More handpicked essays just for you.
Dangers of distracted driving essay
Outline of an essay on distracted driving
Essay how distraction affects driving
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The speech called “Texting and Driving…Don’t Do it!” was given by John Cortes. The speech was published on January 7, 2013. This speech was written due to all of the accidents that were caused by texting and driving in 2013. The main argument is that you should not text and drive, it causes accidents and collisions; loss of life; and results in tickets.
The audience that Cortes was aiming for is anyone with a cellphone and driver’s license, this affected the argument because he could be speaking to all different types of people. He spoke in a very simple way which helps to avoid confusion on what he was trying to get across. His style was calm but stern at the same time; He wasn’t very aggressive but he made it clear that texting and driving
Radley Balko, the senior editor of Reason Magazine and former policy analyst for civil liberties issues for the Canto Institute, vents his frustrations toward the American population crying for a law to holster phones while driving. He states Americans always get a case of “TOBAL-itis” which is an abbreviation for “There Ought a Be A Law”. Balko declares that Americans are not concerned about the outcome of a texting ban law, but only the fact that a law is enacted is suffeciently adequate. The aftermath of this law would be chaotic and the local courthouses would have a line of infuriated citizens stretching out the door due to the increased number of traffic tickets. We must also think of the consequences
Are you tired of the stereotypical lies about Hispanics? Well I’m here to clear that up. Not all Hispanics are Mexican or Immigrants like society has told you. Not every Hispanic is a poor, Spanish speaking Immigrant. Society does not know who you are, unless they know recognize your language, origin, and culture accurately!
This article shows both sides of the “Texting While Driving “debate. The article talks about how banning texting while driving could be a good thing. It states that countless of fatal car crashes have been caused by texting motorists. It also gives information on why banning texting while driving could be a bad thing mainly because it is a law that is hard to enforce. This article does a very good job of portraying both views. It is chock full of facts, quotes and studies that support each argument.
The Editors. (2009). Should texting cellphone use by drivers be illegal?. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.thenewyorktimes.com
Further evidence is shown when the author states, “When I was in college: to call myself a Hispanic” (Rodriguez 72-73). In the early 1970s, the President Nixon established the responsibility to identify Americans by race: black, white, Asian, Indian, and Hispanic. Then, he realized that he was classified as Hispanic by the government when he was in college. This evidence is significance for convincing Rodriguez’s argument because it demonstrates that he doesn’t identify himself by race, and he doesn’t believe that he is Hispanic, even if someone defines him as Hispanic; moreover, he opposes classifying people by race. In “Blaxican”, there are some persuasive writing skills that are used to convince the idea that people shouldn’t classify themselves by race, and they have their own identity to classify themselves based on the assimilated
The cell phone provider known as AT&T has produced several commercials to show the dangers of texting and driving. These are designed to grab people’s attention and to touch them in a small place in there heart to the point that they no longer feel the need to pick up their phone in the car. They stress over and over the dangers of reading just one text. There have even been safety precautions placed in teens vehicles that record them as well as the road while they are driving to catch any of this distracted behavior. As Americans have seen an increase in the amount of texting and driving there have been several of the 50 states that have put laws in place to help try and put a reduction on the amount of fatalities. The devastating part about this kind of distraction is that nearly every person that has owned a cell phone has picked it up at some point while they are driving to make a phone call or send a quick text. They have seen the commercials and they know the hurt that it has caused many families loosing someone they love, but we still to do it anyways. It’s so easy to tell yourself “It’s just one quick text, I will be fine.” At some point we need to realize this is not
That goal was to inform his audience about the dangers of texting while driving and even more importantly persuade his audience why they should not text while driving. The speaker makes his goal clear multiple times throughout his speech by listing three main reasons why people should not text and drive. The three goals the speaker was speaking on were causes of accidents and collisions, causes the loss of life, and finally the price of paying for tickets. Those reasons include the increased amount of accidents and collisions that result from texting and driving, the 5,800 lives that are lost each year, and the legal consequences that take place if caught texting and driving (John Cortes, “Texting and Driving”). We also know his purpose is to inform and persuade because he defends his position by giving multiple statistics, as well as, the constant repetition of the words “please don’t text and drive” (John Cortes, “Texting and Driving”). John did an excellent job at achieving his intended goals for the speech by “wowing” his audience. This can be seen by his positive reviews and comments. Of the available ratings, less than 1% of the audience members did not feel affected by his speech. However, he was still able to reach out to over 100,000 people with one single
Most of the drivers are likely to mix up driving and messaging from their cell phones while driving regardless of the laws standing on the issues, and danger posed to them. A majority of those drivers engaging in this act do not contemplate the possible detrimental effects from their actions. Research has indicated that texting while driving contributes to road accidents significantly. This situation is sufficiently bad to the extent that there are more accidents caused by messaging while driving than those caused by drunken driving (Fumento n.p.). From the foregoing statements, this essay seeks to support the laws, which outlaws texting while driving by highlighting how dangerous it is for drivers to massage while driving.
