Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Possible genetic roots to criminality debate
Conclusion of how poverty is connected to crime rates
Correlation of poverty and crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Possible genetic roots to criminality debate
The most stand-out causes for violence mentioned in the films fell within two major categories: biological, and social. Biologically, some of the causes of aggression were due to an imbalance between the chemicals of Serotonin and Vasopressin. Jim Fallon also points out a genetic marker that could also predict violent behavior. Fallon explains that the combination of this genetic marker in tandem with early life trauma is a strong indicator for a person to exhibit psychopathic murderous tendencies (Fallon, 2009). Socially, precursor events related to things such as socioeconomic status, neglect, and abuse. In the case of Joel Rifkin, he was raised in a loving family but was the victim of bullying in school. Despite the encouragement of other, …show more content…
His IQ was even noted for being above average. But when it came to task objective testing, Rifkin began to exhibit more difficulty. The color/word association test, where participants are told to say the color of the ink and not the word typed, Rifkin could not complete the test. It was stated that he began laughing uncontrollably and they had to end the test. Then during an impulse control task, where a participant is told to raise his finger when they hear one knock and to not react when presented with two knocks, Rifkin failed 16 out of 100 attempts. These tests indicated problems with coordination and impulse control. These results were supported with PET scans that indicated subtle and non-symmetrical activity in the prefrontal areas. The results of the PET scan, though initially deemed normal, were later deemed significant enough to warrant the observed …show more content…
In that study, researchers placed hamsters in cages with older, larger, more aggressive hamsters and monitored the behavior. The larger hamsters would constantly chase and attack the test hamster. The test hamsters would not fight back and would eventually become very submissive every time they were placed in cages that contained hamsters of equal or larger size. If those submissive test hamsters were placed in cages with smaller hamsters, the test hamster would become instantly aggressive and attack the smaller hamster. Upon further study, the researchers found that the chemical levels in the brain (predominantly Serotonin and Vasopressin) were off, with low levels of serotonin and extremely high levels of vasopressin. In the case of rhesus monkeys, researchers studied young monkeys that were exposed to emotional abuse or neglect, and were also raised among other young rhesus monkeys with little supervision of a parent monkey. What they found in a majority of the cases was that the monkeys would eventually turn violent against their peers. The ramification of these studies also hold importance in humans; as it shows that both environmental and biological influences are tied to one-another and given the right combination could lead to violence. And that not one single indicator is solely
The study required that participants must be given IQ tests, and also that they be observed in a classroom setting while interventions were put in place. Thus the adminsitratiors were able to draw results both from IQ scores and actual classroom preformance.
Many influences may push young people such as Lee Boyd Malvo to perform violent acts. Psychological, sociological and biological factors play a coexisting role in young adults life. Violence can be caused by disruptions, damage or undeveloped brain or can be brought on by something else such as economic difficulties or social or cultural difficulties. The nature vs. nurture question has been an ongoing debate. It can be argued that John lee Malvo born with predetermined genes or biological factors that played an integral part in creating his homicidal tendencies or that he become murderous through his surroundings partnered by the psychological influence that Mohammed had over him.
Neurotransmitters have been suggested as a significant cause of aggressive behavior. Hans Brunner, a geneticist at the University Hospital in Nijmegen, has found that the violent male members of the Dutch family mentioned earlier in this paper, lacked a gene that produces monoamine oxidase-a (MAOA) (4). MAOA is an enzyme that breaks down significant transmitters in the brain. If the MAOA does not break down these transmitters - specifically, serotonin - then buildup of serotonin will occur and could cause a person to act violently (3).
You may have always wondered if there was a correlation between social behaviour and biological functioning. At the back of my mind I am reminded of the almighty biblical “freewill” as a tool to readjust the resultant antisocial behaviour. With the human species it is difficult to assume 100% causal relationship hence it is safe to look at mediating factors that result in a person's antisocial behaviour. Barnes et al (2016) suggests that if one is to gain a greater understanding of Antisocial behaviours one must look at several domains and they include Evolutionary criminology, Biological criminology, Behaviour genetics, Molecular genetics and Neurocriminology. However, on the predictive side, increasingly, studies are examining whether the
Justin Torres Novel We the Animals is a story about three brothers who lived a harassed childhood life. There parents are both young and have no permanent jobs to support their family. The narrator and his brothers are delinquents who are mostly outside, causing trouble, causing and getting involved in a lot of problems and barely attending school, which their parents allowed them to do. The narrator and his brothers were physically abused by their father, leading them to become more violent to one another and others, drinking alcohol and dropping out of school. Physical abuse is an abuse involving one person’s intention to cause feelings of pain, injury and other physical suffering and bodily harm to the victim. Children are more sensitive to physical abuse, they show symptoms of physical abuse in short run and more effects in the long run. Children who sustain physical abuse grow up with severely damaged of sense of self and inability. The narrator and his brothers were physically abused by their father and showed long run symptoms of Antisocial behaviors, drinking problems and most importantly they becoming more violent themselves. Many psychological and sociological studies such as “Childhood history of abuse and child abuse potential: role of parent’s gender and timing of childhood abuse” and “school factors as moderators of the relationship between physical child abuse and pathways of antisocial behavior can be used to prove the argument that children who sustain physical abuse grow up with criminal and antisocial behaviors.
