John Locke

954 Words2 Pages

In this essay I argue that the late philosopher Locke has the most compelling theory of metaphysics. First, I explain Locke’s point that all humans are born as Tabula Rasa, in order to gain basic understanding of where Locke begins his theory. Second, I discuss how Locke argues how we obtain knowledge, empiricism and representationalism, and knowledge about the work varies between strong and weak inferences. Third, I will provide counter examples to Locke’s ideas, and will explain why these counter examples work for Locke’s theories provided. Finally, I address some of the ways that Locke might respond to my objections.
The following paragraph will be used to define and understand the concepts of the following key terms that Locke uses: epistemology, Tabula Rasa, knowledge, empiricism, representationalism, and inferences. Epistemology is the study of the nature and grounds of knowledge especially with reference to its limits and validity (Merriam). The Tabula Rasa is translated directly from the Latin, meaning blank slate; Locke uses Tabula Rasa stating that humans are not born with innate ideas. When Locke speaks about knowledge he is talking about what is derived from the world through observation. Empiricism is the preference for observation; the idea that knowledge and reality can be understood through experimentation, hypothesis, and testing. Representationalism is knowing the idea of an object as it occurs in our minds, the world causes sensory perceptions which become knowledge (Matheis). Lastly, the term inferences, is the act or process of deriving logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true.
Locke’s argument and theory of the Tabula Rasa originated in the eleventh century by an Islamic philosopher, ...

... middle of paper ...

... that all knowledge begins with sensory perceptions, and with this argument he states that reason alone does not guarantee knowledge. After giving you the idea of how knowledge comes about, he then gives you the two bases for knowledge through empiricism and representationalism. Lastly, Locke has us consider weak and strong inferences and how they can also help our knowledge.

Works Cited

"Epistemology." Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, 8 May 2011. Web. 03 Dec. 2013.

Matheis, C. Lecture Notes on Locke.2013. Print.

Uzgalis, William, Uzgalis,. "John Locke." Stanford University. Stanford University, 02 Sept. 2001. Web. 08 Dec. 2013.

Al-Rodhan, Nayef, Dr. "Innate Knowledge." Innate Knowledge. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2013.

Rizvi, Sajjad H. "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Avicenna (Ibn Sina) . Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 6 Jan. 2006. Web. 05 Dec. 2013.

Show More
Related

  • Reasons to Join the Revolutionary War as Portrayed in The Patriot

    2029 Words  | 5 Pages

    Trans. William Popple. N.p., c. 1686. - c Print. The.. 4) Locke, John.

    Read More

  • Comparing Mencius, Hs�n Tzu, And Thomas Hobbes

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of Locke’s largest points is "All ideas come from sensation or reflection” (Locke 101). He thinks that man is completely blank when they are born and that their basic senses are what gives them knowledge. Locke states, “Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper” (Locke 101). Locke is basically saying that human nature is like a blank slate, and how men experience life in their own ways is what makes them good or evil. Overall, Locke believes that any and all knowledge is only gained through life

    Read More

  • Usama, The Middle East, and The Crusades

    1516 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ibn Munqidh, Usama. "From Memoirs." McNeill, William and Marilyn Robinson Waldman. The Islamic World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973. 184-206.

    Read More

  • Locke and Publius: Comparing Their Views on Civil Government

    1499 Words  | 3 Pages

    Locke, John. The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New York: Courier Dover Publications, 2002.

    Read More

  • Good vs Evil in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper void of all characters, without any ideas. How comes it to be furnished? Whence comes it by that vast store which the busy and boundless fancy of man has painted on it with an almost endless variety? Whence has it all the materials of reason and knowledge? To this I answer, in one word, from experience (Locke, 1690/1947, bk. II, chap. 1, p.26).

    Read More

  • Empiricism In Poe's The Fall Of The House Usher

    1295 Words  | 3 Pages

    A first influence was John Locke’s idea of Empiricism, which was the idea that all knowledge was gained by experiences, exclusively through the senses. A second vital influence was Transcendentalism, which was a reaction to Empiricism. While John Locke believed that reality or truth was constituted by the material world and by the senses, Transcendentalists believed that reality and truth exist within the spiritual or ideal world (Kerry Vermillion & Quinn McCumber).

    Read More

  • Jefferson and Locke

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Locke’s essay, Book II called Second Treatise he explains his philosophical approach to the state of nature and how men are bound to a social contract giving consent to the government to protect their unalienable rights.

