places that we don’t what to go.
The article “When Children Become Criminals” from The New York Times is an opinion piece by the Editorial Board. It discusses how New York is one of the only states to prosecute 16 year olds as adults; resulting in harsher sentences than if they were tried in juvenile court (2014, p. 1). The Toulmin model can be applied in order to analyze the argument. This model consists of a claim, grounds, backing, a warrant, a qualifier, and a rebuttal.
The topic of technology and our society has become a very controversial subject today. Many people believe that technology is an essential component of our modern world, helping us to improve communication from farther distances as well as giving us easy access to important information. On the other hand, there is the opinion that too much technology is affecting social interactions and our basic development. “Technology…is a queer thing, it brings you great gifts with one hand, and stabs you in the back with the other.” (Carrie Snow.) The CBC Documentary “Are We Digital Dummies” displayed the pros and cons when it comes to modern technology that we use in the western world everyday.
What other information might the author use? Has the author remembered to acknowledge the opposition? To repeat myself: the sources are insufficient. Look for magazines, journal articles, and scholarly books. Run subject searches on InfoTrac.
Although, her constant fail to back up her claims continues to hurt her overall credibility and persuasion tactics. Another example of this would be, “A 16-year-old boy who relies on texting for almost everything says almost wistfully, ““Someday, someday, but certainly not now, I’d like to learn how to have a conversation”” (Turkle pg. 2). This quote is very relevant and could have strongly supported Turkle’s main claim but, she leaves out some very crucial information. For example, my first thoughts were, “who is this 16-year-old boy? Why should we as an audience find this teenager to be a credible source? And why does what this one boy say even need to be taken seriously?” If Turkle would have first stated something along the lines of, “95% of 12-to-17-year-old in Britain have a mobile phone and 87 percent of those have smartphones” (Butler pg. 2). And then later decided to use this quote from this unknown 16-year-old boy the quote would have seemed much more relevant and given some credibility to her and the argument as well. This is true because it would have helped Turkle’s overall argument by showing a statistical number of the children who are being effected by this technology phenomenon and why it is important to try and prevent any further damage to these social
Some of the objections, such as the ones made by Edmund Gettier, claim that three conditions are not nearly enough to justify a true belief, and that at the very least a fourth must be added. Gettier presents a very valid criticism of the JTB theory of knowledge, and his counter examples highlight flaws in the JTB theory that make it an inadequate theory of knowledge. Gettier claims takes an issue with the third part of the JTB theory, which states that proposition P must be true. Gettier makes the interesting observation that person S may very well be justified in believing in proposition P even if P is false
After reading chapter 5, I have learned what a refutation essay is and how to formulate one. In order to compose this type of essay, one must fully understand what a ‘refutation’ is. A refutation is when you object towards someone else’s argument rather than present your own side. Additionally, it is essential to become fully aware of your opponents given side because that can give you the upper hand in the argument. Even though this strategy can further aid you to victory, it is not as simple as disagreeing with your opponent. One must show logical evidence and give in detail why they are right.
It is difficult to escape the influence of technology on modern life. It lurks behind every door: the classroom, home, office, and store. There are many who are resistant to new technology, saying that technology causes harm to society. These claims are often made without the realization that technology also includes important and indispensable parts in their life such as writing and the tools for writing. Writing was one of the first technologies invented. Technology has now become so entrenched in the majority of cultures around the world that it is hard to imagine a life or society without writing. For those that maintain a majority of technology beyond writing is harmful, imagine the difficulty in writing without the help of other technologies, which includes pencils, paper, computers, printing presses, and a number of other technological aids.