Jesus Of Nazareth Analysis

433 Words1 Page

A prominent theme in between chapters 5 to 11 of Gerhard Lohfink’s Jesus Of Nazareth is how the connections between Jesus and the prophets of Torah, compares his divine actions against similar actions of usual people. Jesus calls for disciples, who eagerly follow him, but his study cannot be compared to that of the rabbis and their students. Rabbis demand their students to serve them, stating it as an essential part of studying the Torah. Jesus, on the contrary, is there to serve his students. Rabbis insist on studying Torah by heart and follow it “to the smallest detail” (75), while Jesus is interpreting the same Torah and applying it to the modern times teaches the right way of life through his own example. Jesus also had no place where he could make his preaches, but travelled throughout the country with his disciples. …show more content…

“Brevity and exactness” (102) made him different from all preaches of the past. Jesus’ miracles of helping people with health and mental problems are compared to the works of healers. His attitude towards lepers is remarkable if compared to other people of his time, as he never refused to help them and touch them. People who followed Torah would never also have any contacts with public sinners, but for Jesus it had no importance as long as he saw that the person was ready to change. For Jesus, on the whole human body was a sacred container of the soul and so an “indispensable aspect of humanity” (123). Ancient philosophers, on the contrary, felt ashamed for being born in the human body. Jesus reinterprets Torah so human bodies can be and should be saved, as God wants it. By healing the sick people and doing other “miracles” Jesus makes the reign of God visible and clear. Even though such miracles are highly disputed nowadays, many researchers try to find rational and logical explanations for them making Jesus closer to real people and real

Open Document