    Read More

  • John Locke: America’s Forgotten Founding Father

    1721 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Locke is the most influential character in American history, thought, and practice. Without the influence of his writings, America would not have the same foundation of unalienable Rights, stable governance, and quality of life. However, Locke remains widely unknown and unstudied by the newer generations of Americans. His most influential work, the Second Treatises of Government, laid the ground, both theoretically and institutionally, for the American system of government that has been enjoyed for over two centuries. His influence on the American way of thinking is made evident when examining the text of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution.

    Read More

  • Locke's Theory Of Knowledge By Descartes

    766 Words  | 2 Pages

    Descartes argues in favor of human reasoning, involving innate ideas and subsequent deductions, as the sole avenue toward reaching this certain knowledge. On the other hand, Locke does not invest himself in the possibility of achieving any knowledge that can be claimed as a universal truth. Rather than this, Locke favored the idea that experience can lead individuals to knowledge that is most probable. Ultimately, these two philosophies cannot reconcile themselves together because of a core divergence on the question of the origins of knowledge. As Locke’s argument finds itself dependent on the concept of the mind as a “tabula rasa” at birth, this doctrine surpasses Descartes’ assertion of innate knowledge and, by extension, systematic doubt. For readers, the acceptance of the mind as a blank slate invariably leads to an acceptance of Locke’s reasoning above Descartes’. The argument propelling Locke’s essay and the improbability of innate knowledge favors the idea that there can be no universal truths and that, since individuals are born without any truths evident to them, they must depend entirely on sensory perception of the external world on which to base the beginnings of their knowledge. To support this, Locke considers how children gain knowledge of the world in small increments, as opposed to possessing an extensive knowledge from the time of their birth. Locke discusses that an individual with exposure solely to black and white would be absolutely unaware of scarlet or green, just like children are ignorant of the taste or texture of pineapples and oysters until they first taste

    Read More

  • Nature Vs. Nurture: Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our mind then processes that perception into an idea. A great example I can give is from my childhood. I was playing outside by my elderly neighbor and she said, “Stop,” and I did, which made her tell me I was very obedient. I didn’t know what that word meant so I looked it up and did not like the definition. Ever since that day I tried to not be obedient unless I wanted to be or absolutely needed to be. I heard something I didn’t know anything about, researched it and reflected on it and decided I didn’t want to be that. My experience makes me agree with Locke because I was able to process what happened to me and decide for

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Monism And Dualism

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke possesses many characteristics of an idealist. However, he also believes that we were created by God and that we our morally obligated to preserve ourselves and the rest of humankind. How he can come to this conclusion when he believes we have no pre-knowledge of anything is somewhat disturbing. If we only perceive things with our senses, or though our own mind reflection how is this logic possible? It seems to be a contradiction in th...

    Read More

  • The Misconceptions About Women in Islam

    1311 Words  | 3 Pages

    G. Esposito, John L (2002) Islam; What Everyone Should Know. New York. Oxford University Press Inc.

    Read More

  • John Locke's Argument Against The Will Being Free

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    This essay discussed John Locke’s view about the Will’s being Free and how he concluded that the Will was not free. This is an outcome that he discovered while writing On Power on An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. I have offered reasons for why this is an argument that seems to contradict itself, which makes it inconsistent and unstable.

    Read More

  • John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume

    1235 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke, Berkeley and Hume are all empiricist philosophers that believe in different things. They have things in common such as the three anchor points; The only source of genuine knowledge is sense experience, reason is an unreliable and inadequate route to knowledge unless it is grounded in the solid bedrock of sense experience and there is no evidence of innate ideas within the mind that are known from experience. The relationship between our thoughts and the world around us consisted of concepts which were developed from these philosophers. I have argued that Locke, Berkeley and Hume are three empiricists that have different believes.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Locke And Descartes

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    That everything in our mind is in idea. It all could be developed by human reason, not innate ideas. Locke goes on to describe his theory in order for your mind to gain knowledge humans will have to fill it up their brain with ideas, and learn through their five senses. Since, the innate ideas was not that relevant to Locke he needed to come up with another perceptions. Locke then suggested that external experience called as sensations; this experience which we can attain our knowledge through our senses that we have such as smells, touch and color. In other words, it is about analyses the characteristics of an object. The second kind of experience which Locke mentions is internal experience known as reflection, it is summarize those personal experience such as our thoughts, thinking, and feelings. He says that all knowledge come from sensations or reflection, “These two are the fountains of knowledge, from whence all the ideas we have, or can naturally have,” (page186). Therefore, the sense and observation make up the whole of knowledge. On the contrary, as for Descartes views he believes we do have innate

    Read More

More about John Locke

Open Document