Several hormones such as dopamine and norepinephrine enhance aggressive behavior. A high level of testosterone is also a determining factor of increased aggressive behavior, which is why victims report that their assailant was male in more than 80 percent of all violent personal crimes (Siegel & Worrall, 2013). Aggression is subdivided into two categories: affective and predatory aggression. Affective aggression usually involves high levels of physiological arousal within the individual and takes place when fighting for a mate or social status, such as when a gang uses violence to intimidate other rivals within their neighborhood. Predatory aggression involves low stimulation levels and is done in a methodical manner that involves stalking and meticulous planning. In a study conducted by Barratt, Stanford, Dowdy, Liebman, and Kent (1999), a group of 216 college students were asked to evaluate their own aggressive acts with a self-report survey. The resulting aggressive acts committed were divided into the two categories of impulsive and premeditated aggression. Impulsive aggression was frequently followed by feelings of remorse and confusion after that act was committed, unlike the latter which consisted of dominance and a purpose of social status gain (as cited in Miller, 2014). While some aggressive offenders may have a rational motive to commit a crime, Soutullo, McElroy, & Goldsmith (1998) argue that the act of serial killing consists of compulsions and irresistible impulses (as cited in Miller, 2014). That can be contributed to an impulse control disorder, which according to the DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000) and the DSM-5 (APA, 2013),
Nature refers, in this case, to how the subject is genetically made-up. It is the belief of many researchers that damage to the brain or front lobe causes the violent behavior demonstrated by serial killers. The frontal lobe is in charge of social relations and maintaining adequate relationships with others. Damage to the temporal lobe can result in hair-trigger violent reactions and increased aggressive responses. Damage to the limbic system can also be a cause of serial killers’ ‘dysfunction’. The limbic system controls emotional responses and motivation. MRI scans of known serial killers show damage to the limbic system, or inactivity. When the limbic brain is damaged, it may account for uncontrollable aggression.
When it comes to the topics of violence, murder, and mayhem among children, most will readily agree that children who committed these acts did so because their environmental situation inspired it. However, like me, some are convinced that biological factors are the main reasons children commit violent acts.
Neihoff, D. (1999). The biology of violence: How understanding the brain, behavior and environment can break the vicious circle of aggression. New York: Free Press.
Social researchers, psychological researchers and criminological researchers alike have all applied the MacDonald triad theory to explain violent crime against humans. The triad theory simply uses three main variables, enuresis, pyromania, and animal cruelty during childhood to explain aggression that graduates to violent crimes against humans in adulthood. This research only looks at methods of animal cruelty used, and age of onset abuse. By identifying animal cruelty in childhood and adolescent children findings can be used as an indicator of adult violence and in turn develop the grounds for intervention and prevention. This research is replicated from studies done primarily by Hensley and Tallichet. In the early 1990’s Hensley and Tallichet researched and examined different aspects of animal cruelty and wrote several articles based on the same sample taken from inmates surveyed at both a medium and maximum security prisons in a southern state. According to Tallichet & Hensley (2008), the assertion that youthful animal abusers graduate to later aggression against humans, known as the “graduation hypothesis,” has become more commonly accepted by clinicians, social scientist, law enforcement, and animal advocates alike.
It is also crucial to consider the genetic makeup of these killers when trying to decipher their motives. New research shows a potential link between a strand of genes and aggression and violence (Bradley-Hagerty). The MAO-A gene or (monoamine oxidase A) has been researched extensively. The gene is often referred to as the “warrior gene” (Bradley-Hagerty). The function of this gene is to regulate serotonin in the brain. However, there are different variations of the gene, one of which is believed to prevent the brain from feeling the relaxing effects of the serotonin (Bradley- Hagerty). Without these calming effects, the person with this version of the gene is genetically predisposed to fits of rage; fits of rage that could potentially lead to murder over and over again.
Many experts do not accept that biology alone creates children who kill. They believe that violence is a learned behavior. Being abused or witnessing domestic violence is an environmental factor in ju...
In childhood, if one has abusive, manipulative, or irresponsible parents that neglect them at home, a part of their brain, which controls emotions, is damaged, and they become more prone to violence and aggression (White, Sadie. " Making a Monster: The Biological, Social, and Artistic Construction of a Serial Killer From Psychosis to Sondheim").
There are many factors that are utilized to explain crime. These include things such as DNA, environmental contaminants, hormones, nutrition, and body chemistry can all play a role in criminal behavior and all of these determinants can be passed down through generations making human behavior determined by genetics to some degree. Violent behaviors have been linked to nutrition, vitamin deficiency and other conditions that affect the body. Body chemistry theories have all contributed to advances in understanding criminal behavior. Many studies have been done to link violence with body chemistry.
17(4); 241-305. Reif, A. 2007 Neuropsychopharmacology. -. Nature and Nurture Predispose to Violent Behavior: Serotonergic Genes and Averse Childhood Environment. 32 (11); 2375-2383. Schaffner, K. 2001 Current Opinion in Psychiatry.