Thesis statement: Risks of texting while driving over the past few years has become a key topic for many Americans through the country. It has been the cause of numerous deaths and injuries and remains a vast disturbance for drivers. Hence driving is one of the greatest common causes of misfortunes on roads. This can result in, physical visual and cognitive distraction and significantly increases the amount of time a driver devotes not looking at the road. Therefore police officers should seize the phones of those who text and drive.
Specific Purpose: To inform the audience about various festivals of South American countries as a group, and to inform the audience about the Carnaval de Barraquilla as an individual.
...nned Latinos because they readily fit the social caricature of what Latinos are supposed to look like. In Brignoni-Ponce and Martinez-Fuerte the Court performed a balancing test where it determined that the intrusion to an individual’s rights in an immigration stop was minor compared to the pressing governmental interest of border enforcement. However, the Court ignored the stigmatizing effect of the ruling on Latinos. The media bombards the culture at large with depictions of Latinos as undocumented immigrants. Brignoni-Ponce reinforces these depictions by making Latinos presumptively guilty of being in the country illegally. Citizens are subjected to undue scrutiny because the court is reinforcing the negative cultural association between Latino identity and criminality. It is unjust to impose these undue burdens on a population that is vastly law abiding.
Hello, Senor Cortez, remember when you told me to get the information about the Aztecs well with my genius eye I got everything you need to know about.
Even though texting and driving is against the law, men and women of all ages are doing it on a regular basis. Statistically speaking, 23% of car accidents, which was about 1.3 million, involved cell phones in 2011 (“Texting and Driving..”). According to Edgar Snyder and Associates Law Firm out of Western Pennsylvania, “In 2011, 3,331 people were killed and 387,000 people were injured in accidents involving a distracted driver.” Along with those stats, and according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, “texting and driving kills 11 teens each day” (“Texting and Cell Phone..”). These numbers show how fatally dangerous texting and driving can be. As mentioned earlier, it is illegal, so humans shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. However, if someone gets caught, they could be looking at a ticket costing about, 135 dollars, not including the additional base fine, surcharge and the law library fee (“Texting and Driving, Challenges..”). If a person chooses to text and drive and...
This ignorance comes to light as the act of the driver texting while maneuvering the vehicle down the street, and by showing a Texas inspection sticker, it is showing the ignorance of care by state legislators for safer roadways. In relation, texting and driving is not safe for the driver or bystanders and puts many innocent people in harm’s way. Using the stated examples, BMW is appealing to the emotion and common sense of the readers. This method is undeniably effective as no one will want to intentionally harm another from their own
Good Evening my name is Rafaela, I’m here to persuade you why you shouldn’t text and drive. (Video)There’s times we wish we could rewind time, but sadly we can’t. We all make the mistake of texting and driving without thinking on the consequences this could bring.