Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Culture within organizations
Culture within organizations
Theories of corporate culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Question #1: Describe the culture set by former CEO Jim Carpenter. Would you describe it as a constructive corporate culture, or non-constructive? Why?
Answer: The culture set by former CEO Jim Carpenter was to treat his employees like family. Carpenter knew his employees by name and took a general care on how they were. It wasn 't uncommon for him to make visits to his employees homes when they were sick. He felt it was important to do special things for his employees such as holiday parties. He believed in treating his employees right so they felt a sense of loyalty to the company they worked for. He wanted all his employees to feel like they were really a part of the company and not just an employee. He felt it important to include them in every aspect of the company and its decisions. I think Carpenter used a constructive corporate culture. Like the constructive corporate culture, Carpenter was concerned
…show more content…
Although most employees were not happy about Lawrence 's changes, many employees probably welcomed the change. It should never be looked at as wrong to expect employees to earn their paychecks and treat a job like a job. While change is hard to adapt to, people always do. Lawrence could have slowly changed things to allow for employees to adjust to those changes. You can raise morale by letting the employees know that they are just as important to you as you are to them. Lawrence doesn 't need to be as close with employees as Carpenter was, but he can restore morale by letting them know that they are important to him. Turnover rates would also change If employees felt these changes. Employees of any company want to feel like they are a part of the company and that the company needs them there. When you have happy employees. Productivity and attitutes stay in the positive. Happy employees make for high morale and lower turnover
Each organization big or small has its own values, ways of doing things and assumption that it operates in. The principles and ethics that exist in each of these companies are the baseline through which the company operates its affairs. This is what can be called as that organization’s culture. The culture in existence has an impact on the productivity, effectiveness and efficiency (Keyton, 2011). The basis of setting the most appropriate culture of a company is not only to move or increase the profitability but also to make the stakeholders happy and satisfied. One aspect of that is the employee or the human resource the firm who put their expertise in the firm and add a bit of creativity and innovativeness to move the products. Chick-Fil-A operates in a competitive industry thus it requires all the stakeholders.
The next problem is poor morale. Morale is the job satisfaction, outlook, and feelings of an employee. Right now, employees do not feel secure within the business and are rebelling against it. They do not have a positive outlook for the future of the business and feel betrayed because of all of the people getting let go. The employees right now have a poor morale due to all these factors.
The case study of “What should we do with Jim?” has been read and a set amount of questions has been asked about the reading, which will be answered by the following:
Corporate culture refers to an organization that shares the same values or beliefs that are usually instilled or passed down by example from the upper level executives throughout the organization (Thorne, O. Ferrell, & L. Ferrell, 2011, p. 191). Most organizations are molded from ideals set in place by the founders or upper level executives of an organization. In Enron’s case, they believed in doing whatever it took and unfortunately it bread competitiveness throughout the company, which forced employees into making unethical decisions in order to save their jobs. The CEO, Jeffrey Skilling, decided to implement a program that evaluated employees every six months and the bottom twenty percent of employees would be terminated. This created a
Harold could have also attended the meetings and taken an initiative to ensure that all employees were happy. Roberts should have focused on his own strengths as a leader and could have identified his areas where he was better than Rankle. This way he would have never thought of changing the job. Roberts could have communicated his concerns regarding Rankle with his supervisor and teammates. Rankle should have taken permission and discuss with others about his new ideas. Base on this case study, it is very clear that effective communication is the key factor in the success of any
The company’s approach to motivate employees has been working in a positive way. The employees are satisfied with the family style community, and the productivity has increased as well. The company’s style of treating employees as important partners has been successful in other manufacturing companies too. For example, when Honda opened its first factory in the U.S., the CEO and employees shared the same cafeteria, just like Lincoln.
As we learn from the case study, the Lincoln Electric Company is the largest global manufacturer of machines for welding, which are used in all kinds of construction projects. This means that the company has a large global presence and many employees, so its culture affects thousands of its workers. Even though it is now 2014, the company still has a large market share and very satisfied employees, so clearly the culture leaves employees satisfied and motivates them to work hard for the company.
