At first glance, John Taylor and Howling Wolf’s visual representations of the treaty signing at Medicine Creek Lodge appear very different from one another. It is more than apparent that the two artists have very different interpretations of the same event. This paper will visually analyze both works of art by comparing and contrasting the compositional balance, medium, and use of color, as well as how the artists narrated their views using different visual elements. John Taylor’s picture of the signing is very realistic, especially when compared to Wolf’s picture, which is in a much more abstracted form. In Taylor’s picture the viewer can easily recognize natural objects shown in their true form. For example, the landscape in the background of the piece is easily recognizable as a forest. The layout is filled with tall trees and wavy grass. The …show more content…
In Taylor’s picture it is hard to tell the difference between male and females, and between the Native Americans and Pilgrims. Except for a few of the people on the outside who are shown with incredible detail, most of the people fade together and blur as a crowd. With most of the figures it is hard to differentiate between their faces. Taylor does this to make the narrative of the piece to focus on the treaty rather than focusing on the individual people who were involved in signing of the treaty. In Wolf’s picture it is easily to distinguish the different tribes and genders of the people. In fact, the majority of the people in the picture are women. This shows that in Native American culture values women in their society. He also separates the different tribes by using different colors of clothing. This allows the viewer to understand which tribe was directly involved in the treaty and which ones were simply watching. Wolf makes it clear that the actual people involved in the treaty should be the main focus of the
N. Scott Momaday wrote these lines in his 1991 book of poems, In the Presence of the Sun: “In the shine of photographs / are the slain, frozen and black / … In autumn there were songs, long / since muted in the blizzard.” In this poem called “Wounded Knee Creek”, Momaday depicts the aftermath of Federal and Native American conflict at the Battle of Wounded Knee. He reminds the reader of how the event and loss of native life are remembered solely through these photographs of the dead and lost. Momaday’s work represents the Western tradition of artists using their art to memorialize and remember the past peoples and places that have been transformed, built up, and destroyed through government institutions of the West. It is this remembrance of
Representational art work is resembling the natural world and abstract art shows objects in a basic style (Sayre, Pg. 26). While Taylor uses naturalism in his art work, Wolf uses symbols to show the Native American culture. Wolf’s art is two dimensional because it is flat. Wolf also uses many colors to represent the culture of Native Americans. The colors shown in the artist image is both primary and secondary colors, and is sketched on plain paper. Taylor’s image of the signing of the treaty shows the colors of black and white. Taylor used the highlight method which is going from lighter to darker color. The artist work is also three dimensional. Also, Wolf’s art work exhibited many women (Sayre, Pg. 41) and displays the attendance being majority Native Americas. In Taylor’s image there are no women presented (Sayre, Pg. 41), and indicates at the event there are more United States government there then Native
The art work of Howling Wolf, Treaty signing at Medicine Creek Lodge and John Taylor, Treaty Signing at Medicine Creek Lodge as you can tell from the titles are both from the identical occasion. Both art works are from the same event but is portrayed by two cultures and their point of views (Sayre, Pg. 40). The drawer John Taylor was a journalist, and Howling Wolf was a Native American artist (Sayre, Pg. 40). These art works are concerning what occurred on October 1867 when Cheyenne, Arapaho, Comanche, Kiowa and the United States government signed a peace treaty (Sayre, Pg. 40). The treaty was signed at Medicine Lodge Creek on Arkansas River in Kansas (Sayre, Pg. 40). John Taylor’s art was created off of sketches that was completed shortly after the events (Sayre, Pg. 40). While Howling Wolf art work was created many years later, while Howling was in incarcerated (Sayre, Pg. 40). Wolf and Taylor images have similar art components while they also have different features.
...d Native Americas in a negative light, such as Carl Wimer’s Abduction of Daniel Boone’s Daughter, George Caleb Bingham’s Concealed Enemy, and Horatio Greenough’s The Rescue. These two paintings and statue in particular should be included because they depict the views of people in that era. The view of Native Americans was that of savagery. In the painting by Wimer the woman is depicted a fair skinned maiden, due to the white dress who is being brutishly taken away. The statue by Greenough, which depicts a man protecting his family from a savage Native American, was outside of the United States Capital for nearly a hundred years before it was taken down. These views of indigenous people during the 19th century have lasting impacts on our country. It is our job to tell the real story of what happened to the Native Americans as victims of our view of manifest destiny.
Gardner, Helen, and Fred S. Kleiner. Gardner's Art Through the Ages: The Western Perspective. N.p., 2014. Print.