Kim and Mauborgne (2003) suggest that it is critical to adjust the employees to accept change and to identify how change can happen with limited resources. They also noted, “Many CEOs recognize the importance of getting employees motivated to make changes, but they make the mistake of trying to reform incentives through the whole organization.” In their article, they described how Bratton was able to solve the motivation problems at the police department. To clarify, Bratton recognized that key influencers at the police department could work to his advantage in implementing change. He also recognized that he only needed to motivate these key influencers because they “act like kingpins in bowling: when you hit them just right, all the pins topple over (Kim & Mauborgne,
The third Case Study “Home Depot’s Blueprint for Culture Change” studied Mr. Robert Nardelli’s role as the CEO of Home Depot. He approached management in an autocratic style, which was criticized by many. This paper will take a look at how Mr. Nardelli’s style follows Kotter and Cohen’s model of change.
One of the leading organizations that follow the servant leadership style is the coffee giant, Starbucks. The basis of the company’s organizational culture is the servant leadership principles. These principles pervade every aspect of their business. The company believes in caring their employees first, as they are the one who takes care of the customers (Ferguson, 2015). The hiring and management of the staff, the way the staff work and interact with one another, serving the customers all represent the organizational culture, their policies, and operations.
The definition of corporate culture is the beliefs and behaviors that determine how a company 's employees and management interact and handle outside business transactions (Fisher). A culture of a company can very it can be fun and relaxing or uptight and all about business what ever it is the way the company does everything from how they sell their products to how you are expected to work . A lot of people think of Google when they think of place that has good employee culture, but all the extravagant things that they offer doesn’t mean that that is the only thing that makes for a good employee culture. For example the human resource department at Netflix is more typical not offering any nap times or special foods but it offers things on a
Chapter sixteen in our textbook highlights the benefits of organizational culture and what it can do for any company with a strong culture perspective. In fact chapter sixteen-three(a) speaks widely on how a strong culture perspective shapes any organization up well enough to perform better than any of its competitors who do not balance any organizational culture. If not mistaken after viewing SAS institute case they are well on track with facilitating a high performance organization culture. First, SAS institute motivate all employees to become goal alignment in their field of work. This is where they all share the common goal to get their work done. In one of the excerpts taken away from this case, an employee- friendly benefits summary expresses the statement “If you treat employees as if they make a difference to the company, they will make a difference to the company.” “SAS Institute’s founders set out to create the kind of workplace where employees would enjoy spending time. And even though the workforce continues to grow year after year, it’s still the kind of place where people enjoy working.” Clearly highlighted from this statement that SAS Institute is mainly ran off of a fit perspective. Which argues that a culture is only as good as it fits the industry. Allowing a good blueprint or set up will
The confidence came from Keller’s presence. His long history with the company his respect for coworkers and his reputation as a successful problem solver almost certainly reassured employees that a turnaround could happen. Second, team members must appreciate one another’s perspectives and refrain from blaming one another for problems they may encounter. Before Jimenez’s team-based productivity project, the engineers and the operations workers at the Wichita site neither understood nor appreciated the other side’s contributions. Jimenez and Keller set up the monthly meetings to discuss problems and resolve them.
The company’s focus was on the culture and how it mirrored the impact that management involved creating ideas in which everyone, both the business and the client are in a mutual agreement. To put in other words, IDEO seems to have been pretty lenient with their employee because they hardly fire them. They more so, made their employees feel more at home while at work. IDEO allowed for their employee to plan their own workstation to reflect their individual personalities, as an illustration. They were not so much focus on weeding out all the bad employee but to reward them which is why IDEO has been such successful working environment. The culture and management within a business has a lot to do with how successful a can be. If employees are being treated appropriately there is greater possibility that business will be successful. For example, IDEO rewards those who deserve it which encourages employees to compete with other employees and still deliver and get the job like it should.
Dave Armstrong is about to graduate from Harvard Business School and is facing three career options. The decision problem that Armstrong should be considering is not which of these three jobs should he take, but rather what job will satiate his career goals. By asking this, Armstrong can gain a complete perspective of his options instead of being confined to three career options that may not be in his best interests. His objectives are not clearly outlined in the case; however, we can infer from the manner in which he is describing the jobs that he would like to have ownership in a company, enjoys thrilling non-office jobs, and wants to grow his network. Also, he has to take into consideration his wife’s objectives for him of having a job