The story of Custer’s Last Stand, formally known as “The Battle of Little Big Horn”(25 June 1876), is one that many would consider a legendary tale of gallantry amongst heroic Cavalry Soldiers gloriously fighting against all odds in the face of certain death, until the last bullet fired atop the hill that is now known as Custer’s Last Stand. Regardless of the mythical inspirational value that it provides to Soldiers aspiring to one day also become legendary heroes, from a military perspective, it also teaches us from the unforgiving realities of battle that re-emphasize the importance of tactical knowledge and it’s adequate application. Within my analysis, I will first explain the historical situation during the Western Expansion, the higher commander’s plan and intent for the operation, LTC Custer’s actions on the objective, resulted conclusion of the battle based on his actions, and the significance of this battle that stemmed in terms of tactical lessons learned.
The stress of this caused their once coveted friendship to wither and morph into an ill hatred. The English began a campaign of the demonization of Native Americans. The image of Native Americans was described in Red, White, & Black as friendly traders who shared a mutually beneficial relationship with one another. Evidently, a very different image started to appear when land disputes arose. The new illustration the English painted was that Native American people were “comparable to beasts” and “wild and savage people, that live like heards of deare in a forrest”. It was sudden change of heart between the two societies that supports Waterhouse’s claims of the changing relationship of the English and Native
Democracy can be traced back before the coming of Christ. Throughout Greece during the sixth century democracy was in its earliest stages and as the millenniums would pass the power of government by the people would show distinct alterations. This is evident when analyzing The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears by Theda Perdue and Michael D. Green. These authors illustrate how the U.S government adjusts policies from that of assimilating the Native American Indians to that of removing them from their homelands and forcibly causing the Cherokee nation to relocate themselves west of the Mississippi. In further depth Perdue and Green portray though vivid description how the government would show disloyalty and how that caused division between the tribal members of the Cherokee people. This endeavor of travel and animosity of the Indians would become known as the Trail of Tears.
Examining the formal qualities of Homer Watson’s painting Horse and Rider In A Landscape was quite interesting. I chose to analyze this piece as apposed to the others because it was the piece I liked the least, therefore making me analyze it more closely and discover other aspects of the work, besides aesthetics.
There is, however, a slight opposition to this intense realism. It can be seen in Wood’s representation of foliage. The trees that appear in the upper left corner look like large green lollipops peeking over the roof of the house. The viewer knows that trees do not naturally look like that. Wood has depicted them as stylized and modern, similar to the trees seen is Seurat’s Sunday Afternoon on the island of La Grand Jatte. After viewing other works by Wood, it is clear that he has adopted this representation for the trees in many of his paintings.
Crazy Horse was a warrior and took part in many wars and battles between the Native Americans and the Americans during the westward expansion. In the wars he led his warriors who decoyed Captain Fetterman and 80 soldiers out of Fort Phil Kearny to their deaths in 1866. He led the thousand warriors who fought General George Crook and his thousand soldiers to a bloody draw on Rosebud Creek in June of 1876. Anf he led the warriors in the charge up the hill that outflanked Colonel George A. Custer at the Little Bighorn just a week after the fight on the Rosebud. Custer and more than 200 of his men were killed. It was the greatest Native American victory, but it was also their greatest disaster because the Americans decided the Natives should no
While researching the early relations between the American Indians, and the first European settlers, Jane Tompkins found that the way history was recorded seemed to mislead her. In her essay " ' Indians': Textualism, Morality, and the problem of History," Tompkins found that the historians put prejudice facts, and looked down upon Native Americans. Clearly it is seen that even through time, historians are still this way. This dilemma must be illuminated to find out who and why this has happened.
The first event is the battle of Little Big Horn. This event is called a battle because when the Native Americans and American Soldiers were at war both sides were armed and were organized. The reason for this conflict was gold, American men found gold in the black hills and told the NAtives to move to reservations, but the Indians wouldn't give up the hills and move to reservations this resulted in the battle of Little Big Horn. The American Soldiers lead by Colonel George Armstong Custer consisted of about 600 men. On the other side, the Native American camp consisted of about 2,000 Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho. The Americans didn't plan for a gathering of this sized proportion. When Custer attacked his army was killed very easily and splitting them up weakened the army even more.
Crazy Horse is a legendary Indian Chief who earned his reputation by constantly defending his people, fighting in daring battles and his determination to preserve the Lakota traditional way of life against the removal to an Indian reservation.
In the following essay the painting Nighthawks by Edward Hopper will be analyzed to determine what messages the artist was trying to convey to the viewer, and the significance of the very detailed depiction of the figures occupying the diner. The realism style of the painting that contributes greatly to the intense effect on the viewer, chosen for this reason, will be explored as well. The somber and lonely mood of the painting will be analyzed as well as the aspects of the empty street and the sparsely populated diner. I will discuss how the painting accurately represents the Great Depression era it was painted to portray, why this specific medium was chosen and how it affects the painting itself.